Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Application note
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 31 December 2008
Received in revised form 30 May 2009
Accepted 15 June 2009
Keywords:
Software
Irrigation
Pocket PC
LabVIEW PDA
a b s t r a c t
This communication presents the development of a freeware for mobile devices (Smartphone and pocket
PC). It was developed with a LabVIEW PDA program, and enables engineers and installers to calculate
commercial diameters to be used in laterals of drip irrigation, without the need for being at the personal
computer. Specically, this freeware allows users to immediately evaluate the sensibility to changing
demands (e.g. crop, water needs, spacing, etc.) in all the range of commercial diameters for drip lines
with on-line drippers. Input data required are: drippers ow rates, number of drippers, spacing between
the drippers, medium pressure in the lateral and pressure tolerance. As results, it shows with a gure
with light emitting diodes (LED), the commercial diameters that can be used. Other results implemented
in this tool are the maximum and minimum pressures for each diameter and a table that shows, on a
comparative basis, whether the pressure tolerance of every diameter is exceeded or not.
2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The requirements in agricultural production, the environmental protection and the water resources optimisation have made
farmers modernize irrigation systems. One aspect of these modernisations is the installation of drip irrigation systems (Valiantzas,
2003; Lpez, 1996).
Drip irrigation systems (or microirrigation systems) are characterized by high water use efciency (Rodriguez-Diaz et al., 2004).
Another advantage of this irrigation system is the precision in
water and fertilizers application under adequate design conditions
(Pedras and Pereira, 2001; Holzapfel et al., 2001).
In a recent review of hydraulic analysis and design methods of
microirrigation systems the challenges to design microirrigation
systems in the future were shown (Kang and Liu, 2004). These
challenges are: (1) to develop more perfect methods in order to minimize the total cost of a whole system (e.g. Kuo et al., 2000; Ortega et
al., 2004); (2) to improve present-day methods by applying modern
geographic information sciences such as geographic information
system (GIS), remote sensing (RS) and global position system (GPS)
for computerized input of eld topographic information; and (3) to
develop intelligent computer software with functions where this
eld topographic information can be input automatically, layout
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 966 74 96 39; fax: +34 966 74 97 18.
E-mail address: acanales@umh.es (A. Ruiz-Canales).
URL: http://www.ingtec.umh.es/home.asp?area=ing (A. Ruiz-Canales).
0168-1699/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compag.2009.06.006
113
Table 1
Equivalent length of pipe fe (m) as a function of
the inner pipe diameter Diameter (mm).
Diameter (mm)
fe (m)
10.3
13.2
16.0
18.0
20.4
28.0
0.24
0.15
0.11
0.08
0.07
0.04
where Diameter (mm) is the inner diameter of the drip line and
Qdrip line (l h1 ) is the ow in the beginning of the drip line. Qdrip
line value is obtained multiplying the number of emitters Ne in the
drip line by the nominal ow of the emitter qe (l h1 ).
Pressure distribution in a drip line is shown in Fig. 1. The maximum of pressure coincides with the pressure in the beginning of
the drip line, hmax (m), which is determined by means of Eq. (5):
hmax = ha + 0.75Dh
(5)
(6)
2. Theoretical background
3. Software
The theoretical base of used formulas in the hydraulic design of
drip irrigation considers that ow distribution in a drip line is coming close to a continue distribution. A description of the calculation
procedure is described in the next lines.
Head losses Dh (m) in a pipe of length Length (m), have been
calculated with the next equation:
Dh = F J Lenght
(1)
(m m1 )
is the
where F is the Christiansens reduction factor and J*
unit head losses coefcient that includes major and minor head
losses.
The formula used to estimate the Christiansens reduction factor
is
F=
1
1
+
+
2n
1+
6n2
(2)
Ee + fe
Ee
(3)
(Qdrip line)
(Diameter)
1.75
4.75
(4)
Fig. 1. Pressure distribution in a drip line fed by the extreme in a plane zone.
114
the ratio ((Ee + fe)/Ee) in Eq. (3). The result Dh of Eq. (1) is obtained
and used in the next operations (see at the centre of Fig. 4). The
value of the result Dh is different for every diameter. For this reason, the obtained value for the diameter 13.2, is named Dh 13.2
(Fig. 4, on the right in the middle). This value is calculated with a
double precision oating point (DBL). The values of hmax and hmin
are obtained by Eqs. (5) and (6) using the entry value ha and the
calculated value Dh. These results are calculated with a double precision oating point (DBL) and showed in the screen (Fig. 3). The
entry value hp is compared at the top with the difference between
hmax and hmin. Below, in Fig. 4, the subtraction value is shown
in the screen, in a vertical bar diagram (Fig. 3). For this case, is
assigned the name 13.2 to express this subtraction. In order to show
the results as a LED in two screens (Home and Results) is necessary to assign two different names of the same result (see 13.2 (2)
and 13.2 (3), respectively in Fig. 4, on the right). The corresponding LED is green in colour if this subtraction is less than hp. In
the opposite case, LED is not coloured (true and false values, TF).
The software ow chart is developed under a while loop structure that allows ending the software execution by means of the
button Exit (Fig. 2). The button Calculation determines the true
and false values (TF) of a case structure included in the while loop.
Pushing this button, the case structure takes the true value and
the internal programming is carried out. Fig. 4 shows the software
ow chart used to determine whether or not could be used the
pipe with a diameter of 13.2 mm in the drip line considering general data entry. In Fig. 4, on the left, entry values of qe and Ne are
introduced and multiplied to obtain the ow at the beginning of
the drip line (Qdrip line). Below, entry value Ee is operated with the
corresponding fe value (Table 1) to obtain the value (Jem), that is
Fig. 4. Software ow chart. The example is related to a pipe diameter of 13.2 mm, emitter spacing of 2 m.
These graph values are showed in Figs. 2 and 3 for the diameter
10.3. A similar ow chart has been developed for the rest of every
commercial diameter (10.3, 13.2, 16.0, 18.0, 20.4 and 28.0). These
diagrams establish the algorithms to evaluate if the diameters of
commercial pipes are adequate for the drip line, and the results are
compared. All the results for every diameter could be shown in the
console.
4. Conclusions
This software allows users of drip irrigation systems to evaluate the sensibility to changing demands (water needs, emitters,
spacing, etc.) in all commercial diameters of drip lines. These calculations are executed at once for every commercial diameter in a
pocket PC. This allows to users makes these calculations immediately in the eld without the need of moving to the ofce and using
a PC.
Software has been developed with LabVIEW PDA . This is an
intuitive programming language and allows conguring several
algorithms that compute in parallel at once.
This software version is limited to drip lines, with on-line drippers, fed by the extreme in a horizontal land. It is an accessible freeware, contacting with authors or from the link (http://decibel.ni.
com/content/docs/DOC-3851).
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their gratitude to National
Instruments Spain, S.L. for its help spreading the developed software in its website: (http://sine.ni.com/cs/app/doc/p/id/cs-11093).
115
References
Anyoji, H., Wu, I.P., 1994. Normal-distribution water application for drip irrigation
schedules. Trans. ASAE 37 (1), 159164.
Cetin, O., Uygan, D., 2008. The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and
planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efciency and net
return. Agric. Water Manage. 95 (8), 949958.
Holzapfel, E.A., Jara, J., Matta, R., 2001. Nivel de agua aplicado y fertirrigacin bajo
riego por goteo en ctricos. Agro-Cienc. 17, 2031.
Kang, Y.H., Liu, W., 2004. Review of hydraulic analysis and design methods of microirrigation systems, in: Land and Water Management: Decision Tools and Practices,
vols. 1 and 2. pp. 914924. 7th International Conference on Environment and
Water, Beijing.
Kuo, S.F., Merkley, G.P., Liu, C.W., 2000. Decision support for irrigation project planning using a genetic algorithm. Agric. Water Manage. 45 (3), 243266.
Lajara, J.R., Pelegri, J., 2007. LabVIEW 8.20 Entorno Grco de Programacin. Marcombo, Barcelona.
Lpez, J.R., 1996. Riego Localizado. II. Programas Informticos. Mundiprensa, Madrid.
Medina, 1997. Riego por Goteo. Mundiprensa, Madrid.
Ortega, J.F., de Juan, J.A., Tarjuelo, J.M., 2004. Evaluation of the water cost effect on
water resource management: application to typical crops in a semiarid region.
Agric. Water Manage. 66 (2), 125144.
Pedras, C.M.G., Pereira, L.S., 2001. A simulation model for design and evaluation of
micro-irrigation systems. J. Irrig. Drain. ASCE 50 (4), 323334.
Provenzano, G., Pumo, D., 2004. Experimental analysis of local pressure losses for
microirrigation laterals. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.-ASCE 130 (4), 318324.
Ravikumar, V., Ranganathan, C.R., Bosu, S.S., 2003. Analytical equation for variation
of discharge in drip irrigation laterals. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.-ASCE 129 (4), 295298.
Rodrigo, J., Cordero, L., 2003. Riego Localizado. Programas Informticos para Windows. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid.
Rodriguez-Diaz, J.A., Camacho-Poyato, E., Lopez-Luque, R., 2004. Application of data
envelopment analysis to studies of irrigation efciency in Andalusia. J. Irrig.
Drain. Eng.-ASCE 130 (3), 175183.
Valiantzas, J.D., 2003. Explicit hydraulic design of microirrigation submain units with
tapered tanifold manifold and laterals. J. Irrig. Drain. ASCE 129 (4), 227236.
Wu, I.P., Gitlin, H.M., 1982. Drip irrigation lateral line network design. Trans. ASAE
25 (3), 675685.
Yildirim, G., 2007. An assessment of hydraulic design of trickle laterals considering
effect of minor losses. Irrig. Drain. 56 (4), 399421.