Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
136
J O U R N A L O F R E L I G I O U S H I S T O RY
BOOK REVIEWS
137
towards Buddhist asceticism, namely in relation to the passions which can only be
overcome by the complete annihilation of self in the state of Nirvana. To this
ontology founded in emptiness (p. 82) is added the next chapter on Unfinished
Humanity which focuses on David Humes position that the I is not independent
from and neither does it pre-exist impressions (moods, sensations, sentiments, notions
. . .) which are numerous, unstable, changing, ephemeral (p. 85). He then observes
what he believes is Humes insufficient analysis of the ways in which we imagine or
invent ourselves as uninterrupted or continuous persons.
After completing the section on Hume, Dubuisson begins Part 2 of the book entitled
Christian Techniques of the Soul, which is divided into four chapters. The first of these
chapters, Techniques of the Body and Spiritual Exercises, bases itself on the work of
Marcel Mauss to undertake a comparative analysis of ancient schools such as Stoicism
and Buddhism in order to show the various exercises and practices they prescribed to
escape ones miserable condition (p. 114) resulting in a detachment from the world
and the I or self. The ensuing chapters on Christianity are subsequently refracted
through the lens of these particular wisdoms. The section entitled Christian Anthropology concerns the paradox of the transcendent God as being the closest thing to
the Christian believers inner life, and explores St Augustine, St Francis de Sales,
Thomas Kempis, St John of the Cross, St Ignatius of Loyola, St Teresa of vila, and
others in order to demonstrate this internalization of the absolute (p. 125) around
which the entire mental and interior life of the believer (p. 127) was organised.
Dubuisson sees this as unprecedented yet problematic, and turns to the soul itself
(which, from a theological perspective, is the I) to determine just how Christians
specifically, the medieval mystics envisaged it, before moving onto the next chapter,
Disciplines of the Interior Life. Here, he describes the initial rupture and change of
the I, the resolution to remain changed which is forged through willpower, the
renunciation of self (pp. 1524), and the exercises used to progress in this state; all of
which are rendered in the dualistic, anti-body terminology of some of these mystics,
especially throughout the next subsections on the Discipline of the Heart and Character and the Discipline of the Spirit.
In the next chapter, Suffering and Culpability he contrasts the wisdoms that
instructed individuals that they had the inherent capacity to endure this painful life to
Christianitys preoccupation with internalising the suffering of Christ so as to receive
a reward in a mythical hereafter. Whilst it is incontestable that in the Medieval
Christian West there was an inordinate focus on Christs passion, this must be contextualised in relation to the Dark Ages that preceded (and even persisted into) this
period, where the suffering Christ became a psychic projection of the Wests own
suffering. This sort of contextualisation may have resulted in a more sympathetic
portrait than that which is contained in this monograph, because the impression that
is given is that Christianity in general has been, and remains, afflicted by a morbid
disposition. A comparative analysis with the Orthodox Christianity of Byzantium,
which, with its focus on the resurrection of Christ, was much more optimistic, may
have helped to mitigate the severity of Dubuissons approach. Indeed, the Byzantine
mystics of the late Middle Ages, such as St Gregory Palamas, St Nicholas Cabasilas,
and others, did not postpone heaven to the hereafter, but instead affirmed its attainment in the here and now through an ascetic imitatio Christi within the ecclesial
context. So, despite their different goal which was an immediate participation in
God the Byzantines are perhaps more suitably comparable to the representatives of
the wisdoms insofar as they also share a concern for how to properly endure the
troubles of this life.
2013 The Authors
Journal of Religious History 2013 Religious History Association
bs_bs_banner
138
J O U R N A L O F R E L I G I O U S H I S T O RY
The third section of the book, The Wisdoms of Cultures, returns to the human
sciences that Dubuisson critiqued in the introduction, establishing their incapacity to
address the human being as an individual (p. 184). Instead, they are preoccupied with
categories or superstructures such as the middle class, the workers (p. 183) etc., which
disparage the significance of the I. This is followed by an exploration of how the
wisdoms can address this problem through cosmographic formation, before turning
specifically to these wisdoms in order to contrast the Christian and pagan approaches,
where the author discloses his preference for the latter. Continuing this line of thought,
the following chapter, Metaphysics and Religions, tries to dismantle the discipline of
the history of religions for ostensibly interpreting other religions/faiths/beliefs unilaterally from a Christian perspective. The last chapter, Anthropology and Wisdoms
then praises the wisdoms (sans Christianity) for approaching the difficulties of life apart
from any belief in God or gods; an assessment that is slightly anachronistic since their
atheism or agnosticism which the author mentions (p. 223) cannot be
compared to todays equivalents. According to Dubuisson, it was these wisdoms alone
that were concerned with human beings acquiring a calm and more robust I
(p. 225); an assertion that, I believe, is difficult to maintain with as much certainty as the
author does here. This is followed by the authors conclusion, aptly entitled The
Forgetting of Wisdom which contains his main contribution. This is to point out that
contemporary humanity, which is plagued by similar and even worse problems (which
he lists, pp. 2334) than those experienced by our wise ancestors, could learn from
them how to endure this life how to consolidate the I. In a world replete with quick
fix remedies, this message is indispensable. However, his complete dismissal of the
utility of religion in this endeavour, which is reiterated in the final paragraph of the work
(p. 243), is unfortunate.
MARIO BAGHOS
University of Sydney