EC221 BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (Hons) CIVIL (Infrastructure), FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA ,PULAU PINANG

MAC JULY'2016

LAB REPORT

: OPEN ENDED LAB (LEVEL 1)

COURSE CODE & NAME

: CEW 531 - FLUIDS & HYDRAULICS LABORATORY

LECTURER NAME

: ............................................................................................

GROUP CEW 531

: PEC 221 ...

No.

STUDENT ID

GROUP MEMBERS NAME

SIGNATURE

TOTAL
MARK (%)

DATE
SUBMITTED

DATE
RECEIVED

1.
2.
3.
4.
Instruction to Students (Reminder)
Lab report must be prepared after conducting a lab. One (1) week duration is given for lab report (COMPILE) submission after the end of each level of the open ended
lab. Any plagiarism found or not properly cited and late submission, the group will be penalized and marks will be deducted.

At the end of this laboratory, students should be able to

CO1
PO5
NO

Conduct and organise experiments using appropriate equipments to enhance knowledge on fluid mechanics and hydraulics.
Ability to utilise appropriate techniques, resources and modern engineering and IT tools in predicting and modelling of complex civil engineering activities
with an understanding of the limitations.
ELEMENT

Analysis of
data

Interpretation
of data

Discussion
3

RUBRIC MARKS
0

2
Data collected is relevant
and sufficient to analyse.
Two components of data
incomplete or missing:
____Units
____Tables
____Graphs

Remarks

Data collected are not

relevant and:
i. not sufficient to analyse
OR
ii.no analysis data
reported

Data collected is
relevant, but brief and
insufficient to analyse.

Very incomplete or
incorrect interpretation of
trends and comparison of
data indicating a lack of
understanding of results.

Minimal with 1 sentence

describing the main
finding of the lab or
incorrect interpretation of
the study.

Almost all of the results have

been correctly interpreted but
without sufficient support of
important trends and data
comparisons.

All of the results have been

correctly interpreted, with
only 1 sufficient support of
important trends and data
comparisons.

All of the results have been

interpreted correctly, with
sufficient support of
important trends and data
comparisons.

No discussion on the
experimental results.
The objectives of the lab
are not answered.
The citation is poorly
done or absent

The discussion is mainly

a reiteration of the
introduction.
Minimal with 1 sentence
explaination and 1
citation of how results link
to the context of the lab.

Limited discussion based on

the lab results and backs up
with 1-2 citations to the
appropriate explainations.

Discussion that attempt to

relate results back to the
original objectives with
sufficient and logical
explanations.
2-3 citations to the
appropriate explainations.

Conclusion is derived
from the collected and
analysed data but it does
not answer the
objectives.

Conclusion is derived from

the collected and analysed
data but does not directly
answer the objectives.

Conclusion is clear and

derived from the collected
and analysed data.
Conclusion directly
answers the objectives.

Discussion that accurately

relate results back to the
original objectives with
sufficient and logical
explanations.Also
limitations of the study noted.
3 citations to the
appropriate explainations.
Conclusion is excellent and
derived from the collected
and analysed data.
Conclusion clearly answers
the objectives.

Able to acknowledge
some relevant references

Able to list and acknowledge

adequate relevant references

Able organize and adapt

very good references

Conclusion

The objectives of the lab

are not answered.
No conclusion present

References

Not able to acknowledge

references

`
NO.

3
Data collected is relevant,
related to objective(s) and
sufficient to analyse.
One component of data
incomplete or missing:
____Units
____Tables
____Graphs

Analysis is complete,
relevant and related to the
objective(s). Tables are easy
to read and units are
provided. Graphs are labeled
and show trends.

Able to organize and adapt

substantial relevant and
recent references

ELEMENT OF ASSESSMENT
EXPERIMENT

0.1

FRICTION LOSSES IN A PIPE

0.2

MINOR LOSSES IN A PIPE

0.3

SHARP CRESTED WEIR

0.4

PUMP EFFICIENCY, HEAD AND

DISCHARGE

TOTAL MARKS

ANALYSIS OF
DATA

INTERPRETATION
OF DATA

DISCUSSION

CONCLUSION

REFERENCES

/16

/16

/16

/16

/16

/80