Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
DISCUSSION
(1) Buffington, R. M., and Latimer, TV. M., J . Am. Chem. SOC.,48,
2305 (1926).
(2) Savelli, J. J., Seyfried, W. D., and Filbert, B. M.,IND.ENQ
CHEM.,A N ~ LED.,
.
13, 868 (1941).
(3) Scott, R. B., J . Research .VatZ. BUT.
Standards, 25, 459 (1940).
(4) Shepherd, M., Ibid., 2, 1145 (1929); 26, 227 (1941).
(5) Southard, J. C., and Miluer, R. T., J . Am. Chem. SOC.,55, 4384
(1933).
(6) Ward, E. C., IND.ENG.CEIEM.,ANAL.ED.,10, 169 (1938).
'
LITER4TURE CITED
RECEIVEDMaroh 1, 1948.
70
5.5
4.8
Colorimetric,
70
5.0,5.2
5.0
965
termined by the procedure described. The results showed 2.0
moles of methanol as compared with a theoretical value of 2
moles.
LITERATURE CITED
a suspected compound as obtained from the literature, can be used to calculate the angles of an orthographic projection of the crystal, which is observed
with the electron microscope. A comparison of the
angles measured with those calculated may establish the identity of the crystal. It may be possible
to determine directly axial elements (axial ratios and
interaxial angles) and interfacial angles of unknown
crystals. This represents the determination of
physical constants with the electron microscope.
The solid lines represent the viaible edges, and the dotted lines
represent the edges not directly visible.
All faces in this form are identical; however, in the projection,
faces parallel to the projection plane show their true size, whereas
those a t an angle are reduced in size. -4ngle A is the angle between edges T2T6 and w 6 , and showvs the true value. Angle C i p
the angle between the projections of edges Tar6 and ~ 3 r d . The
plane formed by these edges in space is a t an angle to the projection plane: therefore, the angle between the edges as projected ie
different from the true value. The calculation of this angle, from
the axial elements and others such as B and C, is the problem for
the electron microscopiht. (In this paper interedge angles arc
considered as internal angles.)
Donnay and OBrien (4)showed how the apparent interedge
angles of crystals observed with the optical microscope could be
correlated with true interfacial angles and the axial element,.
They demonstrated how known methods of crystal drawing and B
knowledge of the spherical projection and its derivatives, the
stereographic and cyclographic projections, could be applied to
graphical calculations.
In electron microscopy, the silhouette angles of crystals are
practically the only determinative data available. In this paper
are presented the application of microscope goniometry to the
study of electron micrographs and the use of silhouette angles
for the determination of physical constants by means of the
electron microscope. The calculations follow the methods presented by Donnay and OBrien (4).
Calculation of Angles of Orthographic Projection. Figure 4 is
a stereographic projection of a calcite crystal showing only the
unit rhombohedron { loill. I t is derived from the interfacial
angle (OOOl):(lOil), which is 4436 (Dana, 2). This projection
was constructed with the use of the Wulff net (Donnay and
OBrien 4).
Point C is the projection of the polar axis of the fundamental
sphere of projection and of the c crystallographic axis. The three
points, UI, a2, and u3,are the positive poles of the three horizontal
axes of the hexagonal system. The three points, r l , T P , and
(double circles), are the stereographic projections of the face poles
which are above the equatorial plane of the fundamental sphere.