Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
their job?
Before progressing further into this paper it is necessary that I state my relationship to this
topic I have chosen to research and I should also include any biases that I may have with it as well.
This topic does have a significant importance to me because I am wanting to eventually pursue a
career in the health field, specifically a Physician Assistant. With this being such a personal interest
could also bias my research of the other healthcare providers. I grew up being introduced to the
medical field when I was young. With my mother being Registered Nurse, at times she would allow
me to tag along with her at work and I enjoyed every minute of it. Seeing what she did at work and
helping people in ways others could not really inspired me. Looking up to her motivated me to
eventually become a Physician Assistant. For a couple of my sources used in my inquiry, I included
an interview with Wendy Wrenn, RN and an observation of Amy Berry, PA. This is where another
bias could step in. Wendy Wrenn, RN is my mother and Amy Berry, PA is my godmother; my
connections with these people is what could also bias my research. With my research involving
patients and peoples opinions of their healthcare providers and discriminations upon them could
cause some readers to believe I have written in favor of my chosen career path rather than
proportionately to the occupations discussed.
The focus for my research will involve gathering opinions from people inside and
outside of medical facilities. Reasons why I plan to gather opinions from random people
outside of a medical facility is to discover if prejudice acts and judgments are still made
upon society to our medical professionals than just patients. This research I am
interested in conducting is in seeing how patients in various medical treatment
situations respond to the health care providers treating them. The average person may
not think a topic like this is important but as you continue to read, you will learn the
similarities and differences of our healthcare providers and how people judge them
whether their inside or outside of a medical facility from the study .
Medical Professionals
Literature Review
etc.
A physician assistant and nurse practitioner are similar but are also different. Both
occupations require a masters degree but while in school, a nurse practitioner is allowed to alter
his or her clinical experiences to their chosen specialty while a physician assistant just requires a
clinical rotation through all specialties without a chosen specialty (Freda 2000). This is also a
factor that could cause people not to want to substitute a doctor. If people choose to believe a PA
or NP arent as specialized as a doctor, then they choose not to trust their judgments. This is one
reason why we need to teach society the importance of a physician assistant or nurse
practitioner and how significantly qualified they are to make medical decisions with or without a
doctor. These occupations are very helpful in our healthcare field. From observing a physician
assistant, I learned what they do during the day. Physician assistants normally work with doctors
and have patients like they do. They also refill prescriptions, diagnose patients, provide care and
can receive help from their supervising doctor if need be (Berry 2016).
A registered nurse is only a two year
This is where a physician
assistant and nurse practitioner can
begin to differ. A nurse practitioner is an
academically advanced and experienced
registered nurse and is not required to
work under a doctor like a PA but they
are allowed to (Cresswell 2013). Thus,
nurse practitioner programs are based
off of a nursing foundation, which makes
them similar to a registered nurse in
certain ways. Each of these occupations
strive to ensure better patient outcomes,
as so do other medical professions.
what a PA or NP is.
Stethoscope
A physician/doctor obviously has the
most education out of all of these professions.
In order to become a doctor one must earn their
doctorate degree, go through several years of
residency, and take their board exams. This is
what allows them to be at the top because they
Another factor that plays a role in patient skepticism is discrimination. We as people tend to
discriminate people in unmannerly ways. For instance, some patients tend to discriminate against a
healthcare providers race or ethnicity assuming he or she is not as intelligent as their race, gender,
or ethnicity. This tends to be more seen in hospital settings. Many spoken languages from different
cultures surround our healthcare field; this allows us to have access to people with multiple
linguistic abilities. Even though patients tend to judge a book by its cover at times, these linguistic
aspects of cultural competence have been associated to decreases in racial/ethnic disparities in
health and health care (Johnson 2004). These negative stereotypes and discriminations are deeply
embedded in the culture and institutions of our society (Williams & Mohammed 2008). Any cultures
will more than likely continue to discriminate on others for several decades because; societies seem
to have a natural instinct to judge others. All of these characteristics of skepticism definitely affect
patient gratification. The development of positive ethical conditions is important to the evolution of
quality work environments and quality patient outcomes (Pauly, Varcoe, & Storch 2009). Whether or
not a patient would be more satisfied with being treated from a doctor versus a nurse practitioner or
physician assistant, their providers race, gender, ethnicity, religion, should not be of any concern
unless it affects their medical tendencies in a negative way.
Eyes
Over the past several decades, our healthcare field has seemingly grown in the
amount of people that are becoming physician assistants and nurse practitioners over a
doctor. Even though they are highly qualified healthcare providers, patients seem to believe
that since they do not have as much experience or education as a doctor, there are not as
intellectual as a doctor. Although a doctor does have more education and experience, a
physician assistant and nurse practitioner are both qualified to diagnose, prescribe
medications, perform minor operations, etc. People also tend to discriminate against their
healthcare providers or nurses age, body appearance, ethnicity, hygiene, gender, race,
religion, spoken language etc. What factors do patients tend to discriminate on more than
others? Do patients judge their health providers label more or less than discriminating
their qualities? I would like to propose a study to determine if consumers would prefer a
doctor over a physician assistant or nurse practitioner. I would also determine if this Also to
determine if consumers discriminate and what factors they discriminate on more than
others.
This study will be conducted in three different settings in order to receive opinionated
answers to these questions. These different settings will be various hospitals, outpatient clinics,
and random people outside of the other two settings. In order to gather answers, interviews
must be taken place. There will be 12 different interviewers, four in the hospital, four in the
outpatient clinic, and four in the city outside of the clinic and hospital. Since we are asking two
different questions in this study, two of the four interviewers in each group will be asking about
their opinion on having a physician assistant or nurse practitioner as their healthcare provider
and the other two interviewers will be asking about what they tend to discriminate on with
their healthcare provider or nurse. While we are trying to find these answers, the interviewers
will be dressed very professionally but they will be of various races, genders, ethnicities, body
appearance, etc. since we are asking discriminative questions. Reasons to split the four
interviewers into two groups and have different settings is to avoid biased answers and to
receive different opinionated answers. More specifically:
Each group of four interviewers has two subgroups of two interviewers. One subgroup will be
asking the Interview Questions A (see questions bulleted below) about their opinion on having a
physician assistant or nurse practitioner as their healthcare provider versus a doctor and the other
subgroup will be asking Interview Questions B (see questions bulleted below) about the
discrimination of healthcare providers and nurses.
All of the patients being interviewed must be ages 18 and up because younger patients may not
understand the questions or why theyre be interviewed. Two interviewers must ask 50 random
patient Interview Questions A and the other two must ask 50 random patients/people Interview
Questions B as well but they cannot be the same person asked for Interview Questions A.
The four interviewers inside the outpatient clinic will be interviewing random patients that is either
waiting in line or leaving the clinic from their appointment. Two interviewers asking 50 random
patients Interview Questions A will be at a different outpatient clinic than the other two who are
asking 50 random patients Interview Questions B. This is being done so we can have a variety of
people and not asking one person two sets of questions.
The four interviewers inside the hospital will be interviewing random patients that are just in the
general care unit. Two interviewers asking Interview Questions A will be asking 50 random patients
and the other two interviewers asking Interview Questions will be asking 50 random patients as well
but they must be different from the patients than the ones asked for Interview Questions A.
Lastly, the other four interviewers will be going to other places in the same county as the clinic and
hospital to interview 50 random people Interview Questions A and 50 random people Interview
Questions B that are not currently being patients inside a facility.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Also, people are going feel very strong about their opinion and some are going to care
but not feel strong on their opinion. When a patient or person states their judgment,
the interviewer cannot change their facial expression or states their opinion. This
could create tension between the interviewer and the applicant. As for the healthcare
provider being discriminated upon should make their statement on how qualified and
determined they are before their patient decides if they want a new provider or not.
Interview questions A:
In todays society our healthcare providers are not just doctors; there are physician assistants and
nurse practitioners. Knowing that nurse practitioners and physician assistants tend to work
underneath a doctor and have less education and less experience, would you trust having a nurse
practitioner or physician assistant as your healthcare provider versus a doctor?
When going to an outpatient clinic and your temporary provider is a doctor, would be feel less
uncertain since he or she is not a physician assistant or nurse practitioner?
Now, if you are a patient staying the in hospital and your healthcare provider is a doctor but you
have a physician assistant to come and do check ups, would you feel like you are not receiving the
same level of care?
To continue from question three, would you feel any different if you had a nurse coming to do your
check ups and take your vitals even though they are trained to do so?
If you were skeptical to having a nurse practitioner or physician assistant as your healthcare
provider versus a doctor, explain why that is even though they are trained to do so. Also, if you were
uncertain about having a nurse take your vitals or draw blood, explain why having a nurse to do
these duties makes you feel that way.
Interview Questions B:
1. If your healthcare provider were of a different race or ethnicity of you, would you feel like you
are treated with the same level of care as a provider of the same race or ethnicity as you? If they
were not fluent in your language, would you be less trustful of them?
2. If your healthcare provider were of a different gender, would you feel like you are treated with
the same level of care as a provider of the same gender as you?
3. If your healthcare provider were apart different religion, would you feel like you are treated with
the same level of care as a provider of your religion?
4. If your healthcare provider had a difference appearance than you, for example is covered in
tattoos and looks different than any other provider youve had before, would you feel like you
were treated with equal level of care?
5. If you answered yes to any of these questions, could you explain why you would discriminate
that factor with their level of intelligence and providing equal care?
After conducting all of these interviews we now compare the results of each question in each
category. First, we will divide the answers to the questions according to setting where they we interviewed.
Next, we will categorize the answers for each question into sections with the same answers. Then, we will
calculate the same answers in each question and divide that number by the total number of people who
answered that question. Doing this will give us the percentages for each question according to setting.
Lastly, before calculating the percentages, separate the patients interviewed by category with their age.
Dividing the answers according to the interviewees age will determine if the ages of the patients affect how
they respond to their healthcare professionals in various medical treatment situations. Once the
percentages for all of the answers are found, you can then compare the answers to one another. From this,
you can discover the percentages of which discriminating factor is used more than others. You can also
determine the percentages of how many people prefer a doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant,
or if they simply do not have a preference. Calculating all of these differences will develop a reasoning as to
why people discriminate on certain factors, and why people tend to trust the label of a nurse practitioner or
physician assistant less than a doctor. Once these calculations are finished, a module could be created in
various languages. This module could be kept with the medical professionals to have when the time is
needed, will be at any medical facility for the public, and will be available online for the public to access.
Conclusion
This research conducted is really important to release to our society. It could be a major
role in leading our society to decrease or stop these prejudice acts within our healthcare field.
It is important for our public to have easy access to this module rather than having it just at
one place. They will be available online, in medical facilities, and all healthcare providers will
have to carry it with them at all times when doing their job. This way anyone can learn about
the results and know why it is important to stop prejudice acts to our healthcare providers.
Our patients who do make these verdicts may come to realize that they their prejudgment
remarks to their healthcare provider treating them are redundant.
There will always be research involving patient skepticism with medical professionals and
treatment. Further research I would like to propose is if patient skepticism affects the
performance of our healthcare providers. Lets say if a patient refuses treatment from a physician
assistant because he/she wants to be seen by a doctor, would this affect the PAs performance in a
negative way at work? Another question I would like to propose is how can our societys
knowledge of healthcare and medical professionals be improved so that patent skepticism will
decrease? A way I have thought to conclude this is for everyone in high school and college to take
a mandatory course about healthcare, medical professionals, and ethics that revolve around
them. This could possibly improve our societys knowledge involving healthcare. The medical
field is full of new opportunities and new technologies and I hope that there will be continuous
research involving the topics I have mentioned.
The End