Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 25

REPORT OF LALRINHLUI HAHA

Under the guidance of Sh. Lalnunpuia,
Advocate and Smt. Vanlalhruaii, Advocate, I
have done my internship during the period
from 28th June to 14th July 2010.

28th June 2010 (Monday): Drafting
a
Representation regarding consideration
of claim for
release of pension and other
retrial benefits in accordance
with the observation made by
the Hon’ble Guwahati High
Court in its Judgement and
Order Date.4.6.2010 passes in
WP (C) No.4288/04 addressed
to the
Commissioner
&
Secretary to the Government of
India, Ministry of Defence on
behalf of the 2nd Assam

Regiment
Servicemen
Mizoram.

Disband
ExAssociation,

29th June 2010 (Tuesday): Filed a Defamation
case to the court of Shri. Lalbiakzama,
Subordinate District Council
Court under Case No. C.S.
Appln. No. 18/09 representing
the Defendant Lalduhawmi
Sailo against the Plaintiff
Lalzuiliana Sailo.
1st July 2010(Thursday): Name of Court:
Court of Senior Civil Judge
Case No. M.S. Appln.
No. 1/03
C. Sangkhuma – Vrs - State of
Mizoram
Name
of
R.Vanlalchami

Judge:

Smt.

Advocate The day Defendant’s evidence.Counsel for Plaintiff : A. Sam Joseph.Rinliana Malhotra. Appln. 31/06 R. No. C. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: W. . 2nd July 2010 (Friday): Name of Court: Court of Senior Civil Judge Case No. Prayer is allowed and another date is scheduled for the submission of the Evidence of the Defendant.Laltawna – Vrs – State of Mizoram .S. is fixed for the The Counsel for the Defendant prayed for more time for the submission of the Defendant’s evidence.

Name of Judge: Smt. . The date is fixed for the Cross Examination of the Plaintiff. Advocate Both the parties are present through their respective Counsel. The next court was fixed for the submission of the Defendant’s evidence. Sam Joseph. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: W. . the Plaintiff was cross examined by the Counsel for the Defendant and was again re-examined by the Plaintiff’s Counsel.Lalramzauva . Accordingly. R.Vanlalchami Counsel for Plaintiff: C. The Counsel for the Plaintiff closed their evidence at this stage.

Lucy Lalrinthari Counsel for Plaintiff: Lalnunpuia .5th July 2010 : Name of the Court: Additional District & Session Judge (Monday) Case No. .9/01 Nauraj Kumar – Vrs – Ganesh Chhetri Name of Judge: Smt. Both parties are present through their respective Counsels. Advocate Court procedure starts at 10:30 am. and the same . Advocate Counsel for Defendant: W. Today is fixed for the submission of Written Objection by the opposite party. Accordingly. the Counsel for the Defendant submitted their Written Objection. Exe. Sam Joseph.

6th July 2010 (Tuesday): Name of Court: Subordinate District Council Court Case No. After perusal of the available materials on records and submission made by the Counsel for the Petitioner it was held the suit is liable to be proceeded and fix the next court date for the framing of issue.is furnished to the Petitioner wherein it was stated that the suit is not maintainable in its present form and style and as such the suit is liable to be dismissed outright. Criminal Complaint No.Liantluanga Name Liansangzuala of Judge: .30/09 U/S 125 of CrPC Vanlalzawni – Vrs – C.

Advocate for Claimant: A. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: Nil The Claimant is present with her Counsel while the Defendant is present in person.3 was brought forward and submitted her evidence through her Counsel by way of Examination – in – Chief on Affidavit under Order XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002) in which she made her deposition about her knowledge of the claimant.Rinliana Malhotra.Counsel C. Today is fixed for the Plaintiff’s evidence. her relation with her and all the matters in . the Plaintiff’s witness No. Accordingly.Lalramzauva .

M. Advocate .Lalramzauva . 7th July 2010 : Name of Court: Subordinate District Council Court (Wednesday) Case No.5/09 Laldingliana – Vrs – Laldingngheti Trial Magistrate: Sh.connection with the case within her knowledge. Plaintiff’s Witness No. As the Claimant has no other witness. the Counsel for the Claimant closed the evidence.3 was cross examined by the opposite party and was re – examined by the Counsel for the Claimant. Lalbiakzama Counsel for Plaintiff: C. Appln. Next court date is fixed for the submission of the opposite party’s witness. C. No.

Advocate .Lianhrima . However due to the absence of the Defendant Laldingngheti due to unavoidable circumstances. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: Lalnunpuia.H. 18/09 Lalthavunga – Vrs – State of Mizoram Trial Magistrate: Liansangzuala Counsel for Defendant : L.A.Lalramzauva . Advocate Today is fixed for Pre – Hearing. . 8h July 2010 (Thursday): Name of Court: Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class Bail Petition Crl.Rinliana Malhotra. Advocate Counsel for Petitioner: C. the court is adjourned and the PreHearing is rescheduled for another later date. No.

Today is fixed for Bail Hearing The Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the accused is a first time offender and have no previous convictions or criminal case pending against him and he further stated that he is the sole bread winner of his family looking after his old aged parents. Advocate . He also stated that the accused was arrested by the Excise Personnel without any civilian witness thereby violating the provisions of Sec. .100 of the Cr.7.PC. his wife and one minor child.A. 1995.Rinliana Malhotra. The accused was arrested on 17.2009 under Section 8 (1) of Mizoram Liquor Total Prohibition Act.

3000/. . The Counsel for the Defendant strongly opposes the release of the accused on bail at this initial stage as there is fear of absconding at the time of trial during his release on bail.As such the Counsel for the Petitioner pray for the release of the accused on bail with the condition that the accused will be present in court regularly as and whenever required by the court. the Magistrate issues an order for the release of the accused on bail with reliable surety upon the payment of bail amount of Rs.(Rupees three thousand) only. After hearing both the parties.

469/99 Lallunghnema – Vrs – Lalthangfala Trial Magistrate: Lalbiakzama Counsel C. Advocate for Plaintiff : A. Appln. Advocate Court procedure starts at 10:30 am.Lalramzauva .C.Rinliana Malhotra. . Sam Joseph. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: W. No. Name of the Court: Subordinate District Council Court (Friday) Case No. 9th July 2010 : 1.The next court date is fixed for the personal appearance of the accused in court. H.

2.S. Advocate .Rinliana Malhotra. C. Name of the Court: Subordinate District Council Court Case No. Accordingly.Today is fixed for submission of Written Argument.1/01 L. the Written Argument is submitted by both the parties.T.Lalramzauva . Appln. No.Kima – Vrs – State of Mizoram Trial Magistrate: Liansangzuala Counsel for Plaintiff: C. Another date is scheduled for Judgment and Order. Advocate A.

12th July 2010 : 1.Counsel for Defendant: L.S. T. Today is fixed Examination of the Plaintiff. Advocate Court procedure starts at 10:30 am. Name of the Court: Court of Senior Civil Judge (Monday) Case No.H Lianhrima. the Plaintiff was cross examined by the Defendant’s Counsel and was re-examined by the Counsel of the Plaintiff. 11/07 C. for Cross Accordingly.Zirkunga – Vrs – State of Mizoram . The Counsel of the Plaintiff closed the Plaintiff’s evidence.

Lalramzauva . Next Court date was fixed for the cross examination of Plaintiff. the Examination – in – chief of the Plaintiff’s Evidence on Affidavit under Order XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002). Vanlalchami Counsel for Plaintiff : C.Name of Judge: R. Name of Court: Subordinate District Council Court .Rinliana Malhotra. Advocate Today is fixed for Plaintiff’s evidence. Advocate Counsel for Defendant : T. Accordingly. Guite. Advocate A. 2.

Appln.Case No.Lalramzauva . No. Accordingly. The Plaintiff’s witness is cross examined by the Defendant’s .C. Sam Joseph . Advocate Counsel for Defendant: W.Rinliana Malhotra. Advocate for Plaintiff : A. Advocate Today is fixed for Plaintiff Evidence. H. the evidence of the witness of the Plaintiff is submitted by way of Examination – in – Chief on Affidavit under Order XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002).8/08 Lalvena Hnamte – Vrs – Lalhmingthangi Trial Magistrate: Lalbiakzama Counsel C.

The next court date is scheduled for the further production of the Plaintiff’s witness before the court. . All the answers of the witness are carefully noted and recorded by the examining Counsel.Counsel regarding his relation to the plaintiff and his knowledge about all the events and situations that have made up the case so far.

11/08 Lalrinliana – Vrs – Lalrinngaii Trial Magistrate: Lalbiakzama Counsel for Plaintiff : L.Lianhrima . No.2 is . Advocate A.S.Lalramzauva .2. Advocate Counsel for Defendant: C.2 is cross examined by the Counsel for the Defendant. Accordingly the Plaintiff’s witness No. Advocate The day is fixed for the Cross examination of the Plaintiff’s witness No.H. M.13th July 2010 : Name of Court: Subordinate District Council Court (Tuesday) Case No.Rinliana Malhotra. The witness No. Appln.

Sangzuala – Vrs Lalneihkimi . The witness No. No. Appln. The next court date was fixed for the further production of the Plaintiff’s witness before the court.the wife of the Plaintiff who is the holder of the LSC in dispute.2 was not reexamined by the Counsel for the Defendant.2 was questioned as to whether she had given the Plaintiff the power of attorney or authority to use the LSC or to file the present suit. Name of the Court: Subordinate District Council Court Case No. 16/08 F.S. M. The Witness No.

4 submitted his Examination –in-chief on Affidavit under Order XVIII Rule 4 of CPC (22 of 2002). Advocate Counsel for Defendant: Lalramenga. And is being cross examined by the Counsel for the Defendant on the same day. The day is fixed production of the Plaintiff’s witness. the Plaintiff’s witness No. . Advocate Magistrate: Plaintiff : A. Advocate Both the parties are present through their respective Counsel.Rinliana Malhotra. for the Accordingly.Lalramzauva .Trial Lalbiakzama Counsel for C.

The Counsel for the Plaintiff closed the witness and as such the next court date is fixed for the Defendant’s evidence after which the next stage would be the Final Hearing of the case. No. Appln. Advocate . M.S. 10/09 Vanlalhriata – Vrs – Lalhmuna Thankima Malsawma Liansanga Lalfela Sailo Trial Magistrate: Lalbiakzama Counsel for the Plaintiff: Lalhriatpuia. 14th July 2010 : Name of Court: Subordinate District Council Court (Wednesday) Case No.

Whether the Plaintiffs have a right to file this present suit? .Counsel for the Defendant: T. up to what extent? 3. Whether the present suit is maintainable in a court of law or not? 2.J. Lalnuntluanga. Accordingly the issues of the case are framed as under: 1. Whether the Plaintiffs and Defendants are entitled to get the relief claimed and if so. Advocate Both the parties are present through their respective Counsels. Today is fixed for the framing of the issues of the case.

Next court date is fixed for the Preliminary Hearing of the trial. .

a student of JSS Law College.TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This is to certify that Smt. Her performance during the satisfactory . period of internship was . Mysore underwent internship under my guidance for the period between 28th June to 14th July 2010. Chawngdingpuii Chawngthu.

Mizoram .Date: 15th July 2010 Place: Aizawl.

Centres d'intérêt liés