Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Improv
Defense Sciences Office
DARPA-BAA-16-22
March 11, 2016
Table of Contents
1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.
2.1.
3.
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
4.
4.1.
4.2.
4.3.
4.4.
4.5.
5.
6.
6.1.
6.2.
6.3.
7.
8.
8.1.
8.2.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
Types of Instruments that May be Awarded: All awards will be made via purchase
order.
Agency contacts
o Technical POC: John Main, Program Manager, DARPA/DSO
o Solicitation Email (UNCLASSIFIED): Improv@darpa.mil
o Solicitation Mailing Address:
DARPA/DSO
ATTN: DARPA-BAA-16-22
675 North Randolph Street
Arlington, VA 22203-2114
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): FAQs for this solicitation may be viewed on the
DSO Solicitation Website. See Section 8.1 for further information.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
Introduction
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Improv program is soliciting
innovative research proposals for prototype products and systems that have the potential to
threaten current military operations, equipment, or personnel and are assembled primarily from
commercially available technology.
The program definition of commercially available technology is largely unrestricted and
ranges from generic and widely available technology such as cell phones, to highly specialized,
domain-specific technology such as construction, salvage, or surveying equipment.
The technology scope of Improv is broad, and the program is structured to encourage
participation by a wide range of technical specialists, researchers, developers, and skilled
hobbyists. Proposers are free to reconfigure, repurpose, program, reprogram, modify, combine,
or recombine commercially available technology in any way within the bounds of local, state,
and federal laws and regulations. Use of components, products, and systems from non-military
technical specialties (e.g., transportation, construction, maritime, and communications) is of
particular interest.
The specific mechanisms for preserving the central role of commercially available technology in
the program are: (1) constrained budgets, and (2) short development periods between award and
prototype delivery. The purpose of these mechanisms is to keep the focus of each individual
project on the integration of easily procured technology rather than on developing completely
new technology. However, new technology development activity within the bounds of the
Improv program structure is acceptable and encouraged.
1.2
Program Structure
DARPAs intent for the Improv program is to fund a short feasibility study phase, during which
performers will compete for the opportunity to build their proposed prototype. Following the
prototype construction phase, some of the prototypes will be selected for evaluation. If
performance warrants, DARPA may then further the development of countermeasures or
capabilities of interest in separate follow-on programs.
The five sequential steps of the Improv program are illustrated in Figure 1 and further detailed
below. Note: the first two steps occur during the solicitation period (i.e., are pre-award).
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
1.2.1
Abstracts
Prior to submission of full proposals, proposers must submit a 2-page abstract that describes their
proposed product or system; a description of the threat it might pose to conventional military
operations, equipment, or personnel; the list of critical software and hardware components to be
acquired; and a short description of the integration tasks and process. Following abstract review,
DARPA will respond to proposers by either encouraging or discouraging preparation of a full
proposal.
1.2.2
Proposals
Proposed technical plans should provide an analysis (the more quantitative the better) of the
proposed system or product improvement, an integration plan, and a description of how the
system or product will operate or be operated. A revised version of the abstract, updated to be
congruent with the proposal, must be included with the proposal submission. (Note: while the
updated/edited abstract will not count against the proposal page limit, it must still comply with
the abstract content/format requirements outlined herein.) Proposals must include a Statement of
Work and costs covering all three independent and sequential project phases: Feasibility Study
(Phase 1); Prototype Construction (Phase 2); and Prototype Evaluation (Phase 3).
1.2.3
The purpose of the Feasibility Study activity is to gain more clarity on the capability of the
proposed product or system and the level of effort required to realize it. This clarity could be
provided by a detailed engineering treatment of the product or system, but alternative approaches
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
are not excluded as long as the proposer can: (1) quantitatively predict the performance of the
proposed product or system; and (2) demonstrate their ability to complete a functioning
prototype within the timing and funding constraints outlined herein.
For each proposal selected for award, DARPA anticipates issuing a purchase order within four
weeks of the proposal submission deadline stated herein. The period of performance (PoP) for
the Feasibility Study is 30 days from the issuance date of the purchase order. Upon conclusion
of the Feasibility Study PoP, a report must be delivered that describes (1) the results of the study,
and (2) what else can be learned by building the prototype. Based on the evaluation criteria
herein, the Government may or may not select a proposed product or system to proceed to the
Prototype Construction phase; the Feasibility Study report will provide the basis for the
Governments decision.
1.2.4
The purpose of the Prototype Construction activity is to build a functional system that will
enable experimental evaluations of key aspects of system performance. It is not possible to
identify in advance what constitutes key performance criteria since the technology scope of
Improv is broad. Proposers must identify and justify the key performance parameters and
metrics of their respective products or systems in their proposals. These parameters/metrics will
be updated as necessary throughout the Phase 2 PoP.
For each effort selected to proceed to Prototype Construction, the proposer will receive a
purchase order for the Phase 2 PoP within two weeks of the submission of the Feasibility Study
final report. The PoP for the Prototype Construction phase is 75 days from the purchase order
issuance date. Upon conclusion of the Prototype Construction phase, a report must be delivered
that (1) describes in detail the design and operation of the prototype, and (2) what else can be
learned through a test range evaluation of the prototype. The report will provide the basis for the
Governments selection of products or systems that will proceed to the Prototype Evaluation
phase. While the Government may or may not select a prototype for evaluation, it should still be
prepared for shipment at the conclusion of Phase 2 in the eventuality that it is selected, using the
evaluation criteria set forth herein.
1.2.5
The purpose of this phase is independent evaluation of performer prototypes. The Government
and/or Government contractors will perform these evaluations at a Government test facility.
Evaluation schedules will be established on a case-by-case basis and will depend upon the
availability of the appropriate test facility and personnel. Phase 3 performers will be expected to
support the Government evaluators by providing subject matter expertise for their prototype.
For each effort selected to proceed to the Prototype Evaluation phase, a purchase order will be
issued to provide support for proposer attendance at the prototype evaluation. Proposers will be
notified within three weeks of the submission of the Phase 2 report whether the Government
intends to issue a purchase order for Phase 3 participation; the actual purchase order will be
issued at an appropriate date prior to the prototype evaluation. Proposers may only include two
weeks salary for two participants, two weeks travel to the Washington DC area, per diem, and
appropriate G&A and overhead in their cost breakdowns. Following the evaluation, performers
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
must submit a final report describing the evaluation and providing feedback.
1.3
As stated above, all proposers must first submit an abstract prior to submitting a full proposal.
This process allows a proposer to ascertain whether the proposed concept is both applicable to
the Improv BAA and currently of interest without incurring the cost of preparing a full proposal.
If, in the sole opinion of the Government after full consideration of the circumstances, an
abstract or full proposal is found to be not applicable to the Improv program as defined in this
document, then it may be deemed non-conforming and removed from consideration.
Conforming is defined as having been submitted in accordance with all of the requirements
outlined in this Improv BAA. All abstracts and full proposals must provide sufficient
information to assess the validity/feasibility of their claims as well as comply with the
requirements outlined herein for submission formatting, content, and transmission to DARPA.
Proposers will be notified of non-conforming determinations via letter.
Each abstract or proposal may only address a single prototype system or product; however,
proposers may submit multiple abstracts and proposals.
Abstracts and proposals may be either unclassified or classified. See Section 4 for detailed
instructions for each type of submission related to content, format, templates, and transmission to
DARPA.
Proposers may receive multiple awards.
2. Award Information
Awards under this solicitation will be made to proposers whose proposals are determined to be
the most advantageous and provide best value to the Government.
The Government reserves the right to:
select for negotiation all, some, one, or none of the proposals received in response to this
solicitation;
fund proposals in increments with options for continued work at the end of one or more
phases;
request additional documentation once the award instrument has been determined (e.g.,
representations and certifications); and
remove proposers from award consideration should the parties fail to reach agreement on
award terms within a reasonable time, or the proposer fails to provide requested
additional information in a timely manner.
2.1.
Individual Awards
Multiple awards are anticipated in each phase of the program. DARPA intends to issue purchase
orders to fund all phases of this program. The anticipated levels of funding for each phase are as
follows:
Feasibility Study (Phase 1): up to $40,000 per individual award
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
3. Eligibility Information
Eligibility determinations are at the sole discretion of DARPA and are made on a case-by-case
basis. The burden to prove the eligibility of all team members to DARPAs satisfaction rests
solely with the proposer. Therefore, all proposals must include the information requested in
Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the Administrative and National Policy Requirements document
(Attachment 4 to the BAA). If a team member is deemed ineligible after full deliberation of the
circumstances, the proposal may be removed from consideration.
Any prospective proposers who are unsure whether they meet the eligibility requirements for this
BAA should email a summary of the issue(s) to Improv@darpa.mil before time and effort are
expended in preparing a proposal.
3.1.
Eligible Applicants
Any responsible source (including individuals) capable of meeting all eligibility requirements
and satisfying the Government's needs may submit a proposal for DARPA consideration.
3.1.1.
Foreign Participation
Non-U.S. organizations and/or individuals may participate to the extent that such participants
comply with any necessary and applicable nondisclosure agreements, security regulations, export
control laws, and other governing statutes.
3.2.
Conflicts of Interest
Current Federal employees are prohibited from participating in particular matters involving
conflicting financial, employment, and representational interests (18 U.S.C. 203, 205, and
208). Furthermore, without prior approval or a waiver from the DARPA Director, in accordance
with FAR 9.503, a contractor cannot simultaneously provide scientific, engineering, technical
assistance (SETA) or similar support and also be a technical performer. Therefore, all proposers
are responsible for disclosing all facts relevant to the existence or potential existence of
organizational conflicts of interest (FAR 9.5).
Prior to the start of proposal evaluations, the Government will assess potential conflicts of
interest and will promptly notify the proposer if any appear to exist. The Government
assessment does not affect, offset, or mitigate the proposers responsibility to give full notice and
planned mitigation for all potential organizational conflicts (see Attachment 4 to the BAA). If in
the sole opinion of the Government after full deliberation of the circumstances, a proposal fails
to fully disclose potential conflicts of interest and/or any identified conflict situation cannot be
effectively mitigated, the proposal will be withdrawn from consideration.
3.3.
Cost Sharing/Matching
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
3.4.
Both classified and unclassified submissions are acceptable under the Improv BAA.
Proposers intending to submit classified abstracts and proposals must be capable of supporting
classified design and development work. Such proposers must have either current cleared
personnel and facilities approved for receiving, processing, and storing export-controlled and
classified information or have recently held facility clearances (i.e., facility decertification
occurred within the last 12 months).
Proposers submitting classified information must have cognizant security agency approved
facilities, information systems, and appropriately cleared/eligible personnel to perform at the
classification level proposed. This includes meeting the requirements set forth in DoD Manual
8570.01-M (Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program) for all proposer
personnel performing Information Assurance (IA)/Cybersecurity related duties on classified
Information Systems.
For questions on security or classification issues, send an UNCLASSIFIED email request
to Improv@darpa.mil. Also see Sections 4.5.2-4.5.3.
4. Application and Submission Information
DARPA policy is to treat all submissions as source selection information (see FAR 2.101 and
3.104), and to disclose their contents only for the purpose of evaluation. Restrictive notices
notwithstanding, during the evaluation process submissions may be handled by support
contractors for administrative purposes and/or to assist with technical evaluation. All DARPA
support contractors performing this role are expressly prohibited from performing DARPAsponsored technical research and are bound by appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Submissions will not be returned. The original of each submission received will be retained at
DARPA and all other non-required copies destroyed. A certification of destruction may be
requested, provided the formal request is received at this office within 5 days after
unsuccessful notification.
4.1.
This document contains all information required to submit a response to this solicitation. No
additional materials or information regarding this opportunity will be issued except as referenced
herein.
4.2.
All pages of all submissions shall be formatted for printing on 8-1/2 by 11 inch paper with 1inch margins and font size not smaller than 11 point. Font sizes of 8 or 10 point may be used
for figures, tables, and charts. Document files must be in .pdf, .ppt, .pptx, .odx, .doc, .docx,
.xls, or .xlsx formats. Submissions must be written in English.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
Proposers are solely responsible for clearly identifying proprietary information. Submissions
containing proprietary information must have the cover page and each page containing such
information clearly marked only with the label Company Proprietary. Do not use the
markings Confidential or Secret to identify company proprietary material.
4.2.1. Abstract Information
As stated above, all proposers are required to submit an abstract in advance of a full
proposal. DARPA will respond to abstracts with a statement as to whether DARPA is
interested in the idea. If submission of a full proposal is not recommended, DARPAs
response will include feedback regarding the rationale for this decision. Regardless of
DARPAs response to an abstract, proposers may submit a full proposal. DARPA will
review all conforming full proposals using the published evaluation criteria and without
regard to any comments resulting from the review of an abstract. Likewise, a favorable
response to an abstract is not a guarantee that a proposal based on the abstract will ultimately
be selected for award negotiation. Proposers may anticipate a response within approximately
two weeks from the abstract submission deadline.
4.2.1.1. Abstract Format
Abstracts shall not exceed a maximum of two pages. The cover sheet does not count against the
page limit. Abstracts must include the following components:
I. Cover Sheet: Provide the following information:
(1) Label: Abstract
(2) BAA number (DARPA-BAA-16-22)
(3) Abstract title
(4) Lead organization name
(5) Technical point of contact (POC) including name, mailing address, telephone
number, and email address
(6) Administrative POC including name, mailing address, telephone number, and email
address
(7) Security POC including name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address
(8) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code
(9) Primary subcontractors (if known/applicable)
(10) Identify any other solicitation(s) to which this concept has been proposed
II. Goals and Impact: Describe the purpose of the prototype system or product. Identify
the military capability that would be threatened if the new system or product were to be
fully realized.
III. Technical Plan: Provide a detailed list of the major components to be acquired
(including source, model #, etc.) and a discussion of the major integration tasks and
processes.
IV. Capabilities/Management Plan: Provide a brief summary of expertise of the team,
including subcontractors and key personnel. Identify a principal investigator for the project
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
10
and include a description of the teams organization including roles and responsibilities.
4.2.2. Full Proposal Information
All proposals must include the following seven parts. Templates containing content
descriptions and instructions for parts 1 through 6 have been provided as attachments to the
BAA posted at http://www.fbo.gov/. Use of these templates is mandatory for all proposal
submissions to this BAA. Part 7 must comply with the abstract content and format
requirements outlined herein.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
4.3.
All times listed herein are in Eastern Time. Proposers are warned that submission deadlines as
outlined herein are strictly enforced. When planning their response to this solicitation, proposers
should take into account that some parts of the submission process may take from one business
day to one month to complete (e.g., registering for a DUNS number or TIN).
DARPA will acknowledge receipt of complete submissions via UNCLASSIFIED email and
assign identifying numbers that should be used in all further correspondence regarding those
submissions. If no confirmation is received within two business days, please contact the BAA
Administrator at Improv@darpa.mil to verify receipt.
Failure to comply with the submission procedures outlined herein may result in the submission
not being evaluated.
4.3.1. Abstract Submission Deadline
Abstracts must be submitted per the instructions outlined herein and received by DARPA no later
than 4:00 p.m. on April 13, 2016. Abstracts received after this time and date may not be
reviewed.
4.3.2. Full Proposal Submission Deadline
The full proposal package, including all applicable attachments and any proprietary
subcontractor cost proposals, must be submitted per the instructions outlined herein and received
by DARPA no later than 4:00 p.m. on May 25, 2016. Proposals received after this time and date
may not be reviewed.
4.4.
Funding Restrictions
Not Applicable
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
11
4.5.
Proposers must transmit all parts of their abstract or proposal package in accordance with the
instructions outlined herein. Duplicate submissions must not be sent via multiple methods.
Complete submission packages are defined as follows:
Abstracts: The single document file as described in Sections 4.2 and 4.2.1.1 above. This
file may be classified or unclassified.
Proposals: The seven document files (described in Section 4.2.2), and any proprietary
subcontractor cost proposals that may be submitted separately as outlined in Attachment
2 to the BAA. Proposals may be classified or unclassified. Note: if any of the proposal
files contain classified information, the overall proposal is considered classified.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
12
Mailed via U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Registered Mail or USPS Express Mail. All
classified information will be enclosed in opaque inner and outer covers and doublewrapped. The inner envelope shall be sealed and plainly marked with the assigned
classification and addresses of both sender and addressee. The inner envelope shall be
addressed to:
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
ATTN: DARPA/DSO BAA Office
Reference: DARPA-BAA-16-22
675 North Randolph Street
Arlington, VA 22203-2114
The outer envelope shall be sealed with no identification as to the classification of its
contents and addressed to:
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Security & Intelligence Directorate, Attn: CDR
675 North Randolph Street
Arlington, VA 22203-2114
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
13
Confidential, Secret or Top Secret Information: Previously issued SCGs, the DoD
Information Security Manual (DoDM 5200.01, Volumes 1 - 4), and the National
Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), including the Supplement
Revision 1, (DoD 5220.22-M and DoD 5200.22-M Sup. 1).
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
14
(2) Proposers choosing to submit SAP information from an agency other than DARPA
are required to provide the DARPA/DSO Program Security Officer written permission
from the source materials cognizant Special Access Program Control Officer
(SAPCO) or designated representative. For clarification regarding this process, send
an UNCLASSIFIED email to Improv@darpa.mil and request contact by the
DARPA/DSO Program Security Officer.
Classified submissions must indicate the classification level of not only the submitted materials,
but also the classification level of the anticipated award.
Proposers choosing to submit classified information from other classified sources (i.e., sources
other than DARPA) must ensure: (1) they have permission from an authorized individual at the
cognizant Government agency (e.g., Contracting Officer, Program Manager); (2) the proposal is
marked in accordance with the source Security Classification Guide (SCG) from which the
material is derived; and (3) the source SCG is submitted along with the proposal.
Additional information on the subjects discussed in this section may be found
at http://www.dss.mil/.
5. Application Review Information
DARPA policy is to treat all submissions as source selection information (see FAR 2.101 and
3.104), and to only disclose their contents to authorized personnel. During the evaluation
process, submissions may be handled by support contractors for administrative purposes and/or
to assist with technical evaluation. All DARPA support contractors performing this role are
expressly prohibited from performing DARPA-sponsored technical research and are bound by
appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Submissions will not be returned. The original of each submission received will be retained at
DARPA and all other non-required copies destroyed.
5.1. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated using the following criteria listed in descending order of
importance: Overall Scientific and Technical Merit; Potential Contribution and Relevance to
the DARPA Mission; and Cost Realism.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
15
Cost Realism
The proposed costs are realistic for the technical and management approach and accurately
reflect the technical goals and objectives of the solicitation. The proposed costs are
consistent with the proposer's Statement of Work and reflect a sufficient understanding of
the costs and level of effort needed to successfully accomplish the proposed technical
approach.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
16
17
Administrative and National Policy Requirements document (Attachment 4 to the BAA). This
includes both noncommercial items and commercial items. The Government may request
additional information from the proposer to evaluate the proposers assertions. Failure to
provide full information may result in a determination that the proposal is non-conforming.
6.2.2.2. Patents
All proposers using patented inventions in the proposed project which are owned by or assigned
to the proposing organization or individual must provide the information requested in Section 5
of the Administrative and National Policy Requirements document (Attachment 4 to the BAA).
6.2.3. Human Subjects Research and Animal Use
No research involving human subjects or animals may be proposed under this BAA. For
information on these topics, see http://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/for-smallbusinesses/human-animal-research.
6.2.4. Export Control
Per DFARS 225.7901-4 and as deemed appropriate, all awards resultant from this BAA will
include the DFARS Export Control clause (252.225-7048).
6.2.5. Employment Eligibility Verification
Per FAR 22.1802, all award recipients under this BAA must enroll as Federal contractors in Everify and use the system to verify employment eligibility of all employees assigned to the
award. All awards resultant from this solicitation will include FAR 52.222-54, Employment
Eligibility Verification.
6.2.6. Representations by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or
a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law
In accordance with the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114-53) and any applicable
subsequent FY 2016 appropriations act, all awards will include a representation that none of the
funds made available by this or any other Act may be used to enter into a contract with any
corporation that (1) has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all
judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being
paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting
the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless the agency
has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this
further action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or (2) was convicted of
a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the
awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless the agency has considered suspension or
debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to
protect the interests of the Government.
Proposers must provide the information requested in Section 4 of the Administrative and
National Policy Requirements document (Attachment 4 to the BAA) to comply with this
requirement.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
18
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
19
6.3. Reporting
6.3.1. Technical and Financial Reports
The number and types of technical and financial reports required under the award will be
specified in the purchase order(s).
6.3.2. Representations and Certifications
In accordance with FAR 4.1201, prospective proposers shall complete electronic annual
representations and certifications at http://www.sam.gov.
6.3.3. Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF)
Unless using another means of invoicing, performers will be required to submit invoices for
payment directly at https://wawf.eb.mil. If applicable, WAWF registration is required prior to
award under this solicitation.
6.3.4. i-Edison
Award documents will contain a requirement for patent reports and notifications to be submitted
electronically through the i-Edison Federal patent reporting system at
https://public.era.nih.gov/iedison.
7. Agency Contacts
DARPA will use email for all technical and administrative correspondence regarding this
solicitation.
8. Other Information
8.1. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Administrative, technical, and contractual questions should be sent via UNCLASSIFIED email
to Improv@darpa.mil. Proposers who have classified questions should send an
UNCLASSIFIED email to Improv@darpa.mil and request contact.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
20
All questions must be in English and must include the name, email address, and the telephone
number of a point of contact.
DARPA will attempt to answer questions in a timely manner; however, questions submitted
within 7 days of the proposal due date may not be answered. DARPA will post an FAQ list at:
http://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/opportunities. The list will be updated on an ongoing
basis until the BAA expiration date as stated in Part I.
8.2. Proposers Day
The Improv Proposers Day will be webcast on March 29 and March 30, 2016. Advance
registration is mandatory for every individual intending to view the webcast either alone or as
part of a group. Only confirmed registrants may access and view the webcast. Recording of the
webcast is not permitted. Viewing the webcast is voluntary and is not required to propose to this
solicitation. See DARPA-SN-16-26 posted at www.fbo.gov for all details.
DARPA-BAA-16-22 Improv
21