Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Desalination
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d e s a l
Laboratoire Sciences de Matriaux et Environnement, Facult des sciences de Sfax, Route de Soukra Km4, 3038 Sfax, Tunisie
Universit Paul Czanne, UMR 6181, M2P2, Laboratoire de Mcanique, Modlisation et Procds Propres, Europole de l'Arbois, Bat. Laennec, Hall C, BP 80, 13545 Aix en Provence Cedex 4,
France
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 June 2010
Received in revised form 22 September 2010
Accepted 23 September 2010
Available online 25 October 2010
Keywords:
Coagulation/occulation
Laccase catalysis
Nanoltration
Textile efuent
Reactive dye
Decolourization
a b s t r a c t
The objective of the present paper is to examine the decolourization efciency of textile efuent using
different processes: coagulation/occulation, enzymatic catalysis by commercial laccase and nanoltration. A
series of experiments are conducted on laboratory-prepared wastewaters combining chemically two reactive
dyes (Blue Bezaktiv S-GLD 150 and Black Novacron R), auxiliaries and chemicals. To optimise coagulation/
occulation and enzymatic treatment, response surface methodology is applied. Coagulation/occulation
leads to a maximum percent of colour removal of about 93% at 593 nm and 94% at 620 nm. Whereas, applied
commercial laccase catalysis reduces colour by up to 99%. Nevertheless, these two processes have not the
same behaviour on chemical oxygen demand (COD) and salinity removal since the obtained results show that
applied coagulation/occulation permits a partial removal of COD without effect on salinity. However, laccase
treatment has no effect on COD and on salinity retention. The application of the nanoltration shows excellent
performances in term of decolourization (superior to 99%). In the same time, a partial retention of COD and
salinity respectively of about 56% and 35% is obtained. Thus, nanoltration seems to be an efcient process in
colour removal of textile wastewater. The obtained permeate can be reused in the dyeing process in the textile
industry.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
With the increased demand for textile products, the textile
industry and its wastewaters have been increasing proportionally,
making it one of the main sources of severe pollution problems
worldwide [1]. Efuent treatment from dyeing and nishing
processes in the textile industry is one of the most signicant
environmental problems [2,3]. Since most synthetic dyes have
complex aromatic molecular structures which make them inert and
biodegradable difcult when discharged into the environment [4,5].
Through, textile processing employs a variety of chemicals
depending on the nature of the raw material and product. Some of
these chemicals are enzymes, detergents, dyes, acids, sodas and salts
[6,7]. The high consumption of reactive dyes, mainly in the cotton
industry, increases the environmental problems, due to their low
degree of exhaustion (60 - 90%) [8,9].
Dyes removal techniques such as adsorption, electrochemical
oxidation, photocatalytic oxidation, electro-Fenton oxidation appear
to face several technical and economic limitations [1012] and were
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: benoit.marrot@univ-cezanne.fr (B. Marrot).
0011-9164/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.046
28
Nomenclature
ODU
Optical Density Unit
NTU
Nephelometric Turbidity Unit
Da
Dalton
T
Temperature (C)
U.g-1
Unity per gram
U.L-1
Unity per liter
TMP
Transmembrane Pressure
i
Regression coefcient
Xi
Coded factor
RDE
Reconstituted Dyeing Efuents
ADS
Aqueous Dye Solution
CL
Commercial Laccase
CF
Coagulation/Flocculation
EC
Enzymatic Catalysis
NF
Nanoltration
CCD
Central Composite Design
RSM
Response Surface Methodology
MWCO Molecular Weight Cut Off
COD
Chemical Oxygen Demand
PAS
Polymeric Aluminium Sulphate
CC
Calcium Chloride
Al2(SO4)3 Polymeric Aluminium Sulphate
CaCl2
Calcium Chloride
NaOH
Sodium hydroxide
HCl
Hydrochloric acid
BB150
Blue Bezaktiv S-GLD 150
BNR
Black Novacron R
Unit
BB 150
BN R
max
Absorbance at max
Dry matter (DM)
Mineral matter (MM)
Volatile matter (VM)
BOD5
COD
Turbidity
Chemical group
Chromophore
nm
ODU
%
%
%
mg O2/ g
mg O2/ g
NTU
-
620
15.94
91.93
70
30
300
840
b1
Reactive
Not available
593 - 400
26.30 15.37
96.57
68.66
31.34
272
850
b1
Reactive
Azoic
Unit
Concentration
-1
mg.L
mg.L-1
mg.L-1
mg.L-1
mg.L-1
g.L-1
RDE
ADS
40
80
200
40
40
4
40
0
0
0
0
0
29
k1
Y = 0 + i xi + ij xi xj + ij xi +
i=1
i=1 j=2
i=1
30
Factors
Coded level
-1
+1
25
3
80
35
5
160
45
7
240
1.0
5
2
1.5
7
3
2.0
9
4
Table 5
Maximum percentages of colour removal obtained experimentally under CF treatment.
Dye
BB 150
Wavelength
Initial colourization
Final colourization
Colour removal
Run N
31
BNR
Unit
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
nm
ODU
ODU
%
620
0.559
0.033
94
7, 8, 23, 24
620
0.557
0.033
94
7, 8, 11,
12, 15,
16, 19,
20, 23,
24, 25,
26, 27,
28, 29
593 - 400
0.542 - 0.309
0.043 0.046
93-85
23
593 - 400
0.541 - 0.3
0.037- 0.036
93-88
5, 6, 7, 8, 19,
20, 23, 24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29
3
2
5
2
whereY(620) and Y(620) are colour removal of RDE and ADS of reactive
BB150 dye at 620 nm. Y(593), Y(593),Y(400) and Y(400) are colour
removal of RDE and ADS of reactive BNR dye at 593 nm and at 400 nm
respectively. X1, X2 and X3 are independent variables of coagulant
concentration, pH and occulant concentration respectively.
Positive sign indicates synergistic effect, whereas negative sign
indicates antagonistic effect. The model quality developed was
evaluated on the correlation coefcient value. Coefcients with one
factor represent the particular factor effect, while coefcients with
two factors and those with second-order terms represent the
Table 4
Experimental results of CCD designed experiments for CF treatment and for CL catalysis of RDE and ADS at 40 mg.L-1 dyes concentration.
Run
no.
Factors
X1
X2
g.L-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
10
10
20
20
10
10
20
20
10
10
20
20
10
10
20
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
5
5
5
5
9
9
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
9
9
5
5
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
BB150 dye
Run
no.
Factors
BNR dye
X3
= 593 nm
= 400 nm
= 620 nm
X1
g.L-1
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
70
70
70
70
93
93
93
93
90
90
90
90
91.57
91.57
91.57
91.57
70
70
93
93
70
70
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
92
92
60
60
90
90
92
92
70
70
75
75
80
80
90
90
60
60
85
85
70
70
93
92
92
92
92
92
92
60
60
60
60
88
88
88
88
83
83
83
83
86
86
86
86
60
60
88
88
60
60
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
85
85
40
40
70
70
80
80
65
65
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
70
70
60
60
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
75
75
80
80
93
93
94
94
92
92
94
94
93
93
94
94
76
76
94
94
80
80
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
77
77
80
80
92
92
94
94
90
90
92
92
92
92
93
93
78
78
93
93
75
75
94
94
93
93
93
93
93
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
25
25
45
45
25
25
45
45
25
25
45
45
25
25
45
45
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
X2
3
3
3
3
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
7
7
3
3
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
BB150 dye
X3
= 593 nm
= 400 nm
U/L
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
= 620 nm
RDE
ADS
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
80
80
80
80
240
240
240
240
80
80
80
80
240
240
240
240
160
160
160
160
160
81.61
81.61
84.73
84.73
94.60
94.60
98.93
98.93
89
89
95
95
93
93
97
97
88
88
98.70
98.70
89
88
98.90
98.90
98.40
98.40
98.40
98.40
98.40
93.80
93.80
94
94
97
97
97.50
97.50
94.20
94.10
94.40
94.30
94.30
94.20
95
95
94.20
94.20
98.50
98.50
95.20
95.20
98.40
98.40
97.50
97.50
97.50
97.50
97.50
32.05
32.05
72.90
72.90
74.74
74.60
79.90
79.90
0
0
61.40
61.50
0
0
59.20
59.20
0
0
79.90
79.85
6
5.97
59.30
59.35
59.35
59.30
59.35
59.34
59.33
0
0
73.90
73.90
79
79
80.10
80.10
20
20
65
65
30
30
62
62
0
0
81.20
81.20
0
0
73.10
73
73
73
73
73
73
95.68
95.71
96
96.07
96.51
96.55
98.90
98.90
95.70
95.70
97.80
97.80
97.81
97.81
98.20
98.20
95.80
95.80
98.04
98.04
94.70
94.70
98.20
98.20
98.12
98.12
98.12
98.12
98.12
95.89
95.99
96.21
96.20
98
98
98.80
98.80
97.80
97.80
98.70
98.70
96.65
96.65
97.80
97.80
96.50
96.50
99
99
96.50
96.50
99
99
98.10
98.10
98.10
98.10
98.10
32
Table 6
Estimated regression coefcient for CF treatment of RDE (BB150 and BNR).
R.C.
Coefcient value
BNR
F. Ination
BB150
BNR
593
(nm)
593
400
620
0
1
2
3
11
22
33
12
13
23
93
0
11.5
0.392
-1.107
-10.39
-1.107
0
0
0
88
0
14
0.75
-1.75
-12.25
-1.75
0
0
0
94
1.125
8
0.625
-0.625
-7.875
-0.125
-1
-0.25
-1
1
1
1
1.03
1.03
1.03
1
1
1
BB150
400
1
1
1
1.03
1.03
1.03
1
1
1
Standard deviation
t exp.
BNR
BNR
BB150
p value
BB150
BNR
BB150
620
593
400
620
593
400
620
593
400
620
1
1
1
1.03
1.03
1.03
1
1
1
0.161
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.137
0.137
0.137
0.127
0.127
0.127
0.308
0.172
0.172
0.172
0.261
0.261
0.261
0.243
0.243
0.243
0.218
0.122
0.122
0.122
0.185
0.185
0.185
0.172
0.172
0.172
577.36
0
127.71
4.36
-8.11
-76.10
-8.11
0
0
0
285.91
0
81.37
4.36
-6.71
-46.94
-6.71
0
0
0
431.90
9.25
65.75
5.14
-3.39
-42.68
-0.68
-5.81
-1.45
-5.81
b 0.01 ***
100
b 0.01 ***
0.0338 ***
b 0.01 ***
b 0.01 ***
b 0.01 ***
100
100
100
b0.01 ***
100
b0.01 ***
0.0338 ***
b0.01 ***
b0.01 ***
b0.01 ***
100
100
100
b 0.01 ***
b 0.01 ***
b 0.01 ***
b 0.01 ***
0.309 **
b 0.01 ***
50.6
b 0.01 ***
16.3
b 0.01 ***
R.C.: Regression Coefcient; p value: the signicance of the test; ***: extremely signicant.
efuent were obtained and same interpretations were drawn (Fig. 4).
Indeed, from the 3D surface plots 4A and 4 C, the best colour removal
was obtained at basic pH below value of 9. From 4B surface plot we
observed that, at xed pH, coagulant and occulant concentrations
have no effect on colour removal.
Optimum colour removal of the reconstituted BB150 efuent
predicted from the models (95.75 %) occurs when the coagulant and
occulant concentrations were about 1.842 g.L-1 and 3.82 g.L-1
respectively at pH 8.2 (Table 8). For BNR (RDE and ADS) maximum
yields decolourization obtained at the optimum conditions described
in Table 8 were 94.21% at 593 nm and 89.57 % at 400 nm and they
were calculated from the regression equation.
Graphical response surfaces were used to identify the optimum
point. Satisfactory prediction equations were derived for colour
removal using RSM to optimize the parameters.
Obtained results demonstrated the applicability of CF method for
dye removal. In fact, under optimal values of process parameters, high
colour removal (N94%) was obtained for all dye solutions treated
containing BB150 or BNR reactive dyes.
Nevertheless, after CF treatment, the pH was decreased to a value
between 5 and 6 resulting in pH regulation to the discharge standards
(pH = 7) by adding NaOH solution. So, the major disadvantage of this
type of treatment is due to the addition of chemicals which increase
the cost of the CF process.
3.2. Laccase decolourization
The aim of this part is rstly to test the ability of a commercial
laccase (CL) formulation containing a specic mediator (DeniLite IIS)
and a pure laccase (DeniLite Base) for catalysis of reactive BB150 and
BNR dyes and, secondly, to determine the operative and the optimum
Table 7
Analysis of variance (NemrodW) for the tted quadratic polynomial models of CF treatment of RDE (effect of coagulant concentration, pH and occulant concentration).
Sources of Degree
variation
of
freedom
(DF)
(nm)
Regression 9
Residual
Total
19
28
Novacron R
593
400
Ratio / F
statistics
S-GLD 150
Novacron R
620
593
S-GLD 150
620
620
593
400
620
2.87058E+
03
2.46490
2.87304E +
03
4.18921E +
03
9
4.19821E +
03
400
400
decolourization conditions of these dyes. Laccase based decolourization treatments are potentially advantageous to bioremediation
technologies since the enzyme is produced in larger amounts [53].
RSM and the CCD model were used to establish the best conditions for
the CL treatment. The optimization study of colour removal of RDE
and of ADS based on BB150 and on BNR using CL was produced similar
to the optimization study using CF treatment. Table 4 shows the coded
experiments conducted as per experimental design along with the
33
response values. The optimum colour removals obtained are presented in Table 9.
The optimum values predicted from the experimental models at
maximal percent colour removal (above 99%) are registered at the
Table 8. The results demonstrate that the enzyme concentration used
depends on the type of dye treated and of components added to
synthetic efuents. The results obtained are very promising and reveal
the high potential of CL to reactive dyes decolourization.
34
BB150
Samples
ADS
BNR
RDE
ADS
RDE
41.9
5.91
220.65
40.82
6.7
183.89
43
6
222
1.842
8.2
3.82
1.804
8.31
3.85
1.925
8.55
3.69
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional response surface plot for percent colour removal of reconstituted
BB150 efuent at 620 nm using CF treatment as a function of: (A) occulant concentration
and pH, (B) occulant and coagulant concentrations, (C) coagulant concentration and pH.
Table 9
Maximum percentages of colour removal obtained experimentally under CL treatment.
Dyes
Wavelength
Initial colourization
Final colourization
Colour removal
Run N
BB150
BNR
Unit
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
nm
ODU
ODU
%
620
0.559
0.006
99
19, 20,
23, 24
0.557
0.0061
98.9
7, 8
593 - 400
0.542 - 0.309
0.005 0.061
98.5 - 81.2
19, 20
593 - 400
0.540 - 0.3
0.0058 0.0603
98.93 - 79.9
7, 8
45
100
40
90
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
35
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
20
25
30
35
40
45
55
50
0
0
Temperature (C)
Blue S-GLD 150
dye solution
Black Novacron R
dye solution
Reconstituted Black
Novacron R effluent
10
12
14
18
16
TMP (bar)
Reconstituted Blue
Bezaktiv S-GLD 150 dye
effluent
Reconstituted Black
Novacron R dye effluent
Distilled water
Fig. 7. Variation of the permeate ux with TMP for different synthetic efuents [T= 25C].
Table 10
Decolourization rates of RDE and ADS using tangential nanoltration.
Dyes
BB150
BNR
Samples
Unity
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
Wavelength
Absorbance
Coloration after NF
Colour removal
Inuent Conductivity
Conductivity after NF
Conductivity removal
(nm)
(ODU)
(ODU)
(%)
(S/cm)
(S/cm)
(%)
620
0.604
0.001
99.8
22
12
45.45
620
0.596
0.002
99.6
5450
3542
35
593 - 400
1.06 - 0.6
0.008 - 0.006
99.2 - 99
21
12
42.8
593 - 400
0.999 - 0.595
0.005 - 0.004
99.4 - 99.3
5370
3425
36.2
80
-1
-2
100
Table 11
Characterization of RDE and ADS under NF process and after CF and CL treatment when
maximum colour removals were achieved.
60
Colour removal
%
40
COD
retention
%
Conductivity
removal
%
Turbidity
NTU
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
Reconstituted Blue
S-GLD 150 effluent
Reconstituted Black
Novacron R effluent
Treatment
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
RDE
ADS
BB150
NF
CF
CL
NF
99.6
94
98.9
99.4 (a)
99.3 b)
93 (a)
88 (b)
98.93 (a)
79.9 (b)
99.8
94
99
99.2 (a)
99 (b)
93 (a)
85 (b)
98.5 (a)
81.2 (b)
56
42
0
52
75
60
0
73
35
0
0
36.2
45.45
0
0
42.8
b1
4.5
1
b1
b1
1.2
1
b1
40
60
4.8
1.6
100
Time (min)
Blue S-GLD 150
dye solution
Dye
BNR
Black Novacron R
dye solution
Fig. 6. Variation of the permeate ow as a function of the time for different efuents
[TMP = 10 bar; T = 25C].
CF
CL
36
Fig. 8. Treatment of reconstituted dye efuents (A): Reconstituted BB150 efuent, (B): Reconstituted BNR efuent, (a): after CF treatment at the optimum conditions, (b): after CL
treatment at the optimum conditions (C): after NF process treatment.
Tavares et al. [55] showed also the generation of a light orange colour
formed during the degradation of reactive blue 114 (Levax Brilliant
Blue E-BRA) by a CL. Likewise, Sugano et al. [56] showed the
generation of light red-brown reaction products during the decolourization of reactive black 5 by versatile peroxidase.
Moreover, laccase has a negative effect on the characteristics of the
solutions treated; indeed, addition of CL has increased the COD and
the conductivity whether for RDE or for ADS.
In fact, the highest COD retention is obtained by applying the NF
process, whereas CL is not able to remove the COD of samples treated.
On the other hand, synthetic efuents treated by NF were more stable
to light than those treated by CL; laccase efuent catalysis was
oxidized as a function of time. On the other hand, CF treatment
removes also the COD with moderate rates but has no effect on the
conductivity and increase the efuent turbidity. Although, CF
treatment is economically feasible (but sometimes becomes expensive due to the cost of chemicals) with satisfactory dyes removal, its
main drawback is that the nal product is a concentrated sludge
produced in large quantities and removal is pH dependent [57]. This
process is not good for highly soluble dyes and the result with azo,
reactive, acid and especially the basic dyes [58,59] are generally low.
Thus, CF process was widely employed as pre-treatment for the
decolourization of dye wastewater [60]. Finally, obtained results
showed that NF may be the appropriate choice to treat textile dyeing
efuents. Indeed, NF has been proved an efcient process to remove
dyes from both RDE and ADS with moderate COD removal at about
50% with RDE (about 70% with ADS) and with turbidity always b 1
NTU.
4. Conclusion
The present study deals with the decolourization of two types of
synthetic textile dye efuents (RDE and ADS) using coagulation/
occulation, commercial laccase and NF processes.
During coagulation/occulation PAS and CHT-Flocculant CV are
found to be the best among other coagulants and occulants used
resulting in 94% colour removal (for both ADS and RDE) and 42% COD
reduction for reconstituted BB150 efuent (60% for ADS) and in 93% at
593 nm (88% at 400 nm) colour removal and 40% COD reduction for
reconstituted BNR efuent (60% for ADS). However, CF treatment has
increased the turbidity of solutions treated and has no effect on
salinity removal.
In the other hand, the decolourization of reconstituted BB150 and
BNR dye efuents by enzymatic catalysis using commercial laccase
was optimized leading to dye catalysis above 98%. Highest colour
removal was achieved at 98.93%, 79.9%, and 98.9% respectively for the
reconstituted BNR dye efuent at 593 nm and at 400 nm and for the
reconstituted BB150 dye efuent at 620 nm. These results show that
laccase has a strong potential to degrade the textile dyes and resolve
the problem of unnecessary dyes present in the textile industries
37
[37] S. Chakraborty, M.K. Purkait, S. Dasgpta, S. De, J.K. Basu, Nanoltration of textile
plant efuent for color removal and reduction in COD, Sep. Purif. Technol. 31
(2003) 141151.
[38] O. Marmagne, C. Coste, Color removal from textile plant efuents, Am. Dyestuff.
Rep. 85 (1996) 1521.
[39] M. Marcucci, G. Nosenzo, L. Ciabatti, D. Corrieri, G. Ciardelli, Treatment and reuse
of textile efuents based on new ultraltration and other membrane technologies,
Desalination 138 (2001) 7582.
[40] C. Fersi, L. Gzara, M. Dhahbi, Treatment of textile efuents by membrane
technologies, Desalination 185 (2005) 18251835.
[41] C. Jarusutthirak, S. Mattaraj, R. Jiraratananon, Inuence of inorganic scalants and
natural organic matter on nanoltration membrane fouling, J. Membr. Sci. 287
(2007) 138145.
[42] A.I. Schfer, A.G. Fane, T.D. Waite, Nanoltration, nanoltration- Principles and
Applications, Elsevier Ltd, UK, 2005 1-85617-405-0.
[43] F. Harrelkas, A. Azizi, A. Yaacoubi, A. Benhammou, M.N. Pons, Treatment of textile
dye efuents using coagulationocculation coupled with membrane processes
or adsorption on powdered activated carbon, Desalination 235 (2009) 330339.
[44] I. Khouni, B. Marrot, R. Ben Amar, Decolourization of the reconstituted dye bath
efuent by commercial laccase treatment: Optimization through response surface
methodology, Chem. Eng. J. 156 (2010) 121133.
[45] G.E.P. Box, K.B. Wilson, On the experimental attainment of optimum condition,
J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 13 (1951) 138.
[46] M. Evans, Optimization of Manufacturing Processes: A Response Surface
Approach, Carlton House Terrace, London, 2003.
[47] D. Mathieu, J. Mony, R. Pan-Tan-Luu, Laboratoire ractionnelle et d'analyse de
l'information, NemrodW Version 2000, Aix en Provence, France, 2000.
[48] M. Muthukumar, D. Mohan, M. Rajendran, Optimization of mix proportions of
mineral aggregates using BoxBehnken design of experiments, Cem. Concr.
Compos. 25 (2003) 751758.
[49] K.Y. Benyounis, A.G. Olabi, M.S.J. Hashmi, Effect of laser welding parameters on the
heat input and weld-bead prole, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 164/165 (2005) 978985.
[50] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th
edAmerican Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/
Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1998.
[51] F. Wei, Analysis of Water and Wastewater, Chinese Environmental Science Press,
Beijing, 2002.
[52] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Third ed.Wiley, New York,
1991.
[53] E. Rodriguez, M.A. Pickard, R. Vazquez Duhalt, Industrial dye decolorization by
laccases from ligniolytic fungi, Curr. Microbiol. 38 (1999) 2732.
[54] M. Chivukula, V. Renganathan, Phenolic azo-dye oxidation by laccase from
Pyricularia oryzae, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 (1995) 43744377.
[55] A.P.M. Tavares, R.O. Cristvo, J.M. Loureiro, R.A.R. Boaventura, E.A. Macedo,
Application of statistical experimental methodology to optimize reactive dye
decolourization by commercial laccase, J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2-3) (2009) 12551260.
[56] Y. Sugano, Y. Matsushima, M. Shoda, Complete decolorization of the anthraquinone dye Reactive blue 5 by the concerted action of two peroxidises from
Thanatephorus cucumeris Dec1, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73 (2006) 862871.
[57] J.W. Lee, S.P. Choi, R. Thiruvenkatachari, W.G. Shim, H. Moon, Evaluation of the
performance of adsorption and coagulation processes for the maximum removal
of reactive dyes, Dyes Pigm. 69 (2006) 196203.
[58] F.I. Hai, K. Yamamoto, K. Fukushi, Hybrid treatment systems for dye wastewater,
Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 37 (2007) 315377.
[59] C. Raghavacharya, Colour removal from industrial efuents a comparative review
of available technologies, Chem. Eng. World. 32 (1997) 5354.
[60] B. Shi, G. Li, D. Wang, C. Feng, H. Tang, Removal of direct dyes by coagulation: the
performance of preformed polymeric aluminium species, J. Hazard. Mater. 143
(2007) 567574.