Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Guide to Landfill
Waste Management
A Guide to Landfill
Contents
RICS Guidance Notes
1.
Introduction
2.
General Background
3.
8
8
8
8
9
10
11
11
4.
Site Licensing
Long-term funding
Use of a bond
Pollution
The application
Monitoring
11
11
11
11
11
12
5.
12
6.
Landfill Practice
13
7.
Monitoring
Closed sites
Operational sites
13
13
14
8.
Development
Development of land adjacent to landfill sites
Development of land on and around landfill sites
14
14
14
9.
Accelerated Stabilisation
Description
Effects on site engineering
Filling methods
15
15
15
15
10.
16
11.
Agricultural Considerations
Introduction
Waste management
Landfill gas management
Leachate
Compaction and settlement
Aftercare
Afteruse
17
17
17
18
19
20
21
21
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
22
23
25
26
A
B
C
D
Bibliography
List of Abbreviations
Practical Points
Essential Questions
Legislation Relevant to Operation, Monitoring
and Control
27
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.
GENERAL BACKGROUND
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.
3.1
3.2
The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Planning Compensation
Act 1991 control the use of land for waste disposal through:
development plans;
the grant or refusal of planning permission.
Development plans
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.16
10
3.17
Nuisance from noise, odour, smoke and fumes is covered in the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which is regulated by
local authority environmental health officers.
3.18
3.19
Rating
3.20
4.
4.1
All landfill licences in future will subsist well beyond the cessation of
landfilling.
The period of post-closure control and monitoring may last 30 years or
more and could be longer than the actual landfilling operations. Once
the site ceases accepting waste it will not be generating income from
the waste disposal.
Use of a bond
4.2
In some cases, the local planning authority may have obtained a planning
agreement with the applicant involving the use of a bond to secure the
preliminary restoration of the site after the cessation of landfilling.
To secure the desired result, detailed specification of the work to be
carried out under the bond needs to be set out.
Pollution
4.3
The EA must assess, among other things, the facilitys potential for
causing environmental pollution, and the applicants proposals for
mitigating it.
4.5
11
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(ii)
(h)
(i)
for landfill sites, the operators plans for the management of gas
and leachate, and for capping and restoration.
Monitoring
4.6
As a guide to the monitoring detail, four survey points per hectare are
recommended for settlement measurements.
Once any control systems have been phased out, sampling should be
carried out for sufficient time to ensure that any changes in the
condition of the waste have been detected. Two periods are
recommended - five years in cases where no significant appropriate
monitoring has been carried out at the site, and two years where the
site is already reasonably well characterised.
12
5.
5.1
Many sites were licensed under the Control of Pollution Act 1974 (the
forerunner of the Environmental Protection Act) to accept inert wastes.
However, experience has shown that inert was a misnomer. A very high
proportion of these sites contained slowly degrading materials, such as
wood from demolition waste, and that subsequently gave rise to the
production of landfill gas and leachate.
Conditions which set arbitrary limits - for example, on paper and cardboard
typically at 5% or 10% of the waste input - in order to allow an amount
of accidental or adventitious contamination, are ineffective and enforceable.
Source-based descriptions, such as waste from the construction
industry, should also be avoided.
6.
LANDFILL PRACTICE
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
7.
7.1
13
8.
DEVELOPMENT
Development of land adjacent to landfill sites
8.1
8.2
14
gas. Gardens of houses should not extend to within ten metres of any
such site. Great care should be taken with any development which takes
place within 250 metres of in-filled wastes. Where development is taking
place on or adjacent to a landfill site, the developer should take account
of the need for the assessment and monitoring of any risk to the
development posed by the site.
9.
ACCELERATED STABILISATION
Description
9.1
9.2
Filling methods
9.3
9.4
9.5
15
(b)
(c)
the use of many and varied soil types in one restoration phase
should be avoided;
(d)
(e)
16
10.
10.1
10.2
Routine monitoring therefore informs the site operator and the EA of the
current state of the site and its progress towards completion. Where a
complete record of monitoring is available this should provide all the
information needed for the application to surrender a licence.
10.3
10.4
10.5
The 1990 EPA sets out a condition for deciding whether or not a landfill
site may receive a certificate of completion. This is that the authority
must be satisfied that the condition of the land is unlikely to cause
pollution of the environment or harm to human health. This condition is
referred to here as the completion condition. The most important way
in which a landfill might cause pollution or harm to human health is by
the release of pollutants in gas or leachate. WMP4 deals mainly with
the risk of harmful quantities of such pollutants being released into the
environment, it also considers the physical stability of the site, and the
possibility that dangerous wastes might be present.
11.
AGRICULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
Introduction
11.1
The aim in restoration and afteruse terms is to ensure that land will
meet the criteria set out at the beginning of the project assuming time
and satisfactory inputs.
11.2
11.3
Historically, the UKs waste strategy has been towards landfill - 85% of
controlled waste has been deposited in this manner. The UKs sustainable development strategy requires that each generation should deal
with its own waste and not pass the problem on to future generations.
The present strategy is towards re-use, recovery and disposal; however,
the scale of current practice suggests that landfill will remain the major
approach for some time.
11.4
The National Rivers Authority document Policy and Practice for the
Protection of Groundwater has been instrumental in bringing about a
sea-change in modern waste practice. It gives the following as examples
of the time required to stabilise the landfill with different methods:
The table overleaf gives a clear indication of the timescales of landfill
and the basis for the preferred hierarchy. It is necessary to put these
timescales in perspective with afteruse and aftercare.
17
TABLE 1 TIME
Methods
Time to stabilise
300500 years
50300 years
Accelerated stabilisation
3050 years
11.6
11.7
11.8
Operators differ in their views as to the life of gas wells. Some consider
that wells will not need to be replaced, others feel that any permeable
lining around the well pipe is likely to clog if the permeable material is
too fine. WMP26B states that wells with an internal diameter of less
than 150 mm can become unserviceable and need replacing in three to
four years. Where a well has to be replaced, redrilling in the same
location may appear to be technically unfeasible, expensive or counterproductive.
11.9
11.10
18
(c)
11.11
Some sites bring gas to a manifold which houses individual controls for
each well, enabling sampling and adjustments to be made. This arrangement allows the restored area to be obstacle-free in the short term.
11.12
11.13
11.14
11.15
Landfill engineering practice usually splits each site into cells. Cell size
is based on water balance calculations aimed at limiting the quantity of
rainfall in each cell. Modern cells are engineered with basal slopes of
between 1:40 and 1:100. In containment sites base liners are highly
engineered often with multi-liner systems and a drainage blanket with
drainage pipes, which all allow leachate to drain to the low engineered
point. A leachate monitoring well, sited at the engineered low point, is
usually constructed progressively as infilling continues.
11.16
11.17
11.18
19
11.20
11.21
11.22
11.23
11.24
TABLE 2 OPERATIONAL
20
Site Practice
Aftercare
11.25
11.26
21
EA
EA Regulations
EPA
LFG
LPA
MAFF
MPG7
PPG23
WMP4
WMP26A
WMP26B
WMP26E
WMP27
22
Environment Agency
Environmental Assessment Regulations
Environmental Protection Act 1990
Landfill Gas
Local Planning Authority
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Minerals Planning Guidance Note 7
Planning Policy Guidance Note 23
Waste Management Paper 4 (1994)
Waste Management Paper 26A (1994)
Waste Management Paper 26B (1995)
Waste Management Paper 26E (in draft 1996)
Waste Management Paper 27 (1989)
Freehold
Buildings
Consider values within curtilage of landfill sites.
What is the effect on values of the long-term use of a site as a
landfill?
Lease or sale considerations - how will each be affected?
Consider measures to protect properties at an early stage bunding, direction and method of working.
Position of gas flare and impact on properties.
Tenants and Tenancies of Landfill Sites
Obtain all the information prior to advising to take restored land
that has been landfilled. Limitations as to use or farming practice
will be particularly relevant.
Restoration standards crucial to future potential of land.
Worth taking land on a short-term basis to assess potential and
any inherent problems.
Farming Practice
What limitations are placed on the site by the aftercare scheme?
Restoration methods and the presence of gas/leachate
infrastructure can constrain farming.
Obtain full details of site requirements for monitoring, access and
leachate disposal.
Check position with regard to Integrated Administration Control
Scheme and requirements for forage areas (may need grazing
where stock may not be allowed).
23
Other Items
24
Footpaths
Tree planting
Amenity
Monitoring
Certificate of
completion
Certificate of Completion:
(a)
what does it say?
(b)
what are the limitations it imposes?
2.
Who is the licence holder? Is this person still on site or in the locality?
3.
What are the requirements for monitoring. As set out in the licence and
planning permission?
4.
5.
6.
What are the benefits and potential liabilities for sale or lease?
7.
What are the implications for valuation? Is the valuation covered by the
Red Book (contaminated land) and P.I. insurance?
8.
What is the long-term potential for the site? Has it any potential?
9.
When selling land that has been filled, has full information been given
and obtained?
10.
Have risks and liabilities been inherited when buying filled land from the
receiver?
11.
25
26
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Environmental Protection Act 1990, HMSO
Minerals Planning Guidance Note 7 - The Reclamation of Mineral Workings,
HMSO, 1989
Planning Policy Guidance Note 23 - Planning and Pollution Control, HMSO, 1994
Policy and Practice for the Protection of Groundwater, National Rivers Authority,
1992 (ISBN: 1 873160 37 2)
The Potential for Woodland Establishment on Landfill Sites, Department of the
Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1993
Town and Country Planning (Assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations
1988, HMSO
Town and Country Planning Act 1990, HMSO
Town and Country Planning Compensation Act 1990, HMSO
Waste Management Papers, Department of the Environment:
4: Licensing of Waste Management Facilities, HMSO, 1994
26A: Landfill Completion, HMSO, 1994
26B: Landfill Design, Construction and Operational Practice, HMSO, 1995
26E: Landfill Restoration and Post-Closure Management, HMSO (in draft 1996)
27: Landfill Gas, HMSO, 1989
27
Waste Management
A Guide to Landfill
Waste management is becoming an increasingly complex topic for the surveyor, and
as legislation and site practice continually change there are both short and long-term
implications for site negotiation and management. This new title provides rural practice
and other surveyors with the guidance they need to deal with the various aspects of waste
management concerning landfill, and raises a number of wider issues in the process.
This Guidance Note focuses on the various discrete stages involved in the landfill process.
From initiation, usually through the granting of planning permission and a subsequent waste
management licence, to monitoring, stabilisation, competition, and finally aftercare and
afteruse, the Note offers a guide to the right approach for the surveyor to adopt. Relevant
legislation is referred to throughout and, while the authors are careful to avoid becoming
too technical, there is a separate chapter which covers the legal aspects of landfill in detail.
The authors also believe that it is essential to consider the parameters of afteruse and
restoration at the planning stage, and therefore they include a comprehensive section on
the agricultural considerations of landfill. This covers waste management, landfill gas
wellheads and leachate among other topics.
Waste Management: A Guide to Landfill includes in its appendices a list of practical points
and essential questions, a guide to abbreviations, legal references and a useful bibliography.
It provides not only essential guidance, but will also be useful as an aide-mmoire,
information source and a starting point for locating further resources.
www.ricsboks.com