0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
23 vues2 pages
ACS AWARD FOR CREATIVE ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: HONORING JAMES F. PANKOW. First theoretical framework for understanding gas / particle (G / P) partitioning in the atmosphere was proposed by Junge (1977)
ACS AWARD FOR CREATIVE ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: HONORING JAMES F. PANKOW. First theoretical framework for understanding gas / particle (G / P) partitioning in the atmosphere was proposed by Junge (1977)
ACS AWARD FOR CREATIVE ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: HONORING JAMES F. PANKOW. First theoretical framework for understanding gas / particle (G / P) partitioning in the atmosphere was proposed by Junge (1977)
ACS AWARD FOR CREATIVE ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY: HONORING JAMES F. PANKOW
(Sponsored by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.) Gas/Particle Partitioning: The State of the Science Organized by J.F. Pankow and R.A. Hathaway (Page 425 in Preprints of Extended Abstracts, Vol. 39 No. 1) Symposia Papers Presented Before the Division of Environmental Chemistry American Chemical Society Anaheim, CA March 21-25, 1999 THE THEORY OF GAS/PARTICLE PARTITIONING IN THE ATMOSPHERE - THE HISTORY AND FUTURE NEEDS James F. Pankow Department of Environmental Science and Engineering Oregon Graduate Institute, Portland, OR 97291 The first theoretical framework for understanding gas/particle (G/P) partitioning in the atmosphere was proposed by Junge (1977). That framework considers atmospheric particles to be solid in nature, with the consequent importance of the amount of surface area available for the adsorption of gaseous compounds therefore recognized. Junge (1977), however, assumed that the only source of variability in the magnitude of the compound-dependent G/P partitioning constant Kp was compound-to-compound differences in the pure compound liquid vapor pressure p oL. Thus, Junge (1977) did not consider the potential importance of variability in either: 1) the chemical properties of adsorbing surfaces; or 2) adsorbate polarity and/or conformation. The current view for adsorption to surfaces is that both of these factors are very important in determining Kp values. And, for a plot of log Kp vs. log p oL for any given surface, it is also now recognized that compound-to-compound differences in non-pure-liquid-like interactions can cause slope values that are different than -1.0. While adsorption to solid surfaces in the atmosphere can be important under some circumstances, in urban air the likelihood that adsorption dominates G/P partitioning for organic compounds now seems low: it is very probable that absorption uptake by liquid (or at least amorphous, and probably mostly organic) atmospheric particulate material (APM) is more important in most urban circumstances. For absorptive uptake, in place of the particle surface area, we have the mean molecular weight of the absorptive phase as a Kp -governing parameter. It has been established by Pankow (1994) that
the importance of non-pure-liquid-like interactions in absorptive uptake is embodied in
the activity coefficient of the compound of interest in the absorbing phase. Current research on G/P partitioning theory involves the study of how: 1) values for absorption can be predicted based on the properties of the compound and the absorptive phase; 2) n-octanol might serve as a surrogate phase for absorptive APM thus allowing liberation from the need for knowledge of values for the compounds/phases of interest; 3) the identities of the compounds making up absorptive APM can be predicted for secondary organic aerosol; and 4) aerosol pH can affect the partitioning of acid/base active organic compounds such as nicotine. References Junge C.E. (1977) Basic considerations about trace constituents in the atmosphere as related to the fate of global pollutants. In Fate of Pollutants in Air and Water Environments (edited by Suffett I.H.), Part I, pp.7-26. Wiley, New York. Pankow J.F. (1994) An absorption model of gas/particle partitioning in the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ., 28, 185-188.