Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
- Purpose
The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the momento of inertia and different
techniques for determining inertia.
2.- Introduction
To calculate inertia, the torque is required
T =r F
(R- distance to center F- Force )
For a point mass, the moment of inertia can be calculated by using the formula
2
(I-inertia r distance with respect to axis m-mass)
I =r m
However, with different objects, there are different formulas to calculate the moment of
inertia.
1
I = ML
12
rod.
For a solid sphere,
For a disc,
2
I = mr 2
5
1
2
I = mr
2
T =2
l
k
placed on opposite sides of the rod with the same distances from the axis. The distance of the
weights to the axis was measured. The measurements for the oscillations were repeated.
Distances were changed and the measurements were repeated. The whole experiments was
repeated with one weight on one side of the rod.
4th type of measurement:Measurement of the moment of inertia for different rotational
axes.
A disk with diametrical holes was given. The distances of each hole to the middle hole were
measured. The size and the mass of the disc were measured as well. The disc was fixed in the
middle of the axis and then deflected clockwise by 180 and released, The time taken for 3
oscillations was measured using a stopwatch. The experiment was repeated with placing the
disc in different hole positions on the axis.
5th type of measurement:Measurement of the arrival time for different rolling objects.
The massive cylinder and cylindrical shell was placed on the same height on an inclined plane and
released simultaneously. The arrival time of both objects at the bottom of the inclined plane was
measured using a stopwatch.
d in m
F in N
M inNm
180
0.10
0.83
0.083
180
0.20
0.42
0.084
180
0.30
0.28
0.084
mean
0.08367
stand. dev.
0.00058
uncertainty
0.00033
360
0.10
1.75
0.175
360
0.20
0.88
0.176
360
0.30
0.60
0.180
mean
0.177
stand. dev.
0.00265
uncertainty
0.00153
540
0.10
2.52
0.252
540
0.20
1.30
0.260
540
0.30
0.83
0.249
mean
0.25367
stand. dev.
0.00569
uncertainty
0.00328
Figure 1 - momentumvs
The slope of the regression line above is the wanted spring constant k. Its value is k=0.027 Nm.
And the uncertainty is u(k)=0.0015Nm.
2nd Measurement
With a tape ruler we measured the circumference of the sphere. By using the circumference
formula ( c=2 r and solving for r, that is
r=
c
) we calculated its radius. The radius of
2
the cylinder and of the hollow cylinder was measured by using a ruler.
The following table shows our results for the different radii:
Radius of the sphere
in m
Radius 1 of the
hollow cylinder in m
Radius 2 of the
hollow cylinder in m
0.0718
0.0450
0.04300
0.04500
0.0721
0.0445
0.04300
0.04500
0.0723
0.0445
0.04325
0.04525
0.0719
0.0440
0.04275
0.04475
0.0719
0.0445
0.04275
0.04475
Evaluation
We used the formulas given to calculate the moment of inertia of the different shaped objects
and its uncertainties. Examples of how we calculated them will follow.
2
I = 1.025 kg(0.072 m)=2.125103 (for the sphere)
5
u( I )= (
4.4721 05 kg
8.944105 m
) +(2
)I =5.285106 kgm
1.025 kg
0.0720 m
Object
m inkg
Sphere
1.025
mean
r in m
I inkg*m
0.072
2.125*10-3
stand. Dev.
0.0001
0.0002
1.182*10-5
uncertainty
4.472*10-5
8.944*10-5
5.28*10-6
Object
m inkg
Cylinder
0.364
mean
r in m
I inkg*m
0.0445
3.604*10-4
stand. Dev.
0.0001
3.536*10-4
5.727*10-6
uncertainty
4.4721*10-5
1.581*10-4
2.561*10-6
r in m
I inkg*m
0.04295
7.769*10-4
Object
m inkg
Hollowcylinder
0.402
mean
stand. Dev.
0.0001
2.092*10-4
7.396*10-6
uncertainty
4.472*10-5
9.354*10-5
3.308*10-6
3rd Measurement
Then we measured the period time T for the different shaped objects. The following table shows
the results of the period time T.
T of the sphere in s (5
oscillations)
T of the cylinder in s (6
oscillations)
8.62
4.40
5.85
8.75
4.41
5.88
8.75
4.40
6.00
8.67
4.39
5.92
8.69
4.38
5.73
Evaluation
Fromtheformula
8.696 s
0.027 Nm
5
I=
=2.069103
4
u( I )= (2
2.482104 s
0.0015 Nm
) +(
) I =1.292104
8.696 s
0.027 Nm
5
Object
T in s
I inkg*m
mean
8.696
2.069*10-3
stand. Dev.
5.549*10-2
uncertainty
2.482*10-2
1.292*10-4
T in s
I inkg*m
mean
4.396
3.671*10-4
stand. Dev.
1.14*10-2
uncertainty
5.099*10-3
Sphere
Object
Cylinder
2.102*10-5
Table 8 - moment of inertia of a cylinder, calculated by its period time, without disc
Object
T in s
I inkg*m
mean
5.876
6.559*10-4
stand. Dev.
9.915*10-2
uncertainty
4.434*10-2
Hollowcylinder
6.698*10-5
The following tables compare the moments of inertia, one calculated by the dimensions and one
calculated by the period times.
Object
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
2.125*10-3
2.069*10-3
uncertainty
5.285*10-6
1.292*10-4
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
3.604*10-4
3.671*10-4
uncertainty
2.561*10-6
2.102*10-5
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
7.769*10-4
6.559*10-4
uncertainty
3.308*10-6
6.698*10-5
Sphere
Object
Cylinder
Object
hollowcylinder
4th Measurement
Period times measured with mass at different distances to the center.
T (without
mass) in s
T (m at 10
cm) in s
T (m at 15
cm) in s
T (m at 20
cm) in s
T (m at 30
cm) in s
2.13
3.58
4.57
5.65
8.07
2.32
3.54
4.58
5.67
8.07
2.30
3.54
4.59
5.68
8.07
2.30
3.54
4.57
5.66
8.04
2.33
3.52
4.59
5.66
8.06
mean
2.276
3.544
4.58
5.664
8.062
stand. Dev.
0.0827
0.0219
0.01
0.0114
0.0130
uncertainty
0.0369
0.0098
0.0045
0.0051
0.0058
I (without
mass) in
kg*m
1.733*10-4
4.896*10-4
7.977*10-4
1.219*10-3
2.488*10-3
2.056*10-4
4.787*10-4
8.012*10-4
1.228*10-3
2.488*10-3
2.021*10-4
4.787*10-4
8.047*10-4
1.232*10-3
2.488*10-3
2.021*10-4
4.787*10-4
7.977*10-4
1.224*10-3
2.469*10-3
2.014*10-4
4.733*10-4
8.047*10-4
1.224*10-3
2.481*10-3
mean
1.981*10-4
4.798*10-4
8.012*10-4
1.225*10-3
2.483*10-3
stand. Dev.
1.404*10-5
5.946*10-6
3.499*10-6
4.935*10-6
8.024*10-6
uncertainty
6.279*10-6
2.659*10-6
1.565*10-6
2.207*10-6
3.588*10-6
Table 13- period times at different mass positions and different inertia
Magic plot shows us that the slope is 0.0025 kg*m. It means that the inertia grows in a very
small number compared to the square of the distance, and the relation is almost linear as can
be seen on the graph.
5. Conclusions
1st Measurement:
After measuring the force at different distances from the center and different angles we
calculated the momentum, then we plotted the momentum against in radians. From the graph
we could read the slope which is in this case the spring constant k. We also could read the
uncertainty. Those values are:
k=0.027Nm and u(t)=0.0015Nm
2nd and 3rd Measurement
Object
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
2.125*10-3
2.069*10-3
uncertainty
5.285*10-6
1.292*10-4
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
3.604*10-4
3.671*10-4
uncertainty
2.561*10-6
2.102*10-5
I (dimensions)
inkg*m
I (period time) in
kg*m
mean
7.769*10-4
6.559*10-4
uncertainty
3.308*10-6
6.698*10-5
Sphere
Object
Cylinder
Object
hollowcylinder
It can be seen that the moment of inertia calculated using the time periods and the one
calculated using the dimensions are pretty similar, and the differences can be attributed to small
deviations in the measurements due to the methods of measurement, i.e. the type ruler might
have slided giving a margin of 1 mm error. Another possible cause is that we might have
rounded up or down differences of less than 1 mm. On the other side, we tried to be very
accurate measuring the time periods by measuring five or six oscillations and then dividing the
time by the number of oscillations to get an exact result, but even though we might have done
small mistakes letting the chronometer run and then stopping it. So all in all, the small difference
are caused by slight human mistakes in the measurement procedure.
4th Measurement
After measuring the period time of different masses at different distances from the center, we
got as a result different moment of inertias caused by this difference of the distance from the
mass points to the center of the rod. We plotted them against the square of the distance and got
a linear increase and from that can be concluded that the moment of inertia is indeed increasing
in a squared relationship as the distance from the mass point to the center of mass of the object
changes, which make sense because the general formula of the moment of inertia equals the
mass times the radius (in this case distance from the center of the rod to the center of mass of
the weights) squared. It means in simple words that this distance has more influence in the
moment of inertia than the mass itself.