Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NABL
NATIONAL ACCREDITATION
BOARD FOR TESTING AND
CALIBRATION LABORATORIES
APPLICATION FORM
for
TESTING LABORATORIES
ISSUE NO : 12
ISSUE DATE: 27.06.2012
AMENDMENT NO : 04
AMENDMENT DATE: 03.09.2015
AMENDMENT SHEET
Sl
no
Page
No.
6/11
Clause
No.
13
7/11
1.1
9/11
3.4.1
Date of
Amendment
Amendment
made
22.08.2012
Laboratory locations
16.10.2012
Reasons
Signature
QO
Signature
Director
Internal audit
findings
3-5/11
4.0
23.04.2013
Change in fee/
GB Decision
assessment
charges structure
4
3-5/11
4.0
28.05.2015
Change in fee/
GB Decision
assessment
charges structure
03.09.2015
Change in fee/
GB Decision
assessment
charges structure
6
7
8
9
10
CONTENTS
Sl. No
Title
Page
Application Form
requirement of ISO/IEC 17025: 2005, additional requirements of NABL and the regulatory authorities, as
applicable at all times.
3. Applicant laboratories are advised to ensure that the latest versions of NABL documents are available with them.
4. The application fee and other necessary charges related to accreditation process is given in NABL document
NABL 100 General Information Brochure under NABL Finance and NABL Fee Structure. NABL 100 is available
on NABL website.
5. Laboratories are advised to familiarize themselves with NABL 100 General Information Brochure, NABL 216
Procedures for Dealing with Adverse Decisions and NABL 131 Terms and Conditions for Obtaining and
Maintaining Accreditation before filling up this form.
6. The applicant laboratory shall provide photocopies of appropriate document in support of the legal identity
claimed (eg. Registration Certificate under Companies Act, approval from local or regulatory bodies, etc.)
7. The applicant laboratory shall intimate NABL about any change in the information provided in this application
such as scope applied for accreditation, personnel, location etc. within 15 days from the date of changes.
8. NABL expects applicant laboratories that are to be accredited to follow the test methods as mentioned in the
current National or International standards and as stipulated by regulatory bodies. Where such methods do not
exist, other validated methods are acceptable. In case laboratory uses in-house validated methods the validation
data should be submitted along with the application.
9. The applicant laboratories must participate satisfactorily in the Proficiency Testing program conducted by NABL/
APLAC or any other national or international accredited/ recognized PT provider. In cases, where formal
accredited /recognized PT programmes are not available, the laboratory will either initiate Inter laboratory
comparison or participate in Appropriate ILC programme conducted by accredited /reputed laboratory. The
minimum stipulated participation is one type of test per discipline prior to grant of accreditation. The satisfactory
performance shall be defined in term of z score. For unsatisfactory performance, the laboratory shall take
corrective action and inform NABL.
10. The laboratory shall also inform NABL in advance about any reservation with valid reason regarding appointment
of Lead Assessor/ Assessor for the assessment.
11. The applicant laboratory shall be given due notice of any intended changes relating to NABL accreditation
criteria and will also be given such time, as in the opinion of NABL is reasonable to carry out the necessary
changes to its policies/practices & procedure(s). The laboratory shall inform NABL when such changes have
been completed.
National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
Doc. No: NABL 151
Issue No: 12
12. The application must be filled up carefully to provide required information in such a manner that further
correspondence for seeking clarifications are not required. Particularly the scope of accreditation (para 2.2) shall
be complete to indicate unambiguously:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
13. The details of laboratory locations and the tests which the laboratory intends to cover vide NABL accreditation
must be listed clearly. The tests those are performed at site should be clearly identified in the scope of
accreditation.
Note: Laboratory operates from different locations in the same city may apply for NABL accreditation as a single laboratory.
The details of each location shall be explicitly mentioned in 1.1 of application form. In events where the laboratory operates
from different city/ state, each laboratory shall be applied separately for accreditation.
14. The laboratory shall submit NABL 131 duly signed by the Chief Executive or his/her Authorized Representative
to NABL Secretariat along with this application form. By signing NABL 131 the laboratory agrees to comply at all
times with Terms and Conditions of NABL.
15. The laboratory shall offer the NABL or its representative cooperation in:
a. undertaking any check to verify testing capability of the laboratory.
b. the laboratory shall unambiguously provide names of all authorized signatories who are responsible for
authenticity and issue of test certificates and reports.
c. offering access to relevant areas of the laboratory for witnessing the test being performed.
d. examination of all relevant documentation and records.
e. interaction with all relevant personnel.
16. The laboratory shall take all necessary actions and discharge all non- conformities raised during the assessment
within a maximum time of two months. The same shall be verified to the satisfaction of NABL. The final decision
on accreditation shall rest with NABL.
17. The application shall be kept confidential by NABL and information obtained during the processing of application,
assessment visit and grant of accreditation shall be safeguarded and dealt with impartiality. The procedure for
processing of application for accreditation is given in NABL 100.
***
Renewal of Accreditation
1. Laboratory Details
1.
1
1.
2
a.
Permanent Facility
Yes
No
b.
Site Facility
Yes
No
c.
Mobile facility
Yes
No
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
an in-house activity
2. Accreditation Details
2.1 Discipline of Testing for which accreditation is sought
Biological
Mechanical
Chemical
Non-Destructive
Electrical
Optical/ Photometry
Electronic
Radiological
Fluid-Flow
Thermal
Forensic Science
Group of products,
materials or items
tested
1
2
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication Oil
VISCOSITY @40
VISCOSITY @100
Lubrication Oil
Viscosity Index
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
8
9
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication Oil
POUR POINT
DENSITY
ASTM D 97
ASTM D 1298
<-400C
0.550 TO 1.200
10
Lubrication Oil
FLASH POINT-PMCC
ASTM D 93
20 TO 2000 C
11
Lubrication Oil
ASTM D 92
120 TO 2800 C
12
Lubrication Oil
ASTM D 893
13
Lubrication Oil
ASTM D 974
0 TO 25%
0.01 TO 10
MGKOH/GM
14
15
Lubrication Oil
Lubrication Oil
FLASH POINT-COC
INSOLUBLE PENTANE AND
TOLUENE
ACID NUMBER -MANUAL
TITRATION
WATER CONTENT BY DEAN
AND STARK
COLOUR
ASTM D 95
ASTM D 1500
0 TO 10%
VISUAL
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS
ALUMINIUM
BERIUM
BORON
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
IRON
LEAD
COPPER
Measurement
Uncertainty
( )
16
17
18
19
20
21
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Lubrication
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
22
Lubrication Oil
23
Lubrication Oil
CALORIFIC VALUE
PARTICLE COUNTER
SOOT CONTENT
OXIDATION
GLYCOL CONTENT
NITRATION
ASTM D 240
ISO/NAS
ASTM E 2412
ASTM E 2412
ASTM E 2412
ASTM E 2412
SULPHATION
ANTI WEAR COMPONENTSRULLER TEST
ASTM E 2412
ASTM E 2412
100 TO 50000
KCAL/GM
NAS-4 TO 12
-
NOTE: ALL THE TEST PARAMETER WRITTEN IN RED COLOUR ARE GOING TO ADD NEWLY IN THE SCOPE.
Note 1. Laboratories performing site testing shall clearly identify the specific tests on product(s)/ material performed at site separately.
2. Measurement uncertainty shall be expressed as expanded uncertainty with 95% confidence level
3. Test methods and standards shall be mentioned along with the year of publication of the standard
4. In case of enhancement of scope; it shall be specifically mentioned and clearly identified in the scope of accreditation
3. Organization
3.1 Senior Management (Name, Designation, telephone, Fax, e-mail)
3.1.1 Chief Executive of the laboratory _________________________________________________
3.1.2 Person responsible for the management system Dr. Ajay Mohan Suvarna, MD & CEO,
Ph.no. 040-65556400, amsuvarna@petrolabsindia.com
3.1.3 Person responsible for technical operations _________________________________________
3.1.4 Contact person for NABL _______________________________________________________
3.2 Authorized Signatories
3.2.1 Authorized signatories for approval of test reports
(Please refer relevant specific criteria for qualification and experience details)
Sl
no
Laboratory/
Department/
Section
1 Prasanna
. Bhavani
K.Surya
Kantha
Name &
Designation
of Signatory
Sr.Chemist
Qualification with
Specialization
M.Sc (Chemistry)
Technical
Manager
B.Sc.
(Chemistry)
Experience in
years related to
present work
2 years
7 years
Relevant Training
Authorized for
which specific area
of testing
Specimen
Signature
3.3
Organization Chart
3.3.1. Indicate in an organization chart the operating departments of the testing laboratory for which
accreditation is being sought (please append)
3.3.2 Indicate how the testing laboratory is related to external organizations or to its own parent organization
(where applicable)
3.4 Employees
3.4.1 Details of staff
Sl
no
1.
Name
S.Ravinder
A.Sriramlu
P. Venumadhav
Designation+
Experience related to
present work (in years)
3 years
M.A
1 year
Lab
Co-oridinator
B.Com
1 years
Prasanna Bhavani
Sr.Chemist
M.Sc (Chemistry)
2 years
ISO/IEC 17025:
2005
Internal
audit training
5.
K.Surya Kantha
Technical
Manager
B.Sc. (Chemistry)
7 years
ISO/IEC 17025:
2005
Internal
audit training
6.
E.Ramakrishna
Admin Asst
MBA
1 year
7.
Poonam Kumbhar
Chemist
M.Sc.(Physical Chemistry)
3 years
ISO/IEC 17025:
2005
Internal
audit training
8.
D.Suresh Kumar
Chemist
B.Sc (Chemistry)
2 years
ISO/IEC 17025:
2005
Internal
audit training
9.
Sumalatha
Chemist
M.Sc (Chemistry)
1 year
10
.
11
Jyothi
Chemist
M.Sc (Chemistry)
1 year
L.Prasanth Kumar
Chemist
B.Sc (Chemistry)
10 years
12
Vishala
M.Sc.(Chemistry)
13
Vijay
B.Sc (Chemistry)
14
Trainee
Chemist
Trainee
Chemist
B.Tech
Sr.Sales
Engineer
&
Service
6 years
ISO/IEC 17025:
2005
Internal
audit training
15
.
Rajinder Negi
B.Tech
Sr.Sales
Engineer
&
Service
6 years
Admin
Manager
Admin
Relevant
Training
Note: Laboratory shall clearly indicate staff responsible for site testing
Laboratory operating in shifts shall clearly identify the staff working in shifts
Quality Manager shall have 4 days training course on laboratory management system from a reputed institute
Name of
equipment
Model/ type/
year of make
Range and
accuracy
Date of last
calibration
Calibration due on *
Calibrated by**
Kinematic
Viscosity Bath
37 to 1000C
As permanual
08.07.15
07.07.2016
Euro
calibration
Kinematic
Viscosity bath
37 to 1000C
As permanual
08.07.15
07.07.2016
Euro
calibration
Digital
Automatic
potentiometic
titration
Digital
Automatic
potentiometic
titration
Rotating disc
electrode
Auto/POT(KF
)
07.23.2013
15.04.2016
-
Monthly
calibration
Petrolabs
India Pvt Ltd
Auto/POT(KF
)
14.01.2015
14.04.2016
-
Monthly
calibration
Petrolabs
India Pvt Ltd
Petrolabs
India Pvt Ltd
5
.
Spectro Q100
10
Daily
Source
TAN
1
Potassium
Phthalate
Hydrogen
Date of expiry/
Calibration
validity
31.07.2019
Traceability
900 ppm
This
standard
was
prepared
by
weight
measurements originating
from assayed element
concentrate. A precursor
blend was verified by
atomic
emission
or
absorpotion spectroscopy.
Element concentrations for
this standard are based on
the Concentrate assay
values and were prepared
to within the uncertainty
values listed above at the
95% confidence interval as
determined by weighted
measurements of blend
component conducted on
balances calibrated and
verified
with
NIST
traceable weights.
* The laboratory to decide the calibration interval based on ISO 10012 or ILAC-G24
** Please mention name of calibration agency. In case the equipment is calibrated in-house, same needs to be clearly indicated under this
column.
+ information should be provided for reference standards only and not for all testing and measuring equipment.
\
6. Proficiency Testing
Participation in NABL/ APLAC/ any other Inter Laboratory Comparison
(for details and requirements please refer to ISO/IEC 17043, NABL 162 , NABL 163)
Sl.
no.
Product/
Material
Details of
Test(s)
Date of
Testing
Nodal Laboratory/
Performance in
PT Provider
terms of Z
(Accreditation Body/
score
Country)
Corrective Action
Taken (if any)
7. Application Fees
7.1 Number of groups* applied for accreditation 1 group
7.2 Application fees (Rs.) ___________________________________________________________
7.3
Availability
1.
Yes
2.
Two copies of Quality Manual (latest issue) according to ISO/IEC 17025: 2005
Yes
3.
Application fees
a) Information on total groups applied for accreditation
b) Estimated applicable fees as per NABL 100
c) Demand Draft in favour of 'NABL'
One
Group
6.
7.
Availabl
e&
attached
Yes
8.
Yes
9.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes