Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives_template
(11.1)
(11.2)
If Von Neumann's stability analysis is applied to these schemes, we find that both are
unconditionally unstable.
A well known remedy for the difficulties encountered in such formulations is the upwind
scheme which is described by Gentry, Martin and Daly (1966) and Runchal and Wolfshtein
(1969).
Eq. (11.1) can be made stable by substituting the forward space difference by a backward
space difference scheme, provided that the carrier velocity u is positive. If u is negative, a
forward difference scheme must be used to assure stability. For full Burger's equation.
(9.11), the formulation of the diffusion term remains unchanged and only the convective
term (in conservative form) is calculated in the following way (Figure 11.1):
viscous term, for
(11.3)
(11.4)
Objectives_template
Objectives_template
Transportive Property
A finite-difference formulation of a flow equation possesses the transportive property if the
effect of a perturbation is convected (advected) only in the diprection of the velocity.
Consider the model Burger's equation in conservation form
(11.5)
Let us examine a method which is central in space. Using FTCS we get
(11.6)
Consider a perturbation
in
A perturbation will spread in all directions due to diffusion. We are taking an inviscid
model equation and we want the perturbation to be carried along only in the direction of
the velocity. So, for
which is not very reasonable. But at the upstream station ( i = m-1 ) we observe
Objectives_template
which means that the perturbation is being transported out of the affected region.
Finally, at ( m-1) station, we observe that
This signifies that no perturbation effect is carried upstream. In other words, the upwind
method maintains unidirectional flow of information.
In conclusion, it can be said that while space centred difference are more accurate than
upwind differences, as indicated by the Taylor series expansion, the whole system is not
more accurate if the criteria for accuracy includes the tranportive property as well.
Objectives_template
for u < 0
From Taylor series expansion, we can write
(11.8)
(11.9)
Substituting Eqns. (11.8) and (11.9) into (11.3) gives (dropping the subscript i and
superscript n)
[Diffusive terms]
or
Objectives_template
(11.10)
where
C (Courant number)
was taken as
(11.11)
On one hand we have considered that u > 0 and on the other CFL condition demands that
C < 1 (so that the algorithm can work).
As a consequence,
work).
Objectives_template
(11.13)
The Taylor series procedure as was done for Eq. (11.10) will produce
(11.14)
where
with
As such for
and
CFL condition is
This indicate that for a stable calculation, artificial viscosity will necessarily be present.
However, for a steady-state analysis, we get
(11.15)
We have observed that some amount of upwind effect is indeed necessary to maintain
transportive property of flow equations while the computations based on upwind
differencing often suffer from false diffusion (inaccuracy!). One of the plausible
improvements is the usage of higher-order upwind method of differencing.
In the next lecture we'll discuss this aspect of improving accuracy.
Congratulations, you have finished Lecture 11. To view the next lecture select it from the
left hand side menu of the page or click the next button.