Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
09/10/15 12:26 pm
- Mrunal - http://mrunal.org -
Page 1 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Negative Implications
Person can use it to justify violence behavior and lunacy
and still society will accept it because moral attitude =
strong emotions. Example
April 1919: A violent mob attacks an English missionary
Marcella Sherwood in Punjab. General Dyer uses this to
justify Jaliawalla Massacre, and hes given heros welcome
in England.
Motivates a person towards riots, genocide and terrorism.
Since moral attitude is tied with strong emotions, people
dont get along with those who dont share their moral
attitude.
Result? Intolerance. Before buying/renting a house,
people will inquire about the caste/religion of the
neighbors.
Religious attitude has trickle down effect. E.g. Hindus vs.
Muslim- if there is negativity towards other persons
religious outlook, then theyll find differences even in
political and economic outlooks. Ultimately itll transform
from religious to communal attitude.
Page 2 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Such teenagers feel attracted towards doing wrong things through internet, because internet gives
them following advantages
1.Anonymity
2.Action at
distance
1.Hacking
2.Impersonation
3.Surveillance
4.Harassment
5.Recruitment
6.Malicious
distribution
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
Page 3 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Character
They support basic ideas of liberty, equality and democracy but want reforms in the
Liberal/Moderate system albeit not in extreme/violent manner but through constitutional / legal
means.
Conservative
Want Status quo. They believe changes or reforms will not improve the situation.
Progressive
Reactionary
Theyre one step behind Conservatives I.e. Conservatives want status quo,
while reactionaries want to go back to previous system.
Example Taliban/ISIS wanting to run nation with literal interpretation of
Sharia/Quran.
Religious organizations involved in politics= theyre usually reactionary in
nature.
Extremist
Pacifist
Theyre also unhappy with current system but reject violence as a tool to
achieve the goal.
Example: Gandhi, Dr.Martin Luther King Jr.
Religion
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
Page 4 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
Age
Economic
Status
Residence
Family
Race
Gender
Education
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Poor will align towards communist / socialist ideology. Hell vote for a party
promising to get food, fertilizer and kerosene subsidy.
Rich will align towards right wing- free market, capitalism. Hell vote for a party
promising to remove wealth tax. (recall the Utilitarian function of Attitude in E2/P1).
So, why did Socialism thrive in post-colonial democratic third world countries
from 50s to 80s? Because people were mostly poor.
Local unemployed youth more likely to align with party that promises action against
the migrants or reservation based on region.
Children more likely to espouse the political ideology of their parents.
If a race feels theyre deprived of opportunities because of other races, then more likely
to lean towards a party offering radical solutions against other races. E.g. German
Aryans joining Nazi party.
Females more likely to lean towards liberal ideology.
School syllabus plays an important role. A Chinese may find Indian democracy as
repulsive, because he has been taught that Maos Communist ideology is best.
Conception
about
human
nature
Disposition
Some people hate order and prefer chaos-like Joker in the Dark Knight. Theyll
naturally be in favor of anarchy / radicalism.
If a person is born and raised in a military family, hed be in favor of strong state,
discipline, order, authoritarianism.
Japan is a disciplined society, youll find the same in their building Architecture
and political functioning.
Social
media
The information processed and shared on social media, molds a persons political views.
Social media has played big role in swinging the opinion of youth towards Modi/BJP
during 2014 General elections.
Keep in mind that a persons political attitude is shaped not by any single, but complex combination of
all above factors. E.g. A Poor Muslim youth may be pro-Congress/SP but a Rich Dawoodi Bohra
Muslim may be pro-Modi.
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
Page 5 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Strength of Attitude
Government of Maharashtra has imposed beef ban in the states. How do you feel about this?
Strength of attitude
Strong
Neutral
Mild
Result?
Youll go out in dharnaa-Pradarshan for/against meat-ban
Youll not say /do anything thinking this doesnt concern me at personal level.
You may murmur about it to your family members while watching news.
Accessibility of Attitude
Conscious
Youre aware. Those C-A-B components immediately light in your brain.
Hidden (unconscious) Youre unaware. C-A-B wont immediately reflect in your thoughts.
Study: Participants were asked will you vote for Obama?
Those who immediately raised hands (conscious), theyll go for voting on the election date.
Those who raise hands after few minutes they did not go to voting.
Milgram Experiment
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
Page 6 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Page 7 of 8
Mrunal Ethics (E2/P2): Moral & Political Attitude: Role of Social media
09/10/15 12:26 pm
Hitler was an evil dictator. But even ordinary Germans participated in atrocities against Jews.
Why?
Prof. Stanley Milgram of Yale University (1961) began experiment to study it.
The participant (teacher) would ask a series of questions to another participant (learner).
The teachers were instructed to shock the learners whenever an incorrect answer was given.
The learner was not a participant at all but actually an actor who would pretend to be hurt by the
shocks and yell out in pain when the button was pushed.
2/3rd of the participants gave shocks upto fatal level (450 volts).
Because behind participant, there was a doctor, hell keep saying go onincrease the voltage,
person will not die.
http://mrunal.org/2015/10/ethics-e2p2-moral-political-attitude-types-factors-social-media.html/print/
Page 8 of 8