Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 34

Lecture 8: Preferential Trade

Agreements

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Introduction

The term multilateralism refers to the GATT/WTO system and


the trade negotiations that take place within it

One of the founding


nondiscrimination

principles

of

this

system

is

Involves the most favored nation (MFN) and national treatment (NT) subprinciples

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Introduction

Regionalism refers to a violation of the nondiscrimination


principle in which one member of a regional trade agreement
(RTA) discriminates in its trade policies in favor of another
member of the RTA and against nonmembers

Has been allowed


circumstances:

by

the

GATT/WTO

under

certain

Free trade areas (FTAs)


Customs unions (CUs)
Interim agreements leading to a FTA or CU within a reasonable
length of time

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Table 8.1: Types of Preferential Trade


Agreements
Type of PTA

Description

Number in
Force
2014

GATT Article
XXIV (FTA)

An agreement on the part of a set of countries to


eliminate trade restrictions among themselves.

221

GATT Article
XXIV (CU)

An agreement on the part of a set of countries to


eliminate trade restrictions among themselves
and to adopt a common external tariff.

17

Enabling
Clause

Allows PTAs in goods trade among developing


countries.

37

GATS Article V

An agreement to reduce barriers to trade in


services among a set of counties.

131
Total: 406

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Table 8.2: Steps to Regional Integration


Type

Description

Free trade
area

An agreement on the part of a set of countries to eliminate


trade restrictions among themselves.

Customs
union

An agreement on the part of a set of countries to eliminate


trade restrictions among themselves and to adopt a common
external tariff.

Common
market

An agreement on the part of a set of countries to eliminate


trade restrictions among themselves, to adopt a common
external tariff, and to allow the free movement of labor and
physical capital among member countries.

Monetary
union

A common market that adopts a common currency and adopts


a common monetary policy.

Economic
union

A monetary union that adopts a process of domestic policy


harmonization in areas such as tax and spending policies and
domestic regulation.
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

The WTO and PTAs

WTO members who wish to form FTAs or CUs


may do so

However, there are certain requirements

Trade barriers against non-members cannot be higher or


more restrictive than those in existence prior to the FTA or
CU
FTA or CU must be formed within a reasonable length of
time
FTA or CU must eliminate trade barriers on substantially all
the trade among the members
With regard to services, the General Agreement on Trade in
Services (GATS) requires that the FTA or CU involve
substantial sectoral coverage
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

The WTO and PTAs: Enforcement

The WTO has a Committee on Regional Trade


Agreements (CRTA)

Despite the institutional structure present in the WTO to


govern PTAs, there has never been any serious
evaluation or enforcement

Most PTAs are of doubtful WTO consistency

A cooperative equilibrium exists where no WTO


member contests anothers PTA
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Rules of Origin

In FTAs (but not CUs), a product can be imported into a


low-tariff member and then resold in a high-tariff member

This process is known as tariff rate arbitrage

To protect tariff rate arbitrage FTA members established


rules of origin (ROOs) to protect against this

Domestic content
Change in tariff heading
Specific processes
Substantial transformation
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

HS

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Economic Effects of PTAs

TWO concept exist in PTAs

Trade creation

Occurs when the formation of a FTA or CU leads to a


switching of imports from a high-cost source to a lowcost source

Tends to improve welfare

Trade diversion

Occurs when imports switch from a low-cost source to


a high-cost source

Tends to worsen welfare


Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Trade Creation and Trade Diversion

Trade creation and trade diversion using the absolute


advantage model of lecture 2

Along with Brazil (B) and Argentina (A), we are also


going to refer to a third country, El Salvador (S)

Brazil and Argentina are members of a PTA, whereas El


Salvador is not

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Figure 8.1: Trade-Creating PTA

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Trade Creation

Before the PTA, Brazil has in place a specific (per unit)


tariff on imports from both Argentina and El Salvador

Argentina is the lower-cost producer in comparison to


Brazil, itself

Therefore Brazil imports good from Argentina

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Trade Creation

Once Brazil joins either a PTA with Argentina, tariff is


removed on imports from Argentina

Good continues to be imported from Argentina and imports


increase because price has fallen due to removal of tariff

Consumer surplus in Brazil increases while producer


surplus and government tariff revenue falls

Net increase in welfare due to trade creation

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Figure 8.2: A Trade-Diverting PTA

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Trade Diversion

Before the PTA, Brazil has in place a specific (per unit)


tariff on imports from both Argentina and El Salvador

El Salvador is the lower-cost producer in comparison to


Argentina

Brazil imports the good from El Salvador

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Trade Diversion

Once Brazil joins a PTA with Argentina, however, Brazil


switches to Argentina as an import supplier

Imports expand as the domestic price falls

Consumer surplus in Brazil increases while producer


surplus and government revenue fall

Whether net welfare effect is positive or negative is


ambiguous

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Summary of Economic Effects of PTAs

PTAs can be either welfare-improving or welfareworsening.

Whether an PTA is welfare-improving or welfareworsening is something that must be assessed on a


case-by-case basis, based on evidence on the relative
strengths of trade creation and trade diversion.

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

The European Union


Year

Initiative/Treaty

Members Added

1951

European Coal and Steel


Community/Treaty of Paris

France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands

1958

European Economic Community/Treaty


of Rome

1973

Enlargement

Denmark, Ireland, United Kingdom

1981

Enlargement

Greece

1986

Enlargement

Portugal, Spain

1992

European Union/Maastricht Treaty

1995

Enlargement

Austria, Finland, Sweden

1999

European Monetary Union

United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark not included

2002

Common EMU currency: the euro

United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark not included

2004

Enlargement

Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary


Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia

2007

Enlargement

Bulgaria, Romania

2007

EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty

2013

Enlargement

Croatia
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

The European Union

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Economic Assessment of the EU

Some studies have suggested that trade creation


has dominated trade diversion in the EU

Other studies have drawn attention to the role of


non-tariff measures and subsidies (especially to
agriculture) - increased

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

North American Free Trade Agreement

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

North American Free Trade Agreement

In January 1994 a FTA between Canada, Mexico


and the United States took place (NAFTA)

Addressed the following

Trade in goods
Financial services
Transportation
Telecommunications
Foreign direct investment
Intellectual property rights
Government procurement
Dispute settlement
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Mercosur

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Mercosur

PTA among Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Paraguay, and


Uruguay

Launched in 1991

Took on Chile and Bolivia as associate members in 1996 and


1997, respectively

Peru, Colombia and Ecuador became associate members in


2003-2004

Not actually a common market but a CU

Free movement of labor and physical capital is along way off


Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

FTAA

In 1994, governments of 34 countries agreed to pursue a Free


Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)
Negotiations were launched at the Second Summit of the
Americas in 1998 in nine negotiating groups

Market Access
Investment
Services
Government Procurement
Dispute Settlement
Agriculture
Intellectual Property Rights
Subsidies, Antidumping, and Countervailing Duties
Competition Policy
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

FTAA

The 2004 Summit of the Americas was blocked by a


number of issues
Agriculture
Anti-dumping

The 2005 Summit of the Americas ended


negotiations on the FTAA
Venezuela and Argentina blocked progress in
opposition to US-backed neo-liberalism
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

ASEAN / AFTA

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

ASEAN / AFTA

Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)


includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, the Lao Peoples
Democratic
Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, the
Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam

Beginning in 1992, members began to form the ASEAN


FTA or AFTA, which now includes all 10 members

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

FTA (Azerbaijan and some CIS


countries)

Free Trade Agreement between Azerbaijan, Armenia,


Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Kazakhstan, the Russian
Federation, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and the
Kyrgyz Republic

Launched in 1994

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Regionalism vs. Multilateralism

Represent two alternative trade policy options available


to the countries of the world

The 1950s and 1960s saw first wave of PTAs in


developing world

The 1980s saw beginning of second wave of PTAs

What role will this second wave of PTAs play vis--vis


the multilateral efforts toward trade liberalization pursued
under the GATT-WTO framework ?
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Regionalism vs. Multilateralism

Opponents argue that PTAs are discriminatory by nature

They draw attention to spaghetti-bowl nature of secondwave and current PTAs

Meaning the overlapping nature of most PTAs, with most


WTO members holding simultaneous membership in many
PTAs at once

The negotiating energies put into PTAs will detract from


those put into multilateral agreements under the auspices
of the WTO
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Appendix: Rules of Thumb for Evaluating


PTAs

Countries excluded from a PTA almost always lose

Market access is a key determinant of the net benefits of


a PTA

Lowering external tariffs against non-members of a PTA


improves their desirability from a welfare standpoint

Multilateral trade liberalization results in significantly


larger gains to the world than a network of PTAs
Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University
Press 2012

Appendix: Rules of Thumb for Evaluating


PTAs

For some countries additive PTAs can be more


beneficial than unilateral trade liberalization due to
the market access gains involved in the former

For developing countries North-South PTAs can


offer beneficial increases in competition in their
home markets

Kenneth A. Reinert, Cambridge University


Press 2012

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi