A framework is necesary to situate observation and the research process and it
procedures. If the framework change dependig on the scientific progress and the innovations (fortuitous in some cases) to influence the frameworks then the typology of this methodological resource will change in almost the same way to this progressions, when not, is just literature or history of science: data, evidence, and rational considerations shape knowledge but history shape a research. The time we decide to design a research proposal, the time we invest reading the state of the art: proceeding in the opposite way is just socialize a sepia delined sketch of what we are about to do. Whatever the theoretical perspective should be, it would be useful to follow the outcomes tracing them in a period of time (according to the authors perspective on this text: long, medium or short). It is know that when a researcher dot not reach the outcomes expected, he can go back and reanalyze the things done and reconstruct the frame. The procedures a man uses in a research seems to me like writing poetry: strategies are a formalism that might scientifisize the languaje, but are not the metric and the prosody for itself; in a research process I guess to choose and using a strategie (focusing it space of influence) are not doing an inquiry. I assume that our bakground shapes the way we doing research but if human beings construct theories, methodology, problems, a technical lenguaje for giving answers to a certain questions, I dont understand the way some people use the notion of human nature, only to opposite one theory or an epistemological perspective. When a researcher uses a mixed methods there would be a lack of profundity on the mode he does research. I believe that is consecuence of a desire to prove satisfactory a hypothesis or is a fiability trouble. Stratospherical perspective of social theory isnt flowig in the same way all the time. The categories constructed should be modified by this interrelationship. Sometimes it is necesary to make it clear the time we are writing sciense or literature. In the case that both are mixed by (...) the autor and found it so througout the text, I dont really know what to say. I believe that the amount of money of the Nobel is the same for both cathegories and I rather writing in a style that allow me to see what Iam writing after processing information so then, I can be taken as a literacy object and see what is within me as a mirror effect. I think that in grounded theory an approach to a certain problema must consider the personal interest as the money you will get for every paper you write or political policy you design, in a Word, public o private investment.