Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NOTE
1. Introduction
Fruit harvesting by hand is a labour intensive and time consuming operation but is still
used in most of the developing countries. Fruits are easily damaged by this method of
harvesting and almost half of the fruit harvested has been found to be unmarketable.
Attempts to mechanically
harvest fresh market quality tree fruits have resulted in excessive
damage to the fruits caused by (1) detachment, (2) falling through the tree canopy and (3)
interaction with catching and collecting components of the harvesting machine.2 The cost of
this type of fruit harvesting machine is usually high and so a lift, substantially lower in cost,
has been developed as a tractor attachment to facilitate hand harvesting of fruits.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. General layout of the lift attachment
The tractor-operated lift (Fig. 1) consists of a main beam (A) hinged to the tractor top link
hitch point. The main beam is supported by the lower links of the tractor through a drawbar
and strut assembly (B). A platform (C) is hinged to the free end of the main beam. The
platform is also hinged to a supporting beam (D) which in turn is hinged to the tractor
chassis. The platform is provided with a ladder (E).
2.2. Construction
The platform is maintained in the horizontal position while the main beam is raised by
means of the four-bar linkage mechanism provided by the unit. The tractor chassis acts as a
fixed link, the main beam, platform and the supporting beam act as the three hinged links of
the four-bar linkage mechanism. The platform was provided with suitable hand rails and
weld-mesh enclosures for ensuring convenience and safety of the operator. Reinforcement
was given to the main beam to avoid bending during operation. Below the platform two
L-shaped structures made of angle sections were welded to the free end of the main beam
(Fig. 2). If any of the hinge pins connecting the platform to the main or supporting beam
shear-off by mishap the platform will be held in position by these L-shaped structures and it
will not topple.
* Department of Farm Machinery, College of Agricultural Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
Coimbatore-641
Received
003, India
4 March
1987; accepted
1988
297
0021-8634/88/080297 + 05 %03.00/O
Engineering
298
A TRACTOR-OPERATED
LIFT
T.W
Fig. 1. Tractor-operated
lifi
= 6.5 m
= 2.0 m
= 1.5 m
A.
299
TAJUDDIN
= 6.5--2.0-
1.5 = 3 m
= 3 cosec 60
= 3.5 m approx.
The section of the main beam from the supporting point of the strut was taken as a
cantilever beam subjected to a uniformly distributed load of 100 N/m due to self-weight of
the beam and a point load of 1000 N acting at the free end of the beam which includes the
weight of the platform and the weight of operator. The main beam is supported by the strut
at a distance of 700 mm from the upper hitch point of the tractor and the length of the
cantilever beam from this point to the platform end is 2.8 m. The maximum bending
moment was calculated to be 3190 N m. The permissible bending stress was limited to
15 750 N/cm2 which indicated a tubular section of inner dia. 56 mm and outer dia. 70 mm.
The reaction force acting through the strut member was determined to be 5080 N. By trial
and error, a tubular section of 50 mm outer dia. ahd 48 mm inner dia. was selected for the
strut. The slenderness ratio of the strut section was calculated to be 40.4. The permissible
stress3 in axial compression (P,) for this slenderness ratio is 12 000 N/cm. Since the capacity
of the strut (P, x cross sectional area) is greater than the reaction force the design of strut is
safe.4
3. Results
3.1. Cost economics
=
=
=
=
with the
Rs.97 165.00
10% of the purchase price
10000 h in 10 years of use
12%.
Agricultural tractors are exempted from taxes in India, so tax charges were ignored.
Insurance and housing charges were taken as 0.5 and 1.5% of the average purchase price of
the tractor respectively.
Average diesel consumption of the
tractor
Cost of diesel fuel
Average lubricating oil consumption
of the tractor
= 4 l/h
= Rs.3.75/1
Therefore, depreciation
the tractor
= 97 165 -9717
10 000
charges for
= Rs.8.74/h
300
A TRACTOR-OPERATED
97165+9717
2
= Rs.6.41/h
12
1
xiKOx1OOO
97165+9717
2
= Rs.O_27/ha
0.5
1
x 100 x 1000
Interest on investment
Insurance charges
97 165+9717
2
Rs.O.gO/h
Housing charges
1.5
xExlOOO
Fuel charges
4 x 3.75 = Rs.l5.OO/h
&
charges
LIFT
x 4 x 18 = Rs.2.16/h
97 165 x 10
= Rs.9.72/h
100 x 1000
33
- = Rs.4.17/h
7
8~74+6~41+0~27+0~80+15~00
+2.16+9.72+4.71
= Rs.47.81/h
2500-250
5000
= Rs.O*45/h
Interest on investment
2500+250
2
12
x loo x &
2500 x &
x &
Operators wages
Rs.13.50/day of 8 h = Rs.1.69/h
= Rs.0.33/h
= Rs.O*25/h
Operational cost of the lift attachment = 0.45 + 0.33 + 0.25 + 1.69 = Rs.2.72/h
Operational cost of the tractor= 47.81+ 2.72 = Rs.50*5/h
operated lift
3.2. Evaluation of the lift attachment
The platform could be raised from its minimum level to a maximum height of 4.2 m from
ground level within 5 s. This enabled the operator standing on the platform to reach easily a
height of 6.5 m from ground level. In total, the attachment weighed 155 kg, which includes
the platform, main beam, supporting beam and drawbar-strut assembly.
The tractor-operated lift was tested for harvesting sapota, mango and breadfruit and it
was found ideal for harvesting these fruits. The test results in the case of sapota fruit are
given below.
Quantity of sapota fruits plucked in
12 min duration using the tractoroperated lift
= 10.5 kg
A.
301
TAJUDDIN
= 10.5 x ;
Rs.50.53/h
= Rs.0.96/kg
= 52.5 kg/h
= 52.5 kg/h
4. Discussion
The cost of plucking 1 kg of fruit using the tractor-operated lift was 30% less than the
corresponding cost of manual plucking without the lift. The fruits plucked using the lift were
undamaged as these could be hand plucked. Apart from harvesting fruits and coconut, the
tractor-operated
lift could be used for other operations such as repair and maintenance
works on buildings, pruning, lopping and spraying of tree crops.
The operating height of the tractor-operated lift can be increased further by increasing the
length of main and supporting beams. Increasing the length of beams may result in lifting of
the tractor front wheels. This can be overcome by adding front wheel weights. Suitable
telescopic arrangements could be incorporated in the unit so that the overall length could be
shortened for better manoeuvrability during transit. There is scope for using the tractor
attachment in maintenance works on telegraphic and overhead power lines. Thus, the
tractor-operated lift is a useful attachment to a tractor for its many uses in and around the
farm.
Acknowledgement
Thanks are due to Prof R. Karunanithi,
Ers T. V. Job, P. Natarajan
College of Agricultural Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
help in designing the tractor-operated
lift.
References
Sahu, S. D.; Singh, M. D.; Manjit Singh. Fruit harvesting
Indian
Society of Agricultural