Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
In economics , fiscal policy is the use of government revenue collection (taxation) and
expenditure (spending) to influence the economy.[1] The two main instruments of fiscal policy
are changes in the level and composition of taxation and government spending in various
sectors. These changes can affect the following macroeconomic variables in an economy:
The pattern of resource allocation within the government sector and relative to
the private sector.
Fiscal policy refers to the use of the government budget to influence economic activity.
Before the Great Depression in the United States, the governments approach to the economy
was laissez faire. But following the Second World War, it was determined that the
government had to take a proactive role in the economy to regulate unemployment, business
cycles, inflation and the cost of money. By using a mixture of both monetary and fiscal
policies (depending on the political orientations and the philosophies of those in power at a
particular time, one policy may dominate over another), governments are able to control
economic phenomena.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE
Objectives of Fiscal Policy
1. To achieve desirable price level:
The stability of general prices is necessary for economic stability. The maintenance of a
desirable price level has good effects on production, employment and national income. Fiscal
policy should be used to remove; fluctuations in price level so that ideal level is maintained.
2. To Achieve desirable consumption level:
A desirable consumption level is important for political, social and economic consideration.
Consumption can be affected by expenditure and tax policies of the government. Fiscal
policy should be used to increase welfare of the economy through consumption level.
3. To Achieve desirable employment level:
The efficient employment level is most important in determining the living standard of the
people. It is necessary for political stability and for maximization of production. Fiscal policy
should achieve this level.
4. To achieve desirable income distribution:
The distribution of income determines the type of economic activities the amount of savings.
In this way, it is related to prices, consumption and employment. Income distribution should
be equal to the most possible degree. Fiscal policy can achieve equality in distribution of
income.
The difference between total revenue and total expenditure of the government is termed as
fiscal deficit. It is an indication of the total borrowings needed by the government. While
calculating the total revenue, borrowings are not included. Generally fiscal deficit takes place
due to either revenue deficit or a major hike in capital expenditure. Capital expenditure is
incurred to create long-term assets such as factories, buildings and other development. A
deficit is usually financed through borrowing from either the central bank of the country or
raising money from capital markets by issuing different instruments like treasury bills and
bonds.
In order to relate high fiscal deficit to inflation, some economists believe that the portion of
fiscal deficit, which is financed by obtaining funds from the Reserve Bank of India, directs to
rise in the money stock and a higher money stock eventually heads towards inflation.
Expert
recommendation
Financial advisors recommend that the Government should not promote disinvestment to
reduce fiscal deficits. Fiscal deficit can be reduced by bringing up revenues or by lowering
expenditure.
Impact
Fiscal deficit reduction has an impact over the agricultural sector and social sector.
Government's investments in these sectors will be reduced. The primary component of fiscal
deficit includes revenue deficit and capital expenditure.
Revenue deficit: It is an economic phenomenon, where the net amount received fails to meet
the predicted net amount to be received.
Capital expenditure: It is the fund used by an establishment to produce physical assets
like property, equipments or industrial buildings. Capital expenditure is made by the
establishment
to
consistently
maintain
the
operational
activities.
In India, the fiscal deficit is financed by obtaining funds from Reserve Bank of India, called
deficit financing. The fiscal deficit is also financed by obtaining funds from
the money market (primarily from banks).
Advantages
1. Transaction costs will be eliminated.
For instance, Uk firms currently spend about 1.5 billion a year buying and selling foreign
currencies
to
do
business
in
the
EU.
With the EMU this is eliminated, so increasing profitability of EU firms.
Advice to young people: You can go on holiday and not have to worry about getting your
money changed, therefore avoiding high conversion charges.
2. Price transparency.
Eu firms and households often find it difficult to accurately compare the prices of goods,
services and resources across the EU because of the distorting effects of exchange rate
differences.
This discourages trade. According to economic theory, prices should act as a mechanism to
allocate resources in an optimal way, so as to improve economic efficiency. There is a far
greater chance of this happening across an area where E.M.U exists.
Advice to young people: We can buy things without wrecking our brains trying to calculate
what price it is in our currency.
3. Uncertainty caused by Exchange rate fluctuations eliminated.
Many firms become wary when investing in other countries because of the uncertainty caused
by the fluctuating currencies in the EU. Investment would rise in the EMU area as the
currency is universal within the area, therefore the anxiety that was previously apparent is
there no more.
4. Single currency in single market makes sense.
Trade and everything else should operate more effectively and efficiently with the Euro.
Single currency in a single market seems to be the way forward.
5. Rival to the "Big Two".
If we look out in the world today we can see strong currencies such as the Japanese Yen and
The American $. America and Japan both have strong economies and have millions of
7
inhabitants. A newly found monetary union and a new currency in Europe could be a rival to
the
"BIG
TWO".
EMU can be self-supporting and so they could survive without trading with anyone outside
the
EMU
area.
This fact makes the Euro very strong already, and even George Soros couldn't affect it (well,
hopefully!!!!).
The situation that EMU is in is good as it seems that it can survive on its own, with or
without the help of Japan and U.S.A.
6. Prevent war.
The EMU is, and will be a political project. It's founding is a step towards European
integration, to prevent war in the union. It's a well known fact that countries who trade
effectively together don't wage war on each other and if EMU means more happy trade, then
this means, peace throughout Europe and beyond (we hope).
7. Increased Trade and reduced costs to firms.
Proponents of the move argue that it brings considerable economic trade through the wiping
out of exchange rate fluctuations, but as well as this it helps to lower costs to industry
because companies will not have to buy foreign exchange for use within the EU. For them,
EU represents the completion of the Single European Market. It is vital if Europe is to
compete with the other large trading blocs of the Far East and North America.
8. The Political agenda.
There is also a political agenda to European bank (the European System of Central Banks
-ESCB), the complete removal of national control over monetary policy and the partial
removal of control over fiscal policy. Individual nation states will lose sovereignty (i.e. the
ability to control their own affairs). It will be a considerble step down the road towards
political union. There are many in the EU who faviour economica dn political union and they
are very much in facour ot EMU. There are also many who wish to keep national sovereignty
and are strugging to prevent EMU, whatever its merits might be, from going ahead.
9. Inflation
From the mid-1980s onwards, there were a number of economists and politicians who argued
that, for the UK at least, EMU provided the best way forward to achieve low inflation rates
throughout the EU. During the first half of the 1980s high inflation countries, such as France
and Italy were forced to adopt policies which reduced their inflation rates to something
approximating the German inflation rates to something approximating the German inflation
rate. If they had not done this, the franc and the lira would have had to be periodically
devalued, negating the fixed exchange rate advantages of the system. Effectively, the German
central bank, the Bundesbank, set inflation targets and therefore monetary targets for the rest
of the EU. At the time, there was much discussion of why Germany had a better inflation
record than many other European countries. The consensus emerged that it was because the
Bundesbank, the German central bank, was independant of the German Government. In
8
countries such as the UK and France, central banks were controlled by governments. If the
UK government decided to loosen monetary policy, for example, by reducing interest rates, it
had the power to order the Bank of England to carry out this policy on its behalf. There have
always been especially strong pressures before an election for UK governments to loosen the
monetary reins and create a boom in the economy, with the subsequent increase in inflation
following the election. The Bundesbank, in contrast, was independent of government. By law
it has a duty to maintain stable prices. It can resist pressures from the German government to
pursue reflation policies if it believes that these will increase inflation within the economy.
Events of the early 1990s have shaken the naieve faith that linkage to the independent ESBC,
the central bank of Europe would solve all inflationary problems. This is because German
inflation rates in the early 1990s rose to over 4% as Germany strugged with the consequences
of unification. In 1993, inflation was nearly three times as high in Germany as in the UK and
twice as high as that in France. Some countries, such as France, have made their central
banks independent on the Germany model and therefore arguably don't need to the EMU link
to Germany to maintained low inflation.The UK has gone a little way towards giving more
power to the central bank by publishing reports of monthly meetings between the Chancellor
of the Exchequer and the Governenor of the Bank of England. This forces the Government to
justify its monetary policy publically and makes it harder for it to use interest rates for short
term political ends.
10
11
expenditures from national governments to Brussels - just what anti Europeans are opposed
to.
12
The government's fiscal deficit estimate for 2013-14 faces several risks and there could be a
slippage if the economy faces challenges in the next financial year, economists have said.
While finance minister P Chidambaram has won praise for keeping the fiscal deficit target in
2012-13 at 5.2% of GDP, marginally lower than the original estimate of 5.3%, economists
said the promise of keeping it at 4.8% of GDP in 2013-14 could be a bit optimistic against the
backdrop of challenging economic conditions. "Basing higher revenue generation on strong
GDP growth assumptions, taxing the super rich, and one-off revenues to achieve the 4.8%-ofGDP fiscal deficit target is risky, as macroeconomic conditions could be disappointing,"
Samiran Chakraborty and Anubhuti Sahay, economists at Standard Chartered, said in a
research note.
"There is a high probability of fiscal deficit slippage in 2013-14 unless capital expenditures
are reined in. Currently, we maintain 2013-14 fiscal deficit target at 4.8% of GDP in line with
the government projection, but watch closely for any adverse developments," the Standard
Chartered note said. Chidambaram has defended his estimates and has said he is confident of
a pick-up in growth which would help realize the targets while improving economic
prospects will also contribute in reversing the gloom. He has said that the government is
committed to sticking to the fiscal deficit target and said the 2013-14 budget had sent a strong
message about fiscal consolidation.
"We must redeem our promise by 2016-17 and bring down the fiscal deficit to 3%, the
revenue deficit to 1.5% and the effective revenue deficit to zero," Chidambaram said in his
Budget speech. But economists have expressed doubts about the government's ability to stick
to a strict fiscal plan against the backdrop of looming elections.
Indranil Pan, chief economist at Kotak Mahindra Bank, said the 4.8% fiscal deficit target for
2013-14 may be slightly optimistic and estimated it to be at 5.3% of GDP. He said the
government has under-provided for oil subsidies and the revenue targets may be a bit
optimistic, being contingent on a large divestment programme of Rs 54,000 crore
. Rohini Malkani, economist at Citigroup India, said the Budget arithmetic may be a tad
optimistic. "The FM did keep his word on fiscal targets, with the deficit in 2012-13 coming in
at 5.2%, marginally below his 5.3% target. This was in line with expectations, largely due to
expenditure compression and the usual deferment in fuel subsidies. Going forward for 201314, the Budget arithmetic is based on nominal GDP growth of 13.4%, total receipts of 23.4%
13
and expenditures up 16.4%, all of which we believe are a tad on the optimistic side," Malkani
said in a note.
Even though moderation in growth might pose difficulties in revenue generation, the
government is hopeful of raising adequate revenue through various measures. The budget
estimates a higher collection of tax and non tax revenue. However, the disinvestment target
for FY14 which has been more than doubled from the revised estimates in the current fiscal
seems to be a tad ambitious. Besides reiterating its commitment towards fiscal consolidation,
the budget has tried to address various crucial issues i.e. promoting investments, encouraging
infrastructure activities, boosting rural demand through enhanced social sector spending,
initiating measures to boost savings, besides giving a thrust to capital markets including
developing the debt market and so on.
14
CONCLUSION
The government today said restricting fiscal deficit to 5.3 per cent of GDP is a challenging
task given the uncertainty on disinvestments, higher subsidy outgo and subdued tax
collection. "Uncertainty on account of disinvestment receipts and likely higher subsidy
requirement does make it a challenging task to adhere to the overall fiscal deficit target
during 2012-13," said the mid-year economic review 2012-13 tabled in Parliament.
With the present trend and prevailing scenario in the capital market, it said that while efforts
are there for expeditious divestment, "nevertheless achieving the target of Rs 30,000 crore
during the remaining period of 2012-13 would be a challenge". While the government
realised Rs 125 crore by way of selling 10 per cent in NBCC, a 5.58 per cent stake sale in
Hindustan Copper (HCL) fetched Rs 808 crore. Last week the government raised Rs 6,000
crore by selling stake in NMDC. Referring to subsidy, the report said increasing subsidy bill
of three major subsidies -- food, fertiliser and petroleum -- has led to rising Non-Plan
expenditure.
The Centre's outgo on major subsidies was up 49 per cent to about Rs 1.42 lakh crore in the
first half of the fiscal against Rs 95,190 crore in the same period last year.
The analysis further said achieving Budget targets in case of corporate tax and customs and
central excise would be "somewhat difficult given the trend so far".
It said on the tax revenue side, the trend growth in the mid-year is lower than estimated.
To contain the increasing subsidy burden, the government has revised diesel prices and
capped supply of subsidised LPG cylinders to consumers.
The review report pegs the fiscal deficit at 5.3 per cent of GDP as against 5.1 per cent
projected in the Budget. The Centre's fiscal deficit touched a high of 5.9 per cent in the
previous fiscal.
The Economic Survey 2011-12 had pointed out the reasons for the lower-than budgeted fiscal
outcome in 2011-12 due to the sharp slowdown in industry, rising costs and thinning profits, a
less- than-conducive financial market inhibiting divestment plans, and continued high
subsidy outgo on account of firm global crude petroleum and fertiliser prices.
"This process has continued through the first half of the current fiscal," the review report
said, adding, these factors are unlikely to reverse substantially over the foreseeable future.
15
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Heyne, P. T., Boettke, P. J., Prychitko, D. L. (2002): The Economic Way of Thinking (10th ed).
Prentice Hall.
Larch, M. and J. Nogueira Martins (2009): Fiscal Policy Making in the European Union - An
Assessment of Current Practice and Challenges. Routledge.
Hansen, Bent (2003): The Economic Theory of Fiscal Policy, Volume 3. Routledge
Economics times
WEBSITES
o
o
o
www.legalserviceindia.com
www.lawkhoz.com
www.wikipedia.com
16