1

Ologies, Isms, & Icists

Omar Alansari-Kreger
In light of informational modernity, the internet serves as our gateway to an unprecedented
array of information. How often does the average person think of words that have never been
thought of before? Of course, a difference must be made between what is sensible and nonsensible, but as long as there is a communicative idea supporting some sort of nuance, its
discernibility is either made or broken by its comprehensibility. It really comes down to the
questionability of what is and isnt intellectually discernable; all things are questionable which
entertains the notional prosecution of context. The differentials of context are often the greatest
precursors to words waiting to be had and discovered.
English is an interesting language because it allows a great deal of creativity when it
comes down to the exploration of words, ideas, and analogies. All three categories of the latter
enables the formation of original ideas; the liberation of an intellectual mind. There are those
occasions when we stumble across words we never imagined. Such experiences occur with
frequent regularity! The application of an analogy describes the projection of an idea that is
attributable to a specific subject matter. An ism is defined as the typological flagship of an
architectural idea; aspects attributing to it unlock a universe of thinking that is case specific to a
designated frame of reference. Arguably, does that describe the originating cornerstone of human
ideation? For that reason, sapience is the quintessence of a redeemable humanity! We are
inclined to invent terms based on the inhibitions of an analogous mind.
The organization of ideas demands the creation of a case specific ism in order to bring its
conceptual analogy to fruition. When scientifically placated, a developmentally compound idea
is transformed into an ology of sorts. Specialists are able to project an ism as an ology
which creates a school of thought. The originators of an ology are succinctly recognized as
icists. A hegemonic ideology demands that all imaginable aspects of the world must be
reinterpreted through classifiable aphorisms that fit into its categorized ology. That is
degenerative because the basis of an ideological absolute is a precursor to a Dark Age of sorts.
The belittlement of human intelligence occurs through the stifling of creativity. We become
slaves to manmade ideologies through the hegemony of man; that leads to the one dimensionality
of mind.
The idolatry of human ideation entertains a dangerous prospect to all things relating to
posterity; when man worships his own ideas he becomes ideologically decadent to all views but
his own! In such a world, nothing is legitimate unless it is ideologically sanctionable to the ism
of its ology. Ideological hegemony destroys the potential for intellectual impartiality. Where does
that leave the icist? They become the anthropomorphic image of their own ideology. The likes of
such an individual knows nothing beyond its realm. That represents the developmental finality of
an intellectually imposed hegemony. The vernacularization of the human renaissance does not
compartmentalize ideas, but cultivates them through synchronisms of intellectual discourse.

The isms of ologies should not be isolated to the disparaging icist. Ideas are
indicative to what is otherwise perpetually unexplainable which makes each one inexplicable to
processes of originated intellectuality. Therefore, truths secured by nuances of the big picture are
anything but empirical. Contextual visualization delivers the ultimate reality of one
dimensionality, but nothing is an actuated finality in of itself because the end of a new beginning
is the beginning of a new end. There is simply no other way around it.
For every nuance, there is an event horizon which manifests what is infinitely conjectural; the
basis of which balances all aspects of applied human intelligence.