Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Original article
70..78
K.K.F. CHENG, rn, pgdip epidemiol & biostat, phd, associate professor, Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies,
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, & R.M.W. YEUNG, md, consultant, Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
CHENG K.K.F. & YEUNG R.M.W. (2013) European Journal of Cancer Care 22, 7078
Impact of mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain among patients receiving cancer therapy
This paper describes the prevalence of mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain (MSFP), either
alone or in combination in patients receiving cancer therapy, and determines its impact and whether it is a
predictor for functional status and the impairment of quality of life (QoL). This is a cross-sectional study using
secondary data from a sample of 214 patients being treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In all, 87%, 68%,
66% and 38% of the patients reported MSFP respectively. Co-occurrence of any three and all of the four
symptoms, were reported separately at rates of 29% and 31%. Patients with all four symptoms recorded
significantly lower Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores (mean 77.7 12.9) and QoL scores (mean
subscales scores 9.017.6) than those with none or up to any three of the symptoms (P < 0.001). Regression of
the KPS and QoL scores against the MSFP revealed an increase in the explained variance of 25%, 43%, 27%,
37% and 41% respectively for KPS, physical, emotional, functional and total QoL. The results suggest that
MSFP are highly prevalent, whether alone or in combination, in patients receiving cancer therapy, and may
negatively influence the patients functional status and QoL during cancer therapy.
Keywords: symptoms, mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue, pain, chemotherapy, radiotherapy,
quality of life.
INTRODUCTION
Many cancer patients continue to struggle with myriad
symptoms and morbidities. Mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain (MSFP), are four of the most
common self-reported symptoms. Each of these has been
shown to affect patients throughout the process of diagnosis and treatment for cancer and can persist into the
survivorship period (Stone et al. 2000; Wells 2000; Savard
research into MSFP has focused on any two or three symptoms in combination, rather than on exploring the potential interactions and interrelationships between all of the
MSFP symptoms together. In addition, only a limited
number of studies have dealt with clusters of MSFP symptoms in patients receiving cancer treatment as compared
with those who are receiving palliative care and are at an
advanced stage of the disease. Thus, it is becoming
increasingly critical to address the effect of MSFP on
patients lives in order to reduce the burden of cancer
treatment. The purpose of the present study is to determine the impact of MSFP on patients functional status
and QoL, and evaluate whether MSFP can be a predictor of
functional status and the impairment of QoL during
cancer therapy, after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study used secondary data from a
convenience sample of 214 patients, 18 years of age and
older, with head/neck, colorectal, breast, lung, gynaecological or other cancers receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy at an oncology unit of a regional hospital in Hong
Kong. The study sample was drawn from a previously
conducted observational validation study (Cheng et al.
2009). The original database consisted of 370 patients who
were undergoing cancer therapy or at the early posttreatment stage for any diagnosed cancer. The study was
conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki;
all of the subjects provided written informed consent
before being enrolled in the study.
Mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain
were measured using the respective items from the
Chinese version of the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS). The
possible score ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating a high
level of symptom distress (McCorkle & Young 1978). For
this study, a symptom was considered to be present if the
SDS score was 2. The patients QoL was assessed using
the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of
Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). The physical, social,
emotional, and functional subscales and total scores were
computed as previously described. A lower score indicates
a poorer QoL (Cella et al. 1993). The Chinese versions of
both the SDS and FACT-G are accepted as being valid and
reliable psychometric tools, and to have an acceptable
cultural equivalence with the original version (Chan 2000;
Yu et al. 2000).
The observer rated Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
was used to measure functional status. This is an 11-point
rating scale ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = dead, 100 = normal
71
function) widely used to assess patients physical functional level related to cancer and its treatment (Yates et al.
1980). A validation study strongly suggests that the score
reflects the physical functioning of the patient (Mor et al.
1984).
Statistical analysis
Pearsons simple correlation test was performed for the
correlations between the MSFP symptoms, and thus to
determine the relationships between those symptoms, the
KPS, and the FACT-G subscale/total scores. Univariable
and multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses
were performed in order to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for
the patients who reported co-occurrence of any three symptoms of MSFP or all of the four symptoms. Any variables
with P-values <0.50 in the univariate model were tried in
the multivariate model in order to avoid excluding independent variables that might be non-significant in the
univariable analysis due to confounding. One-way analyses
of variance were used to determine if there were significant
differences among the patients who reported different
numbers of combinations of symptoms on KPS, and on the
FACT-G (C) subscale and total scores. The influence of the
MSFP symptoms on the patients functional status and
QoL was determined by a two-stage hierarchical multiple
regression. As the first step, gender, age, cancer diagnosis
and treatment modality were entered into the regression
model as covariates. To analyse whether the MSFP symptoms influenced the patients QoL over and above the
influences of the covariates, the four symptoms were
entered into the hierarchical analysis as a second step. This
resulted in a statistical significance of P < 0.05.
RESULTS
As shown in Table 1, the mean age of the patients was
54.24 11.56 years (range 2078 years); 51.4% (n = 110)
were men. About 22% were diagnosed with head/neck
cancer (n = 48), and 21% with colorectal cancer (n = 45).
More than half of the patients were at the early stage of
the disease (66.1%). More than half of the patients were
receiving chemotherapy (61.2%, n = 128), and 27% undergoing chemoradiotherapy.
The patients reported MSFP, at rates of 87%, 68%, 66%
and 38% respectively. Pain was the most distressing
symptom, with a mean score of 3.17 1.0. The mean
distress scores for sleep disturbance, fatigue and mood
disturbance were 2.94 0.9, 2.92 0.9 and 2.81 0.7
respectively. Among patients reported pain, 65.4% of
them were taking analgesics. Co-occurrence of any three
72
Frequency (%)
54.24 11.56
110 (51.4)
104 (48.6)
16
78
101
19
(7.5)
(36.4)
(47.2)
(8.9)
48
45
41
34
15
31
(22.4)
(21.0)
(19.2)
(15.9)
(7.0)
(14.5)
128 (61.2)
57 (27.3)
24 (11.5)
Table 2. Correlation coefficients among mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain, and among KPS and FACT-G subscale and
total scores (n = 214)
Sleep disturbance
Fatigue
Pain
KPS
QoL scores
Physical
Social
Emotion
Functional
Total
Mood
Sleep disturbance
Fatigue
Pain
0.32*
0.33*
0.25*
-0.29*
0.42*
0.26*
-0.28*
0.39*
-0.48*
-0.57*
-0.49*
-0.27*
-0.53*
-0.48*
-0.57*
-0.39*
-0.20*
-0.29*
-0.44*
-0.44*
-0.50*
-0.32*
-0.39*
-0.52*
-0.55*
-0.55*
-0.26*
-0.24*
-0.43*
-0.47*
Table 3. Associations between patients characteristics and the no. of combined mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain
(n = 214)
Age
Gender
Male
Female
Cancer diagnosis
Head and neck
Colorectal
Breast
Lung
Gynaecological
Others
Cancer therapy
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy
02 symptoms
(n = 85)
3 symptoms
(n = 127)
Bivariate analysis
Odds ratio (95% CI)
P-value
P-value
53.81 11.4
54.52 11.7
1.01 (0.981.03)
0.659
42 (48.8%)
44 (51.2%)
68 (53.1%)
60 (46.9%)
1.0 (referent)
1.19 (0.692.05)
0.539
1.46 (0.663.20)
0.350
19
20
21
7
8
11
29
25
20
27
7
20
1.0
0.82
0.62
2.58
0.57
1.19
(referent)
(0.361.87)
(0.271.45)
(0.926.96)
(0.181.84)
(0.473.04)
0.635
0.272
0.073
0.350
0.714
0.64
0.46
2.81
0.40
1.14
0.328
0.163
0.023*
0.179
0.791
1.0 (referent)
2.12 (0.795.70)
0.84 (0.451.58)
0.136
0.593
1.68 (0.574.98)
0.84 (0.431.63)
(22.1%)
(23.3%)
(24.4%)
(8.1%)
(9.3%)
(12.8%)
53 (62.4%)
6 (7.1%)
26 (30.6%)
(22.7%)
(19.5%)
(15.6%)
(21.1%)
(5.5%)
(15.6%)
75 (60.5%)
18 (14.5%)
31 (25.0%)
Multivariate analysis
(0.271.56)
(0.161.37)
(1.166.85)
(0.101.53)
(0.423.10)
0.351
0.598
P-value
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
30.7
8.7
9.5
25.4
32.9
15.6 5.6 (14.216.9)
17.6 4.2 (16.518.6)
15.5 4.6 (14.416.7)
9.0 5.7 (7.510.4)
63.0 16.3 (58.967.1)
4.3 (20.122.2)
3.8 (17.419.4)
4.0 (15.717.7)
5.3 (11.714.4)
12.7 (70.977.6)
21.1
18.4
16.7
13.0
74.3
4.6 (20.924.2)
3.4 (19.521.8)
3.9 (17.720.4)
5.8 (14.117.9)
12.3 (80.088.6)
22.6
20.6
19.1
16.0
84.3
4.1 (21.624.6)
3.8 (19.722.5)
3.4 (17.119.5)
4.9 (14.818.4)
11.4 (80.889.3)
23.2
21.1
18.3
16.6
85.0
(25.527.7)
(20.324.1)
(19.522.7)
(18.923.7)
(95.2104.1)
2.2
3.5
3.1
4.8
8.1
26.6
22.2
21.1
21.3
99.7
25.3
F
All MSFP (n = 64)
KPS*
FACT-G scores
Physical
Social
Emotion
Functional
Total
No MSFP (n = 18)
Table 4. The mean KPS and FACT-G (C) subscale scores by the no. of combined MSFP (n = 214)
74
<0.001
DISCUSSION
The above data have shown that MSFP are highly prevalent, whether alone or in combination, in patients who
have undergone cancer therapy. It is to be noted that the
reported mood disturbance (87%) and sleep disturbance
(68%) was higher than in the previous study of patients
prior to the initiation of radiotherapy (mood disturbance
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Table 5. Regression coefficients of the KPS and FACT-G subscale and total scores against mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue
and pain (n = 214)
Standardised coefficients b
FACT-G (C)
KPS
Age
Gender
Male
Female
Cancer diagnosis
Head and neck
Colorectal
Breast
Lung
Gynaecological
Others
Cancer therapy
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Mood disturbance
Sleep disturbance
Fatigue
Pain
DR2
DF-value
P-value
-0.11
Physical
0.05
Social
-0.03
Emotional
0.22**
Functional
0.03
Total
0.10
1 (Referent)
0.05
1 (Referent)
-0.03
1 (Referent)
0.19*
1 (Referent)
0.02
1 (Referent)
0.15
1 (Referent)
0.10
1 (Referent)
-0.28
-0.34*
0.13*
-0.20
0.01
1 (Referent)
-0.26
-0.23
0.29
-0.38
-0.13
1 (Referent)
0.14
0.01
0.16
0.06
0.19
1 (Referent)
-0.29
-0.33
0.11
-0.22
-0.01
1 (Referent)
-0.28
-0.34
0.13
-0.20
0.01
1 (Referent)
-0.27
-0.39
0.20
-0.42
-0.50
1 (Referent)
-0.25
0.02
-0.05
-0.04
-0.26
-0.34
0.25
25.3
<0.0001
1 (Referent)
-0.10
-0.02
-0.29
-0.12*
-0.23
-0.33
0.43
42.1
<0.0001
1 (Referent)
-0.13
-0.01
-0.11
0.01
-0.20*
-0.12
0.09
4.98
0.001
1 (Referent)
-0.22**
-0.05
-0.40
-0.06
-0.22**
0.03
0.27
22.5
<0.0001
1 (Referent)
-0.05
0.10
-0.26
-0.29
-0.27
-0.29
0.37
34.1
<0.0001
1 (Referent)
-0.15*
-0.03
-0.35
-0.14*
-0.27
-0.19**
0.41
44.5
<0.0001
indicates areas for continued research into symptom clusters and innovative treatment to target multiple symptoms. The results also show that patients with lung cancer
are associated with a greater risk of co-occurrence of any
three or all four of the MSFP symptoms. In a populationbased study to examine cancer symptoms and performance outcomes, Barbera et al. (2010) also found that lung
cancer patients had the worst burden of symptoms. Nevertheless, differences in the symptoms reported for cancer
subgroups require further investigation. Congruent with
other studies, the inter-correlation found in this study
between MSFP was mild to moderate (Gaston-Johansson
et al. 1999; Theobald 2004; Stepanski et al. 2009). There is
a growing volume of literature that supports its observations that MSFP occur concurrently and are interrelated.
Several other recent studies have shown that depression is
also often part of a cluster of interrelated symptoms,
including pain, fatigue and sleep disturbance (Redeker
et al. 2000; Theobald 2004). It has been suggested that the
link between pain and depression are reciprocally related.
Fatigue is another symptom related to both pain and
depression in cancer patients (Spiegel et al. 1994; Glover
et al. 1995; So et al. 2009). It is notable that sleep disturbance in the context of cancer seldom occurs by itself
and is more commonly clustered with pain, fatigue and
75
depression (Redeker et al. 2000; Theobald 2004). Stepanski et al. (2009) studied the relationship between trouble
in sleeping, depressed moods, pain and fatigue in 11 445
cancer patients undergoing treatment in a large community oncology practice, and revealed that trouble in sleeping occurred in 55% of patients and was associated with
significantly increased fatigue, pain and depressed moods.
The same study indicated that the effect of depressed
moods on fatigue and pain was mediated by trouble in
sleeping, and the effect of trouble in sleeping on fatigue
was mediated by pain as shown by structural equation
modelling. The relationship between pain and sleep has
often been assumed to be reciprocal pain can lead to
disturbed sleep, and vice versa (Smith & Haythornthwaite
2004). A small body of research has accumulated which
suggests that there is a bi-directional link between depression and sleep disturbance (Ford & Kamerow 1989; Savard
& Morin 2001). In a study of patients with advanced
cancer receiving palliative care, Delgado-Guay et al.
(2011) revealed that patients with sleep disturbance were
more likely to report pain (P = 0.0132), depression (P =
0.019), anxiety (P = 0.01) and a poorer sense of well-being
(P = 0.035) compared with patients who did not experience
sleep disturbance. A sample of adult patients with lung
and colon cancer revealed that 56% attributed their sleep
disturbance to experiencing pain (Savard & Morin 2001).
Several studies have established relationships between
fatigue and sleep disturbance both during cancer treatment as well as after (Servaes et al. 2002; Hickok et al.
2005). Beck et al. (2005) examined the interrelationships
between symptoms of pain, fatigue and sleep disturbance,
and found that pain and sleep disturbance predicted
fatigue. In future, more empirical data are needed to determine the interrelationships and the complex patterns of
co-variation among MSFP symptoms, as well as the trajectories and response shift of the symptoms over the
course of cancer therapy in order to develop a robust
causal model of the symptoms in order to improve MSFP
management strategies.
The results in this study suggest an association
between the symptoms of MSFP, functional status and
QoL. Patients who had a co-occurrence of any three or all
four of the symptoms of MSFP reported the worst functional status and poorest QoL. Miaskowski et al. (2006)
and Pud et al. (2008) analysed 191 and 228 adults undergoing active cancer treatment respectively, and also
found that the subgroup of patients who had high levels
of MSFP reported poor functional status and QoL. In the
current study, one-fifth to half of the variance (2543%)
in functional status as well as physical, emotional and
functional well-being and total QoL was explained by the
76
77
78
Copyright of European Journal of Cancer Care is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.