Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ARTICLE IN PRESS
CATENA-01112; No of Pages 12
Received 7 September 2005; received in revised form 27 July 2006; accepted 1 August 2006
Abstract
The high Andes region of south Ecuador is characterised by intense land use changes. These changes affect particularly the pramo, which
is a collection of high altitudinal grassland ecosystems. In this region, the interaction between airborne volcanic ashes and the cold and wet
climate results in very typical soils, with an elevated organic C contents. The physical soil properties are closely related to the high and
reliable base flow in rivers descending from the pramo, which makes them important for the socio-economic development of the region. In
this study, we analyse the regional variability of the soils in the south Ecuadorian rio Paute basin. In a first part of the study, data from soil
profiles along northsouth transects are used to determine the soil properties, and to relate the spatial variability of these properties to the
major trends in parent material, volcanic ash deposits and climate. The profiles are Histic Andosols and Dystric Histosols devoid of
allophane, with very high amounts of organic matter. Significant differences between the western and central mountain range are observed, as
well as a general decrease in Andic properties from north to south, coinciding with the decrease in volcanic influence. Finally, the impact of
human activities on the soil properties is assessed in a case study in the Machangara valley. Data from 5 profiles, located in an area with
natural grass vegetation and a low degree of human impact are compared with 4 profiles in a heavily disturbed, intensively drained cultivated
area. Despite the intensity of the land use, very few significant differences are found.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Andosols; Land use; Ecuador; Pramo; Organic matter; Cultivation
1. Introduction
1.1. Soils of the Ecuadorian pramo
The pramo is a neotropical alpine ecosystem covering the
upper mountain region of the Andes of Venezuela, Colombia,
Ecuador and northern Peru. It consists of vast grasslands,
extending from the continuous forest border (about 3500 m
altitude) up to the perennial snow limit (about 5000 m altitude).
The total area covered by pramo is estimated between 35,000
(Hofstede et al., 2003) and 77,000 km2 (Dinerstein et al.,
1995). This discrepancy is primarily due to uncertainties in the
Corresponding author. Now at: Environmental Sciences, Lancaster
University, LA1 4YQ, Lancaster, UK. Tel.: +44 1524 593894.
E-mail address: W.Buytaert@lancaster.ac.uk (W. Buytaert).
0341-8162/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
Fig. 1. Geographical location of the rio Paute basin and the location of individual sampled pedons. NorthSouth transects used to study soil properties on natural
pramo ecosystems were located on the western mountain range (pedons, CU, CH1, CH2, SO, PD) and on the central mountain range (pedons, TA, GU, SI, JI).
An additional 9 pedons were located in the Machangara catchment (pedons MA14 and MA59) to study the effect of land use on soil properties. S = Sangay
volcano, T = Tungurahua volcano.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W. Buytaert et al. / Catena xx (2006) xxxxxx
Fig. 2. Picture of the natural pramo ecosystem. Inset: Picture of profile JI. On the border of the A and C horizon, a continuous placic layer of about 2 cm thick
was observed.
water from the pramo is the major water source for the
Interandean region. Water is used for urban and agricultural
purposes as well as hydropower generation. As such, an adequate soil management program in the Ecuadorian pramo is
of high social and economic importance.
In contrast to the rest of the country, land use changes,
cultivation and intensive grazing are a very recent phenomenon in the pramo of the Paute basin, and both the regional
variability of the soil properties and the impact of land use
changes are rather poorly documented. This study describes
Fig. 3. Picture of an interfered part of the Machangara catchment. A: intensive cultivation of potatoes with complete removal of the original vegetation;
B: drainage and intensive grazing with replacement of the grass vegetation for more nutritive species; C: drainage and extensive grazing on the natural
grasslands.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
4
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W. Buytaert et al. / Catena xx (2006) xxxxxx
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
6
Table 1
Chemical properties and classification of soils studied on two mountain ranges (western and central) and the Machangara catchment in south Ecuador
Name
Horizon
pH
pH
SOC
Alo
Alp
Alp/Alo
Feo
Fep
H2O
KCl
mg g 1
mg g 1
mg g 1
mg g 1
Western cordillera
CU
Ah1
Ah2
A
CH1
Ah1
Ah2
A
CH2
Ah1
Ah2
A
SO
Ah
A
C
PD
Ah
A
C
5.1
4.8
5.1
4.7
5.0
4.8
4.8
4.9
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
5.0
5.0
5.5
4.5
4.2
4.6
4.0
4.3
4.4
4.0
4.2
4.3
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.1
4.2
4.4
22.8
24.1
13.5
16.7
29.1
17.5
32.1
36.1
32.6
14.9
16.9
11.2
22.1
14.2
n.r.
37.3
24.0
49.5
21.6
40.4
24.8
21.2
38.7
39.4
14.4
16.4
15.0
11.4
13.3
12.3
29.6
23.1
19.3
21.9
32.7
33.8
22.0
39.3
43.8
14.8
17.3
12.4
11.7
12.9
3.0
0.79
0.96
0.39
1.01
0.81
1.36
1.04
1.02
1.11
1.03
1.05
0.83
1.03
0.97
0.24
14.3
11.7
12.2
11.4
18.5
8.6
13.0
21.3
24.1
6.3
6.5
5.4
5.5
6.4
5.4
11.9
9.4
8.8
11.3
16.6
16.1
12.7
20.2
21.7
5.8
6.2
4.3
3.8
4.5
2.2
Central cordillera
TA
Ah1
Ah2
A
GU
Ah
A
C
SI
Ah
A
C
JI
Ah1
Ah2
A
4.8
4.9
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.9
4.4
4.5
5.0
4.1
4.1
4.2
3.9
4.2
4.2
3.9
4.2
4.5
3.7
3.9
4.7
3.4
3.6
3.7
33.0
31.1
26.4
10.6
4.6
n.r.
27.1
18.7
n.r.
17.1
8.3
n.r.
21.2
35.9
38.0
4.9
4.9
1.4
10.5
14.9
21.7
7.2
5.9
4.4
21.4
39.3
37.7
4.9
4.5
1.3
9.9
13.6
2.9
6.3
6.4
3.6
1.01
0.91
0.99
1.00
0.92
0.92
0.94
0.91
0.13
0.87
1.08
0.85
11.4
18.2
19.1
9.8
5.0
1.3
7.9
9.6
6.3
14.0
11.8
7.4
9.1
15.8
17.4
7.0
2.8
1.5
6.2
8.0
0.6
9.4
12.5
7.2
Machangara catchment
MA1
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA2
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA3
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA4
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA5
Ah
A
C
MA6
Ah
A
C
MA7
Ah
A
C
MA8
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA9
Ah
A
C
4.7
4.8
5.0
4.8
5.1
4.8
4.4
4.7
4.6
4.8
4.8
5.0
4.6
4.9
4.5
4.3
4.7
4.9
4.6
5.0
5.2
5.2
5.4
5.6
4.9
5.0
4.5
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.4
4.3
3.9
4.2
4.4
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.4
4.1
3.9
4.0
4.3
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.4
4.3
3.6
31.0
36.9
31.3
35.3
28.2
14.1
28.6
26.2
17.8
34.5
31.2
30.6
29.6
44.0
n.r.
34.7
34.5
1.8
34.7
32.5
0.0
38.1
29.7
34.1
36.6
17.5
3.3
21.8
31.7
44.5
16.2
36.6
21.9
15.6
24.1
19.9
10.5
56.0
39.6
27.0
48.0
3.7
25.9
34.1
24.7
22.7
53.1
19.5
10.4
33.0
62.9
10.9
47.9
18.6
22.6
32.8
43.6
16.5
28.7
19.6
15.5
23.8
18.7
10.2
41.3
37.5
27.4
51.0
3.3
22.9
38.0
11.8
24.8
40.0
10.5
9.8
39.9
48.1
11.4
14.5
7.6
1.03
0.98
1.02
1.02
0.78
0.89
0.99
0.99
0.94
0.97
0.74
0.95
1.03
1.06
0.89
0.88
1.11
0.48
1.09
0.75
0.54
0.94
1.21
0.76
1.04
0.30
0.41
12.8
16.1
21.9
30.7
24.3
3.2
10.4
14.4
12.4
12.3
27.8
14.0
22.0
15.8
0.4
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
9.8
13.5
19.5
25.9
21.3
2.9
9.8
14.1
11.1
6.9
7.8
9.3
16.6
13.2
0.3
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
n.r.
Classification
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Dystric Histosol
Dystric Histosol
Histic Andosol
Dystric Histosol
Dystric Histosol
Dystric Histosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Histic Andosol
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W. Buytaert et al. / Catena xx (2006) xxxxxx
Table 2
The physical and hydrological properties of soils studied on two mountain ranges (western and central) and in the Machangara catchment in south Ecuador
Sand
Silt
Clay
Ks
BD
1500 kPa
Depth
Colour
Altitude
mm h 1
g cm 3
g g 1
cm
(Munsell)
(m asl)
Western cordillera
CU
Ah1
Ah2
A
CH1
Ah1
Ah2
A
CH2
Ah1
Ah2
A
SO
Ah
A
C
PD
Ah
A
C
59
40
83
40
32
63
37
21
24
31
34
50
26
36
68
25
42
15
43
30
17
44
50
35
31
27
16
42
37
16
16
18
2
17
38
20
19
29
41
38
39
34
32
27
16
26.4
32.0
16.2
7.7
4.9
9.8
n.r.
15.0
13.0
12.0
7.1
27.5
22.3
2.5
n.r.
0.38
0.37
0.37
0.29
0.30
0.30
0.29
0.29
0.23
0.47
0.58
0.95
0.46
0.55
0.76
1.28
1.12
1.03
1.58
1.80
1.24
1.69
2.26
2.03
0.79
0.95
0.36
1.03
0.84
n.r.
017
1755
5588
018
1860
6078
020
2049
4970
021
2142
4262
012
1230
3047
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR2/2
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/2
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR2/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
3700
Natural
3550
Natural
3580
Natural
3660
Natural
3630
Natural
Central cordillera
TA
Ah1
Ah2
A
GU
Ah
A
C
SI
Ah
A
C
JI
Ah1
Ah2
A
29
18
19
62
63
67
25
23
79
55
53
57
50
39
0
18
21
23
36
31
18
12
14
20
21
43
81
20
16
10
39
46
3
33
33
24
20.4
1.0
5.0
3.3
2.5
n.r.
5.3
5.8
n.r.
4.9
4.6
1.5
0.31
0.48
0.55
0.42
0.60
1.59
0.28
0.36
0.99
0.34
0.42
0.61
1.68
1.53
1.27
0.71
0.45
0.07
1.27
1.03
0.20
0.90
0.97
0.30
324
2458
5874
015
1540
N40
020
2040
N40
015
1534
3470
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR2/1
7.5YR2/1
7.5YR3/1
2.5YR4/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR4/6
10YR1.7/1
10YR2/1
10YR3/3
3400
Natural
3350
Natural
3250
Natural
3350
Natural
Machangara Catchment
MA1
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA2
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA3
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA4
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA5
Ah
A
C
MA6
Ah
A
C
MA7
Ah
A
C
MA8
Ah1
Ah2
A
MA9
Ah
A
C
30
20
32
31
40
63
28
49
24
38
28
24
36
27
65
12
26
58
23
34
39
40
39
27
34
44
27
49
52
43
51
35
20
45
23
38
62
47
55
12
51
16
55
33
19
40
41
15
32
31
31
29
31
20
21
28
25
18
25
17
27
28
38
0
25
21
52
22
19
33
41
23
37
25
46
28
30
42
37
25
53
9.5
7.5
3.1
3.6
1.5
1.3
3.7
10.0
n.r.
23.0
4.0
1.0
10.8
4.9
n.r.
44.1
12.1
29.0
14.9
45.3
n.r.
176.7
243.9
10.6
29.6
10.4
2.3
0.44
0.28
0.25
0.31
0.30
0.33
0.40
0.36
0.54
0.30
0.31
0.38
0.29
0.30
0.30
0.23
0.25
0.95
0.28
0.25
n.r.
0.16
0.18
0.23
0.13
0.19
0.58
1.11
1.90
1.69
1.70
1.75
0.85
1.46
1.42
1.31
1.44
1.74
1.61
1.63
1.96
0.17
2.09
2.28
0.31
1.32
2.40
n.r.
1.80
2.30
1.83
1.66
1.34
0.63
027
2754
5470
022
2250
5079
013
1327
2750
015
1538
3853
030
3060
N60
012
1244
N44
024
2456
N56
015
1541
4162
018
18110
110135
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/2
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
10YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/3
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR1.7/1
7.5YR2/1
7.5YR1.7/1
2.5YR6/3
10 YR 2/1
10 YR 1.7/1
10 YR 4/4
7.5 YR 1.7/1
7.5 YR 1.7/1
7.5 YR 5/3
10 YR 2/3
10YR 1.7/1
10YR 1.7/1
7.5 YR 2/1
7.5 YR 4/1
7.5 YR 3/1
3500
Cultivated
3520
Cultivated
3600
Cultivated
3600
Cultivated
3600
Natural
3800
Natural
3915
Natural
3790
Natural
3645
Natural
Name
Horizon
Land use
Ks = saturated hydraulic conductivity; BD = bulk density; 1500 kPa = water retention at 1500 kPa (wilting point).
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
8
Fig. 4. The relationship between Soil Organic Carbon (%) in volcanic ash soils with: (A) pyrophosphate extractable Al (mg g 1), (B) water retention (1500 kPa)
(g g 1), (C) saturated hydraulic conductivity (mm h 1), and (D) bulk density (g cm 3). Only statistically significant R2 values are shown on the graphs.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W. Buytaert et al. / Catena xx (2006) xxxxxx
Fig. 5. Changes in selected soil properties on transects on the central and western mountain ranges as related to the distance from the Sangay volcano in the study
region (see Fig. 1). The soil properties are: (A) oxalate extractable Al, (B) pyrophosphate extractable Al, (C) oxalate extractable Fe, (D) soil organic carbon,
(E) pH (H2O extraction), (F) pH (KCL extraction), (G) bulk density, and (H) water storage capacity. Only where the linear regression is significant (at a 0.05
confidence level), R2 is given and trend lines are drawn. = western mountain range; = central mountain range.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
10
SOC
pH(H2O)
pH(KCl)
Alo
Alp
Sand
Silt
Clay
Ks
BD
1500 kPa
Complete profile
Natural
Cultivated
Natural
Cultivated
31.7
4.73
4.12
20.0
20.0
31.7
36.5
31.7
29.6
0.23
1.68
32.3
4.67
4.10
16.0
16.2
31.7
51.6
16.6
9.5
0.36
1.42
0.88
0.72
0.86
0.33
0.35
0.99
0.07
0.07
0.03
0.02
0.12
32.0
4.90
4.23
33.2
29.6
13.6
37.9
31.6
45.1
0.24
1.86
28.8
4.79
4.24
28.2
25.9
33.9
43.2
22.9
6.19
0.35
1.45
0.25
0.30
0.83
0.39
0.43
0.56
0.17
0.02
0.09
0.001
0.003
The analysis was performed for only the upper soil horizon (left) and the
complete profile, except the C horizon (right). SOC = Soil Organic Carbon;
Ks = saturated hydraulic conductivity; BD = bulk density; 1500 kPa = water
retention at 1500 kPa. P indicates the chance of equal means. Bold values
are significant at a 0.05 significance level. Data from the C horizon were
excluded, as this horizon is not affected by land use.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
W. Buytaert et al. / Catena xx (2006) xxxxxx
11
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
12
Poudel, D.D., Midmore, D.J., West, L.T., 1999. Erosion and productivity of
vegetable systems on sloping volcanic ash-derived Philippine soils. Soil
Science Society of America Journal 63, 13661376.
Poulenard, J., 2000. Les Sols des Pramos d'Equateur sur Couverture
Pyroclastique. Diversit, Gnse et Proprits Physiques. PhD Thesis,
Universit Henry Poincar-Nancy I.
Poulenard, J., Podwojewski, P., Janeau, J.L., Collinet, J., 2001. Runoff and
soil erosion under rainfall simulation of Andisols from the Ecuadorian
pramo: effect of tillage and burning. Catena 45, 185207.
Poulenard, J., Podwojewski, P., Herbillon, A.J., 2003. Characteristics of
non-allophanic Andisols with hydric properties from the Ecuadorian
pramos. Geoderma 117, 267281.
PRONAREG, 1983. Soil maps of Ecuador, scale 1:200.000. PRONAREG,
Quito.
Shepherd, T.G., Saggar, S., Newman, R.H., Ross, C.W., Dando, J.L., 2001.
Tillage-induced changes to soil structure and organic carbon fractions in
New Zealand soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 465489.
Van Reeuwijk, L.P., 2002. Procedures for soil analysis. International Soil
Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen.
Vargas, O.R., Zuluaga, S., 1986. Classificacin y ordenacin de comunidades vegetales de pramo. Perez-Arbelaezia 2, 125143.
White, S., Maldonado, F., 1991. The use and conservation of natural
resources in the Andes of southern Ecuador. Mountain Research and
Development 11, 3755.
Wright, C., 1968. Pramosols. Working Document. FAO, Rome. 15 pp.
Please cite this article as: Wouter Buytaert et al., Regional variability of volcanic ash soils in south Ecuador: The relation with parent material, climate and
land use, Catena (2006), doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.08.003.