Allstate Claim 0411061054 Certified Letter From Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Allstate Attorneys of May 19, 2016 With Allstate Claim of April 16, 2016 Updated May 21, 2016

Gmail - Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim
1 of 2
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim

1 message
Daniel Naumann <allstate@service.allstate.com>
Reply-To: Daniel Naumann <claims@claims.allstate.com>
To: SCATERBONE@live.com
Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:43 PM
Allstate: Your recent claim has been submitted. To check on your claim status, sign in to the My Account and refer to
Claim Number 0411061054.
Having trouble seeing graphics in this email? View as a Web page.
VISIT ALLSTATE.COM
TOOLS & RESOURCES
Confirmation: Your claim has

been successfully submitted
M Y ACCOUNT
Daniel Naumann
Allstate Agency
1-717-871-1721
Dear Stanley Caterbone,

I'm so sorry to hear about the recent damage to your
property. I'm sending this email to confirm the submitted
claim is being processed.
At Allstate, we care about helping you get your life back to
normal as quickly as possible. In order to do so, our Allstate
Claims Representative may contact you directly to help
expedite processing your claim.
If you prefer, you may access your claim status any time day
or night online. Its simple to do:
Claim handling details

Claim Number:
0411061054
File Handler/Group:
Express Property Dispatch Team
Telephone:
1-800-ALLSTATE
1. Click the "Check Claim Status" button below

2. Sign in to My Account*
3. Once logged in, you'll be taken to "My Claim Summary"
within Claim Status.
Check Claim Status
For more information regarding the Claims Process you can
access it here at Allstate.com/Claims
In Claim Status you will have access to other convenient
tools that will help you manage your claim, like schedule
appointments, register for and update your Direct Deposit
preference, send a message and/or documents to your file
handler, and more. In addition, you'll have access to other
pertinent information, such as the insurance benefits and
coverages that are applicable to your claim.
4/27/2016 3:57 AM
Gmail - Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim
2 of 2
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
If you have any questions, please call us any time at

1-800-ALLSTATE and have your Claim Number 0411061054
on hand to help us quickly address your concerns. If you
would like to give us feedback about your claim experience
so far, please click here. And you can always call us, 24/7,
with any questions, comments or concerns.
Thank you for choosing Allstate. I appreciate your business
and want you to know you're in Good Hands with Allstate.
Please don't hesitate to call me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Daniel Naumann
Allstate Agency
P.S. Talk to your Claims Representative before discarding
any damaged property or photograph damaged property that
needs immediate disposal - this includes parts related to
suspected product, plumbing or appliance malfunction. And
hang on to all service and repair bills---we'll need to see
those too!
If you wish to no longer receive future Claims email updates,
let us know.
* If youre not already enrolled in My Account, youll need to do so first in order to view your claim.
This email was sent to Stanley Caterbone at SCATERBONE@LIVE.COM.

VISIT ALLSTATE.COM
Learn more about how Allstate can help you
stay prote cte d.
PRIVACY POLICY
Allstate follows strict guidelines about
protecting your privacy. Learn about our
Priv acy Policy.
CONTACT US
Questions? For more information, feel free
to contact us.
Allstate Insurance Company, 2775 Sanders Road, Northbrook, IL 60062

2016 Allstate Insurance Company. All rights reserved.
08_12_CLMSUBPROP_01
4/27/2016 3:57 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 16, 2016

Allstate Insurance Company
P.O. Box 660598
Dallas, TX 75266-0598
Attn: Property Insurance Claims Department
Policy No. 952500478
Claims for Vandalism and Thefts at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
17603
To Whom It May Concern:

Attached is a claim for the above policy in accordance with the insurance laws of Pennsylvania. I
have had many problems with your local agent, Dan Nauman with specific regards to the automobile
claim for the rear-end accident of December 8, 2015 in which Nationwide Insurance accepted full
liability. My automobile insurance policy number is 977083004.
Please note that I have had similar claims paid by insurance companies for my residence at 220
Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA beginning in the years 2005. I have had similar automobile claims
dating back to 1987 when Erie Insurance paid out some $7,000.00 when again I was hit by another
driver. There have been at least 4 instances where drivers hit my automobile and the circumstances
were more than suspect as far as it appearing that the accident was anything but an accident. Malicious
intent is hard to prove, however given the pattern over time, you will come to the same conclusion.
Please correspond via U.S. Mails or Fedex only.
Continued on following page.
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CLAIM

OF STOLEN OR DAMAGED PROPERTY
April 3, 2016
Items Stolen or Damaged
Cost to Replace
dishwasher
front door locks
ipod
bluetooth
hammer drill
reciprocating saw
iphone
screen door locks
sleepy's matress
3 laptop computers
Cost to Repair Computers from Hacking
Wet/Dry Vac
cordless phone
cable boxes and modem
Sakrete 3 bags
misc clothes
2 vapor pens
1 iphone
Total
$476.00
$400.00
$400.00
$60.00
$100.00
$100.00
$600.00
$30.00
$2,300.00
$800.00
$400.00
$65.00
$40.00
$100.00
$12.00
$100.00
$100.00
$600.00
$6,748.00
Page 1
Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim
Page 1 of 69
Friday, April 15, 2016
Information as of December 17, 2015

Page 1 of 2
Policyholder(s)
Stan Caterbone
Policy number
952 500 478
Dan Naumann Agy Inc

355R Manor Avenue
Millersville PA 17551
Your Allstate agency is

Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
DANIELNAUMANN1@ALLSTATE.COM
ADDFADDFDFAAFAADADTAAAFAFTDDFTDDAFDTDAADAADTTAFDFTADFDFAAFTDFDTAF
STAN CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
Thank You for Being a Loyal Allstate CustomerWere Happy to Have

You with Us!
Heres your Homeowners insurance renewal offer for the next 12 months. We've also included a guide to whats
in this package and answers to some common questions.
Renewing your policy is easy

Keep an eye out for your bill, which should arrive in a couple of weeks. Just send your payment by the due date
on your bill.
If youre enrolled in the Allstate Easy Pay Plan, you wont receive a billwell send you a statement with your
payment withdrawal schedule.
You also wont receive a bill if a mortgage company or lienholder pays your insurance premium for you.
How to contact us
Give your Allstate Agent a call at (717) 871-1721 if you have any questions. Its our job to make sure youre in
good hands.
Sincerely,
Steven P. Sorenson
President, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
RP378-4
Page 2 of 69
Policy number:
Policy effective date:
952 500 478

February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 2 of 2
Your Insurance Coverage Checklist

Were happy to have you as an Allstate customer! This checklist outlines whats in this package and provides answers to some
basic questions, as well as any next steps you may need to take.
Whats in this package?
See the guide below for the documents that are included.
Next steps: review your Policy Declarations to confirm you
have the coverages, coverage limits, premiums and
savings that you requested and expected. Read any
Endorsements or Important Notices to learn about new
policy changes, topics of special interest, as well as
required communications. Keep all of these documents
with your other important insurance papers.
What about my bill?

Unless youve already paid your premium in full, well send
your bill separately. Next steps: please pay the minimum
amount by the due date listed on it.
Am I getting all the discounts I should?

Confirm with your Allstate Agent that youre benefiting
from all the discounts youre eligible to receive.
What if I have questions?

You can either contact your Allstate Agent or call us 24/7
at 1-800-ALLSTATE (1-800-255-7828) para espaol,
Ilamar al 1-800-979-4285 with questions about your
coverage, or to update your coverages, limits, or
deductibles. Or visit us online at allstate.com.
You can also pay your bill online at allstate.com or by

calling 1-800-ALLSTATE (1-800-255-7828). Para
espaol, Ilamar al 1-800-979-4285. If youre enrolled in
the Allstate Easy Pay Plan, well send you a statement
detailing your payment withdrawal schedule.
Policy
Declarations*
The Policy
Declarations
lists policy
details, such as
your property
details and
coverages.
Important
Notices
We use these
notices to call
attention to
particularly
important
coverages, policy
changes and
discounts.
Insurance Made
Simple
Insurance seem
complicated?
Our online
guides explain
coverage terms
and features:
www.allstate.com/
madesimple
Espanol.allstate.com
/facildeentender
* To make it easier to see where you may have gaps in your protection, weve highlighted any coverages you do not have in the
Coverage Detail section in the enclosed Policy Declarations.
Page 3 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233001006001201
A guide to your renewal package
Renewal Homeowners Policy Declarations

Your policy effective date is February 3, 2016
Page 1 of 4
Total Premium for the Premium Period (Your bill will be mailed separately)
Information as of December 17, 2015
Premium for property insured
Summary
$525.14
Total
$525.14
If you do not pay in full, you will be charged an installment fee(s). Refer to your bill for
installment fee information.
Named Insured(s)
Stan Caterbone
Mailing address
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster PA 17603-6812
Discounts (included in your total premium)
Policy number
952 500 478
30%
18%
Protective Device
4%
Policy period
Begins on February 3, 2016 at 12:01 A.M.
standard time, with no fixed date of
expiration
Location of property insured

1250 Fremont St, Lancaster, PA 17603-6812
Rating Information*
Please review and verify the information regarding your insured property. Please
refer to the Important Notice (X67831-1) for additional coverage information.
Contact us if you have any changes.
The dwelling is of brick construction and is occupied by 1 family
Your dwelling is 1 mile to the fire department
Dwelling Style:
Built in 1953; 1 family; 1100 sq. ft.; center row house - 2 stories
Foundation:
100% Basement (100% finished)
Interior details:
One basic kitchen
Premium period
Beginning February 3, 2016 through
February 3, 2017 at 12:01 A.M. standard
time
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
355R Manor Avenue
Millersville PA 17551
(717) 871-1721
DANIELNAUMANN1@ALLSTATE.COM
Some or all of the information on your
Policy Declarations is used in the rating
of your policy or it could affect your
eligibility for certain coverages. Please
notify us immediately if you believe
that any information on your Policy
Declarations is incorrect. We will make
corrections once you have notified us,
and any resulting rate adjustments, will
be made only for the current policy
period or for future policy periods.
Please also notify us immediately if you
believe any coverages are not listed or
are inaccurately listed.
One basic full bath
Exterior wall type:

100% solid brick
Interior wall partition:
100% drywall
Heating and cooling:
Gas heating, 100%
Additional details:
Interior wall height - less than 10 ft,
100%
Fire protection details:
Fire department subscription - no
Your policy provided by

Allstate Property and Casualty
Insurance Company
1 mile to fire department
PA070RBD
Home and Auto

Claim Free
(continued)
Page 4 of 69

Policy number:
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 2 of 4
Rating Information* (continued)

Roof surface material type:
Composition
100% asphalt / fiberglass shingle
*This is a partial list of property details. If the interior of your property includes custom
construction, finishes, buildup, specialties or systems, please contact your Allstate
representative for a complete description of additional property details.
Mortgagee
None
Additional Interested Parties:

Michael T Caterbone
Philip W Caterbone
Steven P Caterbone
Limits of Liability
$140,669
Applicable Deductible(s)
$1,000 All peril
$14,067
$84,402
$1,000 All peril

$1,000 All peril
Up to 12 months not to exceed $14,067

$100,000 each occurrence
$1,000 each person
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
(continued)
Page 5 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233002006001201
Coverage
Dwelling Protection - with Building
Structure Reimbursement Extended
Limits
Other Structures Protection
Personal Property Protection Reimbursement Provision
Additional Living Expense
Family Liability Protection
Guest Medical Protection
Building Codes
Building Materials Theft
Business Property Protection
Business Pursuits
Electronic Data Processing Equipment
Extended Coverage on Cameras
PA070RBD
Coverage detail for the property insured

Policy number:
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 3 of 4
Coverage
Extended Coverage on Jewelry,
Watches and Furs
Extended Coverage on Musical
Instruments
Extended Coverage on Sports
Equipment
Fire Department Charges
Golf Cart
Home Day Care
Identity Theft Expenses
Incidental Office, Private School Or
Studio
Increased Coverage on Money
Increased Coverage on Securities
Increased Silverware Theft Limit
Loss Assessments
Satellite Dish Antennas
Limits of Liability
Not purchased*
Applicable Deductible(s)
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
* This coverage can provide you with valuable protection. To help you stay current with
your insurance needs, contact your agent to discuss available coverage options and
other products and services that can help protect you.
Scheduled Personal Property Coverage

Your policy does not include Scheduled Personal Property Coverage. This coverage can provide you with valuable protection. To
help you stay current with your insurance needs, contact your agent to discuss available coverage options and other products and
services that can help protect you.
Your policy documents

Your Homeowners policy consists of the Policy Declarations and the following documents. Please keep them together.
Homeowners Policy APC215
PA070RBD
Building Structure Reimbursement Extended Limits

Endorsement APC198
Pennsylvania Homeowners Policy And Select Homeowners

Policy Amendatory Endorsement AP4794
Sinkhole Activity Coverage Endorsement AP4869
Page 6 of 69

Policy number:
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 4 of 4
Important payment and coverage information

Here is some additional, helpful information related to your coverage and paying your bill:
Coverage A - Dwelling Protection Limit includes an approximate increase of $2,134 due to the Property Insurance
Adjustment provision. Coverage B - Other Structures Protection and Coverage C - Personal Property Protection adjusted
accordingly.
Please note: This is not a request for payment. Your bill will be mailed separately.
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company's Secretary and President have signed this policy with legal authority at
Northbrook, Illinois.
Susan L. Lees
Secretary
Page 7 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233003006001201
PA070RBD
Steven P. Sorenson
President
Important notices
Policy number:
952 500 478

February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 1 of 3
Notice, please contact your Allstate representative, or call us
at 1-800-ALLSTATE.
Dwelling Profile
Allstate has determined that the estimated cost to replace
your home is: $140,669
The enclosed Policy Declarations shows the limit of liability
applicable to Dwelling ProtectionCoverage A of your
homeowners insurance policy. The estimated replacement
cost of your home is the minimum amount for which we will
insure your home.
The decision regarding the limit applicable to your Dwelling
ProtectionCoverage A is your decision to make, as long as, at
a minimum, your limit equals the estimated replacement cost
as determined by Allstate and does not exceed maximum
coverage limitations established by Allstate.
It is important to keep in mind that your Coverage A limits
reflect a replacement cost that is only an estimate based on
data that was available to us when we made this estimate (this
information is described in the Rating Information section of
your Policy Declarations). The actual amount it will cost to
replace your home cannot be known until after a covered total
loss has occurred.
How is the replacement cost estimated?

Many factors can affect the cost to replace your home,
including its age, size, and type of construction. For example,
the replacement cost uses construction data, such as labor and
materials, that are available to us when we made this estimate.
This estimate is also based on characteristics of the home,
which include information that you provided to us. You might
have chosen to insure your home for a higher amount than the
estimated replacement cost shown above.
Note to customers renewing their policy

The estimated replacement cost for your home may have
changed since the last time we communicated this information
to you. This is because, at renewal, Allstate uses the home
characteristics that you have provided to us to recalculate and
update the estimated replacement cost. Using updated labor
and material rates for your zip code, Allstate takes the home
characteristics you have provided and determines the updated
estimated replacement cost. The information about your
homes characteristics is provided in the Rating Information
section of your Policy Declarations.
If the information about your home shown in your Policy
Declarations requires any change or if you have any questions
or concerns about the information contained in this Important
Additional Information About Dwelling Protection

Limits
Your policy includes a feature called "Property Insurance
Adjustment" (PIA). PIA reflects changes in construction costs
in your area that may have occurred during the policy period.
We would like you to know that your policy's PIA recently
indicated that construction costs in your area have increased.
Based on this information, we have automatically increased
your Dwelling Protection-Coverage A limits.
However, it is ultimately your responsibility to consider
whether the changes we have made are sufficient for your
insurance needs. It is important for you to understand that
these are only estimates and the new limits of your policy may
not provide sufficient coverage in the event of a loss. For
example, if you have done any remodeling to your home which
has not been updated in our records, your home's replacement
cost may be higher than our current records indicate. In that
case, you may want to increase your limits to reflect such
changes. Conversely, there is a possibility that your new limits
may provide coverage in excess of the actual replacement cost
of your home. For example, if you originally decided to insure
your home at an amount that exceeded the estimated
replacement cost, you may want to call your Allstate
representative to discuss the current value of your home and
the possibility of lowering your limits.
If you have any questions about PIA, or your policy in general,
please contact your Allstate representative.
X67831-1
What You Should Know About Flood

Insurance
Most homeowners, renters and commercial insurance policies
do not provide coverage for flood damage. In fact, protection
against floods is generally available only through a separate
policy.
Thats why Allstate is a participant in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) and offers standard flood insurance
policies.* A flood insurance policy can help complete the
Page 8 of 69
Page 2 of 3
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
insurance protection for your property and help protect your

financial well-being.
Its protection not typically provided with standard property

coverage. SPP benefits typically include:
You May Have More Risk from Flood Than You

Think
No deductibles to meet
Coverage for lost or damaged items
Approximately 90 percent of all disasters in the U.S. are flood

related. While you may think that it couldnt happen to you,
over 25 percent of all flood losses occur in low- to
moderate-risk areas.
Coverage for valuables kept in a storage location outside

your home
Whats more, flood damage is often accompanied by other

damage, such as wind and hail (which is typically covered
under a property policy). So if you purchase your NFIP
coverage through Allstate, you would have the convenience
and peace of mind that comes with working with just one claim
adjuster and one agent, instead of two or more for a flood
claim.
Items That May Need the Extra Protection

SPP coverage provides protection for an array of valuable
personal property. Here are some of the items you can protect
by purchasing SPP coverage through Allstate:
Jewelry (including wedding rings and precious or

semi-precious stones)
Furs
Cameras (digital, still, movie, video and related

equipment)
Silverware and antiques (including furniture)
Musical instruments
Collections (stamps, coins, music)
Fine art works (including paintings, etchings, vases and

sculptures)
Manuscripts or books
Home-office equipment (laptop, computer, audio/visual)
Sports equipment (such as golf clubs)
Flood Coverage Is Affordable

The federal government sets the rates for flood insurance, so
theres typically no difference in rates from policy to policy.
You can switch to an NFIP flood insurance policy administered
by Allstate for the same amount of premium you may be paying
elsewhere. If you choose Allstate, you can have the quality
service youve come to expect from us.
For more information about flood insurance, or if you have any
questions about your policy in general, please contact your
Allstate representative or visit us at allstate.com.
* Allstate provides the standard flood insurance policy under the terms of the
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and its amendments, and Title 44 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. The standard flood insurance policy is written by
Allstate for the National Flood Insurance Program which is administered by the
Federal Insurance Administration, part of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
Subject to availability and qualifications. Other terms, conditions and exclusions may
apply.
Additional Protection for Your

Valuable Possessions
Affordable Protection for Your Valuables

The cost of SPP coverage varies, but the value of your property
is the best way to determine how much coverage you need.
The rates are generally a small percentage of the total value of
the items youre insuring. This means that your valuables are
being protected for only a fraction of the cost.
Regularly Review Your SPP Coverage
X73168 Even if you currently have SPP coverage, its a good idea to
review it annually. Its possible that the value of your property
has changed or that youve purchased new items that have not
been added to your coverage.
Most
Property insurance covers many belongings, but some items

may require higher coverage limits than those in a standard
property policy.
To learn more about SPP coverage, or if you have any questions

about your insurance policy in general, contact your Allstate
representative, or visit us at allstate.com.
X73169
Scheduled Personal Property (SPP) coverage gives you

additional protection against loss or damage to your valuables.
Page 9 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233004006001201
Important notices
Policy number:
Important notices
Policy number:
952 500 478

February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 3 of 3
Other Allstate Companies Also Offer

Homeowners InsuranceGiving You
Additional Protection Options
We want to make sure you know that Homeowners insurance
is available from different Allstate-branded companieseach
with its own mix of price and coverage options. Although your
current policy is with Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance
Company, Homeowners coverage from another
Allstate-branded company can differ from your current policy
in a number of ways, including:
Price
Coverage
Features
Discounts
Things To Consider When Comparing Insurance

Policies
When comparing different policies, you may want to consider
the following:
Price While another company may offer a lower premium

today, the premium could change in the future. Be sure to
consider this.
Policy Features and Benefits Some of the policy features

and benefits that your current policy has may not be
available or carry over to the new company. Also, the new
policy might not provide the same level of benefits as your
current policy. And if you leave Allstate Property and
Casualty Insurance Company, you will not be able to return
to that company or get the same rate.
Your Allstate Agent Can Help

Your Allstate Agent is here and can discuss any options you
might be interested in. We want to thank you again for
choosing Allstate to protect whats important to you.
X73083v2
Page 10 of 69
Page 11 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233005006001201
Privacy Statement
Policy number:
952 500 478

February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Page 1 of 2
Thank you for choosing Allstate. We value you, respect your

privacy and work hard to protect your personal information.
This statement is provided on behalf of Allstate Insurance
Company and the affiliates (Allstate) listed at the end of this
notice. We would like to explain how we collect, use and share
the information we obtain about you in the course of doing
business.
Our Privacy Assurance
We do not sell your personal or medical information to

anyone.
We do not share your information with non-affiliate
companies that would use it to contact you about their
own products and services, unless permitted pursuant to a
joint marketing agreement.
We require persons or organizations that represent or
assist us in servicing your policy and claims to keep your
information confidential.
We require our employees to protect your personal
information and keep it confidential.
As you can see, protecting your personal information is

important to us. In addition to the practices described above,
we use a variety of physical, technical and administrative
security measures that help to safeguard your information. For
Social Security Numbers (SSN), this includes restricting access
to our employees, agents and others who use your SSN only as
permitted by law: to comply with the law, to provide you with
products and services, and to handle your claims. Also, our
employees and agents access to and use of your SSN are
limited by the law, our policies and standards, and our written
agreements.
companies. This information may include, but is not limited to,

your driving record, claims history, medical information and
credit information.
In addition, Allstate and its business partners gather
information through Internet activity, which may include, for
example, your operating system, links you used to visit
allstate.com, web pages you viewed while visiting our site or
applications, Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, and cookies. We
use cookies, analytics and other technologies to help:
Evaluate our marketing campaigns
Analyze how customers use our website and applications
Develop new services
Know how many visitors have seen or clicked on our ads
Also, our business partners assist us with monitoring
information including, but not limited to, IP addresses, domain
names and browser data, which can help us to better
understand how visitors use allstate.com.
How We Use and Share Your Personal Information

In the course of normal business activities, we use and share
your personal information. We may provide your information
to persons or organizations within and outside of Allstate. This
would be done as required or permitted by law. For example,
we may do this to:
Fulfill a transaction you requested or service your policy
Market our products
Handle your claim
Prevent fraud
Comply with requests from regulatory and law
enforcement authorities
Participate in insurance support organizations
The persons or organizations with whom we may share your

personal information may include, among others:
Your agent, broker or Allstate-affiliated companies
What Personal Information Do We Have and Where Companies that perform services, such as marketing,
Do We Get It
credit card processing, and performing communication
We gather personal information from you and from outside
services on our behalf
sources for business purposes. Some examples of the
Business partners that assist us with tracking how visitors
information we collect from you may include your name, phone
use allstate.com
number, home and e-mail addresses, drivers license number,
Other financial institutions with whom we have a joint
Social Security Number, marital status, family member
marketing agreement
information and healthcare information. Also, we maintain
Other insurance companies that play a role in an insurance
records that include, but are not limited to, policy coverages,
transaction with you
premiums, and payment history. We also collect information
Independent claims adjusters
from outside sources including, but not limited to, insurance
A business or businesses that conduct actuarial or
support organizations that assemble or collect information
research studies
about individuals for the purpose of providing to insurance
Our privacy practices continue to apply to your information
even if you cease to be an Allstate customer.
Page 12 of 69
Privacy Statement
Policy number:
Page 2 of 2
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
Those who request information pursuant to a subpoena or

court order
Repair shops and recommended claims vendors
your personal information with our affiliates for marketing

products and services.
To request that we not allow other Allstate affiliates to use

your personal information to market their products and
services, you can contact us by calling 1-800-856-2518
We use cookies, analytics and other technologies to help us
twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Please keep in
provide users with better service and a more customized web
mind that it may take up to four weeks to process your request.
experience. Additionally, our business partners use tracking
If you previously contacted us and asked us not to allow other
services, analytics and other technologies to monitor visits to
Allstate affiliates to use your personal information, your
allstate.com. The website may also use Web beacons (also
called clear GIFs or pixel tags) in conjunction with cookies. previous choice still applies and you do not need to contact us
If you prefer, you can choose to not accept cookies by changing again. If you would like to change your previous choice please
call the number above at any time.
the settings on your web browser. Also, if you would like to
learn about how we gather and protect your information over
We Appreciate Your Business
the Internet, please see our online privacy statement located at
Thank you for choosing Allstate. We understand your concerns
the bottom of the allstate.com homepage.
about privacy and confidentiality, and we hope this notice has
To learn more, the allstate.com Privacy Statement provides
been helpful to you. We value our relationship with you and
information relating to your use of the website. This includes,
look forward to keeping you in Good Hands.
for example, information regarding:
If you have questions or would like more information, please
1) How we collect information such as IP address (the
dont hesitate to contact your Allstate agent or call the Allstate
number assigned to your computer when you use the
Customer Information Center at 1-800-ALLSTATE.
Internet), browser and platform types, domain names,
access times, referral data, and your activity while using
We reserve the right to change our Privacy practices,
our site;
procedures, and terms.
2) Who should use our website;
Allstate Insurance Company
3) The security of information over the Internet; and
4) Links and co-branded sites.
Allstate entities on which behalf this notice is provided and
amongst which information may be shared:
The Internet and Your Information Security
The Allstate family of companies, LSA Securities, Deerbrook

You can request to review your personal information contained General Agency, Inc., Deerbrook Insurance Company, North
Light Specialty Insurance Company, Northbrook Indemnity
in our records at any time. To do this, please send a letter to
Company.
the address below requesting to see your information for the
previous two years. If you believe that our information is
Please Note: Allstate affiliates American Heritage Life
incomplete or inaccurate, you can request that we correct it.
Insurance Company, Castle Key Insurance Company and
Please note we may not be able to provide information relating Castle Key Indemnity Company participate in information
to investigations, claims, litigation, and other matters. We will
sharing with the affiliates listed above, but have a separate
be happy to make corrections whenever possible.
privacy notice for their customers.
Please send requests to:
Allstate Insurance Company Customer Privacy Inquiries
P.O. Box 40047
Roanoke, VA 24022-0047
(ed. 10/2015)
X73180v6
Your Preference for Sharing Personal Information

We would like to share your personal information with one or
more Allstate affiliates in order to make you aware of different
products, services and offers they can provide. However, you
can request that Allstate and its affiliate companies not share
Page 13 of 69
065 070 037

151217S301619
1100000S301619065PA000151217012511000233006006001201
How You Can Review and Correct Your Personal

Information
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 36 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 10
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________________________________________________________________________
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
:
Advanced Media Group
:
CIVIL DIVISION
Petitioner
:
Case No.
15-03984
Related Case: Pennsylvania
Superior 1915 MDA 2015
:
v.
:
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention
:
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police
Lancaster City Police Department
Dr. Silvia Gratz, Chief Medical Officer and
Fairmount Behavioral Health System
:
Defendants
:
EXHIBIT re Fruadulent Lancaster City Property Tax Records re Extortion of 1250

Fremont Street by the City of Lancaster, PA 17603 Reported on April 14, 2016
This exhibit, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the PETITIONER's
obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the PETITIONER's claims
and statements.
The OWNER of 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania is NOT
Steven P. Caterbone and the address of Stanley J. Caterbone is not 114 N. Old
Stonehouse Road, Harrisburg, PA.
The recorded onwership is Steven Caterbone,
Stanley Caterbone, Phillip Caterbone, and Michael Caterbone.
This exhibit clearly is
evidence of the City of Lancaster and the Lancaster City Police Department changing the
ownership of the residence of Stanley J. Caterbone and using this to ignore the complaints of
harassment, vandalism, thefts, etc., while occupying said property.
This fraud also was used to
bolster the false reports of mental illness to the Lancaster County Administrator who was required
to sign off on all of the 302 mental health warrants.
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 114ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the PETITIONER's claim
of the value of the PETITIONER's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059 and 16-10167. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the
Court with unnecessary filings, however this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls
on the shoulders of all those in the government that ignored the PETITIONER's pleas for help to
resolve these issues dating back to the days immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
Date: April 14, 2016
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
/S/
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163
Page 215ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 316ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 417ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 518ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 619ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 720ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 821ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 922ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page
Page10
23ofof1069
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
www.am gglobalent er t ainm ent group.com

am group01@m sn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
St anley J. Cat erbone, Pro Se Lit igant

1250 Fr em ont St reet
Lancast er, PA 17603
June 25, 2007
Lancast er Cit y Police Chief Sam Gat chell

Cit y of Lancast er Bureau of Police
39 West Chest nut St reet
Lancast er, PA 17603- 3510
Re: St an Cat erbone & 1250 Frem ont St reet
Dear Sir;
I again need t o bring t o your at t ent ion Police m isconduct and abuse on t he part of t he
Lancast er Cit y Police Depart m ent . I asked you before in person for a m eet ing t o resolve t hese
issues and have writ t en you, but you cont inue t o ignore t hese problem s, which cont inue and are
causing m e dire problem s wit h m y Federal and St at e lit igat ion effort s. My com plaint s t o your
depart m ent fall on deaf ears, which in it self is illegal and a violat ion of m y Pennsylvania and Unit ed
St at es Const it ut ional right s. I n addit ion t here are violat ions of civil and crim inal st at ut es. These
m at t ers, if left unat t ended could lead t o physical violence.
The harassm ent and int im idat ion by your officers is not above t he rule of law, and I will hold
you and your police depart m ent account able in t he court of law when I am able. I also have m ade
several pleas wit h Mayor Rick Gray regarding t he sam e; for a civil resolut ion t o t hese issues. I had a
m eet ing wit h Mayor Rick Gray on February 6, 2007. I n t hat m eet ing t he Mayor of Lancast er Cit y
began yelling and scream ing at m e wit h no int ent but t o provoke and int im idat e m e. I did not get a
chance t o say anyt hing t o him , and he lit erally was having a nervous breakdown in front of m e
because he was filled wit h such rage. I believe he was upset at t he fact t hat I was referred t o him
by Robert Kagel and m et wit h him in 1987- 1988 regarding m y civil com plaint s and disclosed t his t o
aut horit ies.
There are several m at t ers t hat I need t o address. They are as follows:
1. Conflict s of I nt erest Chris Depat t o is an officer on t he Lancast er Cit y Police
force and his fat her, John Depat t o have a vest ed int erest in seeing t hat m y
Federal False Claim s Act ( Whist le- Blowing) lit igat ion in t he Unit ed St at es
Dist rict Court for t he East ern Dist rict of Pennsylvania regarding I nt ernat ional
Signal & Cont rol, ( I SC) be at least int errupt ed and at m ost be dism issed. John
Depat t o is m at erial in several ways.
a. John Depat t o was t he form er president of Parent Bank, owned and
operat ed by Jam es Guerin and I SC.
b. John Depat t o and Parent Bank foreclosed on m y propert y at 2323 New
Danville Pike, Conest oga in 1988; which is t he subj ect of current
lit igat ion in Federal Court s.
c. John Depat t o and Sylvia Depat t o were business associat es of m y
brot her Thom as Cat erbone and were responsible for writ ing a fraudulent
check t o m y brot her which is now m at erial t o a wrongful deat h

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 24 of 69
Page 1 of 3

06/25/2007
com plaint against Fult on Bank in Unit ed St at es Dist rict Court for t he
East ern Dist rict of Pennsylvania Case no. 05- 2288.
There are also conflict s of int erest wit h t he relat ionships of Mr. Pat rick Egan
and officers of t he Lancast er Cit y Police Depart m ent .
Mr. Pat rick Egans
daught er, Kerri, is t he subj ect of allegat ions of m aking false st at em ent s t o
aut horit ies. I n February of 2005, Kerri Egan, from t he Alley Kat Rest aurant at
about 5: 00 am , called 911 and m ade up a st ory t hat I em ailed her and was
going t o com m it suicide. This caused a m aj or problem when t he Sout hern
Regional Police Depart m ent broke int o m y hom e and physically and m ent ally
abused m e.
There is also a conflict of int erest wit h t he Chief of Police, Mr. John Fiorill of t he
Sout hern Regional Police Depart m ent , and his office of t he President of t he
Lancast er Red Rose Chapt er of t he Frat ernal Order of Police. Chief Fiorill is a
Defendant in several civil act ions and an affiant of several false arrest s and
false st at em ent s t o aut horit ies ( current ly in appeal t he Pennsylvania Superior
Court case no. 855 MDA 2007)
2. On August 4, of 2006, while I was illegally det ained for several hours in your
holding cell at t he Lancast er Cit y Police Precinct had m y social securit y card
st olen by one of your officers, which m ade it im possible t o cash a check from
Harleysville I nsurance Com pany at any local inst it ut ion. I required t his m oney
for food, post age, and gas. I n addit ion m y not es from t hat day are very
dam aging in dem onst rat ing t he abuse and int im idat ion of your police officers
during t hat incident .
3. From Sept em ber of 2006 t o t he present I have been residing at 1250 Frem ont
St reet , Lancast er, Pennsylvania and have m ade several com plaint s regarding
t heft s of legal files, Advanced Media Group business files, elect ronic devices,
and m ade num erous com plaint s of com put er hacking and t he illegal use of
com put ers. These com plaint s also include t he hacking of m y Averat ek Lapt op
wit hin t he past several weeks t hat left it inoperable. These com put er hacking
incident s cause m e irreparable harm in disabling m y effort s t o cont inue m y
lit igat ion in Federal, St at e, and Local Court s of Law. There have been no
effort s on t he part of t he Lancast er Cit y Police Depart m ent t o invest igat e t hese
m at t ers or even t o st op t hem .
4. Officer McFarland has prom ised m e t hat a Lancast er Cit y Det ect ive would
provide finger print analysis at 1250 Frem ont St reet .
This also never
happened.
5. During t he Professional Bicycle Race a few Sunday ago, Lancast er Cit y
Det ect ive Skyles prom ised m e a m eet ing t o discuss t he finger print ing at t he
Lancast er Cit y Precinct . I showed up at t he precinct and he was not t here at
t he designat ed t im e. The desk Sergeant dialed his num ber and had m e leave a
m essage on his voice m ail t hat was never responded t o.
6. I have m ade num erous com plaint s regarding t he act ivit ies of 1252 Frem ont
St reet and t he daily visit s of unsuspect ing charact ers and t he breach of
securit y of m y residence at 1250 Frem ont St reet . The Lancast er Cit y Police
Depart m ent has left t his sit uat ion cont inue wit hout int errupt ion. I t appears
t hat t he Lancast er Cit y Police Depart m ent is on t he t ake wit h regards t o t his
m at t er, and is willing t o look t he ot her way in order t o sabot age m y Federal,
St at e, and Local lit igat ion.

Page 25 of 69
Page 2 of 3

06/25/2007
7. According t o m y docum ent s and files dat ing back t o 1987, t he Lancast er Cit y
Police Depart m ent was a t arget and Defendant in a civil act ion t hat I was
preparing in t he sum m er of 1987 wit h regard t o I SC and Financial Managem ent
Group, Lt d.,. This civil act ion included t he Com m onwealt h Nat ional Bank and
Fult on Bank, bot h of t he Cit y of Lancast er.
I would ask t hat you forward t his t o your solicit or and your int ernal affairs depart m ent for a
t horough review and invest igat ion.
Respect fully,
St an J. Cat erbone, Pro Se Lit igant

cc:
Lancast er Cit y Mayor Rick Gray

Page 26 of 69
Page 3 of 3

06/25/2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (Plaintiffs)
v.
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, et. al., (Defendants)
Case No. 08-cv-02982
DEFENDANTS
CITY OF LANCASTER
CITY OF LANCASTER MAYOR RICK GRAY
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
LANCASTER CITY POLICE CHIEF KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CIVIL COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION
1. Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE) and Advanced Media Group were located at 220 Stone Hill
Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania (Conestoga Township) until August 30, 2006 when CATERBONE
temporarily moved into a family residence at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (City
of Lancaster).
2. The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore CATERBONES
complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to retaliate, subvert, interrupt and deter current and
ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and government agencies
with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would
include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (not Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation; a Wachovia
Bank branch (pending); Lancaster Newspapers; the County of Lancaster; the Lancaster County
Prison; the Hotel Brunswick (pending); James Street Investment District (pending); Aurora Films;
Haverstick Films (pending); and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police. The City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police are derelict in their duties in forcing CATERBONE to litigate for
duties and services due CATERBONE that are mandated in the bylaws of the City of Lancaster.
3. CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to retaliate,
subvert, interrupt and deter other litigation and civil complaints against other police departments,
namely the Southern Regional Police Department, the Manheim Township Police Department, the
East Lampeter Police Department, the Millersville Boro Police, the Avalon Police Department and
the Stone Harbor Police Department. CATERBONE alleges that Southern Regional Police Chief John
Fiorill used is official capacity as President of the Red Rose Chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police
to help accomplish these civil torts.
4. CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police Bureau of Police
gave the green light, or approval, for others to continue a long and successful period of
harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and
manipulation of court related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, eaves dropping,
invasion of privacy, criminal trespass, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have
taken on the characteristics of a hate crime.
5. CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and gross negligence defamed his name and that of
his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to diminish
credibility in the courts; to thwart any reprimands by oversight agencies; and to disrupt and
thwart any possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP. This has
resulted in direct and immediate financial loss, loss of time, and loss of income.
6. Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to resolve these
disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with the Lancaster Center for
Page 27 of 69
Mediation in May of 2008. Keith Sadler communicated to the Lancaster Mediation Center on May
8, 2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
7. On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911 or the Lancaster
City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police would not respond or take
complaints.
8. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and stolen from
CATERBONEs 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50 (from December 20,
2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless of the efforts to have Lancaster
City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to look into the allegations and complaints.
CATERBONE had meticulously documented the incidents in a journal and a log of gas receipts,
photographs, and odometer miles for all of the incidents. CATERBONE also made a thorough and
documented calibration of his 1991 Dodge Dakota Pick-Up truck with logs of mileage and times
and dates of gas purchases in a report to prove the gas was stolen. Lancaster City Police Bureau
Officer Cosmore returned the report with such words as counterfeit, fake, written on it and had
the audacity to ask CATERBONE if he had a certification of the gas pumps that were listed on
gas receipts. There were some days when the gas was stolen 2 or more times. CATERBONE
alleges that perpetrators were using a kerosene battery operated siphon, or like kind, to siphon
the gas from the gas tank.
9. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911 calls in the
last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE, for complaints of
property damage; stolen property, missing legal and business files and evidence for litigation;
computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic files; harassment; terrorist threats,
stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.
10. CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement
regarding the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office. CATERBONE had also visited
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and
intervention.
11. CATERBONE also had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City
Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the
problems and or resolve the conflicts. The resulting pain and suffering, as well as loss and
destruction of property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing was unprecedented.
12. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their
Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years.
The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action
Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
13. In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro bono
attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder trials and appeals
of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had
communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her
Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County residents,
despite the fact that many more sought her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE
had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell in an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an
AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or
Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges that these
facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law enforcement-at-large of Lancaster
County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to
bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large
had the same attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national notoriety when
Page 28 of 69
U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was
actually innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying,
"I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three
weeks, and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want
you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking
world where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found it. The
case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November
10, 1997 and a television episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster
community gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart
Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of the case and
appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison. The case went all the way to
the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights
of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney
generals from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before former
Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. To this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County
Judicial System and Law Enforcement, and his own dire civil complaints, CATERBONE believes that
the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly
investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.
CAUSES OF ACTION
14. On or about April 14, 2008 1999 HP Notebook n5150 laptop was rendered useless by an
intruder shorting the power cord. This was the third computer rendered useless since November of
2007, and the last computer available for use in the home and office. Other incidents were
happening while at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA since 1997. The only computer available
for use was the public computer at the Lancaster County Library on North Duke Street in
downtown Lancaster.
15. On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to
continue take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and
development plan. (The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since 1995.
CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of the Brunswick,
Hamid Zahedi, to make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the site. CATERBONE had begun
discussions in 2006.) On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department
of Justice Office of Trustee was conducting hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential
Room of the Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case No.
05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the clerk of
courts. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States Department of
Justice Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings. The following day CATERBONE received
a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn
Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known Mr. Solodky since the 1980s and had even
solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on
May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the incident and the false reports and
allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.:
Page 29 of 69
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
CLOSED,SPECIAL
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
CATERBONE et al v. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU et al

Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 06/18/2008

Date Terminated: 07/11/2008
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
PRO SE
Plaintiff
represented by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

c/o STANLEY J. CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-427-1821
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU
Defendant
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY
BUREAU OF POLICE
Defendant
KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CHIEF
Defendant
RICK GRAY
LANCASTER CITY MAYOR
Defendant
CITY OF LANCASTER
Page 30 of 69

11/7/2015 5:56 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
Date Filed
# Docket Text
06/18/2008
1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(ti, )

(Entered: 06/26/2008)
07/11/2008
2 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS

GRANTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITH LEAVE TO FILE AN AMEDNED
COMPLAINT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE
THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
7/10/2008.7/11/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/11/2008
3 COMPLAINT against LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER

CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, KEITH SADDLER, RICK GRAY, CITY OF LANCASTER, filed by
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/22/2008
4 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE..(ap, ) (Entered:

07/22/2008)
07/25/2008
5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. THE

PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE
DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT, THE CLERK
SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT.SIGNED BY
HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/25/08.7/28/08 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED.(ah) (Entered: 07/28/2008)
09/25/2008
6 MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. with

EXHIBITS..(ap, ) (Entered: 09/26/2008)
10/10/2008
7 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS GRANTED; THIS

CASE SHALL REMAIND CLOSED STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/10/2008.10/10/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ap, )
(Entered: 10/10/2008)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
11/07/2015 05:55:41
PACER
Login:
am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Search
Criteria:
2:08-cv02982-MAM
Billable
Pages:
Cost:
0.10
Page 31 of 69

11/7/2015 5:56 AM
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM Document 3 Filed 07/11/08 Page 1 of 33
Page 32 of 69
Page 33 of 69
Page 34 of 69
Page 35 of 69
Page 36 of 69
Page 37 of 69
Page 38 of 69
Page 39 of 69
Page 40 of 69
Page 41 of 69
Page 42 of 69
Page 43 of 69
Page 44 of 69
Page 45 of 69
Page 46 of 69
Page 47 of 69
Page 48 of 69
Page 49 of 69
Page 50 of 69
Page 51 of 69
Page 52 of 69
Page 53 of 69
Page 54 of 69
Page 55 of 69
Page 56 of 69
Page 57 of 69
Page 58 of 69
Page 59 of 69
Page 60 of 69
Page 61 of 69
Page 62 of 69
Page 63 of 69
Page 64 of 69
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

STANLEY J. CATERBONE
v.
:
:
:
:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, et al.:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 08-2982
O R D E R
AND NOW, this
day of October, 2008, upon
consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without

Prejudice (Doc. No. 6), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)
Plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without Prejudice is
GRANTED; and
(2)
This case shall remain CLOSED statistically.

BY THE COURT:
/S/ MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, J.
Page 65 of 69
Civil Rights Division Home Page
1 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php
Skip to content
En Espaol
ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT
Main Page
AAG Thomas E. Perez
LAWS ENFORCED BY THE
About Us
Section Sites
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FOIA
Press Releases
Speeches & Testimony
Frequently Asked Questions
Special Topics
Post 9/11 Backlash
H1N1 Response
ADA
FACE
Cases & Briefs
Recruitment & Employment
Contact Us
Go to the
Department of Justice
Privacy Act Statement
The vast majority of the law enforcement officers in this country perform their very difficult jobs with
respect for their communities and in compliance with the law. Even so, there are incidents in which this is
not the case. This document outlines the laws enforced by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ)
that address police misconduct and explains how you can file a complaint with DOJ if you believe that
your rights have been violated.
Federal laws that address police misconduct include both criminal and civil statutes. These laws cover
the actions of State, county, and local officers, including those who work in prisons and jails. In addition,
several laws also apply to Federal law enforcement officers. The laws protect all persons in the United
States (citizens and non-citizens).
Each law DOJ enforces is briefly discussed below. In DOJ investigations, whether criminal or civil, the
person whose rights have been reportedly violated is referred to as a victim and often is an important
witness. DOJ generally will inform the victim of the results of the investigation, but we do not act as the
victim's lawyer and cannot give legal advice as a private attorney could.
The various offices within DOJ that are responsible for enforcing the laws discussed in this document
coordinate their investigation and enforcement efforts where appropriate. For example, a complaint
received by one office may be referred to another if necessary to address the allegations. In addition,
more than one office may investigate the same complaint if the allegations raise issues covered by more
than one statute.
What is the difference between criminal and civil cases?
Hints...
Feedback Form
Criminal and civil laws are different. Criminal cases usually are investigated and handled separately from
civil cases, even if they concern the same incident. In a criminal case, DOJ brings a case against the
accused person; in a civil case, DOJ brings the case (either through litigation or an administrative
investigation) against a governmental authority or law enforcement agency. In a criminal case, the
evidence must establish proof "beyond a reasonable doubt," while in civil cases the proof need only
satisfy the lower standard of a "preponderance of the evidence." Finally, in criminal cases, DOJ seeks to
punish a wrongdoer for past misconduct through imprisonment or other sanction. In civil cases, DOJ
seeks to correct a law enforcement agency's policies and practices that fostered the misconduct and,
where appropriate, may require individual relief for the victim(s).
Federal Criminal Enforcement

It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive
another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C.
241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by
a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even
if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. The types of law enforcement misconduct covered by
these laws include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrests, or the intentional fabrication
of evidence resulting in a loss of liberty to another. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that
any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.
What remedies are available under these laws?
Violations of these laws are punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. There is no private right of action
under these statutes; in other words, these are not the legal provisions under which you would file a
lawsuit on your own.
Page 66 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
2 of 4
Federal Civil Enforcement

"Police Misconduct Provision"
This law makes it unlawful for State or local law enforcement officers to
engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights
protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (42 U.S.C.
14141). The types of conduct covered by this law can include, among other
things, excessive force, discriminatory harassment, false arrests, coercive
sexual conduct, and unlawful stops, searches or arrests. In order to be
covered by this law, the misconduct must constitute a "pattern or practice" -- it
may not simply be an isolated incident. The DOJ must be able to show in
court that the agency has an unlawful policy or that the incidents constituted
a pattern of unlawful conduct. However, unlike the other civil laws discussed
below, DOJ does not have to show that discrimination has occurred in order to
prove a pattern or practice of misconduct.
What remedies are available under this law?
The remedies available under this law do not provide for individual monetary
relief for the victims of the misconduct. Rather, they provide for injunctive
relief, such as orders to end the misconduct and changes in the agency's
policies and procedures that resulted in or allowed the misconduct. There is
no private right of action under this law; only DOJ may file suit for violations of
the Police Misconduct Provision.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

and the "OJP Program Statute"
Together, these laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion
by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance from the Department of
Justice. (42 U.S.C. 2000d, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. 3789d(c)). Currently, most persons are served by a
law enforcement agency that receives DOJ funds. These laws prohibit both individual instances and
patterns or practices of discriminatory misconduct, i.e., treating a person differently because of race,
color, national origin, sex, or religion. The misconduct covered by Title VI and the OJP (Office of Justice
Programs) Program Statute includes, for example, harassment or use of racial slurs, unjustified arrests,
discriminatory traffic stops, coercive sexual conduct, retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or
participating in the investigation, use of excessive force, or refusal by the agency to respond to
complaints alleging discriminatory treatment by its officers.
DOJ may seek changes in the policies and procedures of the agency to remedy violations of these laws
and, if appropriate, also seek individual remedial relief for the victim(s). Individuals also have a private
right of action under Title VI and under the OJP Program Statute; in other words, you may file a lawsuit
yourself under these laws. However, you must first exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a
complaint with DOJ if you wish to file in Federal Court under the OJP Program Statute.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 prohibit discrimination against individuals with
disabilities on the basis of disability. (42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq. and 29 U.S.C. 794). These laws
protect all people with disabilities in the United States. An individual is considered to have a "disability" if
he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,
has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.
The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all State and local government programs,
services, and activities regardless of whether they receive DOJ financial assistance; it also protects
people who are discriminated against because of their association with a person with a disability. Section
504 prohibits discrimination by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance
Page 67 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
3 of 4
from DOJ. Section 504 also prohibits discrimination in programs and activities conducted by Federal
agencies, including law enforcement agencies.
These laws prohibit discriminatory treatment, including misconduct, on the basis of disability in virtually all
law enforcement services and activities. These activities include, among others, interrogating witnesses,
providing emergency services, enforcing laws, addressing citizen complaints, and arresting, booking, and
holding suspects. These laws also prohibit retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or participating in the
investigation.
If appropriate, DOJ may seek individual relief for the victim(s), in addition to changes in the policies and
procedures of the law enforcement agency. Individuals have a private right of action under both the ADA
and Section 504; you may file a private lawsuit for violations of these statutes. There is no requirement
that you exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ first.
How to File a Complaint with DOJ

Criminal Enforcement
If you would like to file a complaint alleging a violation of the criminal laws discussed above, you may
contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which is responsible for investigating allegations of
criminal deprivations of civil rights. You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) in
your district. The FBI and USAOs have offices in most major cities and have publicly-listed phone
numbers. In addition, you may send a written complaint to:
Criminal Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66018
Washington, D.C. 20035-6018
Civil Enforcement
If you would like to file a complaint alleging violations of the Police Misconduct Statute, Title VI, or the
OJP Program Statute, you may send a written complaint to:
Coordination and Review Section
P.O. Box 66560
You may also call the Coordination and Review Section's toll-free number for information and a complaint
form, at (888) 848-5306 (voice and TDD).
If you would like to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, you may send a
written complaint to:
Disability Rights Section
P.O. Box 66738
You may also call the Disability Rights Section's toll-free ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 (voice)
or (800) 514-0383 (TDD).
How do I file a complaint about the conduct of a law enforcement officer from a Federal agency?
If you believe that you are a victim of criminal misconduct by a Federal law enforcement officer (such as
the Immigration and Naturalization Service; the FBI; the Customs Service; Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms; or the Border Patrol), you should follow the procedures discussed above concerning how to file
a complaint alleging violations of the criminal laws we enforce. If you believe that you have been
subjected by a Federal law enforcement officer to the type of misconduct discussed above concerning
"Federal Civil Enforcement," you may send a complaint to the Coordination and Review Section, at the
address listed above. That office will forward your complaint to the appropriate agency and office.
What information should I include in a complaint to DOJ?
Your complaint, whether alleging violations of criminal or civil laws listed in this document, should include
the following information:
Your name, address, and telephone number(s).
Page 68 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
4 of 4
The name(s) of the law enforcement agency (or agencies) involved.

A description of the conduct you believe violates one of the laws discussed above, with as
many details as possible. You should include: the dates and times of incident(s); any
injuries sustained; the name(s), or other identifying information, of the officer(s) involved (if
possible); and any other examples of similar misconduct.
The names and telephone numbers of witnesses who can support your allegations.
If you believe that the misconduct is based on your race, color, national origin, sex,
religion, or disability, please identify the basis and explain what led you to believe that you
were treated in a discriminatory manner (i.e., differently from persons of another race, sex,
etc.).
Reproduction of this document is encouraged.
Return to Conduct of Law Enforcement Agencies Page

Return to Documents and Publications Page
Return to Special Litigation Section Home Page
Last updated October 13, 1999
Updated July 25, 2008
Page 69 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
PRIVATE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF:
Lancaster
Magisterial District Number:
MDJ Name: Hon
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
VS.
DEFENDANT:
Address:
NAME and ADDRESS

Telephone:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2

1252 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Docket No.:
Date Filed:
OTN:
(Above to be completed by court personnel)
(Fill in defendants name and address)
Notice: Under Pa.R.Crim.P. 506, your complaint may require approval by the attorney for the Commonwealth before it can be
accepted by the magisterial district court. If the attorney for the Commonwealth disapproves your complaint, you may
petition the court of common pleas for review of the decision of the attorney for the Commonwealth.
Fill in as much information as you have.

Defendants Race/Ethnicity
White
Black
Asian
Native American
Hispanic
Unknown
Defendants A.K.A. (also known as)
Defendants Sex
Defendants D.O.B.
Female
Male
Defendants SID (State Identification Number)
not available
Defendants Vehicle Information
Plate Number
State
Registration Sticker (MM/YY)
Defendants Drivers License Number

State
Stan J. Caterbone of 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603
I,
(Name of Complainant-Please Print or Type)
do hereby state: (check appropriate box)

1.
I accuse the above named defendant who lives at the address set forth above
I accuse the defendant whose name is unknown to me but who is described as 1. Son of "Bruni" 2. White Male Friend
I accuse the defendant whose name and popular designation or nickname is unknown to me and whom I have
therefore designated as John Doe
with violating the penal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at
1252 and 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster City

(Place-Political Subdivision)
in
Lanccaster
County on or about
March 25 to March 29, 2016
Participants were: (if there were participants, place their names here, repeating the name of the above defendant)
Stalking, Harassing, and attempted vandalism to my 2007 Honda CRV on March 28th, 2016 with attempting to let air out of drivers
side rear tire. See complaint from June 2015 as attached.
AOPC 411A-10
Private Criminal Complaint v. 1250 Fremont St.

St.
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 66
64
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
PRIVATE
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Defendants Name:
Docket Number:
2.
The acts committed by the accused were:

(Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged. A citation to the statute allegedly violated, without more,
is not sufficient. In a summary case, you must cite the specific section and subsection of the statute or ordinance allegedly violated. The age of the victim at the
time of the offense may be included, if known. In addition, social security numbers and financial information (e.g. PINS) should not be listed. If the identity
of an account number must be established, list only the last four digits. 204 Pa.Code 213.1 - 213.7. )
All of which were against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of
Assembly, or in violation of
and
(Section)
(Subsection)
of the
(PA Statute)
3.
I ask that process be issued and that the defendant be required to answer the charges I have made.
4.
I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and
belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.C.S. 4904)
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date
Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth

(Name of Attorney for Commonwealth-Please Print or Type)
AND NOW, on this date
Signature of Complainant
Approved
Disapproved because:
(Signature of Attorney for Commonwealth)
(Date)
, I certify that the complaint has been properly completed and verified.
(Magisterial District)
AOPC 411B-10

St.
(Issuing Authority)
SEAL
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 66
64
Private Complaint v. 1250 Fremont Street
Page 2A
2709. Harassment and stalking.

(a) Harassment.--A person commits the crime of harassment when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another, the person:
1. strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects the other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or
2. follows the other person in or about a public place or places; or
3. engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which serve no legitimate purpose.
(b) Stalking.--A person commits the crime of stalking when he engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts toward another
person, including following the person without proper authority, under circumstances which demonstrate either of the following:
1. an intent to place the person in reasonable fear of bodily injury; or
2. an intent to cause substantial emotional distress to the person.
Webmaster notes: The constitutional right of free speech and address is a shield and not a constitutional sword with which to do harm to
others. Therefore, the stalking penal statute in Pennsylvania is not unconstitutional as an impingement on free speech. Commonwealth v.
Schierscher, 557 Pa.Superior Ct. 61, 668 A.2d 164 (1995).
Evidence of related prior bad acts is admissible where appellant has been charged with stalking. Commonwealth v. Urrutia, 439 Pa.Superior
Ct. 227, 653 A.2d 706 (1995).
The intent to "cause substantial emotional distress" may be inferred from a defendant's conduct.
Commonwealth v. Miller, 455 Pa.Superior Ct. 543, 689 A.2d 238 (1997).
Introduction in evidence of prior convictions of stalking does not constitute a violation of a defendant's protection from double jeopardy.
Commonwealth v. Roefaro, 456 Pa. Superior Ct. 588, 691 A.2d 472 (1997).
Harassment is a lesser included offense of stalking.
Commonwealth v. Reese, 725 A.2d 190 (Pa. Superior Ct.: 1999).
The first act in a course of conduct constitutes a violation of this section, as much as the subsequent acts; in such a case, a 2 1/2 to 5 year
imprisonment sentence for one count of stalking is not excessive and illegal, even though it may exceed the sentencing guidelines, where 8
subsequent incidents of harassment are demonstrated which might incur sentences cumulatively which would approximate the single penalty
imposed. Commonwealth v. Leach, 729 A.2d 608 (Pa. Superior Ct.: 1999).
(c) Grading.-1. An offense under subsection (a) shall constitute a summary offense.
2.
1. An offense under subsection (b) shall constitute a misdemeanor of the first degree.
2. A second or subsequent offense under subsection (b) or a first offense under subsection (b) if the person has been previously
convicted of any crime of violence involving this same victim, family or household members, including, but not limited to, a violation of section
2701 (relating to simple assault), 2702 (relating to aggravated assault), 2705 (relating to recklessly endangering another person), 2901 (relating
to kidnapping), 3121 (relating to rape), 3123 (relating to involuntary deviate sexual intercourse) or 3128 (relating to spousal sexual assault)
[now repealed], an order issued under section 4954 (relating to protective orders) or an order issued under 23 Pa.C.S. 6108 (relating to relief),
shall constitute a felony of the third degree.
Page 3 of 66
(d) False reports.--A person who knowingly gives false information to any law enforcement officer with the intent to implicate another under
this section commits an offense under section 4906 (relating to false reports to law enforcement authorities).
(e) Application of section.--This section shall not apply to conduct by a party to a labor dispute as defined in the act of June 2, 1937 (P.L.1198,
No.308), known as the Labor Anti-Injunction Act, or to any constitutionally protected activity.
(e.1) Course of conduct.--Acts indicating a course of conduct which occur in more than one jurisdiction may be used by any other jurisdiction
in which an act occurred as evidence of a continuing pattern of conduct or a course of conduct.
(f) Definitions.--As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:
"Course of conduct."
A pattern of actions composed of more than one act over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of conduct. The term
includes lewd, lascivious, threatening or obscene words, language, drawings, caricatures or actions, either in person or anonymously.
"Emotional distress."
A temporary or permanent state of great physical or mental strain.
"Family or household member."
Spouses or persons who have been spouses, persons living as spouses or who lived as spouses, parents and children, other persons related
by consanguinity or affinity, current or former sexual or intimate partners or persons who share biological parenthood.
[Webmaster note: Compare 5504 of this title (relating to harassment and stalking by communication or address).]
Page 4 of 66
Outlook.com - scaterbone@live.com
1 of 1
https://col131.mail.live.com/?tid=cmPH2JZxgV5RGaeQAiZMIDDA2&fi...
New
Reply
Delete
Archive
Junk
Sweep
Stan J. Caterbone
Move to
1252 Fremont Street - Trouble Again

Folders
Stan J. Caterbone 1:43 PM
Inbox 2
To: sector9@police.co.lancaster.pa.us, stancaterbone@gmail.com
Junk
June 17, 2015

Drafts
Sent
Deleted
AA Inbox 42
Deed and City Rehab
Ebay and Online Purcha
FFCHS Communications
May-June Surge 23
Mind Control Research
New folder
To: Sector 9 of Lancaster City Police Dept.

I live at 1250 Fremont Street. There is so many people (8) living at 1252
Fremont Street that I can't count or tell who is who. I have been physically
threatened on numerous occasions, the most recent last evening. A few weeks
ago they were carrying around a large red re mans axe trying to scare me. Last
night they threw a ball on our steel pao roof to scare our dog so he jumps the
fence and runs away. They are trying to inmidate me with looks of rage. Rick
Wennerstrom told me today that only a Father, Mother and daughter should live
there. To make maers worse I have given them 2 maresses, a dehumidier, a
computer, and candy and gis for there kids. I have loaned them tools, cut
there grass, shoveled their walks, and I place their trash cans and recycling cans
in the alley in their yard every week. And Rick does nothing. The problem is that
there are sweet lile girls who live there.
Stan J. Caterbone
2015 Microsoft
Terms

St.
Privacy & cookies
Developers
Page 5
3 of 66
64
English (United States)
6/17/2015 2:09 PM
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
111of
1of
41
6
ofof
of
51
51
of
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
222
1of
2of
52
7
ofof
1of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
333
2of
3of
63
8
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
444
3of
4of
74
9
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
555
410
5of
of
85
ofof
2of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
51
66
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
666
511
6of
of
96
ofof
3of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
51
66
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
777
612
10
7of
of
7
ofof
451
51
of
50
51
51
51
64
66
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
888
713
11
8of
of
8
ofof
551
51
of
50
51
51
51
64
66
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
999
814
12
9of
of
9
ofof
851
51
of
50
51
51
51
64
66
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
10
10
910
13
15
10
of
of
of
9of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
11
10
11
14
16
11
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
111
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
12
12
11
12
15
17
12
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
212
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
13
13
12
13
16
18
13
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
313
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
14
14
13
14
17
19
14
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
414
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
15
15
14
15
18
20
15
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
515
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
16
16
15
16
19
21
16
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
616
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
17
17
16
17
20
22
17
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
717
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
18
18
17
18
21
23
18
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
818
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
19
19
18
19
22
24
19
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
919
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
20
20
19
20
20
23
25
20
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
10
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
21
21
20
21
21
24
26
21
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
11
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
22
22
21
22
22
25
27
22
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
12
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
23
23
22
23
23
26
28
23
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
13
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
24
24
23
24
24
27
29
24
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
14
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
25
25
24
25
25
28
30
25
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
15
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
26
26
25
26
26
29
31
26
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
16
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
27
27
26
27
27
30
32
27
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
17
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
28
28
27
28
28
31
33
28
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
18
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
29
29
28
29
29
32
34
29
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
19
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
30
30
29
30
30
33
35
30
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
20
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
31
31
21
30
31
31
34
36
31
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
41
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
October
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
10,
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2016
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
32
32
31
32
32
35
37
32
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
33
33
32
33
33
36
38
33
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
34
34
33
34
34
37
39
34
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
35
35
35
35
38
40
35
of
of
ofof
of
51
51
of
51
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
30,
17, 2016
15,
2015
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
27.Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would not
issue pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster County
District Attorney, no opinion as of yet.
28.U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016
at the NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over an
hour and finally let go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was no
longer permitted to visit any U.S. Federal Facilities.
Dated: March 15, 2016
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Caterbone
Complaint
Group
Executive
Executive
Executive
v. Summary
1250
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
36
36
36
39
41
36
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
51
64
66
51
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
March
March
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
30,
15, 2016
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
37
37
36
37
37
40
42
37
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
27
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
38
38
37
38
38
41
43
38
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
28
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
39
39
38
39
39
42
44
39
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
29
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
9
,
$;$
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
"2
&<;=
>
1
,
.
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
40
40
39
40
40
43
45
40
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
30
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
41
41
40
41
41
44
46
41
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
31
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
42
42
41
42
42
45
47
42
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
32
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
0 =
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
43
43
42
43
43
46
48
43
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
33
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
44
44
43
44
44
47
49
44
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
34
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
45
45
44
45
45
48
50
45
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
35
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
46
46
45
46
46
49
51
46
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
36
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
47
47
46
47
47
50
52
47
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
37
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
48
48
47
48
48
51
53
48
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
38
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
49
49
48
49
49
52
54
49
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
39
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
50
50
49
50
50
53
55
50
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
40
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Private
Stan
J. Criminal
Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Group
Complaint
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
v. Summary
Release
1250
Release
Summary
Summary
Fremont St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
51
51
50
51
51
54
56
51
of
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
51
64
66
51
Page
41
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
March
December
15,
March
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
30,
17, 2015
15,
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Change.org Petition by Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced Media Group
March 17, 2016
When will the United States of America Settle with Targeted Individuals?
The United States would provide $100,000 per year for documented Targeted
Individuals, payable in the form of an annuity with survivor benefits.
The United States would provide a $10 Million Lump Sum for Suspicious or Accidental
Death.
The United States would provide Medical Benefits for life.
The United States would provide an extra layer of security by law enforcement for persons,
property, identity, and cybersecurity of targeted individuals.
The United States newly formed U.S. Task Force for Targeted Individuals would take a
random sampling of 200 Targeted Individuals Cases Including Affidavits and
Documentation. They would then develop a baseline for evidence and required
documentation.
Settlement is fair considering the following case law:
Erin Andrews Awarded $55 Million in Peephole Video Lawsuit
1. Andrews sought $75 million from the owner of the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt
University, where she was staying in 2008 when the incident occurred, and Michael
David Barrett, the stalker who booked hotel rooms next to her in Nashville and
Columbus, Ohio, and secretly recorded (via a peephole) and released videos of her
naked. Barrett, whom the jury found to be 51% at fault, has to pay more than $28
million. Nashville Marriott owner West End Hotel Partners and former operator Windsor
Capital Group, which were found to be 49% at fault, have to pay more than $26
million.
This is my story Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone are Targeted and Victims of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control Experimentation Programs. We have been engaged in
RECLAMATION; (assets; real estate; personal and business real property; intellectual property;
and business interests) LITIGATION; and RESEARCH since 2005 in federal and state courts. All
activities are for the purpose of restoring Advanced Media Group and all affiliated companies and
Stan J. Caterbone to WHOLE.
Stan J. Caterbone was recently accepted into the Graduate Studies and Research Program at
Millersville University in April of 2009 where a more formal research approach to mind control and
MKULTRA programs will be studied. Other studies will be considered in the areas of law; finance;
computer science; and philosophy.
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group are not able to continue it's litigation until it's
security needs are satisfied and it's computer/electronic property is returned and/or replaced.
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page157
55
11of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and
fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling
arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which
would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart
further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue
our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our
rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media.
Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and
Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel?
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page258
56
22of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
January 22, 2016

Re: Good Old Boys Network and the Kathleen Kane Coup
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates back to
1987, made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the "good old boys". In
1987 I blew the whistle on a local company, International Signal & Control, or ISC, that was
indicted for selling arms and weapons to Iraq via South Africa with the aid and support of the CIA
and the NSA. It was the 3rd largest white collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I
was the victim of a widespread wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that
included 29 false arrests, multiple false imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record that
to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for taking on
this culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law that they
so emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and conduct their affairs in a manner that
suggests they are above the law and we, the Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The
sad fact that it reaches into the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most
outrageous and deplorable truth to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the
APPELLANT in a case before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus
Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle Lambert. A murder case in the early 1990's
that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell found her actually
innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the English speaking
language" and released her from prison. The case drew nationwide attention when then
Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney
generals to curtail the reach of the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus
cases. To make matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable
Stewart Dalzell from the federal bench.
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison within 9
months while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The Honorable
Judge Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was again found guilty and sentenced to
life in prison. The case was covered by the LA Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer
Bill Curtis did a 48 Hours special, and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my efforts to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively withdraw as her MOVANT
and Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my own demise was the result of the same
type of wholesale prosecutorial misconduct by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle
Lambert fell victim to. My efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed
attorney threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be
successful in helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege the U.S. District
Judge was trying in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal court cases that seek to restore
me to whole from a life of ruin, misery, torture, and financial collapse.
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page359
57
33of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states and raised
some 90 million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and early 1990's I was one of
5 domestic companies that had the capabilities of manufacturing CDROM's that included a client
list that reached across the globe and included government agencies and fortune 500 companies.
And in 1987, myself and a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous
recording studio, Power Station Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first
"digital movie". The intellectual property rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal
claims in federal courts were too much for the "Good Old Boys" to handle.
_____________/S/___________
ACTIVE COURT CASES
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page460
58
44of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
AFFIDAVIT

Affiant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Telephone: 717-826-5354
State of Pennsylvania
County of Lancaster
My current legal name is,Stan J Caterbone and my current address is, 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, PA
17603 . I am presently 57 years of age, and my current address of residence is
same as before. I, the Affiant submits and writes these statements of and on my own free will
and on behalf of myself, Stan J. Caterbone.
I, the Affiant states that I have been tortured by U.S. Sponsored Mind Control technologies; and
have experienced the following;
burns, directed high levels of energy being subjected to my
body, private parts, heart, head, spine, joints, etc. I the Affiant states that I have been attacked
by (individuals, police, military, and intelligence agents, etc.) I the Affiant states that I have made
formal police reports to: Lancaster City Police, Manheim Township Police, Southern
Regional Police, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Attorney Office, Pennsylvania
Attorney Office, Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster City Mayor and Office, I
have contacted the Pennsylvania Attorney General, Joe Pitts Office, Mike Sturla' Office,
Senator Arlen Specter, and Bob Casey and former senator Edward Kennedy; Brian
Cutler, and Ryan Aument, and countless other members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly,
and receive no support, just involuntary psychiatric commitments, and the endorsement and the
support for my perpetrators to continue the assaults.
I the Affiant have been arrested, forcibly placed in a mental hospital, physically harmed, assaulted
by countless officials, military, and civilians. I the Affiant states that my life has been ruined as I
am no longer employable, I am workplace mobbed, my work is being damaged, my family is
being threatened, etc.
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page561
59
55of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
I am or have become a victim of (torture, attacks, assaults, harassment, sexual abuse, police
abuse, government funded technology abuse, etc., and am now aware that these technologies are
being funded by the United States government with most of these technologies being developed
for war are also now being tested and evaluated per Department of Defense Directive 5240.1-r
Procedure 13 Human Experimentation (on U.S. Persons and others) for Intelligence Purposes.
As a human being and with Human Rights I have not given approval for the use or abuse of my
body in any form to anyone or to any entity within or outside of the United States government to
include any corporation, researcher, scientist, military agency or anyone affiliated within or
outside of any agency, corporation or individual that has resulted in the harms that my body, life,
property, career and or finances have endured. To further state that military training documents
such
as
the
Department
of
Defense
Joint
https://www.aclu.org/files/dronefoia/dod/drone_dod_jp3_60.pdf;
Targeting
DOD
Joint
Publication
Targeting
of
Individual and Groups that involves the United States Joint Chiefs of Command and the United
States (HHS) Health and Human Services involvement, an agency that oversee the medical
records of every citizen along with citizens who are being used illegally for testing and evaluation
of war technologies;
I the Affiant of this Affidavit do object to such treatment and abuse of my body and life. In
addition to the above noted military training documents that is resulting in the harm to myself
and to millions of citizens of this country I do as well object to the Department of Defense
Directive 5240.1-r Procedure 13 that has resulted in the destruction of my health as will where
this document has existed for decades with no oversight yet it still exists as a published and
available document resulting in harm to myself and millions of citizens. The chapter 13 reads as
follows:
C13. CHAPTER 13 PROCEDURE 13. EXPERIMENTATION ON HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR
INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES
C13.1. APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to experimentation on human subjects if such
experimentation is conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component. This procedure
does not apply to experimentation on animal subjects.
C13.2. EXPLANATION OF UNDEFINED TERMS
C13.2.1. Experimentation in this context
means any research or testing activity involving human subjects that may expose such subjects
to the possibility of permanent or temporary injury (including physical or psychological damage
and damage to the reputation of such persons) beyond the risks of injury to which such subjects
are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives.
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page662
60
66of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
C13.2.2. Experimentation is conducted on behalf of a DoD intelligence component if it is

conducted under contract to that component or to another DoD Component for the benefit of the
intelligence component or at the request of such a component regardless of the existence of a
contractual relationship.
C13.2.3. Human subjects in this context includes any person whether or not such person is a
United States person.
C13.3. PROCEDURES C13.3.1. Experimentation on human subjects
conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component may be undertaken only with the
informed consent of the subject, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of
Health and Human Services, setting out conditions that safeguard the welfare of such subjects.
DoD 5240.1-R, December 1982 58
I hereby state that the information above is true, to the best of my knowledge. I also confirm that
the information here is both accurate and complete, and relevant information has not been
omitted. (1) For an individual acting in his or her own right I set forth my signature:
Stan (ley) J. Caterbone Affiant Signed________________________________, Affiant

Stan J. Caterbone, State of Pennsylvania, County of Lancaster, City of Lancaster,
On
this, _________day of ______________, 20____, before me a notary public, the

undersigned (print name) _______________________________________, personally
appeared before me, known to me (by satisfactorily proven identification and affixed
signature) ______________________________ to be the person whose name is
subscribed to this document, and acknowledged that he or she executed the same for
the purposes therein contained. In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand and official
seal.____________________________________
Notary Public ___________________________ My Commission Expires on
AffidavitCriminal
AFFIDAVIT
Private
of Stan
of Stan
JJ.
Complaint
Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
v. re
1250
reState-of-Affairs
Current
reFremont
State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
St.
St.
Page
Page
Page
Page763
61
77of
of
of
of113
23
27
23
64
66
Wednesday,
Tuesday, March 30,
22, 2016
15-03984
PA
State
Police
Habeus
Background
EXHIBITre
State Fremont
of AffairsSt.
Private
Criminal
Complaint
v.Check
1250
St.
Page
Page
ofof180
181
Page1464
62
of
64
66
Sunday, March 30,

27, 2016
Wednesday,
15-03984
PA
State
Police
Habeus
Background
EXHIBITre
State Fremont
of AffairsSt.
Private
Criminal
Complaint
v.Check
1250
St.
Page
Page
ofof180
181
Page2565
63
of
64
66
Sunday, March 30,

27, 2016
Wednesday,
15-03984
PA
State
Police
Habeus
Background
EXHIBITre
State Fremont
of AffairsSt.
Private
Criminal
Complaint
v.Check
1250
St.
Page
Page
ofof180
181
Page3666
64
of
64
66
Sunday, March 30,

27, 2016
Wednesday,

Allstate Claim 0411061054 Certified Letter From Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman &amp; Goggin Allstate Attorneys of May 19, 2016 With Allstate Claim of April 16, 2016 Updated May 21, 2016

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Allstate Claim 0411061054 Certified Letter From Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman &amp; Goggin Allstate Attorneys of May 19, 2016 With Allstate Claim of April 16, 2016 Updated May 21, 2016

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Gmail - Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim

Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>

Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim

Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:43 PM

TOOLS & RESOURCES

Confirmation: Your claim has

Dear Stanley Caterbone,

Claim handling details

1. Click the "Check Claim Status" button below

Gmail - Allstate Claim 0411061054: Your recent property insurance claim

If you have any questions, please call us any time at

This email was sent to Stanley Caterbone at SCATERBONE@LIVE.COM.

Allstate Insurance Company, 2775 Sanders Road, Northbrook, IL 60062

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

1250 Fremont Street

April 16, 2016

To Whom It May Concern:

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street

ALLSTATE INSURANCE CLAIM

Friday, April 15, 2016

Information as of December 17, 2015

Dan Naumann Agy Inc

Your Allstate agency is

Thank You for Being a Loyal Allstate CustomerWere Happy to Have

Renewing your policy is easy

Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim

Friday, April 15, 2016

952 500 478

Your Insurance Coverage Checklist

What about my bill?

Am I getting all the discounts I should?

What if I have questions?

You can also pay your bill online at allstate.com or by

Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim

Friday, April 15, 2016

065 070 037

A guide to your renewal package

Renewal Homeowners Policy Declarations

Information as of December 17, 2015

Premium for property insured

Discounts (included in your total premium)

Location of property insured

One basic full bath

Exterior wall type:

Your policy provided by

1 mile to fire department

Home and Auto

Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim

Friday, April 15, 2016

Renewal Homeowners Policy Declarations

Rating Information* (continued)

Additional Interested Parties:

$1,000 All peril

Up to 12 months not to exceed $14,067

Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim

Friday, April 15, 2016

065 070 037

Coverage detail for the property insured

Renewal Homeowners Policy Declarations

Scheduled Personal Property Coverage

Your policy documents

Building Structure Reimbursement Extended Limits

Pennsylvania Homeowners Policy And Select Homeowners

Allstate Claim 0411061054 Certified Letter From Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Allstate Attorneys of May 19, 2016 With Allstate Claim of April 16, 2016 Updated May 21, 2016

Allstate Claim 0411061054 Certified Letter From Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin Allstate Attorneys of May 19, 2016 With Allstate Claim of April 16, 2016 Updated May 21, 2016