DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET A
Government Speaker 1: _________________________________________
Matter (40)
Definition
(20)

0-5
No definition
Wrong
definition

Stand (20)

No stand
Wrong scope

Manner (40)

6-10
Vague
definition
Keywords- not
defined
No
justification/
wrong
justification of
stand

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

11-15
Well defined
No supporting
evidence
Attempt to
justify stand

6-8
Good
(Always)

16-20
Well defined
Supported with
evidence
(quote/dictionary)
Solid stand
Supported with
evidence

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and
loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)

0-2
None taken
Taken but not
answer

3-5
Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

6-8
Accurate
Answer
without solid
explanation

9-10
Answer accurately
with solid support
and explanation

Score

POI One (10)

POI Two (10)
Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET A
Opposition Speaker 1: ____________________________________________
Matter (40)
Definition
(20)

Stand (20)

0-5
No
definition
Wrong
definition
No stand
Wrong
scope

Manner (40)

6-10
Vague definition
Keywords- not
defined
No justification/
wrong justification
of stand
0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

11-15
Well defined
No
supporting
evidence
Attempt to
justify stand

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

16-20
Well defined
Supported with
evidence
(quote/dictionary)
Solid stand
Supported with
evidence

6-8
Good
(Always)

Score

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)
POI One (10)

0-2
None taken
Taken but not
answer

3-5
Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

6-8
Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation

9-10
Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation

Score

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with
good reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Government Speaker 2: ___________________________________________
Matter
(40)
Presentatio
n/
Elaboration
Reason
(25)
Example
(15)

0-6
Weak
No point
/No reasoning
Wrong point/
Wrong reasoning

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant

0-4
5-8
No example given Irrelevant
Wrong example
example

Manner (40)

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence

9-12
Vague or
unclear example

13-15
Good and
relevant example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

9-10

Score

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Opposition Speaker 2: ____________________________________________
Matter (40)
Presentation/
Elaboration
Reason (25)

Example
(15)

0-6
Weak
No point
/No reasoning
Wrong point/
Wrong reasoning
0-4
No example given
Wrong example

Manner (40)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant
5-8
Irrelevant
example

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration
9-12
Vague or
unclear example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence
13-15
Good and
relevant example
9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

9-10

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Score

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Government Speaker 3: _________________________________________
Matter (40)
Presentation/
Elaboration
Reason (25)

Example
(15)

0-6
weak
No point
/No reasoning
Wrong point/
Wrong reasoning
0-4
No example given
Wrong example

Manner (40)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant
5-8
Irrelevant
example

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration
9-12
Vague or
unclear example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence
13-15
Good and
relevant example
9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

Pauses
Hesitant
Speed

Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

9-10

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Score

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Opposition Speaker 3: ___________________________________________
Matter (40)
Presentation/
Elaboration
Reason (25)

Example
(15)

0-6
Weak
No point
/No reasoning
Wrong point/
Wrong reasoning
0-4
No example given
Wrong example

Manner (40)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant
5-8
Irrelevant
example

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration
9-12
Vague or
unclear example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence
13-15
Good and
relevant example
9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

 Clear and loud

Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

9-10

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Score

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Government Speaker 4: _________________________________________
Matter (40)

0-6
Weak
Presentation No point
/
/No reasoning
Elaboration Wrong point/
Reason (25) Wrong reasoning
0-4
Example
No example given
(15)
Wrong example
Manner (40)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing
text
Use of space
Audience

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant
5-8
Irrelevant
example

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration
9-12
Vague or
unclear example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence
13-15
Good and
relevant example
9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

9-10

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Score

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET B
Opposition Speaker 4: ___________________________________________
Matter (40)

0-6
Weak
Presentation No point
/Elaboration /No reasoning
Reason (25) Wrong point/
Wrong reasoning
0-4
Example
No example given
(15)
Wrong example
Manner (40)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing

7-13
Moderate
Vague point
Reason
irrelevant
5-8
Irrelevant
example

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

14-20
Good
Well defined
point
Weak unclear
elaboration
9-12
Vague or
unclear example

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

21-25
Excellent
Well defined
point
Well elaborated
with evidence
13-15
Good and
relevant example
9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Score

text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Response (20)

0-2

3-5

6-8

POI One (10)

None taken
Taken but not
answer

Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

Rebuttal (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

9-10

Accurate
Answer without
solid
explanation
Rebut with
good reasoning

Answer
accurately with
solid support and
explanation
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET C
Government Speaker 5: __________________________________________
Matter (40)

0-1
Weak

2-5
Moderate

6-8
Good

9-10
Excellent

Rebuttal of stand
(10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal One (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal Two (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal Three
(10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Manner (40)

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

Score

Rebut with good

reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/

Score

Score

Consistent)
Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing text
Use of space
Audience reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed

Response (20)

0-2
None taken
Taken but not
answer

3-5
Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

6-8
Accurate
Answer without
solid explanation

9-10
Answer accurately
with solid support
and explanation

POI One (10)

POI Two (10)
Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET C
Opposition Speaker 5: ___________________________________________
Matter (40)

0-1
Weak

2-5
Moderate

6-8
Good

Rebuttal of stand
(10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal One (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal Two (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

Rebuttal Three (10)

Did not rebut

State
disagreement

Attempt to rebut
Wrong reasoning

Rebut with good

reasoning

9-10
Excellent
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence
Rebut with good
reasoning
Substantiate with
evidence

Score

Score

Manner (40)

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing text
Use of space
Audience reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed

Response (20)

0-2
None taken
Taken but not
answer

3-5
Answer wrongly
Vague Answer

6-8
Accurate
Answer without
solid explanation

9-10
Answer accurately
with solid support
and explanation

Score

POI One (10)

POI Two (10)
Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET D
Government Speaker 6: ___________________________________________
Matter (60)
Redefine motion and
stand (15)

0-4
Weak
No stand
Wrong scope

No definition
Wrong
definition
No reasoning
Wrong
reasoning

Reaffirm point 1 (15)

5-8
Moderate
No justification/
Wrong
justification of
stand
Vague definition
Keywords- not
defined
Stating reasons

9-12
Good

13-15
Excellent

Attempt to
justify stand

Solid stand
Supported with
evidence

Well defined
No supporting
evidence
Elaborate
vaguely

Well defined
Supported with
evidence
(quote/dictionary)
Well elaborated
with evidence

Score

Reaffirm point 2 (15)

Reaffirm point 3 (15)
Manner (40)

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Score

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

SCORESHEET D
Opposition Speaker 6: ____________________________________________
Matter (60)
Redefine motion and
stand (15)

0-4
Weak
No stand
Wrong scope

No definition
Wrong
definition
No reasoning

5-8
Moderate
No justification/
Wrong
justification of
stand
Vague definition
Keywords- not
defined
Stating reasons

9-12
Good

13-15
Excellent

Attempt to
justify stand

Solid stand
Supported with
evidence

Well defined
No supporting
evidence
Elaborate

Well defined
Supported with
evidence
(quote/dictionary)

Score

Wrong
reasoning

vaguely

Well elaborated
with evidence

Reaffirm point 1 (15)

Reaffirm point 2 (15)
Reaffirm point 3 (15)
Manner (40)

0-2
Weak
(Rarely)

3-5
Moderate
(Often)

6-8
Good
(Always)

9-10
Excellent
(Throughout/
Consistent)

Pronunciation/
Enunciation
Stress
Tone
Gesture/Eye
contact
Reading/
memorizing text
Use of space
Audience
reaction
Voice Projection
Mumbling
Clear and loud
Slur
Fluency/Pace
Pauses
Hesitant
Speed
Total Score

DEBATE ADJUDICATOR WORKSHOP 2016

Government 1 (Opening) Team

Opposition 1 (Opening) Team

Score

Matte
r

Manne
r

Response
s

1
2
3

Total

Matte
r

Manne
r

Response
s

1
2
3
POI (Deduct max of 10)
Grand Total

Government 1 (Opening) Team

POI (Deduct max of 10)

Grand Total

Opposition 1 (Opening) Team

Total

Matte
r

Manne
r

Response
s

Total

4
5
6

Matte
r

Manne
r

Response
s

4
5
6
POI (Deduct max of 10)
Grand Total

POI (Deduct max of 10)

Grand Total

Winning team
3rd :
2nd :
1st :

Best Speaker :

Total