Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Post Graduate Program in Animal Science and Pastures of the University of So Paulo College of Agriculture Luiz de
Queiroz (ESALQ), Piracicaba SP, Brazil.
2
Department of Animal Science and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) Campus Palmeira
das Misses, 98300-000, Palmeira das Misses, RS, Brazil.
3
Federal Institute Farroupilha, Campus So Vicente do Sul, So Vicente do Sul, RS, Brazil.
4
Post Graduate Program in Animal Science, University of the State of Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages SC, Brazil.
5
Department of Animal and Food Production, University of the State of Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages - SC. Brazil.
Received 11 March, 2016; Accepted 23 April, 2016
Owing to the magnitude and importance of the production of citrus fruits pulp, soybeans and corn in
Brazil, considerable research has focused on the main feedstuffs, co-products, and/or byproducts of
these crops. The present study is aimed at comparing the ruminal degradability parameters of corn and
non-starchy energy sources with high pectin content, including soybean hulls and citrus pulp, through
meta-analysis. The experiments were designed to include parameters related to potential and effective
degradability of the concentrates of these energy feeds. The database (DB) was composed of 62
treatments obtained from 20 papers. No difference (P>0.05) was observed in any of the ruminal
degradability parameters of the dry matter (DM) or crude protein (CP), demonstrating that the total
replacement of corn grain by non-starch feed is possible. The degradation rates of DM were 6.78 and
-1
-1
6.14%.h and those of CP were 5.97 and 5.93%.h , for corn and non-starch feeds, respectively.
Therefore, depending on the cost, corn grain could be substituted by soybean hulls or citrus pulps,
which reduce the possibility of the occurrence of metabolic disorders, such as subclinical and/or
clinical acidosis, without affecting ruminal fermentation.
Key words: Starch, citrus pulps, soybean hulls, energy, pectin, degradability, non-starch feed, acidosis.
INTRODUCTION
According to official information from the Companhia
Nacional de Abastecimento, 32 million hectares of land
were cultivated for soybeans and 15.6 million hectares for
Busanello et al.
1903
1904
Busanello et al.
1905
Table 1. Adjusted average dry matter (DM), water-soluble fraction (a) of the DM, potentially degradable
fraction (b) of the DM, degradation rate (c) of the DM, and effective degradability at 2%.h-1, 5%.h-1, and
8%.h-1 of the DM of corn grain and non-starchy ingredients.
Parameters
Dry matter (% of natural matter)
Water-soluble fraction (a)*
Potentially degradable fraction (b)*
Degradation rate (c)*
-1
Effective degradability 2%.h *
-1
Effective degradability 5%.h *
-1
Effective degradability 8%.h *
Ingredients
Corn
Non-starchy
90.66
89.28
33.12
24.97
66.70
65.72
6.78
6.14
72.70
74.31
63.12
52.56
56.37
54.40
2.26
5.58
5.74
1.17
7.91
6.35
6.99
0.5535
0.1632
0.8659
0.5941
0.8430
0.1138
0.7831
*Values determined using the model of rskov and McDonald (1979);Values determined considering
passage rates indicated by the AFRC (1993).
Table 2. Adjusted average crude protein (CP), water-soluble fraction (a), potentially degradable
fraction (b), degradation rate (c) and effective degradability at 2, 5 and 8%.h -1 passage rates of the
CP of corn grain and non-starchy ingredients.
Parameters
Crude Protein (% DM)
Water-soluble fraction (a)*
Potentially degradable fraction (b)*
Degradation rate (c)*
-1
Effective degradability 2%.h *
-1
Effective degradability 5%.h *
-1
Effective degradability 8%.h *
Ingredients
Corn
Non-starchy
9.25
10.33
24.87
15.93
56.49
52.85
5.97
5.93
49.20
49.00
42.29
35.88
22.86
25.61
1.23
8.20
7.43
1.14
13.18
7.58
9.07
0.3947
0.2930
0.6307
0.9703
0.9890
0.4099
0.7688
*Values determined using the model of rskov and McDonald (1979); Values determined considering
passage rates indicated by the AFRC (1993).
Conflict of Interests
The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was supported by the Financiadora de
1906
Busanello et al.
1907
Santos GT, Lima LS, Schogor ALB, Romero JV, Marchi FE, Grande PA,
Santos NW, Santos FS, Kazama R (2014). Citrus pulp as a dietary
source of antioxidants for lactating Holstein cows fed highly
polyunsaturated fatty acid diets. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci.
27(8):1104-1113.
Santos VC, Ezequiel JMB, Morgado ES, Homem Jnior AC, Fvaro VR,
DAurea AP, Souza SF, Barbosa JC (2012). Influncia de
subprodutos de oleaginosas sobre parmetros ruminais e a
degradao da matria seca e da protena bruta. Arq. Bras. Med.
Vet. Zootec. 64(5):1284-1291.
SAS Institute (2002). SAS/STAT. Guide for personal computers. Cary P
1.
Silva LDF, Ezequiel JMB, Azevedo PS, Barbosa JC, Cattelan JW,
Resende FD, Seixas JRC, Carmo FRG (1999). Degradabilidade
ruminal in situ da matria seca, matria orgnica e da protena bruta
de alguns alimentos em novilhos. Semin. Cinc. Agrr. 20(1):25-30.
Simas JMC, Pires AV, Susin I, Santos FAP, Mendes CQ, Oliveira Jr
RC, Fernandes JJR (2008). Efeitos de fontes e formas de
processamento do amido na utilizao de nutrientes e parmetros
ruminais de vacas em lactao. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec.
60(5):1128-1134.
Tambara AAC, Olivo CJ, Pires MBG, Sanchez LMB (1995). Avaliao
in vivo da digestibilidade da casca do gro de soja moda com
ovinos. Cinc. Rural, 25(2):283-287.
Tanaka M, Kamiya Y, Suzuki T, Nakai Y (2010). Effect of citrus pulp
silage feeding on concentration of beta-cryptoxanthin in plasma and
milk of dairy cows. Anim. Sci. J. 81(5):569-573.
Tylutki TP, Fox DG, Durbal VM, Tedeschi LO, Russell JB, Van Amburgh
ME, Overton TR, Chase LE, Pell AN (2008). Cornell Net
Carbohydrate and Protein System: A model for precision feeding of
dairy cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 143(1-4):174-202.
Volanis M, Zoiopoulos P, Panagou E, Tzerakis C (2006). Utilization of
an ensiled citrus pulp mixture in the feeding of lactating dairy ewes.
Small Ruminant Res. 64(1-2):190-195.
Wang YH, Xu M, Wang FN, Yu ZP, Yao JH, Zan LS, Yang FX (2009).
Effect of dietary starch on rumen and small intestine morphology and
digesta pH in goats. Livest. Sci. 122(1):48-52.
Wing JM (1982). Citrus feedstuffs for dairy cattle. Florida Agricultural
Experiment Station Bulletin 829. University of Florida, Gainsville (FL)
1982.
Zeoula LM, Martins AS, Prado IN, Alcalde CR, Branco AF, Santos GT
(1999). Solubilidade e degradabilidade ruminal do amido de
diferentes alimentos. R. Bras. Zootec. 28(5):898-905.