Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
Division of Toledo City

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION CHECKLIST

FOR _____1ST ____ _2ND SEMESTER

Y._______________

TEACHER :

SUBJECT AREA OBSERVED:

RADE & POSITION:

DATE:

I.

CLASSROOM PREPARATION/MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Average
O VS S US Poor
10 8 6 4 2

1. Classroom was structured to enhance learning (display boards,

Seating arrangement, lights, ventilation, etc.
2. All necessary visual aids/instructional materials were prepared
ahead of time.
3. Boardwork was prepared before class started.
4. Teacher was flexible in his/her time management.
5. Maintained orderand discipline in the classroom.
Sub Rating (Total Score 5) x 20%
Example (505) x 20= 20 = 10 x .20 = 2
II.

TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Average
O VS S
US Poor
10 8
6
4
2

ACHER
1. Clearly formulated the objectives of the lesson
2. Attained the objectives of the lesson.
3. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction
4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured the interest of the learner
5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print & non-print materials in the
Presentation/development of the lesson.
6. Considered intervening of task/skills/process and content.
7. Provided meaningful connections between & among learning opportunities
prior knowledge, relevant events & the learners lives and experiences.
8. Emplyed utilized integrative strategies.
- Integration of values in the subject taught
- Integration of Science & Health in concept in English as content
integration of SK/HKS concepts in Filipino content
- Integration EPP, HKS and MSEP
- Integrationalon across learning areas
9. Provided varied activities to encourage participation of every one especially
the slow learners.
10. Provided activities for interactive/group work/cooperative learning.
11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion.
12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the objectives of the lesson
13. Recognized pupils individual differences and provided activities for:
---- remediation
---- reinforcement
---- enrichment
14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking skills, higher order thinking skills
(HOTS) e. g. open ended questions
15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson.
Used textbooks/materials clearly appropriately to get ideas across
- Used instructional materials creatively to get ideas across.
16. Showed mastery of the subject matter

E PUPILS

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

O
10

VS
8

Average
S
US
6
4

Poor
2

17.
18.
19.
20.

Were actively engaged throughout the lesson

Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher Order of Thinking Skills (HOTS)
Were generally motivated to learn more.
Were provided opportunities for free expression of ideas.
Sub-rating: (Total Score 20) x 50%
=(200 20) x 50
= 10 x .50 = 5

III.

ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

O
10

VS
8

Average
S
US
6
4

Poor
2

Average
S
US
6
4

Poor
2

HE PUPILS
1. Learning was evaluated through seatwork exercise/paper and pencil tests.
2. Learning was evaluated through portfolio assessment.
3. Learners other heeds were diagnosed after the lesson.
4. The lesson was assessed to determine if the objective were attained within the allotted
time.

TOTAL SCORE
Sub rating: (Total Score 4) x 20%
=(40 4) x 20 = 2
=10 x .20 = 2

IV.

CLASSROOM INTERACTION
RATE THE TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF INTERACTION

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
1.
2.
3.

O
10

VS
8

Teacher pupil Interaction

Pupil pupil Interaction
Pupil Materials Interaction
TOTAL SCORE
Sub-rating: (Total Score 3) x 10%
=(30 3) x 10
=10 x .10 = 1

V.

OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

I.
II.
III.
IV.

SUMMARY OF RATING
WEIGHT
Classroom Preparation Management
2
Teaching Learning Process
5
Assessment of Pupils
2
Classroom Interaction
1
OVERALL RATING
10

SUB RATING

Y TO DESCRIPTIVE RATING (OVERALL)

RATED BY:

0
0
0
0
0

JOSEPHUS P.
________________________
Master Teacher I

10.00
= Outstanding
- 8.60
= Very Satisfactory
- 6.50
= Satisfactory
- 4.50
= Unsatisfactory
- & below= Poor

CONFORME:
_

_____________

__________
(Signature Over Printed Name)

(Date)