Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
The present literature review describes the implications of work-life practices in organisations in
order to understand their effects on employee behaviour and organisational performance. These
balance practices employed by many organisations resulted in reducing work-life conflicts and
enhancing employment opportunities. The enhancement of organisational performance is closely
linked with reduction of work-life conflicts and jobs insecurity. This literature review provides
ample evidence for the performance and selection opportunities in developed organisations, to
support the topic that best work-life practices improve firms performance and reduce employee
turnover.
2.2
The presence of very few case studies related to the family work relationships in diverse cultural
background countries raise the need of comprehensive literature review of Asian practices also
(Sector et al 2007). According to Cook (2005), the human resource management practices are in
the phase of development due to the booming economy, so that the changing nature of society and
its impacts on organisational performance should be discussed in detail. Cook (2005) also
mentioned that the working structures and conflicts are quite similar many developed countries
of Europe and North America.
The balance in work life practices has a considerable impact on the organisational structure. The
leadership commitments and the enforced management policies are required to design in
effective manner to address work life balance issues, as they impact on the performance of the
whole organisation (Kalliath and Brough, 2008). The concept of improved organisational
performance and the diverse perception of employees are closely linked with the work life
balance. Also, high levels of management support played a significant role in enhanced
employees commitment and job satisfaction (Beauregard and Henry, 2009).
2.4
According to Thompson, Andreassi & Prottas, (2003), work-life policies in organisation act like
performance indicators of an organisation which determine the priorities of work and family to
the management and individuals. Valcour & Batt (2003) determined that those employers, who
give work-life life issues prime importance, can raise an organisational culture of promoting
family values. On the contrary, work-life conflict arise in those companies where work and
family demands cannot met simultaneously, as a result, they became mutually incompatible
(Higgins, Duxbury & Lyons, 2007). The presence of this work-life conflict generates
psychological barriers to performance (Schieman, McBrier & Gundy, 2003).
Yu (2008) suggested that favourable work life policies reduce employee turnover in
organisations. Glass & Riley (1998) also supported the finding by considering turnover as one
of the vital issues in organisations performance, but Riley (2003) was not able to present any
considerable relation of factors affecting turnover and prevailing work-life policies. Some
researches in Asia, like of Bashir & Ramay (2008) from Pakistan supported the importance of
work-life policies in organisational structure. According to Hom & Kinicki (2001),
organisations are searching for policies which can be adopted to reduce turnover. In words of
Konrad & Mangel, (2000: 23), Work-life programs are effective in reducing work-family
conflict, and efficient in improving attitudes.
Nowadays, with the advancement of human resource practices, firms are more aware of the
significance of balance in work life, and adopt favourable policies to support this balance
(Yasbek 2004). The response to the conflicts arise due to mismanagement of work life issues
could affect the organisations performance (Thaden 2007). Batt & Valcour (2003) had already
proposed that the effective response of companies to work-life conflicts involves the blending of
policies related to work family issues with the jobs redesign, flexible schedules, and incentives to
increase commitments.
2.5
One measure which plays a vital role in work life policies is flexible work schedules. Marks &
Scholarios (2001) suggested that flexibility in work hours can create the balance in work-life
issues. As Rau & Hyland (2002: 124) proposed that flexible work schedules can resolve interrole conflict, as it seems attractive to family enticed workers who are facing upward demands of
work life balance. This approach has been adopted in western countries to achieve a better
understanding between workers and management, also prove to be useful in gaining higher levels
of working efficiencies (Soon et al 2005).
The positive changes and more flexible structures in organisational policies help in reducing
stress among employees and become an important factor in achieving organisational
commitments (Yasbek 2004). Hudson (2005) suggested that the balance in policies can be
achieved redesigning job descriptions and work schedules so that employees can balance their
family and work. As the components discovered by Thompson, Andreassi, & Prottas (2003)
were-support for dependent care, flexible work hours, and less stress of targets. Ling & Phillips
(2006) the work family conflicts create more physical or psychological abnormalities and work
inefficiencies.
Prottas (2003) also suggested that organisations have to revise their strict policies and complex
structures in order to minimize workers inefficiencies and poor health and state of mind. Rigid
schedules created extra stress and longer work hours for employees.
Thaden (2007) stated that employees became under stressed because of work load, heavy duties,
lack of staff, and new job targets. As a result, organisations face high turnover and critical
incidents during work timings. Kemery et al (1987) proposed that job satisfaction has inverse
relationships with on-job stress. Otis & Pelletier (2005) found that this job exhaustion increases
the chances of turnover intentions and less productivity. Leontaridi & Ward (2002) studied
important relation the intentions to quit and levels of stress. Braaten (2000) has related work
related stress to the psychological imbalance and intentions to quit the job. More stress is an
indirect cause of work inefficiency and less productivity (Kavanagh, 2005).
of availing these work life policies on future career prospects acted like demotivation for
workers.
2.9
The dilemma of negative impacts of work life policies and organisational effectiveness described
above, also enhanced by non-supportive organisational cultures in many countries. Ryan &
Kossek (2008) reported that the proper implantation of these policies require top management
support especially from line managers and/or supervisors. Also, the universal appeal and
homogeneity of these practices throughout the organisation can fulfil the needs of employees to a
greater extent.
The work-life requirements and treatment of organisations create actual picture of organisational
culture. The unaccommodating and unsupportive attributes of management and colleagues make
these work-life policies inaccessible to majority of workers. Bailyn (1997) described the trade off
of the organisational commitment standards and work life balance. Working long hours, extra
pile of assignments and visibility at work sites are the measures normally used by management
to evaluate the commitment and loyalty of workers? In some examples, these are the measures of
productivity also. Lewis (1997) supported this argument that those employees are taken as
incompetent who does not give long hours, and often treated as undervalued assets for the
organisation.
The concern of employees mainly related to the prospects of their career growth, and they
perceive that if they use flexible working hours or parental leaves, it will affect their promotion
chances and peer relationships as compared to other employees (Houston & Waumsley, 2003).
The other concerns include personal isolation, less interpersonal networks, less learning
opportunities, and lack of active participation when employees are availing work life balance
and allocating more time to family issues (Cooper & Kurland 2002).
Also some work-life privileges like flexible hours, family leaves, overtime perks etc. are not
available at managerial posts. Even if they are provided by the organisation, managers and upper
management normally avoids reducing the chances of career derailment (Raabe, 1996).
Organisational commitment and work effectiveness is normally measured in terms of the time
spent in the organisation, managers participation in work life practices appears less in order to
keep the career growth upward (Bailyn, 1997; Perlow, 1995).
The core practices of QWL are proposed to be provided the feasible work environment, job
satisfaction and retention, training and development, and monetary betterment of the employees
in an organisation (Lau & May 1998). The human resources department should acquire, train,
motivate, and apprise the respective worker so that the firm achieve its targets through effective
workforce. Job satisfaction is considered to be an important factor of organisational
performance. Locke (1976) discovered in his study that that motivation and performance
appraisal generates job satisfaction, and it more towards emotional side of the employee
behaviour. Job satisfaction includes all physical and psychological areas where employee gets
motivated from the environment. A better work life policy structure is based on job satisfaction.
The other elements of quality of work life associated with pay structure, peer relationships, top
management behaviour, promotion rules, job descriptions, and financial perks involved in the job
design (Nash 1985). The motivation theories form Herzberg et al (1959) suggested that internal
motivation of employees towards work is on o the key factor in job satisfaction. Satisfied and
motivated employees perform better at their jobs, and achieve a better work life balance
(Gilgeous, 1998).
2.11.1
The organisation can support QWL practices by providing competitive wages, hygienic work
conditions, social connectivity, and better leave structures (Zohir 2007). Realisation of
importance of workers relations and their implications in regular working structure enable
companies to allow the formation of workers union. Gilgeous (1998) emphasised the role of
active workers union in organisations performance.
On the contrary, Eaton (1990) supported the negative relationship of workers union and the
standard QWL practices. In the broader context with field surveys, many studies support the
perception of an effective labour union in the company. The working of union is also closely
related with the employee perception and prior experiences with the union (Eaton et al., 1992).
The supportive union can enhance the organisational performance in an organised manner
by providing a disciplined and target oriented work force. The perception of organisations
towards the negative aspects of labour union can be changed by a more participative union
culture to empower workers in decision making; they can also promote socialization, training &
development, and facilitate negotiation on workers issues Zohir (2007). The absence of labour
union in organisations generates an unstructured management for workers; they cannot raise
collective voices on common complaints. The top-down communication reduces the chances of
consultation, negotiation, and increases worker management conflicts. Mustafa et al (2007)
describe that the complaints related to the problems of absences, working hours, health and
medical facilities can be solved easily in the presence of a representative workers union.
2.11.2 Health Care Facilities
Health care facilities at work place and medical insurance played a vital role in employee
retention. As the expenses in health care keep on rising in personal treatments, child care, old age
ailments, and family medical allowances (Nielsen &Welling, 1994). The health plans for
workers in organisations need participation from workers representatives in order to check their
validity (Guy, 2003).
In general, employers concern for employee health is underestimated as they consider this area to
be taken care of the employee. On the other hand, healthy work force not only available for tight
schedules, long working hours, and for under stressed projects, but also contribute significantly
in organisational success. Work life policies required the employers attention to the family
health care for employees, as the dependent family health problems also affect workers
efficiency. Health and hygiene is one of the basic physical need of humans (Maslow 1970),
healthy life style contribute to the workers job satisfaction and organisational commitment.
Sports facilities, gymnasium, gaming zones, and other physical and mental activities help in
decline the stress levels, and increase healthy practices among workers (Tulloch
1993).
Organisations offer club memberships, arrange employee tournaments, and establish health
zones to keep their workers extremely fit and to perform better (Pastor, 1996).
After human resources development, social scientists have paid emphasis to the mutual influence
and interdependence of life and work (Casper and Harris, 2008). This issue has gotten more
importance in this business perspective since with the 1980s
organisations human resource divisions, and its inclusion in companies human resource policies.
These relatively new terms of Quality Work Life (QWL) and Work Life Balance (WLB) have
become a part of business literature since the 1990s. According to Lewis (2003), the issue of WLB
is currently considered for both females and males at all employment levels irrespective of their
family arrangements. It has been observed that work schedules flexibility allows a positive impact
on job satisfaction and attitudes. It has been asserted by Aryee, Luk and Stone (1998), that through
provision of relaxed work hours, employee turnover can be decreased and organisational
commitment increased. The reduced working hours have been connected with enhanced job
loyalty, satisfaction and commitment (Casper and Harris, 2008).
According to Yasbek (2004), the more flexible structures and positively changed organisational
policies are of help in stress reduction in employees and becomes a vital factor for achievement
of organisational commitments. Achievement of balance in policies can be obtained by
redesigning work schedules and job descriptions so that family and work can be balanced by
employees (Secret, 2006). According to a research, the components discovered were flexible
work hours, less stress of targets, and dependent care (Thompson et al, 1999). More work
inefficiencies and psychological or physical abnormalities are created by work family conflicts
( Wood & de Menezes, 2008).