Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kingsville Municipal
Heritage Advisory
Committee
4/25/2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Introduction _________________________________________________________________________________________ 1
Key components of the Kingsville Heritage Conservation District Study ................................... 2
Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Content of the Kingsville Heritage Conservation District Study..................................................... 3
What is a Heritage Conservation District? ________________________________________________________ 4
Policy Framework __________________________________________________________________________________ 5
The Provincial Policy Statement ................................................................................................................. 5
Ministry of Culture Ontario Regulation 10/06 ...................................................................................... 6
Heritage Conservation District Designation Process ____________________________________________ 7
Town of Kingsville Official plan ____________________________________________________________________ 8
Cultural Heritage And Archaeological Resources................................................................................. 8
Cultural And Built Heritage Resources ..................................................................................................... 8
Town of Kingsville Context _______________________________________________________________________ 10
Document Research .......................................................................................................................................10
Consultation ......................................................................................................................................................10
Conservation District Study ______________________________________________________________________ 15
Characteristics of a Heritage District ......................................................................................................15
Cultural Heritage Value for Division St South __________________________________________________ 16
Identifying the Study Area _______________________________________________________________________ 19
Dynamic Evolving District _______________________________________________________________________ 20
Style......................................................................................................................................................................20
Victorian era (1840-1900) __________________________________________________________________ 20
Italianate (circa. 1850-1900): ______________________________________________________________ 21
Gothic Revival (1750-1900) ________________________________________________________________ 22
Mid-Century Modern (1945-1965)_________________________________________________________ 24
Modern buildings ____________________________________________________________________________ 26
Commercial and Public Buildings __________________________________________________________ 27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Materials______________________________________________________________________________________ 31
Height and Massing __________________________________________________________________________ 31
Streetscape Context and Assessment ___________________________________________________________ 32
Street layout ......................................................................................................................................................32
Vegetation ..........................................................................................................................................................32
Recommendations ________________________________________________________________________________ 33
Statement of Significance ............................................................................................................................33
Boundary............................................................................................................................................................33
Character-Defining Elements .....................................................................................................................33
General Policy Recommended ...................................................................................................................34
Recommended Conservation Guidelines for Public Spaces ...........................................................34
Recommended Conservation Guidelines for Buildings....................................................................35
Next Steps _________________________________________________________________________________________ 36
Introduction
Division St South begins at the centre of the downtown area of Kingsville and extends to
Lake Erie. This two-kilometer neighborhood is in the heart of Kingsville.
This centre has been subject to the ebb-and-flow of the economic variations of the last
two centuries. This trend is visible in the form and structure of its landscape. Through
fires, economic hardship, and revitalization, the community has evolved into a diverse
heterogeneous neighborhood. The area is an example of a dynamic cultural landscape
providing a strong sense of place and continuing to act as a gathering place for residents
and visitors to the area.
Division St South represents over 15 decades of built heritage in Kingsville. It is a unique
street that tells the story of
Kingsville through the people who
lived, built, and made Kingsville the
town it is today.
This Heritage Conservation District
Study has been prepared for
consideration by the property
owners in the Town of Kingsville
and Town Council, and proposes
the formal recognition of Division
Street South as a Heritage
Conservation District under Part V
of the Ontario Heritage Act, 2005. It
has been undertaken to map
attributes of cultural heritage
value, identify areas for improvement, and recommend conservation guidelines.
Page 1
Page 2
Examine the character and appearance of the area that is the subject of the study,
including buildings, structures and other property features of the area, to
determine if the area should be preserved as a heritage conservation district;
1
2
Page 3
Page 4
Policy Framework
THE PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT
The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS, 2014) is the current policy statement
regarding municipal land use and planning matters of provincial interest. This policy
statement is made pursuant to section 3 of the Planning Act. The PPS promotes the wise
use and management of cultural heritage resources.
The key policy that supports the implementation of heritage districts is:
Policy 2.6.1:
Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural
heritage landscapes shall be conserved.
Policy 2.6.1 for the conservation of significant cultural heritage landscapes is not new, but
it is strengthened by the stronger implementation standard issued under the Planning Act
which requires that planning decisions by municipalities and other approval authorities
shall be consistent with the PPS, 2005. The PPS also includes a new policy that will
provide additional support for protection of HCDs and their setting:
POLICY 2.6.3:
Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on
adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed
development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been
demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage
property will be conserved.
In other words, lands adjacent to protected heritage properties (which includes
designated HCDs) can be developed or altered only if the heritage attributes of the
protected property are conserved.
To put these policies in place, municipalities and approval authorities should integrate
heritage conservation objectives and policies into their land use planning documents and
approval procedures.
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
CONSULTATION
There were several phases to the public consultation
process. Prior to requesting the study, properties
were featured in the Kingsville Reporter over a twoyear period. A companion website
http://divisionoftime.ca/ was established to provide
additional information and feedback from the public.
Once Town Council approved the study period, a
public open house was provided to the residents of
Kingsville. The event was advertised in the Kingsville
Reporter (see Figure 1). In addition, property owners
on Division St South. were invited by mail to attend.
The invitation also included a frequently asked
questions page to explain the nature of the district
and anticipate any concerns property owners might
have (Figure 3).
Figure 1: Fire Insurance Map 1906
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_HCD_English.pdf
Page 15
5
6
Page 16
EPWORTH UNITED
CHURCH
Page 17
Probably the worst fire in Kingsvilles history and the one that changed the downtown
landscape the most happened on Monday November 9, 1981. Nine business were lost
and 23 people lost their home when fire broke out in the Wigle Block. This Victorian
landmark was completely lost, (see p. 26).
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
There are numerous homes in Kingsville and on Division St South that were built as Queen
Anne homes, or refurbished into this style. The Curtis J. Green (1893) was a home built in
the Queen Anne style. The curved porches were removed at a later date and enclosed.
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
VEGETATION
The 1.2 kilometer public streetscape is defined by a mature canopy of deciduous trees
from past beautification plans. The importance of the mature vegetation is noticeable in
the iconic postcards of the street. While many of these trees are beginning to reach the
end of their lifetime, the impact of shade on the street has been consistent through the
development of the Town and will require
a conscious effort to retain moving
forward.
The jewel of the towns public spaces is
Lakeside Park. First opened in 1907,
Lakeside Park is an 11.26 acre green
space with 553-foot frontage on Lake
Erie. In response to urbanization and
industrialization of daily life during the
late 1800s and early 1900s, the urban
Figure 26: Postcard showcasing Elm trees
Page 32
Recommendations
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
The area of Division St South has been subject to the ebb-and-flow of small town growth
for over 150 years. The dynamic evolution of the Town is reflected in the diversity of
architectural styles ranging from modest turn of the century Victorian residences to
Queen Anne Revival to Mid-Century Modern. The visual impact of these buildings is
reflected in their homogenous uses of vernacular building materials such as the red bricks
forged in the local Broadwell and Miner Brick yards. The streetscape is enhanced by the
additional use of modest wooden clapboard siding. The miscellany of uses historically
found in Division St South have provided the framework for sustainable economic
activities and diversification in use by facilitating micro-streetscapes each providing a
unique atmosphere for different land uses. Collectively these micro-streetscapes provide a
community unto itself as well as a wider social gathering place for regional residents as
well as seasonal tourists. Division St South exists as an excellent example of a dynamic,
evolving, cultural landscape with an eclectic mix of both modest vernacular and designed
structures and a strong association to the economic development of the Town of
Kingsville.
BOUNDARY
The recommended boundary for the Division St South District encompasses the entirety
of residential and commercial properties on Division St from Main Street south towards
Lake Erie.
CHARACTER-DEFINING ELEMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Next Steps
With the conclusion of the Heritage Conservation District Study, it is at Councils
discretion to determine whether the designation should proceed. The study has indicated
a high level of cultural value unique to the community and has provided the foundation for
a set of guidelines to be adopted into a Conservation Plan.
Should Council wish to proceed with investigating designation a motion from the
Municipal Heritage Advisory Committee will be required before staff can proceed with the
preparation of the Heritage Conservation District Plan and amendments to the Official
Plan.
Similarly to all amendments to the Official Plan, a public consultation period is required in
order to provide the community with the opportunity to contribute feedback regarding
staff recommendations. It is highly recommended that an information package, developed
in consultation with Planning and Development Services, rather than the standard Public
Notice, be circulated either by mail or in the newspaper and a specific webpage with
frequently asked questions be made available on the Town of Kingsville website.
Information packages should include, at minimum, the findings of the Study, a draft
version of the Statement of Significance and a frequently asked questions brochure
regarding the implications of district designation.
Following the public notification process, Council will have the opportunity to determine
whether a designation is appropriate and may adopt a bylaw to recognize the Heritage
Conservation District. Following the passing of the bylaw, any person or public agency
owning property within the district may make a motion to object to the Ontario Municipal
Board. If no objection is made, Council must adopt the Heritage Conservation District Plan
and Guidelines for the Conservation District to become an enforceable easement under
Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Page 36