Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1521-043X
0146-0862
UCPN
Issues
in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing
Nursing, Vol. 32, No. 3, June 2009: pp. 113
Bullying
S.
Carter of Students with Asperger Syndrome
INTRODUCTION
Aspergers Syndrome is an autism spectrum disorder in which individuals
are unable to interpret social cues, often have special interests, and are
pedantic in their expression. Children with Aspergers have social interactions that may involve extensive conversation about an all-consuming,
intense special interest; and they may be characterized as, verbose, eccentric, or overly formal in communication (Ghaziuddin & Gerstein, 1996).
Aspergers is named after Hans Asperger, an Austrian psychiatrist who
noted these characteristics in 1944 in the boys he was treating in his practice. Many students having Asperger syndrome attend public schools and
are in general or integrated classrooms where they receive interventions
related to social skills, organization, and written expression and also
receive counseling support. With medical advances and increased public
awareness, Asperger syndrome is being recognized earlier, and subsequent early intervention services are being given.
One of the problems associated with Asperger syndrome is that children and adolescents often are bullied, victimized, and shunned by peers
and siblings. Both the original work by Asperger (1944) and first-person
accounts report of the rejection and pain experienced because of incessant
tormenting and teasing by others. Children and adolescents with Asperger
syndrome have a myriad of challenges confronting them in the schools
they attend. Many will never have the opportunity to express their talents
because they are misunderstood, and often they are denied services
because they are articulate, do well academically, and appear too bright.
Received 21 February 2009; accepted 25 May 2009.
Address correspondence to Susan Carter, Ed. D., Assistant Professor, Dowling College, Department of Special Education, 150 Idle Hour Boulevard, Oakdale, New York 11769. E-mail: carters@
dowling.edu
145
146
S. Carter
147
of age. Eighty-eight percent of the youth were male and 12% were
female. The mean full-scale intelligence quotient (SS = 110) of the sample
was in the average range. Fifty-four percent of mothers and 46% of fathers
had degrees beyond the Bachelors degree. The participants represented
thirty-one school districts from Long Island, New York. More than
one-half of the parents had an annual income of over $90,000. Sixty-eight
percent of the youth had individualized educational plans (IEPs), legal
special education documents outlining educational goals, and school
program. Nine percent received accommodations on a 504 plan, and 24%
received no special services or accommodations.
Measures
Two instruments were used to measure victimization and shunning frequencies, the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ) (Hamby & Finkelhor,
1999) and an instrument consisting of three shunning questions (Little,
2002). Permission was obtained from the authors for the use in the study.
The JVQ was used to assess victimization. This instrument, designed to
measure comprehensive juvenile victimization, contains questions on
different domains of victimization, including conventional crime, child maltreatment, and peer and sibling victimization. Construct validity of the JVQ
peer-victimization items was established from the Youth Internet Safety Survey (Finkelhor, Mitchell, & Wojak, 2000). The instrument was reviewed by
focus groups, and cognitive interviews with youth were conducted in order
to assess young childrens comprehension of survey items on victimization,
which yielded low Flesch-Kindaid readability scores. Other psychometric
properties are still being established (Hamby & Finkelhor, 2001).
Parents completed five questions from Module C of the instrument.
Questions included were:
In the last year, did any kids, even a brother or sister, hit your child at
child? They might pick on them by chasing them, grabbing their hair
or clothes, or making them do something they did not want to do.
In the last year, did any kids try to hurt your childs private parts on
purpose by hitting or kicking them there?
In the last year, did your child get scared or feel really bad because
other kids were picking on him/her? They might pick on them by
calling names, saying mean things to them, or saying they didnt
want them around.
148
S. Carter
The response choices were: Never (0), once (1), twice (2), 35 times (4), 6
or more times (8). Three questions developed by Little (2002) were used to
assess social exclusion frequencies in children. Eighteen of the 34 children
in this study were included in this analysis. The questions included:
How many times has your child (ages 514) been invited to a friends
birthday party in the last year? Response choices ranged from: This
has not happened in the last year (0), 1 time (1), 2 times (2), 3 to 5
times (3), and 6 or more times (4).
When teams are picked in school, how often is your child picked last
or almost last? Response choices were: Never (0), rarely (1), sometimes (2), often (3), and always (4).
How often does your child sit alone at lunchtime during school?
Response choices were the same as for Question 2.
The questionnaire included extra space for parent comments.
Procedures
Parents having children diagnosed with Asperger syndrome were recruited
online, in clinics, and at autism conferences. Questionnaires were mailed to
interested parents and returned by mail to the researcher. In addition to the
five JVQ and three shunning items, information about demographics,
student characteristics, family background, and educational factors were
included in the survey.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 10.0. Means and frequencies
were used to describe the demographic data (Table 1). Victimization and
shunning frequencies and percentages were obtained by transforming the
answers into dichotomous (yes/no) data. Data was coded 1 for any
affirmative response and 0 for a negative response. For example, for the
question related to being picked last for teams, never was categorized
no (0) and all others responses, such as rarely, sometimes, often,
and always were categorized yes (1). Thus, if nine of the 18 parents
registered a yes response to a question, the percentage for the question
would be 50%. Overall prevalence of victimization was derived by assigning a yes if any one of the questions was answered affirmatively, then
dividing the total number of affirmative scores by the total number of parents. In this study, 22 of 34 parents gave a yes response to at least one of
the victimization questions, yielding an overall victimization percentage of
65%. The overall prevalence of victimization, five victimization and three
149
Variable
Age of child
Income of Parents
Gender
Male
Female
Full Scale Intelligence Quotient Score
Mean (N = 34)
Type of Program
Section 504 Plan
Individualized Educational Plan (IEP)
No 504 or IEP
Special Education Service
Inclusion Classroom
Resource Room
Services in Classroom and Out of Classroom
No Services
Mean
Std deviation
(N = 34)
15.03
3.34
2.9% Below $30,000
11.8% $3060,000
29.4% $6090,000
55.9% $90,000 +
14.7% High school degree
32.4% Bachelors degree
47.1 Masters degree
5.9 Doctoral degree
2.9% No High school degree
17.9% High school degree
35.3% Bachelors degree
26.5% Masters degree
17.6% Doctoral degree
88.2%
11.8%
110.06
21.10
8.8%
67.6%
23.5%
14.7%
32.4%
14.7%
38.2%
shunning questions from this study were compared with a peer victimization study using the same items and data transformation (Little,
2002). Frequencies from the previous and current study are illustrated in
Table 2.
RESULTS
This study found that nearly 65% of the parents reported that their
children had been victimized by peers in some way within the past year.
150
S. Carter
Current study
asperger syndrome
Ages 717
Ages 721
Victimization variable
(N = 411)
(N = 34)
Overall Prevalence
Hit by peers
Attacked by peers
Picked on
Hurt in private parts
Scared by peers
Shunning Variable
94%
73%
10%
55%
15%
75%
Ages 714
64.7%
47.1%
8.8%
44.1%
8.8%
50.0%
Ages 714
(N =1 8)
11.8%
5.9%
2.9%
33%
31%
11%
Forty-seven percent reported that their children had been hit by peers or
siblings, 50% reported them to be scared by their peers, 9% were attacked
by a gang and hurt in the private parts, and nearly 12% indicated their
child had never been invited to a birthday party. Six percent were almost
always picked last for teams, and 3% ate alone at lunch every day.
Several of the parents described the nature of victimization in their
children. The extreme pain experienced by several students in this study
caused them to be suicidal, and one child, enduring prolonged bullying by
peers, wanted to be put in the street and run over. Another child was
beaten up in middle school and then tried to commit suicide. A parent
reported her son being bullied, left out, and picked on while on the bus.
One day, he ran after one of the girls, and then was kicked out of school.
Nothing was done to the girl. He has become more socially savvy as he
has gotten older and stays away from those who are unkind. Another
reports her son being egged on and told to run like a bull. After he complied, peers would laugh and call him a freak. One childs picture on the
bulletin board had his eyes scratched out. A mother felt wounded when
she went on a rafting field trip with her son and his class. She saw that he
was a peripheral person with low social status when no one wanted to
join them in their raft. A middle school girl with Asperger syndrome had
her locker vandalized after a friend had decorated it for her birthday. She
was repeatedly verbally harassed, told that everyone hated her and that
no one wanted to be her friend. While riding the school bus, peers would
throw coins at her, and talk about her engaging in sexually explicit acts
151
with others. A parent shared that her daughter had been scratched while
riding the bus, pushed against school lockers, mocked, laughed at by
peers, and ridiculed by teachers. A mother fought with the school to
provide an aide to protect her child. Some parents explained that the
victimization and harassment occurred over a long period of time, with
many of the children having severe migraines, school phobia, and suicidal
ideation.
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of victimization
and shunning of children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome. The
intent was to compare these findings with results from a previous study.
The current study found that nearly two-thirds of the children and
adolescents with Asperger syndrome were victimized and shunned by
siblings and peers, as compared to Littles (2002) findings of an overall
frequency of 94%. Nearly one-half were afraid of their peers and had
been hit by them. Little (2002) reported that 72.9 % of the children were
hit by peers or siblings, 10% were attacked by a gang or a group of
children, 55.2% were picked on, chased, or grabbed by the hair, 15%
were hit in their private parts, and 75.5% were scared by peers, because
they were called names or picked on. Thirty-three percent of parents
reported that their child had never been invited to a birthday party, as
compared to nearly 12% in this study.
The lower frequency rates of victimization and shunning in this study
may be explained by interventions such as school tolerance programs
coupled with better understanding of Asperger syndrome. Despite the
decrease in victimization, 65% rate of victimization in children with
Asperger syndrome remains high. Perhaps the visibility of their negative behaviors put them at risk for peer victimization and shunning,
especially during middle school when peer acceptance is critical. Lack
of social skills, awkwardness, eccentricity, and all-consuming interests
in children with this diagnosis provides bullies with perfect victims
(Heinrichs, 2003). The child with Asperger syndrome who is physically
awkward, socially naive and eccentric in nature is subject to ridicule,
peer harassment, and lack of tolerance from teachers and school staff.
As stated by Hoover (2006):
Sadly, many children develop a tendency of distrust towards others,
because of social failures and negative social experiences over time, which
can lead to self-isolation and social phobia. This behavioral reaction can be
viewed as rude by others, and often people on the spectrum struggle to
understand why they are not liked or frequently feel rejected. (p. 1)
152
S. Carter
153
154
S. Carter
REFERENCES
Asperger, H. (1944). Autistic psychopathology in childhood. Translated by Uta Frith. In
U. Frith (ed.), Autism & Asperger syndrome. (pp. 3792). Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Is Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism necessarily a
disability? Development and Psychopathology, 12, 489500.
Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the
nationss youth. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Justice. #98-MC-CX-K002.
Ghaziuddin, M., & Gerstein, L., (1996). Pedantic speaking style differentiates Asperger
syndrome from high-functioning autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,
42, 4548.
Ghaziuddin, M., Weidmer-Mikhail, W. K., & Ghaziuddin, N. (1998). Comorbidity of
Asperger syndrome: A preliminary report. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,
42, 279283.
Hamby, S. L., & Finkelhor, D. (1999). The juvenile victimization questionnaire
(JVQ):Administration and Scoring Manual. Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children
Research Center.
Heinrichs, R. (2003). Perfect Targets: Asperger syndrome and bullying. Practical
solutions for surviving the social world. Shawnee Mission, Kansas: Autism Asperger
Publishing Company.
Hoover, D. (2006). Doctors often misdiagnose Aspergers syndrome. Retrieved February
15, 2009 from, HealthNewsDigest.com.
Klin, A., Volkmar, F., & Sparrow, S. S. (Eds.). (2000). Asperger syndrome. New York,
NY: Guilford Press.
Little, L. (2002). Middle-class mothers perceptions of peer and sibling victimization
among children with Aspergers syndrome and nonverbal learning disorders. Issues in
Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 24, 4357.
Myles, B., & Simpson, R. L., (1998). Asperger syndrome: A guide for educators and
parents. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Olweus, D., (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers.
Tantum, D., (2003) Challenge of adolescents and adults with Aspergers syndrome. Child
and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12(1), 143163.
Twatchman-Cullen, D. (1996) Blinded by their strengths: The topsy-turvy world of
Aspergers syndrome. The Advocate. Autism Society of America Newsletter.
Retrieved August 3, 2003, from http://www.udel.edu/bkirby/asperger.