Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
tastases of head and neck cancer and has become a routine method in our University Medical Center. Furthermore, the optimal diagnostic modality may be a fusion
image showing the increased metabolism of the tumour
and the anatomical localization.
&kwd:Key words: Head and neck cancer Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose Conventional imaging modalities
Squamous cell carcinoma
Eur J Nucl Med (1998) 25:12551260
Introduction
Head and neck carcinomas constitute approximately 5%
of all malignancies worldwide and their frequency is increasing [1]. Squamous cell carcinomas represent the
vast majority of all malignant tumours of the head and
neck and originate in the superior alimentary and respiratory tracts [2]. About 40% of the newly discovered cases
are early-stage lesions while the remaining 60% of patients have advanced stage disease. The early stages of
head and neck tumours are usually treated by surgery or
radiotherapy alone, and advanced stages by surgery and
concomitant chemoradiotherapy [35]. Lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic factor affecting survival of patients with head and neck cancer [6, 7].
The average 5-year survival is >50% in patients without,
but only 30% in patients with cervical lymph node metastases [8]. Furthermore DNA ploidy and high proliferating activity are important parameters in the assessment
of squamous cell carcinoma, being indicative of a worse
prognosis and a high metastatic risk [9, 10]. The effectiveness of surgical treatment depends on the complete
excision of all tumour tissue, and accurate preoperative
tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging is therefore mandatory. Initial diagnosis and staging of head and neck
carcinomas is based on physical and endoscopic examination [2]. Conventional imaging modalities [computed
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 25, No. 9, September 1998 Springer-Verlag 1998
1256
Results
Among the 60 patients, 15 primary tumours were localized in the tongue, 28 in the floor of the mouth, 5 in the
palate and 12 in the mandibular or maxillary region
(Fig. 1). All patients underwent surgery; 22 had T1, 15
T2, 3 T3 and 20 T4 tumours. Concerning the postoperative grading, 15 primary squamous cell carcinomas were
G1, 30 G2 and 15 G3 (Fig. 2). FDG PET identified the
primary lesions in 59 cases. In one patient with a small
1257
1258
Table 1. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging
modalities with histopathological findings
a) Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy (*P<106)&/tbl.c:&
Method
Sensitivity (%)
SpecifPPV
icity (%) (%)*
NPV
(%)*
Accuracy
(%)
PET*
CT*
MRI*
Sonography*
90
82
80
72
94
85
79
70
99
98
98
96
93
85
79
70
58
35
27
19
Method
Truepositive
Falsenegative
Falsepositive
Truenegative
Total
PET
CT
MRI
Sonography
105
96
94
84
12
21
23
33
75
175
250
350
1092
992
917
817
1284
1284
1284
1284
Discussion
&/tbl.:
Table 2. Correlation (chi square test) of
ventional imaging modalities&/tbl.c:&
18F-FDG
P-Values
CT
MRI
Sonography
0.016897
0.011566
0.000137
&/tbl.:
80%, respectively (P<106). Sonography revealed a sensitivity of 72% (P<106) (Table 1). The comparison of
18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities
demonstrated statistically significant correlation (Table
2). Concerning anatomical imaging, false-positive results were mainly found in enlarged reactive lymph
nodes which decreased specificity (CT: 85%; MRI: 79%;
sonography: 70%). In the comparative analysis of images, CT was true-negative in 19 of 29 patients (66%),
whereas FDG PET showed no malignant lymph node involvement (N0) in 23 of these patients (79%). Fortythree patients were correctly staged by metabolic imaging with FDG PET. Nine patients were classified as having higher N stages (over-staged) and eight as having a
lower N stage (under-staged). Lymph node staging using
sonography agreed with histopathological findings in 25
patients; in 18 patients there were false-positive classifications (over-staged) because of reactive enlargement of
lymph nodes, whereas 17/60 patients were under-staged.
Both CT and MRI over- and under-staged about 25% of
the patients (Fig. 4). The SUVBW of lymph node metastases ranged from 2 to 11, with a mean of 3.72.0. There
was no statistically significant relationship between up-
1259
References
1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 1996. CA
Cancer J Clin 1996; 46: 527.
2. Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, et al. Head and
neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 184194.
3. Forastiere AA. Overview of platinum chemotherapy in head
and neck cancer. Semin Oncol 1994; 21: 2027.
4. Panje WR, Namon AJ, Vokes E, et al. Surgical management of
the head and neck cancer patient following concomitant multimodality therapy. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 97101.
5. Aisner J, Jacobs M, Sinabaldi V, et al. Chemoradiotherapy for
the treatment of regionally advanced head and neck cancers.
Semin Oncol 1994; 21: 3544.
6. Sham JS, Choy D. Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review of 759 patients. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 5158.
7. Snow GB, Annanyas AA, Van Slooten EA, et al. Prognostic
factors of neck metastases. Clin Otolaryngol 1982; 7:
185192.
8. Whitehurst JO, Droulias CA. Surgical treatment of squamous
cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Arch Otolaryngol 1987;
103: 212215.
9. Ensley JF, Maciorowski Z, Hassan M. Cellular DNA content
parameters in untreated and recurrent squamous cell cancers
of the head and neck. Cytometry 1989; 10: 334338.
10. Johnson GS, Williamson KD, Cramer MM, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of head and neck carcinoma DNA index and
S-fraction from paraffin-embedded sections: comparison with
malignancy grading. Cytometry 1985; 6: 461470.
11. Brinkmann G, Brix F, Beigel A. Sonography, CT, MR in soft
part growths in the head and neck region. Rntgenbltter
1990; 43: 5864.
12. van den Brekel MWM, Casteljins JA, Stel HV, et al. Cervical
lymph node metastases: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 1981; 180: 457461.
13. Strauss LG, Ponti PS. The application of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 623648.
14. Jabour BA, Choi Y, Hoh CK, et al. Extracranial head and
neck: PET imaging with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose
and MR imaging correlation. Radiology 1993; 186: 2735.
15. Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, et al. Influence of
the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer a
PET study. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 16.
16. Hermanek P, Sobin LH. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th edn, 2nd revision. Berlin Heidelberg New York:
Springer, 1992.
1260
17. Leicher-Dber A, Thelen U, Bleier R. Palpation and sonography of metastases of the cervical lymph nodes. Rntgenbltter
1989; 42: 195198.
18. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Crooks LE, et al. Magnetic resonance
imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT. Radiology
1984; 153: 719728.
19. Mafee MF, Campos M, Raju S, et al. Head and neck: high
field magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Otolaryngol Clinic North Am 1988; 21: 513546.
20. Gritzmann N, Czembriek H, Hajek P, et al. Sonographie bei
cervikalen Lymphknotenmetastasen. Radiologie 1987; 27:
118122.
21. Archer CR, Yeager VL. Computed tomography of laryngeal
cancer with histopathological correlation. Laryngoscope 1982;
92: 11731180.
22. Zheng G, Zeng Q, Wu P, Yuan CM. Computed tomography in
the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Radiol
1989; 40: 2529.
23. Mancuso AA, Harnsberger HR, Muraki AS, et al. Computed
tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes:
normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer. Part II. Pathology. Radiology 1983;
148: 715723.
24. Moreau P, Goffart Y, Collignon J. Computed tomography of
metastatic cervical lymph nodes. A clinical, computed tomographic, pathologic correlative study. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 1980; 116: 11901193.
25. Helmberger R, Jager L, Grevers G, et al. Computerized tomography of malignancies of the oral cavity, the oropharynx
and hypopharynx and invasiveness. Radiologe 1996; 36:
193198.
26. Stevens MH, Harnsberger HR, Mancuso AA, et al. Computed
tomography of cervical lymph nodes. Staging and management of head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 1985; 111:
735739.
27. Eichhorn T, Schroeder HG, Glanz T, et al. Histologically controlled comparison of palpation and sonography in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases. Laryngol Rhinol Otol
1987; 66: 266274.
28. van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. Imaging of cervical lymphadenopathy. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1996;
6: 417434.
29. Laubenbacher C, Saumweber D, Wagner-Manslau C, et al.
Comparison of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, MRI,
endoscopy for staging head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 17471757.
30. Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, et al. Intratumoural distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiographic comparison with FDG. J Nucl Med 1992;
3: 19721980.
31. Haberkorn U, Strauss LG, Reisser C, et al. Glucose uptake,
perfusion, and cell proliferation in head and neck tumours: relation of positron emission tomography to flow cytometry. J
Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1217.
32. Field JK, Lamonthe A, Spandidos DA. Clinical relevance of
oncogene expression in head and neck tumours. Anticancer
Res 1986; 6: 595600.
33. Field JK, Spandidos DA, Stell PM, et al. Elevated expression
of the c-myc oncoprotein correlates with poor prognosis in
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 1989; 4:
14631468.
34. Kubota R, Kubota K, Yamada S, et al. Methionine uptake by
tumour tissue: a microautoradiographic comparison with
FDG. J Nucl Med 1995 36: 484492.
35. Braams JW, Pruim J, Nikkels PGJ, et al. Nodal spread of
squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity detected with PETtyrosine, MRI and CT. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 897901.
36. Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, et al. Uptake of
11C-methionine in breast cancer studied by PET: an association with the size of S-phase fraction. Br J Cancer 1991; 64:
11211124.
37. Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, et al. Carbon-11methionine and PET is an effective method to image head and
neck cancer. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 691695.
38. Valk PE, Pounds TR, Tesar RD, Hopkins DM, Haseman MK.
Cost-effectiveness of PET imaging in clinical oncology. Nucl
Med Biol 1996; 23: 737743.