Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UDC 621.762:661.66:669.14018.252.2
Ceramic metals obtained by pressing and sintering of briquettes from titanium carbide powders with constant
compositions (stoichiometric and with carbon deficit) followed by impregnation with steels U8, U10, and U12
are studied. The effects of the compositions of the metallic binder and of titanium carbide on the processes of
austenization, dissolution, and segregation of carbides, martensitic transformation, and on the hardness of the
cermets after subsequent heat treatment are determined.
INTRODUCTION
Ceramic metals based on a titanium carbide steel
combination are promising structural materials due to the
possibility of creation of a high-density state characterized
by good cohesion between the metallic binder and the carbide. In addition, the properties of such composites can be
varied widely due to the use of various initial materials and
various regimes of heat treatment of ready parts.
One of the methods for fabricating such cermets is impregnation of pressed and sintered briquettes from titanium
carbide with molten steel.
The microhardness of titanium carbide exceeds those of
other transition metal carbides [1]. Titanium carbide has high
thermodynamic stability in metallic melts, melting temperature, and corrosion resistance, and a low density. It differs
in principle from other carbides in the fact that it has a wide
domain of homogeneity and can form wide domains of
solid solutions with other carbides of metals of groups
IVa VIa [2].
A usual binder in high-hardness titanium carbide composites is steel (high-carbon tool steels including the highspeed kind) [3].
Heat treatment (hardening and tempering) of cermets
with a steel binder can noticeably change the properties of
the binder and thus affect the properties of the cermet, in particular, increase substantially its hardness and strength [4].
1
2
3
METHODS OF STUDY
We studied ceramic metals consisting of TiCx titanium
carbide and steels U8, U10, and U12, i.e., TiC0.98 U8,
TiC0.8 U8, TiC0.98 U10, TiC0.8 U10, TiC0.98 U12, and
TiC0.8 U12. A powder of titanium carbide with stoichiometric composition (TiC0.98 ) or with carbon deficit (TiC0.8 )
was pressed into briquettes at 20C and sintered at 1500C.
Then the briquettes were impregnated at 1450C for 10 min
in 0.013-Pa vacuum with melts of plain high-carbon steels
U8, U10, and U12 that contained 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 wt.% C,
respectively.
167
0026-0673/07/0304-0167 2007 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
168
N. Frage et al.
Changes in the Phase Composition, Structure, and Hardness of Titanium Carbide High-Carbon Steel Cermets
ac , nm
af , nm
0.2881
0.4332
169
1
2
3
0.4330
1
0.2877
0.4328
0.2873
0.4326
0.8
1.0
0.2869
1.2
Cb , %
0.2865
ac , nm
b
0.4328
3
4
5
0.4324
0.4322
1.0
1.2 b , %
HV, kgf/mm2
HV, kgf/mm2
0.8
1.0
Fig. 2. Dependence of the lattice period of ferrite af after impregnation of the cermet on the carbon content in the steel binder Cb: empty
symbols) bottom of the cermet; filled symbols) top of the
cermet; 1, 2 ) cermet with TiC0.8; 3, 4 ) cermet with TiC0.98.
2
0.4326
0.8
1800
1.2
1700
6
5
4
1600
Cb , %
1400
b
5
1300
4
1100
1200
1000
800
600
1500
0.8
1.0
900
700
1.2
Cb , %
500
3
2
1
0.8
1.0
1.2
Cb , %
170
N. Frage et al.
Ti; Fe, wt.%
100
Ti
80
60
Particle
of titanium
carbide
Binder
Particle
of titanium
carbide
40
20
Fe
0
12
16
20
24
h, mm
Fig. 4. Distribution of titanium and iron in two neighbor particles of
titanium carbide in TiC0.98 steel U8 cermet after hardening in
water from 1100C (60 min) (h is the distance from the center of the
particle).
The heating for hardening was accompanied by redistribution of carbon; the redistribution of titanium and iron between the components of the composite went on, especially
at a high heating temperature. Growth in the temperature and
in the time of heating for hardening caused progressive reduction of the lattice period of titanium carbide, which was
the most noticeable in hardening from 1100C (60 min)
(Fig. 1).
The results of the evaluation of lattice periods of ferrite
from the data of x-ray diffraction and spectrum analyses are
close. At least these methods give qualitatively similar results in a comparison of the effect of the compositions of the
carbide and of the steel, and of the tops and of the bottoms of the specimens. Estimates of diffusion paths of titanium confirm the probability of the observed processes of redistribution of elements between the components of composites during impregnation and heating for hardening. The
width of the transition zones (zones with variable concentration) is about 2.0 3.0 mm (Fig. 4).
In specimens with initially stoichiometric titanium carbide, martensite and austenite appeared after hardening from
780C, whereas in specimens with TiC0.8 they appeared after
hardening from 900C, which was connected with different
degrees of carbon diffusion from the metallic binder into the
titanium carbide. The carbon content in the martensite of the
steel binder after hardening from 780C attained 0.9 1.0%
for all the three variants of composites with stoichiometric
carbide. As the temperature of heating for hardening increased to 1100C, it grew to a value close to or even exceeding the carbon content in the steel.
The lattice period of retained austenite also increased; in
the composites with nonstoichiometric carbide the carbon
content in the martensite after hardening from 900 1100C
amounted to 0.3 0.4%. Homogenization of austenite due to
heating of titanium carbide steel composites requires
much more time than usual due to the transition of titanium
from the carbide into the steel. For this reason we observed
inhomogeneity of the composition of austenite and martensite, which appeared during hardening.
In any state (after impregnation and after hardening) the
composites contained a low amount of a Fe2Ti phase and of a
cementite-type carbide (Fe3C). The amount of this carbide
was noticeably higher in the specimens with initially
stoichiometric titanium carbide and in the TiC0.8 steel
U12 composite.
In the composites with stoichiometric titanium carbide
the hardness increased noticeably already after hardening
from 780C due to the appearance of martensite. In the composites with nonstoichiometric titanium carbide the hardness
after such hardening remained at the level of the state after
impregnation. With time, when the temperature of repeated
hardening treatment was increased, the hardness grew for the
composites of all variants (the growth was higher in the composites with initially stoichiometric carbide).The hardness of
the top side was higher than that of the bottom side in all
the specimens. After hardening from 1100C (60 min) the
hardness of the TiC0.98 steel composites increased to
1565 1710 HV; that of the TiC0.8 steel composites increased to 1120 1565 HV (Fig. 3). The hardness of the
TiC0.8 steel U12 composite hardened in mode 6 attained
the level of hardness of the specimen with stoichiometric titanium carbide after hardening in mode 4. In all the composites the hardness increased with growth in the carbon content
in the steel. The efficiency of hardening of the composites increased with growth in the carbon content in the steel
nonmonotonically upon growth in the hardening temperature, because the interaction between the cermet components
changed the chemical composition of the phases and the
structural states of the carbide and of the binder. Specifically,
hardening of TiC0.98 steel composites was accompanied
by the formation of retained austenite the amount of which
was the higher the more carbon was contained in the steel
and the less titanium was dissolved in latter.
When measuring the microhardness of the binder and of
the carbide particles in impregnated specimens we established the formation of cracks in the carbides. After the hardening, cracks did not appear when we measured the hardness, possibly due to the more stressed state of the surrounding binder. Consequently, the strengthening of the binder
produced a favorable effect on the fracture resistance. The
microhardness of the carbides after the hardening did not
change and amounted to 2870 2900 HV and 2580
2620 HV for composites with TiC0.98 and TiC0.8, respectively. The microhardness of the metallic binder after impregnation was virtually the same for all the specimens
(650 690 HV ); after hardening it differed considerably
(820 1060 HV ), which was connected with the differences
in the structure and in the composition of the components of
the composite. The microhardness of the binder increased
with growth in the carbon content in the martensite formed
due to the hardening.
The results of the evaluation of the effect of the tempering temperature on the hardness of the composites are pre-
Changes in the Phase Composition, Structure, and Hardness of Titanium Carbide High-Carbon Steel Cermets
HV, kgf/mm2
CONCLUSIONS
1600
1400
1200
1
1000
800
0
200
400
600 ttemp , C
400
600 ttemp , C
HV, kgf/mm2
1400
1300
1200
2
1
1100
1000
900
b
800
200
171
Fig. 5. Dependence of the hardness HV of a cermet on the tempering temperature after water hardening from 1100C (60 min):
a) cermet with titanium carbide TiC0.98; b ) cermet with titanium
carbide TiC0.8; 1, 2, 3 ) impregnation with steel U8, U10, and U12,
respectively.