Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 56

UFPE Recife: Shipbuilding Competitiveness

Key developments in enabling technologies


Paul Stott
July 2013

Building a ship
What type of industry is shipbuilding ?
Partly manufacturing but predominantly
an assembly industry
The shipyard assembles parts made in-house with parts bought in
from other manufacturers.
There may be 200,000 individual parts to assemble in a large ship.
Typically between 60% and 80% of the cost of building a ship is in
the cost of buying materials for assembly.
Other manufacturing / assembly industry sectors:
Motor cars
Aeroplanes
Computer manufacture
.....
Does shipbuilding have anything in common with these other
sectors?

Building a ship
Does shipbuilding have anything in common with automobile production?

Shipbuilding has a great deal in common with automobile


production and has learned much from automobile production in
the past 100 years.
It may surprise you to hear that the study of shipyard production
at Newcastle University starts with the study of automobile
production.

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....
Automobile factories mass produce identical
products whereas ships are normally unique.

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....

Automobile factories mass produce identical


products whereas ships are normally unique.
1. Cars are rarely identical, even from the same production line.
Engine options, trim options and optional extras mean there are
hundreds of potential variants passing through the line. Nissan UK
put ??? variants through one production line in Sunderland.

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....

Automobile factories mass produce identical


products whereas ships are normally unique.
1. Cars are rarely identical, even from the same production line.
Engine options, trim options and optional extras mean there are
hundreds of potential variants passing through the line. Nissan UK
put 2,573 variants through one production line in Sunderland.

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....

Automobile factories mass produce identical


products whereas ships are normally unique.
1. Cars are rarely identical, even from the same production line.
Engine options, trim options and optional extras mean there are
hundreds of potential variants passing through the line. Nissan UK
put 2,573 variants through one production line in Sunderland.
2. Large ships are normally built in long series numbering hundreds
of virtually identical products.
3. Small ships may also be standardised (e.g. Damens product
range)
4. Even where ships appear to be unique the parts from which they
are made (the interim products) are not.

Large ship production


Hyundai Heavy Industries at Ulsan is the worlds largest shipyard,
with capacity to build 12.6 million deadweight per year.
It is part of the Hyundai Heavy Industries Group, which has interest
in various engineering sectors, as well as owning several very large
shipyards.

High Volume
steelworking
capacity

Large
building
docks

Very large
cranes
(which are
essential for
productivity)

Large ship production


Ownership

Hyundai Heavy Industries, Public Company

Target markets

Large ship types with high steelwork content: large


container, LNG, large tankers, large bulk carriers

Size of business 104 ships in 2009 and around 3.2 million tonnes steel
processed
Employees 9,000 in 2011 plus subcontract and
suppliers (all shipbuilding)
Revenue estimated around $5 billion in 2011 (Ulsan
only)
Key aspects of
the business
model

High investment in pursuit of economic efficiency


through high volume
Focus on products with high steel content compared to
outfit
Strong domestic supply industry
Standardisation of products
Strong government support

What is a marine production business?


In 2009, HHI Ulsan yard delivered 109 ships. None were unique and
all part of long series. They were also all of a similar form: large
with high steelwork content.

11 capesize bulkers

12 VLCC

7 Suezmax

19 Aframax (7 crude 9 products)

4 LNG

14 LPG

42 CC: (in 6 size


classes from 2556
TEU to 11,300 TEU)

Small ship production


Damen of holland is the worlds leading small ship producer.
The family-owned business was established in Holland in 1927.

In recent years it has concentrated on standard small ship


products, which have a global reputation. Examples include the
range of STAN Tugs and COMBI Freighters
Damen only offers standard products
Tugs / Workboats: 55
Offshore Vessels: 5
High Speed Craft & Ferries: 24
Dredging & Specials: 19
Cargo Vessels/Inland & Coastal: 13
Naval & Yachts: 8

Output in 2011, using Damens


own product classifications

Small ship production

A limited selection of Damen products

Small ship production


Ownership

Private family owned business

Target markets

Small specialised ships

Size of business 124 ships delivered in 2011


6000 employees in 35 companies
Revenue 1.4 billion in 2011
Key aspects of
the business
model

Focus on small ship products with an established


brand reputation
Marketing and selling through Holland
Manufacture at low cost sites around the world
Subcontracting hull construction to low cost producers
for finishing at Dutch shipyards
Low key takeover of foreign facilities
Very clever strategy

A visit to www.Damen.nl is recommended

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....
Ships are not built on an assembly line.

Common arguments against the automobile analogy


Ah, but.....

Ships are not built on an assembly line.

1. Whilst not normally a continuously moving line (Meyer Werft does


use a moving assembly line in cruise ship production) the work
flows through defined stages and work stations that constitute an
assembly line.
2. The concept of fixed workstations undertaking repetitive work gains
much of the benefit of a moving flow line.
3. Even when the work appears stationary the flow may be
constituted by movement of people.

Building a ship
Does shipbuilding have anything in common with automobile production?
Shipyards tend not to use a moving assembly line but work flows
none-the less.
The final products may not be identical in shipbuilding (but interim
products should be at least similar if not identical)
But the basic assembly process is the same:
Cut out steel parts
Shape the steel parts
Assemble steel parts
Paint
Install outfit
Shipbuilding has learned a great deal from the automotive sector in
terms of product, process design and organisation of work.

The shipbuilding process


How do you turn the pile of raw materials into the finished
product?

+
=

Shipbuilding production

How do you eat an elephant?

One bite at a time

Shipbuilding production

How do you eat an elephant?

One bite at a time

Break the work down in


a logical way into
manageable pieces

But, what pieces and in what order should you


put them together ?

Work breakdown structure


The way a shipyard chooses to go about constructing a
product is known as its build strategy or
shipbuilding strategy.
The way that work is broken down into manageable
pieces is known as the Work Breakdown Structure or
WBS.
The work breakdown structure defines the INTERIM
PRODUCTS from which the final product is built up.
A WBS is essential for the planning of activities and the
way work is broken down drives the shipbuilding
process.

The traditional shipbuilding process


Up to about 1950 shipbuilding was based heavily on
craft skill in a job shop environment.
Skilled workers undertook a 6 year apprenticeship to
learn their trade and took a lifetime to perfect it.
The construction of a ship was undertaken in a similar
way to the construction of a house.
Work was broken down by system.
All ships tended to be unique.
Many who do not know the industry still imagine it to
be this way.

The traditional shipbuilding process

The traditional shipbuilding process


Erect frames
Add shell plates
Add bulkheads and decks
Install outfit (by system)

The sequential installation of hull and outfit led to a long cycle time
Outfitting was forced to be done at the most expensive time
Demarcation between skilled trades led to disputes
Clashes of trades in small spaces was unavoidable, leading to
inefficiency and idiosyncratic products
Work tended to be done substantially in the open air, leading to
weather delays

The shipbuilding process


Since the 1950s the industry has modernised. Modern shipyards
are no longer jobbing shops.
Key improvements have been:
De-skilling of work
Investment in automation
Multi-skilling of workers
Product standardisation
Process standardisation
Improvement in working conditions
In essence shipbuilding has adopted the modern scientific
management approach, following the example of the automotive
sector.

The shipbuilding process


Significant changes started to occur in the 1960s and 1970s

Covered ship factory

Covered building dock

Significant improvements in processes


and automation
Ships constructed in blocks
Larger cranes at the building position

The shipbuilding process


The first ship under construction in the new dock at Pallion in 1975

The shipbuilding process


A modern shipbuilding block

HHI claims 90% work completion on block

Key enabling technologies

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


1. Introduction of welding in 1940s:
Enabled pre-fabrication so
that all parts did not have to
be fitted at the most
expensive possible stage.
Reduced required skill levels.

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


2. Introduction of numerical control to
burning machines in 1950s/1960s:
De-skilled the parts
production process.
Greatly improved accuracy of
parts AND MARKING.

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


3. Automation and improved welding
processes (getting rid of sticks):
Improved accuracy, quality
and productivity.

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


4. Introduction of network planning:
Facilitated a shift to higher
througput.
Enabled outfit and steelwork
to be integrated.

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


5. Introduction of building docks and
goliath cranes:
Maximised the amount of
pre-fabrication and outfitting
that can be done in the
workshop environment,
minimising cost.
Powered up potential
throughput volume.
China becomes global
market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies

Very little changed


Modernisation
Welding
revolution

Very little changed

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Key enabling technologies


Whilst there have been few
technological changes in the past 30
years, much has changed through:
Investment in economy of
scale
Standardisation of products
Implementation of lean
production management
Logistics
Planning and control

Very little changed

China becomes global


market leader

1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

WWII
Development of steel
shipbuilding in Europe / US

Development of mechanised
shipbuilding in Japan

Development of shipbuilding
to industrialise South Korea

Strategy 1 (up to 1950)


Wooden shipbuilding in steel (Prof. G Bruce)
1. Steel erected piece by piece on a slipway
2. Outfit follows steelwork

1.
2.
3.
4.
Steel
Outfit

Total cycle time

Disadvantages
Highly craft skill dependent
All work undertaken at the most expensive
possible stage
Inherently long cycle time sue to the sequential
steel and outfit work
Low capacity of slipway (one ship every 1 to 2
years)

Strategy 2 (1950 to 1970)


1. Steel erected in prefabricated assemblies (enabled by welding) on
slipway, moving away from the piece by piece assembly
2. Integration of steelwork and outfitting and move away from system
breakdown

1.
2.
3.
4.

Advantages
Blocks built in workshops leading to lower cost of steelwork
Introduction of potential for automation and de-skilling
Integration of steel and outfit reduces total cycle time and
total cost
Slipway capacity increased (more than one ship per year
possibly 4 if the berth cranes are large enough)

Steel

Steel
Outfit

Total cycle time

Outfit

Total cycle time

Strategy 3 (1960 - 1970)


1. Block size increases
2. Slipway capacity enhanced by enabling the stern end of the
following ship to be started alongside the current ship
3. This is known as semi-tandem construction

Advantages
1.Slipway capacity significantly increased possibly up to 8 ships per year
2.Further automation and de-skilling of work
Steel
Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Total cycle time

Steel

Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Steel

Total cycle time


Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Steel

Total cycle time

Outfit

Total cycle time

Strategy 3 (1960 - 1970)


Stern section skidded across for final completion on main slipway

Stern section fabricated and


engine installed

Semi-tandem slipways

Semi-tandem slipways
Slipway
ship being
completed
Stern of next
ship being
fabricated
alongside
slipway

Semi-tandem takes account of the fact that


the stern has the greatest amount of work,
because of the machinery space

Semi-tandem slipways

Completed ship is launched

Semi-tandem slipways

Stern end skidded onto slipway

Semi-tandem slipways

Follow-on ship stern end is started in parallel with


the completion of the previous ship

Strategy 3 (1960 - 1970)


1. Block size increases
2. Slipway capacity enhanced by enabling the stern end of the
following ship to be started alongside the current ship
3. This is known as semi-tandem construction

Advantages
1.Slipway capacity significantly increased possibly up to 8 ships per year
2.Further automation and de-skilling of work
Steel
Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Total cycle time

Steel

Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Steel

Total cycle time


Steel

Outfit

Outfit

Total cycle time


Steel

Total cycle time

Outfit

Total cycle time

Strategy 4 (post - 1970)


1.
2.
3.
4.

Final assembly capacity increased using large building docks


Block size increased by installation of heavy cranes
Multi-ship construction, including semi-tandem construction
Dock capacity can be further enhanced by blocking on the
cope at the top of the dock

Advantages
1.Assembly capacity significantly increased 20+
ships per year per dock
2.Heavy cranes mean that more outfit can be
included in the blocks erected in the dock
3.Larger blocks allow better productivity

Famous quotations by Henry Ford

1. Any colour - so long as it's black.

Any colour so long as its black


This is a statement of mass production
technology
Early industry was:
craft based
individual products
Job Shop manufacturing
Very expensive only available to
very rich people

Rolls Royce
Silver Ghost

Henry Ford introduced flow production and


this revolutionised manufacturing and led
to the motor car being available to the
masses
based on scientific management
standard products
assembly line manufacturing
Low cost

Model T Ford

Any colour so long as its black

1907

1908

Any colour so long as its black

This is a statement of mass production technology


The innovations made by Henry Ford were:
1. To standardise the product.
2. To divide the product into easily
produced interim products.
3. To invest in production facilities
that produced the interim products
and assembled the final product
with as little skill as possible.
4. To design workstations where
identical simple tasks were
repeated leading to high efficiency.
5. To design the way the work flowed
between work stations the mass
production line.

Rolls Royce
Silver Ghost

Model T Ford

Any colour so long as its black


The aim was to produce an automobile that anyone could
afford to buy not only a rich elite
Ford Model T came in 9 body styles but Henry Sloane of
General Motors realised that not everyone wanted the Ford
basic product. The development that resulted is summarised
in the following chart:

The machine that changed the world, James P. Womack

Any colour so long as its black


Mass production (Ford), 1914
Mass production (Sloan), 1920s

Lean production, 1970s

Craft production 1900

How far is this model applicable to shipbuilding?

How close has shipbuilding come to Ford-type mass


production?
The second world war Liberty Ship provides a good example of
what standardisation of product and production process can
achieve in shipbuilding.

How close has shipbuilding come to automobile-type mass


production?

The Liberty ship


10,000 ton general cargo ship

In November 1942, one of Kaiser's Richmond yards


built a Liberty Ship (Robert E. Peary) in guess.......

Note: it takes HHI on average about 9 months to build a ship at the


present time.

How close has shipbuilding come to automobile-type mass


production?

The Liberty ship


10,000 ton general cargo ship

In November 1942, one of Kaiser's Richmond yards


built a Liberty Ship (Robert E. Peary) in 4 days, 15
hours, and 29 minutes

They did this through welding (not riveting), standardisation and adopting mass
production techniques

Any colour so long as its black


The liberty ship was a standard product built in thousands
Is it possible to obtain the benefits of mass production with
a product that may vary?
To understand this it is necessary to review two key
changes in the shipbuilding business in the past 50 years:
1. The pursuit of volume
2. The standardisation of the product

1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014

Million GT delivered

Development of commercial shipbuilding


120

100

80

60

40

20

Year

There have been two peaks in output over this period.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi