Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/finel

A consecutive-interpolation quadrilateral element (CQ4): Formulation

and applications
Tinh Quoc Bui a,n, Dam Quang Vo b, Chuanzeng Zhang a, Du Dinh Nguyen c
a

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Siegen, Paul-Bonatz-Strae 9-11, 57076 Siegen, Germany
Piping Department, Petrovietnam Engineering Company, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
c
Department of Civil Engineering, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam
b

art ic l e i nf o

a b s t r a c t

Article history:
Received 3 April 2013
Received in revised form
13 February 2014
Accepted 19 February 2014
Available online 12 March 2014

An efcient, smooth and accurate quadrilateral element with four-node based on the consecutiveinterpolation procedure (CIP) is formulated. The CIP is developed recently by Zheng et al. (Acta Mech Sin
26 (2010) 265278) for triangular element with three-node. In this setting the approximation functions
handle both nodal values and averaged nodal gradients as interpolation conditions. Two stages of the
interpolation are required; the primary stage is carried out using the same procedure of the standard
nite element method (FEM), and the interpolation is further reproduced in the secondary step
according to both nodal values and average nodal gradients derived from the previous interpolation.
The new consecutive-interpolation quadrilateral element with four-node (CQ4) deserves many desirable
characteristics of an efcient numerical method, which involves continuous nodal gradients, continuous
nodal stresses without smoothing operation, higher-order polynomial basis, without increasing the
degree of freedom of the system, straightforward to implement in an existing FEM computer code, etc.
Four benchmark and two practical examples are considered for the stress analysis of elastic structures in
two-dimension to show the accuracy and the efciency of the new element. Detailed comparison and
some other aspects including the convergence rate, volumetric locking, computational efciency,
insensitivity to the mesh, etc. are investigated. Numerical results substantially indicate that the
consecutive-interpolation nite element method (CFEM) with notable features pertains to high accuracy,
convergence rate, and efciency as compared with the standard FEM.
& 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:
FEM
Consecutive-interpolation nite element
Stress analysis
Numerical methods
Quadrilateral element

1. Introduction
Design procedures of improving and enhancing the performance of engineering structures through stress analysis are often
time-consuming and expensive. Nowadays, simulation technologies using advanced numerical methods in engineering and
science are popular and have been emerged rapidly. The motivations are to accurately model practical problems as exact as the
techniques can. The nite element method (FEM) [13] and the
boundary element method (BEM) [4] have become very powerful
and versatile numerical methods, which are the most common
and extensively used methods in a broad range of engineering
applications. Owing to the simplicity, the three-node triangular
and four-node quadrilateral nite elements are often introduced
and applied to solve engineering problems in two-dimensions
(2D). Because of the linear approximations, the spatial derivatives
of the eld variables are constant within each element [5]. Such

Corresponding author. Tel.: 49 2717402836; fax: 49 2717404074.

E-mail address: tinh.buiquoc@gmail.com (T.Q. Bui).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nel.2014.02.004
0168-874X & 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

constant-strain nite elements are easily formulated and implemented but their performance in practical applications is often
unsatisfactory and, frequently low accuracy is obtained due to
their low-order trial functions [5,6]. Moreover, the gradients on
element-edges in both constant elements and mapped elements
are discontinuous, and demanding smoothing operation in postprocessing step is rigorous [7]. Other relevant issues involving
volumetric locking and sensitivity to mesh, etc. for such elements
can be found in Refs. [13,58] for instance.
A number of advanced numerical methods have been developed in order for improving the accuracy and efciency of the
conventional FEM methods. For instance, Hansbo proposed a nonconforming rotated Q1 tetrahedral element for linear elastic [9]
and elastodynamic problems [10]. By containing the bilinear
terms, the Q1 element performs substantially better than the
standard constant-strain one in bending and allows for underintegration in nearly incompressible situations. Papanicolopulos and Zervos [11] presented a means for creating a class of
triangular C1 nite element particularly suitable for modeling problems where the underlying partial differential equation
is of fourth-order (e.g., beam and plate bending, deformation of

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

strain-gradient-dependent materials). Liu and his co-workers

[12,13] introduced the smoothed nite element method based
on the smoothing strain technique. An extension of the SFEM to
stationary dynamic crack analysis of 2D elastic solids is studied by
the author [14]. In recent years Hughes et al. [15] introduced the
isogeometric analysis (IGA) using higher-order basis functions
(e.g., Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) for constructing an exact
geometrical model. The IGA soon after has been further extended
to study many engineering problems. In the contrary to the meshbased methods, the so-called meshfree or meshless methods,
e.g., see Refs. [1618], have introduced as alternative numerical
approaches that do not require a predened mesh, whereof the
trial functions can be constructed through the scattered nodes
without the reliance of the elements. The meshfree methods on
one side involve several desirable features of an attractive numerical scheme in modeling various engineering problems, but one of
their primary disadvantages lies in the expensive cost of using the
more complex shape functions, which substantially induces a
higher cost of the computation as compared with that of the
mesh-based approaches, e.g., the FEM.
As well-known in the standard FEM frameworks that the
gradients on the element-edges using the constant-strain elements or mapped elements are discontinuous, and a smoothing
operation is rigorously demanded in the post-processing. One
possibility among others that can completely overcome such
discontinuities without any smoothing operation is the novel
consecutive-interpolation procedure (CIP) proposed by Zheng
et al. [7]. They have already proved it for elasticity problems using
their own CIP-based triangular element (CT3). Basically, the
essence of the CIP technique is to enhance the trial functions by
taking the continuous nodal gradients and a higher-order polynomial basis, by which several desirable characteristics when
utilizing the consecutive-interpolation nite element method
(CFEM) can be reached: (a) high accuracy in the eld variables;
(b) high convergence rate; (c) nodal stresses can be produced
continuously without the aid of any smoothing operation;
(d) insensitivity to mesh distortions; (e) volumetric locking is
avoided in incompressible materials; (f) the total number of the
degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the system does not change which
implies that the total number of the DOFs discretized by the CFEM
is the same as that by the FEM; (g) shape functions with higherorder polynomials possess the Kronecker-delta function property;
and so on. The CFEM approximation functions are constructed
through two stages of the interpolation. Apart from the primary
interpolation, the same procedure of the classical FEM, the interpolation is further reproduced using the nodal values and averaged nodal gradients derived from the previous interpolation.
The main objective of the present work is to precisely formulate a novel quadrilateral element with four-node based on the
CIP approach (termed as CQ4), and then apply it to stress analysis
of 2D elastic structures. The developed CQ4 element generally
inherits all the superior characteristics and desirable properties of
the CT3 element as pointed out above. Most importantly, the CFEM
can be implemented straightforwardly from any existing computer
FEM code. To show the accuracy and the efciency of the proposed
CQ4 element, four benchmark examples and two practical applications with complex geometries are considered. The computed
numerical results are then compared with analytical solutions, the
CT3, the standard quadrilateral (Q4) and triangular (T3) solutions,
as well as the FEM solutions using ANSYS. The convergence rate
and the computational efciency are investigated in detail. Additionally, the volumetric locking phenomenon occurring in incompressible materials is also addressed and it shows that the CQ4 can
treat such problem without any modication.
The paper is formed into ve sections. After the introduction,
the CIP technique is briey presented in Section 2. The formulation

15

of the CQ4 element is detailed in Section 3. Numerical examples

are presented and discussed in Section 4. Some conclusions from
the study are drawn in Section 5.

2. A brief on the consecutive-interpolation technique

Consider a 2D elastic body in the domain bounded by
u t and u \ t that can be described by the equilibrium equations as [13].

sij;j bi 0 in

where bi denotes the components of the body force vector and sij
is the stress tensor. The balance equations, Eq. (1), satisfy the
following boundary conditions:

sij nj t i on t and ui ui on u

with ui representing the prescribed boundary displacements on

u , t i being the traction components on t while ni being the unit
outward normal vector. The variational weak-form for this static
elastic problem can be expressed as [13]
Z
Z
Z
s uij Dijkl s ukl d  ui bi d  ui t i d 0
3

where Dijkl is the elasticity tensor and s uij denotes the symmetric part of the displacement gradients i.e., s uij ui;j uj;i =2.
In the FEM we approximate solutions to Eq. (3) by dividing
and the boundary into small elements, and the interpolation is
then determined by approximating the displacement eld in each
element. The element stiffness matrix is derived and it is then
assembled into the global stiffness matrix [13]. Generally, this
step is accomplished almost identically for the FEM and the CFEM.
Now, we start describing the CIP procedure in a general and
brief way. In the subsequent sections the formulation of the novel
CQ4 element with four-node is detailed. For the sake of brevity,
the following presentation will be focused on the displacement
component u1 u only. The function ux with x fx; yg in 2D in
the FEM can be approximated by
n

ux N i xdi Nxd

i1

where n is the number of nodes, d is the nodal displacement

vector, while Nx is the vector of the shape functions, and N i are
the shape functions of node i. By assigning the approximation
value at node i with ui uxi , and the vector of the shape
functions at node i with Ni Nxi , the averaged nodal derivatives
i
ui
;x (similar for u;y ) can then be determined by [7]
i

ui
;x N;x d
where

i
N;x

i

5
are the averaged derivative of Ni , and calculated by

N;x we U Nie
;x

e A Si

being the derivative of Ni computed in element e. In

with Nie
;x
Eq. (6), Si are a set of elements containing all the elements
connected to node i, while we is a weight-function dependent on
the element-type and it will be detailed in the subsequent section
for the quadrilateral element.
The shortcoming in the discontinuous stresses and strains
caused by the discontinuity of the nodal gradients is well known
in the standard FEM [7]. In the present CIP approach, both the
nodal values ui and the averaged nodal derivatives ui
;x are taken
into the interpolations, which can substantially overcome such
drawback of the discontinuities in the stress and strain elds. As a
consequence the approximation functions in Eq. (4) can now be

16

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

rewritten by means of the CIP scheme as follows:

n

i1

i1

i
~
ux
i ui ix ui
;x iy u;y

i
i
i Ni ix N;x iy N;y d

or
~
~
ux
Nxd

and the partial derivatives can also be computed through the

inverse Jacobian matrix J  1 by
()
()

" x
9

i1

and i , ix and iy are the eld functions dependent on the

element-type, which will be detailed in the subsequent section
for the quadrilateral element.
Here, one important point to be stated is that the unknowns
still contain only nodal displacements irrespective of the extension
of the approximation functions including the nodal values and the
averaged nodal derivatives. It means that no additional DOFs in the
system are required for the CIP approach, an advantageous feature
of the development of the CFEM. Another essential issue is also
worth noting that the general solution procedure of the CFEM is
very similar to that of the standard displacement-based FEM. So,
any other steps in realization of the FEM scheme regardless of the
CIP procedure could be applied the same in the implementation of
the CFEM approach.

r
x
s

y #
r
y
s

Li
r

4 L

Lj
r
Lj
s

Lk
r
Lk
s

8
x
>
3>
> i
Lm >
< xj
r
5
Lm > x
>
s
> k
>
: xm

9
yi >
>
>
>
yj =
yk >
>
>
>
ym ;

From Eqs. (10) and (11), the J-matrix can be rewritten as

9
8
yi >
> xi
>
>
>
"
#>
>
>
yj =
1  s
1 s  1 s < xj
1  1  s
J
xk yk >
1  r >
4 1 r  1 r 1 r
>
>
>
>
>
>
:
xm ym ;

13

14

3.1. The rst stage of the interpolation: standard

The approximation function at the point of interest x in a
quadrilateral element in the framework of the conventional FEM
can be expressed as
15

where

In this section we shall formulate the quadrilateral element

with four-node based on the CIP procedure. The four-node quadrilateral element in the global coordinate system can be mapped to
the four-node rectangular element in the natural one as depicted
in Fig. 1. The geometry of the quadrilateral element can be
described explicitly by
x Li r; sxi Lj r; sxj Lk r; sxk Lm r; sxm ;
10

where Li r; s; Lj r; s; Lk r; s; and Lm r; s are considered as geometric interpolation functions as

1
Li r; s 1  r1  s;
4
1
Lj r; s 1 r1  s;
4
1
Lk r; s 1 r1 s;
4
1
Lm r; s 1 r1 s;
4

12

ux N i ui N j uj Nk uk N m um

3. Formulation of consecutive-interpolation quadrilateral

elements (CQ4)

y Li r; syi Lj r; syj Lk r; syk Lm r; sym ;

with

where the shape functions are given by

~ Ni Ni Ni
N
i
ix ;x
iy ;y

J1

Ni Li ;

N k Lk ;

N m Lm

16

Fig. 2 illustrates the application of the CIP method to the

quadrilateral element described particularly in an irregular nite
element mesh, in which the element sets Si ; Sj ; Sk and Sm contain
all the neighboring elements of node i; j; k and m, respectively. It
indicates that the supporting nodes for the point of interest x
include all the nodes in the element sets Si ; Sj ; Sk and Sm . In any
cases using the CFEM method, the support domain as the one
shown in Fig. 2 is larger than that of the standard FEM. The
weight-functions used for evaluating the averaged nodal derivatives of the eld variables of the quadrilateral element e are
calculated similarly to that of the CT3 element, and they are given
by
we

11

N j Lj ;

e
;
e~ A Si e~

with eA Si

17

where e is the area of the element e.

By dening ds fd1 ; d2 ; ; dns g as the displacement vector of
the supporting nodes with ns being the number of the supporting

Fig. 1. A quadrilateral element in (a) global coordinate and (b) natural coordinate systems.

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

17

Fig. 2. Schematic sketch of the consecutive-interpolation quadrilateral element (CQ4) in 2D.

nodes connected to the point of interest x, the interpolation of the

standard FEM for any point in Si ; Sj ; Sk ; and Sm can be determined
by
ns

ux N l xdl

18

l1

The averaged derivatives of the eld variables on node i can then

be computed as follows:
"
#


ns
ie
i
ie
u;x we u;x we N l;x
dl
e A Si

l1
ns

ie
ui

;y we u;y
e A Si

l1

e A Si

"

we N ie
l;y

e A Si

#
dl ;

19

or in compact form
ns

ui
;y

l1

i

20

e A Si

ix;y xl 0;

iy xl 0;

iy;x xl 0;

iy;y xl il ;

i;y xl 0;
23

where l can be any one of the indices i; j; k; and m, and

(
1 if i j
ij
0 if i a j

24

We note that the above conditions have to be applied in a

similar manner to other functions, i.e., j ; jx ; jy , k ; kx ; ky and
m ; mx ; my . Finally, the i ; ix and iy functions can be computed
for the CQ4 element as

 xi  xm L2i Lm pLi Lm Lj pLi Lm Lk ;

iy  yi  yj L2i Lj pLi Lj Lk pLi Lj Lm
 yi  yk L2i Lk pLi Lk Lm pLi Lk Lj



i
N l;x we N ie
;
l;x

ix;x xl il ;

 xi  xk L2i Lk pLi Lk Lm pLi Lk Lj

where

i
N l;y

i;x xl 0;

ix xl 0;

ix  xi  xj L2i Lj pLi Lj Lk pLi Lj Lm

i
N l;y dl

e A Si

i xl il ;

i Li L2i Lj L2i Lk L2i Lm  Li L2j  Li L2k  Li L2m ;

ui
;x N l;x dl ;
l1
ns

condition)

we N ie
l;y

 yi  ym L2i Lm pLi Lm Lj pLi Lm Lk

21

3.2. The second stage of the interpolation: consecutive

25

In Eq. (25), p 1=2 and the j ; jx ; jy ; k ; kx ; ky and m ; mx ; my

functions can be also computed in the same manner by a cyclic
i
permutation of indices i; j; k and m. By substituting ui
;x ; u;y and
into Eq. (22), we nally arrive at
ns

As stated in the previous section, the consecutive stage is

accomplished by taking the nodal values and averaged nodal
derivatives into the interpolation scheme. The approximation
function of the CQ4 element can be expressed as
i

i
ix ui
;x iy u;y

j

j
jx uj
;x jy u;y

~
ux
i u
j u
|{z} |{z}
related to nodei
k

k
kx uk
;x ky u;y

m
mx um
;x my u;y

k u
m u
|{z} |{z}
node k

26

l1

with the consecutive-interpolation shape functions

i
i
j
j
N~ l i N i
ix Nl;x iy N l;y j Nj
jx N l;x jy Nl;y
l
l
|
{z} |
{z}
related to node i
k

node j
m

~
~
ux
N~ l xdl Nxd

22

node m

In Eq. (22), the i ; ix ; and iy functions shown below must satisfy

the following conditions (see Appendix A for proving this

node j
k

m

m

k N k
kx N l;x ky Nl;y m Nm
mx N l;x my N l;y
l
l
|{z}
|
{z}
node k

27

node m

Once again, similar to the CT3 element the unknowns in the

system using the CQ4 element contain only the nodal displacements, and no additional number of the DOFs is required for the

18

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

CQ4 element. This issue shows a signicant difference from the

well-known conforming plate element, where the nodal derivatives are considered as additional DOFs [2,7].
Remark: In general, the proposed CFEM interpolation is comparable to the Hermite interpolation as they use the nodal values
and nodal gradients. However, it may be different in some details
because the CFEM uses the averaged nodal gradients derived
from nite element interpolation at each node instead.

will be degenerated into the FEM if all the nodes in the

problem domain are supposed to be C 0 .
(c) Since the consecutive-interpolation passing through nodal
values, the shape functions are hence said to be satised the
Kronecker-delta function property.
(d) The consecutive-interpolation is said to be linear consistency
as it can exactly reproduce any functions in the basis functions
ns
ns
s
~
~
~
i.e., ni
1 N i x 1; i 1 N i xxi x; i 1 N i xyi y.

3.3. Desirable properties of the shape functions

3.4. Stiffness matrix and numerical integration
Figs. 3a and 3b show a comparison of the 1D shape functions
and their rst-order derivatives between the FEM and CFEM
methods. It is observed in the gures that the curves of the CFEM
shape functions and their derivatives are rather smooth and
continuous as compared with those based on the FEM. The 2D
shape functions derived from the Q4 and CQ4 elements are also
visualized in Fig. 3c and d. Nevertheless, some important and
desirable properties of the CFEM shape functions may be summarized as follows:
(a) The approximation functions or the shape functions do not
include any rational terms, and as a result they are advantageous for an accurate integration of the stiffness matrix.
(b) The shape functions have high-order continuities, i.e., C 1
inside the elements, C 1 on nodes and C 0 on the element edges.
It is also noted that some nodes, for instance the nodes located
on the essential boundary or on the interface of bi-materials,
are required for the CQ4 to recover to a C 0 continuity. Hence a
slight modication may be made on those nodes [7]. The CFEM

Before describing the stiffness matrix implementation and the

numerical integration of the proposed CQ4 element, it must be
stated here that the approximation function of the displacements
using the FEM in Eq. (4) and the CFEM in Eq. (26) has a similar
form. The only difference between them is the way of the
construction of their shape functions. Therefore, the discrete
equations derived from the weak-form in Eq. (3) shall be the same
for both the FEM and the CFEM. As a result the element stiffness
matrix Ke can be nally expressed as [13].
Z
BTe DBe d
28
Ke
e

In Eq. (28), the domain e is different between the FEM and the
CFEM, which fully depends on the supporting nodes and neighboring elements determined by the CFEM procedure. The matrix of
the derivative of the shape functions Be is also different between
the FEM and the CFEM. Obviously, the difference can be depicted
explicitly, for instance, let us consider a quadrilateral element with

Fig. 3. Comparison of the shape functions (a) and their rst-order derivatives (b) in 1D classical and consecutive FEM. Visualization of the shape functions: Q4 (c) and CQ4
(d) elements.

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

four-node presented in this study, the matrix Be obtained by the

FEM method can be expressed as
2 N Nj N N
3
i
k
m
0
0
0
0
x
x
x
x
6
7
N j
N k
N m 7
6
i
0
0
0 N
6 0
29
BFEM
y
y
y
y 7
e
4
5
N i
y

N j
y

N k
y

N j
x

Ni
x

N m
y

N k
x

N m
x

N~ 1

6 x
6
BCFEM
6
e
6 0
4 ~

N 1
y

N~ 2
x

N~ l
x

4. Numerical examples

N~ ns
x

N~ 2
y

N~ l
y

N~ 2
x

N~ l
x

N~ 1
y

N~ 2
y

N~ l
y

N~ ns
y

N~ 1
x

0
N~ ns
y
N~ n
x

7
7
7
7
5
32ns

30
In Eq. (30), ns is the number of the supporting nodes, 1 ol ons
and ns 4 4. It is because that the displacements in the CFEM are
not only interpolated from the nodal displacements of the considered element, but also interpolated from the supporting nodes
determined by other neighboring elements, as sketched in Fig. 2.
The size of the matrix BFEM
is of 3  8 and that is much smaller
e
than the size of the matrix BCFEM
, 3  2ns , which results in an
e
increased bandwidth of the stiffness matrix of the CFEM.
In the above equations the derivative of the CFEM shape
functions is calculated by
N~ l i i ix i iy i j j jx j jy j

N
N
N
N
N
N
z
z l
z l;x z l;y |{z}
z l
z l;x z l;y
|{z}
related to node i

In this section four benchmark numerical examples are examined to show the accuracy, the efciency and the convergence of
the present CQ4 element. In addition, other two examples are
considered as practical applications to illustrate the applicability of
the proposed CQ4 element in dealing with complex geometries.
The materials used for all the four benchmark examples are
assumed to be linear elastic with Young's modulus E 1000 and
Poisson's ratio 0:3, whereas they are specied thereafter for
the two practical examples. The units used in the examples can be
any consistent unit based on the international standard unit
system, if not specied otherwise. To accomplish the convergence
study, two error indicators with respect to the displacement and
energy norms are dened as follows: [19,20]
v
u n
u
uexact  unumer
2
i
ed t i 1 i
;
32
2
n
exact
i 1 ui

ee

node j

k k kx k ky k m m mx m my m
N
N
Nl;x
N
N
N
z l
z{z
z l;y} |{z}
z l
z l;x
z l;y
|
node k

accomplished by considering the rst six two-dimensional Gaussian quadrature rules from 1  1 to 6  6 respectively, and the two
error indicators in the displacement and energy norms, as well as
the maximum and minimum values of the von Mises stresses will
be investigated accordingly.

38

and the same but by the CFEM

2

19

node m

31
with z x; y.
In order to perform the numerical integration of the stiffness
matrix of the CFEM method, we adopt a set of 3  3 Gaussian
quadrature points for all the implementations throughout the
study. It is because, in general, the implementation of the
numerical integration in the CFEM is realized similar to that in
the conventional FEM. None of any special techniques is required
for the numerical integrations of the CQ4 element. Any quadrature
rules used for the FEM can be applied the same for the CFEM, but it
may obey the relation of the number of Gaussian points ngp with
respect to the polynomial of order p as indicated in Ref. [2], i.e.,
p r 2ngp  1. Nonetheless, the variation and the inuence of the
Gauss quadrature rules on the accuracy of the solutions shall be
studied numerically in the numerical example part. This is

1
A

Z
1
exact  numer T Dexact  numer d;
2

33

where the superscript exact represents the analytical solutions

while numer stands for the numerical solutions, and A is the area
of the problem domain.
4.1. Standard patch test
The satisfaction of the standard patch test in general requires
the displacement elds of all the interior nodes of the patch that
follow exactly the same linear functions of the imposed displacements on its boundaries [20]. As a consequence a sufcient
condition for the convergence of a numerical method is to
precisely pass such standard patch test. A 1  1 unit square
domain of a patch test discretized by 4  4 regular and irregular
quadrilateral elements with four-node as shown in Fig. 4 is
studied using the CFEM. The displacements are prescribed on all
boundaries by the following linear functions:
ux x;

Fig. 4. Domain discretization of a unit square patch test using the CQ4 elements: regular (a) and irregular (b) meshes.

20

uy y

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

34

The relative errors in the displacement norm ed are found to be

2:0761e  016 and 2:4855e 016 for the regular and irregular
meshes, respectively. As a result, these error results indicate
that the present CQ4 element passes the standard patch test
successfully.
4.2. Cantilever beam
A cantilever beam with length L 8 and height D 2 subjected
to a parabolic traction on the right end as depicted in Fig. 5 is
considered. The cantilever is assumed to have a unit thickness and

the corresponding analytical solutions of the displacements and

stresses based on the plane-stress condition are given by [21]
"
!#
Py
D2
ux 
6L  3xx 2 y2 
;
6EI
4
"
#
P
D2 x
2
2
3y L x 4 5
3L  xx ;
35
uy
6EI
4

sx  PL I xy;
sy 0;
xy

"
#
P D2
 y2
2I 4

36

where I D3 =12 is the moment of inertia of the cantilever beam.

For the plane-strain problem, E and in Eqs. (35) and (36) are
replaced by E=1  2 and =1 , respectively, and P  2.
To serve the validation purpose, four elements listed in the
following are considered:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 5. Geometry of a cantilever beam subjected to a parabolic traction on the
right end.

the
the
the
the

CIP-based quadrilateral element with four-node: CQ4

CIP-based triangular element: CT3 [7]
standard quadrilateral element with four-node: Q4
standard triangular element with three-node: T3

The convergence rate of all the aforementioned elements is

analyzed using both the regular and distorted meshes. However,

Fig. 6. Three discretized regular (a) and distorted (b) meshes using quadrilateral elements for a cantilever beam.

Fig. 7. Comparison of the convergence rates for a cantilever beam using the regular meshes obtained by the CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 elements: relative errors in displacement
norm (a) and energy norm (b).

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

21

Fig. 8. Comparison of the convergence rates for a cantilever beam using the regular and distorted meshes obtained by the present CQ4 element: relative errors in
displacement norm (a) and energy norm (b).

Fig. 9. Comparison of the deections along the neutral line of a cantilever beam
obtained by the analytical, regular and irregular CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 solutions.

only the regular and irregular meshes of 9  5, 16  10 and 30 

20 quadrilateral elements with four-node are depicted in Fig. 6,
and the meshes discretized by using the triangular elements of the
CT3 and T3 elements are omitted for the brevity. Fig. 7 illustrates
the convergence rates in both the energy and displacement norms
using the regular meshes with respect to the nodal ratio h (e.g.,
h 1=9, 1/16, 1/30, 1/60) obtained by the CQ4, Q4, CT3, and T3
elements. It reveals in the gures that the proposed CQ4 element
outperforms the T3 and Q4 elements as well as the CT3 once the
mesh is further rened. In terms of the accuracy, the CFEM
provides much better results than the FEM and the CQ4 element
performs the best. Further study of the convergence rate is
conducted using the distorted meshes, and their obtained convergence rates in both the displacement and energy norms are
then sketched in Fig. 8. Similar convergence rates for both the
regular and distorted meshes are gained and, not surprisingly, the
regular mesh desirably yields higher accuracy than the irregular
one, as usual. However, the obtained results indicate that the
irregular mesh has only a little effect on the accuracy.
To investigate the accuracy of the developed CQ4 element, the
beam is discretized using both the regular and irregular meshes of
16  10 elements. The numerical results of the displacement in ydirection along the neutral line and the shear stress along the
middle line are obtained using the CQ4 (regular and irregular
meshes), CT3, Q4 and T3 elements, and plotted in Figs. 9 and 10,
respectively. The gures exhibit that the displacement and stress

Fig. 10. Comparison of the shear stress distributions along the line (x L/2) of a
cantilever beam obtained by the analytical, regular and irregular CQ4, CT3, Q4 and
T3 solutions.

components obtained by the CQ4 and CT3 are all in good agreement with the analytical ones, whereas less accuracy can be found
for the Q4 and T3 elements. For a better representation, the
normal and shear stress distributions (e.g., sx , xy ) obtained by
the CQ4, Q4, T3 and SQ4 elements are depicted in Fig. 11.
Obviously, the stresses achieved by the Q4 and T3 elements are
discontinuous and non-smooth whilst the developed CQ4 element
works well, i.e., the stresses are continuous and smooth. It should
be recalled that the developed CFEM is very smooth though no
post-processing is performed.
In Fig. 11, the SQ4 element is the standard Q4 but its nal
results (see Fig. 11d and h) are smoothed out by further applying a
smoothing stress recovery technique in the post-processing step.
These SQ4 results are motivated since it may be interesting to see
how smooth on the stresses obtained by the present CFEM method
and the one using the stress recovery technique as usually done in
practice. By accomplishing that, we merely adopt one of the
simplest stress recovery techniques that have been found most
useful in practice, the averaged nodal stresses [22]. The realization
of this so-called unweighted averaging is carried out by assigning
the same weight to all elements that meet at a node. It is obvious
that the SQ4 results are as smooth as the CQ4 ones.
To check the ability of the present CFEM in treating the volume
locking phenomenon in the incompressible materials (i.e.,
Poisson's ratio tends toward 0.5), the same problem but the beam

22

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

Fig. 11. Comparison of the stress distributions in the cantilever beam obtained by the CQ4 (a, e); Q4 (b, f); T3 (c, g) and SQ4 (d, h) elements: normal stress (a)(d) and shear
stress (e)(h).

Fig. 12. Comparison of the deections along the neutral line of a cantilever beam
obtained by the analytical, regular and irregular CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 solutions with
0:49 for nearly incompressible materials.

Fig. 13. Comparison of the computational time for a cantilever beam subjected to a
parabolic traction at the free-end obtained by different approaches.

is now set to be under plane-strain condition and Poison's ratio is

taken as 0:49 to simulate a nearly incompressible material.
Only the deection along the neural line obtained by the four
aforementioned methods is presented in Fig. 12 together with
the analytical solution. Note that results of the pressure and its

convergence, or issues related to pressure modes, infsup satisfaction, etc. are not studied and do not cover in this manuscript
because of simplicity. However, they are scheduled as our future
research works. We see in the picture that the CFEM performs well
as compared with the exact deection, and it shows higher

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

accuracy than the FEM. More importantly, based on these preliminary results it may be stated that the nearly incompressible
materials can be treated by the CFEM with high accuracy, and the
volumetric locking is alleviated.
Another important issue in relevance to the computational
efciency of the developed CQ4 element is also studied. The
computational time needed for the T3, Q4, CT3 and CQ4 elements
tested on three different meshes of 9  5, 16  10 and 30  20
elements, is investigated. Here, only the time required for the
computation of the global stiffness matrix is measured and
estimated. It is because that the most difference among the
aforementioned methods is induced by the implementation of
the stiffness matrix, which substantially pertains to the difference
of establishing the shape functions and their derivatives. The
comparison is performed on the same PC of Intel(R) Pentium(R)
Dual-Core 2.6 GHz, 2.GB RAM. 5 calculations are carried out for
each mesh and the averaged computational time is then reported.
Fig. 13 shows the required CPU time of different approaches using
the same direct solver. Because of an extra task of the consecutiveinterpolation implementation of the shape functions and their
derivatives, the CQ4 and CT3 elements obviously require more
time than the standard Q4 and T3 ones. On the other hand, the
computational efciency in terms of the relative errors in both the
displacement and energy norms against the computational time
(in seconds) is compared and depicted in Fig. 14 under a loglog
plot. It is evident that with respect to the computational efciency
(computational time for the same accuracy) the CFEM is more
efcient as clearly shown in the relative error results in comparison with the FEM. From the practical point of view, it should be

23

noted that to achieve acceptable solutions by using the standard

FEM, demanding post-processing is often required and it may be a
time-consuming task. In fact, it is difcult and/or even impossible
to estimate how much time such task would take.
Furthermore, as mentioned in Section 3.4, we now study numerically the effect of the Gaussian quadrature rules on the numerical
results of the beam. This investigation is carried out by considering
the rst six two-dimensional Gaussian quadrature rules from 1  1
to 6  6, and the two error indicators in the displacement (ed ) and
energy (ee ) norms as well as the maximum and minimum values
(smax ,smin ) of the von Mises stresses are estimated and explored.
Two regular meshes of 16  8 and 32  16 discretized for the beam
are considered. The corresponding obtained results are tabulated in
Table 1. We observe in the table that as usual high error and less
accuracy can be found for the quadrature rule of 1  1, and the
results are similar for other quadrature rules. It implies that higher
number of the Gaussian quadrature rules does not inuence too
much on the accuracy of the results, but it may increase the
computational time. As expected, the errors obtained by the ner
mesh are found to be smaller than that by the coarser one. As a result
we decide to use a set of 3  3 Gaussian quadrature rule for all the
implementations throughout the study.

4.3. An innite plate with a central circular hole

Next benchmark example considers an innite plate with a
central circular hole of radius a and subjected to a unidirectional
tensile loading T x 1 as depicted in Fig. 15a. Only one quarter of

Fig. 14. Comparison of the computational efciency in terms of displacement (a) and energy (b) error norms for a cantilever beam subjected to a parabolic traction at the
free-end obtained by different approaches.

Table 1
Variation and the effect of the Gaussian quadrature rules on the numerical results of the cantilever beam.
Mesh
16  8

smax
smin
ed
ee

32  16

smax
smin
ed
ee

11

22

33

44

55

66

24.0883
1.0232
0.0169
0.0188

23.2061
0.8472
0.0021
0.0446

23.1883
0.8562
0.0019
0.0434

23.1863
0.8563
0.0019
0.0442

23.1863
0.8563
0.0019
0.0442

23.1863
0.8563
0.0019
0.0442

23.818
0.5771
0.0042
0.0051

23.5251
0.4586
0.00027
0.0161

23.5174
0.4543
0.00025
0.0155

23.5165
0.4543
0.00026
0.0158

23.5165
0.4543
0.00026
0.0158

23.5165
0.4543
0.00026
0.0158

24

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

the plate (b 5; a 1) shown in Fig. 15b is modeled due to the

two-fold symmetry. The analytical solutions of the displacement
and stress elds of the innite plate are given by [21]

 

Tx
1
a2
a4
cos 2 1 1 cos 2  3 cos 2 ;
ur
r
2
4
r
r



Tx
a2
a4
1   r  3 sin 2;
4
r
r


sx T x 1 

37




a2 3
3a4
cos 2 cos 4 4 cos 4 ;
2
r 2
2r

Fig. 15. Geometry of an innite plate with a central circular hole (a) and its quarter model (b).

Fig. 16. Comparison of the convergence rates for an innite plate with a circular hole obtained by the CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 elements: relative errors in displacement norm
(a) and energy norm (b).

Fig. 17. Comparison of the stress distributions along the left boundary (a) and the bottom boundary (b) of the quarter plate with a circular hole subjected to a unidirectional
tension.

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

25

Fig. 18. Comparison of the normal stress (e.g., sx ) distributions in an innite plate with a central circular hole obtained by the CQ4 (a), CT3 (b), Q4 (c) and T3 (d) elements.

Fig. 19. Comparison of the displacement solutions of an innite plate with a central circular hole for plane-strain condition with 0:4999 obtained by the CQ4, Q4 and
analytical methods. Displacement distribution along the bottom boundary (a) and the left boundary (b) of the quarter plate.




a2 1
3a4
cos
2

cos
4

cos
4
;
r2 2
2r 4

 2

a 1
3a4
sin 2 sin 4  4 sin 4 ;
xy  T x
2
r 2
2r

sy  T x

38

where E=21 and is dened in terms of Poisson's ratio

by 3  4 for the plane-strain case and by 3  =1 for
the plane-stress problem. In Eqs. (37) and (38), r; are the polar

coordinates and is measured counter-clockwise from the positive

x-axis. The problem is rst studied under a plane-strain assumption, the traction boundary conditions are imposed on the right
and upper edges with the analytical stresses obtained using
Eq. (38), and the following essential boundary conditions are
imposed:
ux x 0 0; 1 r y r 5;

26

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

Fig. 20. Geometry of internally pressurized hollow cylinder (a) and its quarter model.

Fig. 21. Regular (a) and irregular (b) meshes of 12  12 quadrilateral elements.

Fig. 22. Comparison of the convergence rates of an internally pressurized hollow cylinder hole obtained by the CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 elements: relative errors in displacement
norm (a) and energy norm (b).

uy y 0 0; 1 r x r 5

39

Similar to the previous beam example, the convergence study is

presented. Fig. 16 essentially shows the convergence rate in both
the energy and displacement norms using a regular mesh with
respect to the nodal ratio h (e.g., h 1=7, 1/13, 1/25) for different
approaches. The obtained results of the convergence rate are not

surprising, and as expected the developed CQ4 outperforms the

CT3, T3 and Q4 elements when a mesh renement is made. The
CFEM provides much better results than the FEM as clearly seen in
their relative errors in both the displacement and energy norms,
and here again the present CQ4 is the winner.
In terms of the accuracy, Fig. 17 further provides us a comparison of the stress distributions along the left and bottom

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

27

boundaries of the quarter plate obtained by the CQ4 element using

a regular mesh of 13  13 elements, and by the analytical solutions. The CFEM matches well with the exact solutions. Additionally, Fig. 18 shows the normal stress distributions of an innite
plate obtained, respectively, by the CQ4, CT3, Q4 and T3 elements.
It is again observed that the stresses obtained by the CFEM are
continuous and smooth whereas the standard FEM does not
guarantee such smoothness and continuity.
Similarly, the volumetric locking phenomenon is again analyzed numerically using a regular mesh of 13  13 elements with
Poisson's ratio taken to be 0:4999. Fig. 19 shows a comparison
of the displacement distributions along the bottom (Fig. 19a) and
left (Fig. 19b) boundaries of the quarter plate obtained by the
present CQ4, the Q4 and the analytical approaches. It shows that
the CFEM can still achieve better results with a Poisson's ratio
0:4999 while large errors are found for the standard Q4
element using the same mesh.

4.4. Hollow cylinder under internal pressure

Fig. 23. Displacement distribution along the boundary line x 0 of an internally

pressurized hollow cylinder.

Another benchmark example considers a hollow cylinder subjected to an internal pressure as depicted in Fig. 20 to further show
the accuracy of the CFEM. The cylinder is designed with an inner
radius of a, an outer radius of b and a unit thickness. A uniform
pressure of p is applied to the inner surface at r a, whilst
traction-free boundary condition is assigned at the outer surface
r b. Only one-quarter of the cylinder is modeled due to the
geometrical symmetry of the structure. The analytical solutions of
the displacement and stress elds of this internally pressurized
hollow cylinder are available and given by [21].
"
#
2
a2 pr
b
ur r
1


;
2
r2
Eb  a2
u 0;

40

#
2
b
1 2 ;
sr r 2
r
b  a2
"
#
2
a2 p
b
1 2 ;
s r 2
r
b a2
a2 p

r 0

"

41

In the numerical investigation, the following parameters are

used: a 1, b 5, p 1, and the plane-stress condition is assumed.
We rst explore the convergence rate of the different methods by
considering three regular and three irregular meshes of 6  6,
12  12, 22  22 and 32  32 elements. Only the case of the
regular and distorted meshes with 12  12 elements is shown in
Fig. 21. Fig. 22 shows a comparison of the convergence rates in
both the energy and displacement norms with respect to the nodal
ratio h (e.g., h 1=7, 1/13, 1/23, 1/33) obtained by the CQ4, CT3, Q4
and T3 elements. Again and similar to the previous examples, the
numerical results clearly conrm the high accuracy and convergence rate of the present CFEM.
For the accuracy study, the problem is discretized by using the
regular and irregular meshes with 12  12 elements, and the
obtained numerical solutions using several aforementioned methods are plotted in Figs. 23 and 24 for the displacement and stress
elds, respectively. The results obtained by the CFEM agree well
with the analytical solutions, but the standard FEM yields less
accuracy. The radial stress component sr derived by the four
approaches is also depicted in Fig. 25 and one clearly observes in
the gures that the CFEM provides much smoother stresses than
the FEM using the same mesh.

Fig. 24. Stress distributions along the boundary line x 0 of an internally

pressurized hollow cylinder.

4.5. Practical example: corner bracket

The major objective of the subsequent numerical examples is to
further demonstrate the applicability of the CFEM method to the
problems of complex geometry. The rst practical example considers a
corner angle bracket with its geometry as depicted in Fig. 26a. The
corner bracket is popularly used in many engineering applications.
The bracket in this study is made of steel with a Young's modulus of
206.84 GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.27, and the plane-stress condition is
assumed [23]. The upper left-hand pin hole is constrained around its
entire circumference, and a tapered pressure load is applied to the
bottom of the lower right-hand hole. The corner bracket is discretized
with irregular meshes (see Fig. 26b) using the present CQ4, the Q4
elements, and ANSYS with the PLANE42 element. The results computed by the ANSYS are used here as a reference solution, and the
bracket is discretized with different renements using the standard 4node element starting from approximately 700 elements up to almost
16,000 elements. A maximum value of the von Mises stress of
19.705 MPa is obtained for a ne mesh. On the other hand, the

28

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

Fig. 25. Comparison of the radial stress (e.g., sr ) of an internally pressurized hollow cylinder obtained by the CQ4 (a), CT3 (b), Q4 (c) and T3 (d) elements.

Fig. 26. Geometry of a corner angle bracket (a) and its nite element mesh (b).

bracket is also discretized by an irregular mesh of 1282 elements (see

Fig. 26b) using quadrilateral elements. The maximum von Mises
stresses are obtained, respectively, as 19.8817 MPa by the CQ4 and
20.2707 MPa by the Q4 elements. As compared with the ANSYS-based
von Mises value, one can see that the calculated CQ4 solution is closer
than that of the Q4 element for the same mesh. Fig. 27 depicts the
distribution of the von Mises stresses in the bracket by the CQ4 (a), Q4
(b) and ANSYS1 using PLANE42 with course (c) and ne (d) meshes.
A very good agreement in the stress distributions obtained by different

1
Note that we use the ANSYS's command such as (PLESOL, S, EQV) to plot the
stresses.

approaches is found. However, the CQ4 element again provides much

smoother stresses than the Q4 element.

4.6. Practical example: rotor of a micro-motor

Finally, a common micro-actuator in the form of a side-driving
electrostatic micro-motor used in MEMs devices is analyzed [3].
Such micro-motor is usually made from polysilicon using lithographic techniques. The material parameters of the polysilicon are
Young's modulus of 169 GPa and Poisson's ratio of 0.262. Isotropic
material properties are employed to simplify the problem. A real
model of the micro-rotor can be found in Ref. [3], and due to its

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

Fig. 27. Comparison of the von Mises stress distributions in a corner bracket obtained by the CQ4 (a), Q4 (b), ANSYS with coarse (c) and ne (d) meshes.

Fig. 28. Geometry of a quarter micro-motor rotor (a) and nite element mesh with 96 quadrilateral elements.

Fig. 29. Comparison of the von Mises stresses in a micro-motor rotor obtained by the CQ4 (a) and Q4 (b) elements.

29

30

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

symmetry only one quarter with the corresponding boundary

conditions as depicted in Fig. 28a is taken. Typically, a nite
element mesh of the domain discretized by 96 quadrilateral
elements with four-node is depicted in Fig. 28b. Similar to the
bracket example, reference solutions are also derived from the
FEM using ANSYS. Thus, different renements from a coarse mesh
to a very ne one are performed, and the maximum von Mises
stress at the corners of the rotor obtained by ANSYS using a very
ne mesh is 18.832 MPa. The solutions computed by the CQ4 and
Q4 elements, respectively, are 18.837 MPa and 22.599 MPa, and as
a result it again reveals the high accuracy of the CFEM. Fig. 29
similarly shows the von Mises stress distributions in the rotor
obtained by the CQ4 (a) and Q4 (b) elements, respectively, and
smoother stresses are achieved by using the CFEM rather than the
FEM for the same mesh.

Let us consider a quadrilateral element with four-node as

sketched in Fig. 1. The geometric interpolation functions are given
in Eq. (11). For convenience in representation, the derivatives of
Eq. (11) are
()
"
#
h
i 1  1  s
1 s
1 s  1 s
r
L
L
L
L
m
i
j

1  r
4  1  r  1 r 1 r
s
A1
The Jacobian matrix and its inverse are explicitly
8
> xi
>
"
#>
>
1  s
1 s  1 s < xj
1  1  s
J
xk
1  r >
4 1 r  1 r 1 r
>
>
>
: xm

5. Conclusions
J
An efcient and accurate quadrilateral element with four-node
based on the CIP is formulated. The developed CQ4 element is
applied to the stress analysis of 2D elastic structures. The advantages of the CFEM are due to the fact that the stresses and strains
at nodes are continuous, smooth and it requires no smoothing
operation in the post-processing step. From the numerical results
of the four benchmark examples, it conrms the high accuracy of
the CFEM that pertains to high convergence rate as compared with
the standard FEM (Q4, T3) and even the CT3. Highly accurate
results in the practical examples further conrm the applicability
of the present CFEM in the stress analysis of 2D elastic structures
with complex conguration. The CIP algorithm is general and has
no limitations on its extension to other elements such as tetrahedral and brick elements in 3D. The extension of the method is
also attractive to the incompressible media, in which some
relevant issues pertaining to the pressure modes, convergence,
the infsup satisfaction, etc. should be investigated and addressed
in detail. From the present research work, the following conclusions can be drawn:

 The shape functions of the present CQ4 element are higher-




order polynomials and possess the Kronecker-delta function

property, which allows a straightforward imposition of the
essential boundary conditions.
As compared with the traditional FEM (Q4, T3) and even the
CT3 element, the CQ4 substantially pertains to higher accuracy,
higher efciency and higher convergence rate. Specially, nodal
stresses are generated continuously without any smoothing
operation; mesh distortions are insensitive; based on the
preliminary results it shows that the volumetric locking is
alleviated in incompressible materials; and without the
increase of the DOFs in the system.
The present CFEM method is straightforwardly implemented in
any existing computer FEM code.
No post-processing is required in the CFEM.

Acknowledgment
The support of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD,
Project-ID: 54368781) is gratefully acknowledged.

1

"
J1
1

4detJ J3

J2

J4

with J1  yi 1 r  yj 1 r yk 1 r ym 1  r;
J2 yi 1  s  yj 1  s  yk 1 s ym 1 s;
J3 xi 1  r xj 1 r  xk 1 r  xm 1  r;
J4  xi 1  s xj 1  s xk 1 s  xm 1 s

As stated above that the i ; ix ; and iy functions in Eq. (25)

must satisfy the conditions in Eq. (23), hence we shall present it in
this Appendix.

A3

First, the derivatives of the geometric interpolation functions can

be expressed as
i
1 2Li Lj 2Li Lk 2Li Lm  L2j L2k  L2m ;
Li

i
L2i  2Li Lj ;
Lj

i
i
L2i 2Li Lk ;
L2i 2Li Lm
Lk
Lm
ix
 xi  xj 2Li Lj pLj Lk pLj Lm
Li
 xi  xk 2Li Lk pLk Lm pLk Lj
 xi  xm 2Li Lm pLm Lj pLm Lk ;
ix
 xi  xj L2i pLi Lk pLi Lm
Lj
 xi  xk pLi Lk  xi  xm pLi Lm ;
ix
 xi  xj pLi Lj  xi xk L2i pLi Lm pLi Lj
Lk
 xi  xm pLi Lm ;
ix
 xi  xj pLi Lj  xi xk pLi Lk
Lm
 xi  xm L2i pLi Lj pLi Lk ;
iy
 yi  yj 2Li Lj pLj Lk pLj Lm
Li
 yi  yk 2Li Lk pLk Lm pLk Lj
 yi  ym 2Li Lm pLm Lj pLm Lk ;
iy
 yi  yj L2i pLi Lk pLi Lm
Lj
 yi  yk pLi Lk  yi  ym pLi Lm ;
iy
 yi  yj pLi Lj yi  yk L2i pLi Lm pLi Lj
Lk
 yi  ym pLi Lm ;
iy
 yi  yj pLi Lj yi  yk pLi Lk
Lm
 yi  ym L2i pLi Lj pLi Lk

Appendix A

expressed as
9
yi >
>
>
>
yj =
A2
yk >
>
>
>
;
ym

A4

Now, we prove the condition: i xl il . When l  i, then

r  1; s  1 and Li 1; Lj Lk Lm 0, substituting them into
Eqs. (11) and (25), we obtain: i xi 1. Similarly, when l  j; l  k;
or l  m, we respectively obtain i xj 0; i xk 0 and i xm 0.
Next, we prove the conditions: i;x xl 0, i;y xl 0.

T.Q. Bui et al. / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 84 (2014) 1431

When l  i, then r  1; s  1 and Li 1; Lj Lk Lm 0.

Substituting them into Eqs. (A1) and (A3), we have
()


h
i
2 2 0 0
r
Li Lj Lk Lm 1
;

4 2 0 0 2
s
"
#
 2yi 2ym
2yi  2yj
1
;
J1
 2xi 2xj
4detJ 2xi  2xm
()
()
h
i
h
i
x
Li Lj Lk Lm J  1 r
Li Lj Lk Lm

"
#
 2yi 2ym
2yi  2yj 1  2
1

 2xi 2xj 4  2
4detJ 2xi 2xm
"
#
yj  ym ym  yi 0 yi yj
1

4detJ xm  xj xi  xm 0 xj xi

2
0

0
0

0
2

A5

and into the rst sub-equations of Eq. (A4)

1;
1;
1 and
1
Li
Lj
Lk
Lm

A6

Then, we nally obtain i;x xl 0, i;y xl 0 as

8 Li 9
>
x >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Lj >
=
<
h
i
i
i
i
i
i
x
Li Lj Lk Lm
i;x xi
L
k
>
>
x
>
x >
>
>
>
>
>
;
: Lm >
x
2
3
yj ym
6
7

 1 6 ym  yi 7
6
7
1 1 1 1
6
4detJ4 0 7
5
yi  yj
1
y  ym ym  yi yi  yj  0
4detJ j
8 L 9
i
>
y >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Lj >
>
>
=
<
h
i
i
i
i
i
i
y
Li Lj Lk Lm
i;y xi
Lk >
>
y
>
>
> y >
>
>
>
>
>
;
: Lm >
y
2
3
xm xj
6
7

 1 6 xi  xm 7
6
7
1 1 1 1
7
4detJ6
4 0 5
xj  xi

1
xm  xj xi  xm xj  xi  0
4detJ

A7

Similarly, we straightforwardly prove the same for l  j; l  k; or

l  m, as well as other conditions.

31

References
[1] Hughes TJR, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite
Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1987.
[2] J. Fish, T. Belytschko, A First Course in Finite Elements, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
England, 2007.
[3] G.R. Liu, S.S. Quek, The Finite Element Method: A Practical Course, Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science, Burlington, MA, 2003.
[4] G. Beer, I. Smith, C. Duenser, The Boundary Element Method with Programming For Engineers and Scientists, Springer-Verlag, Wien, Germany, 2008.
[5] C.R. Dohrmann, M.W. Heinstein, J. Jung, S.W. Key, W.R. Witkowski, Node-based
uniform strain elements for three-node triangular and four-node tetrahedral
meshes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 47 (2000) 15491568.
[6] C.R. Dohrmann, S.W. Key, M.W. Heinstein, J. Jung, A least-square approach for
uniform strain triangular and tetrahedral nite elements, Int. J. Numer.
Methods Eng. 42 (1998) 11811197.
[7] C. Zheng, S.C. Wu, X.H. Tang, J.H. Zhang, A novel twice-interpolation nite
element method for solid mechanics problems, Acta Mech. Sin. 26 (2010)
265278.
[8] J. Bonet, A.J. Burton, A simple average nodal pressure tetrahedral element for
incompressible and nearly incompressible dynamic explicit applications,
Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 14 (1998) 437449.
[9] P. Hansbo, A nonconforming rotated Q1 approximation on tetrahedral,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (2011) 13111316.
[10] P. Hansbo, Nonconforming rotated Q1 tetrahedral element with explicit time
stepping for elastodynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 91 (2012) 11051114.
[11] S.A. Papanicolopulos, A. Zervos, A method for creating a class of triangular C1
nite element, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 89 (2012) 14371450.
[12] G.R. Liu, A generalized gradient smoothing technique and the smoothed
bilinear form for Galerkin formulation of a wide class of computational
methods, Int. J. Comput. Methods 05 (2008) 136199.
[13] G.R. Liu, N. Nourbakhshnia, Y.W. Zhang, A novel singular ES-FEM method for
simulating singular stress eld near the crack tips for linear fracture problems,
Eng. Fract. Mech. 78 (2011) 863876.
[14] P. Liu, Q.T. Bui, Yu TT Zhang Ch, G.R. Liu, M.V. Golub, The singular edge-based
smoothed nite element method for stationary dynamic crack problems in 2D
elastic solids, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 233236 (2012) 6880.
[15] T.J.R. Hughes, J.A. Cottrell, Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric analysis: CAD, nite
elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh renement, Comput. Methods
Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (2004) 41354195.
[16] S.N. Atluri, T. Zhu, A new meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in
computational mechanics, Comput. Mech. 22 (1998) 117127.
[17] Q.T. Bui, N.M. Nguyen, Ch. Zhang, An efcient meshfree method for vibration
analysis of laminated composite plates, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 175193.
[18] Q.T. Bui, N.M. Nguyen, Zhang Ch, D.A.K. Pham, An efcient meshfree method
for analysis of two-dimensional piezoelectric structures, Smart Mater. Struct.
20 (2011) 065016.
[19] G.R. Liu, G.Y. Zhang, Y.Y. Wang, Z.H. Zhong, G.T. Li, X. Han, A nodal integration
technique for meshfree radial point interpolation method (NI-RPIM), Int. J.
Solids Struct. 44 (2007) 38403860.
[20] G.R. Liu, G.Y. Zhang, A novel scheme of strain-constructed point interpolation
method for static and dynamic mechanics problems, Int. J. Appl. Mech. 1
(2009) 233258.
[21] S.P. Timoshenko, J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1970.
[22] C.A. Felippa, Introduction to Finite Element Methods. University of Colorado,
Boulder. Available from: http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.
d/IFEM.d/Home.html (accessed 15.11.13).
[23] ASNYS User's Manual, Release 12.1, ANSYS, Inc, Technology Drive Connosburg,
PA, 2009.