0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
92 vues2 pages
Government investments in predictive technologies, risk assessments and preventative policies
gives off a perception that the integration of scientific practices in criminal justice settings
enhance objectivity, accountability and security. However, there are very few analyses or
evaluations of these innovation investments to support this notion. To address this critical gap in
knowledge, we are hosting a two-day workshop focusing on crime, risk and technology entitled,
“Constructing, Predicting and Experiencing Risks”, June 15-16, 2016. The workshop aims to
bring together criminal justice practitioners with academics who are doing empirical research on
risk technologies in the pursuit of security. The goal of the workshop is to share new theoretical
insights and frameworks that suggest innovative ways to interrogate the use of technologies in
the construction and application of risk, as well as to identify the benefits and experiential
implications associated with such classifications.
Government investments in predictive technologies, risk assessments and preventative policies
gives off a perception that the integration of scientific practices in criminal justice settings
enhance objectivity, accountability and security. However, there are very few analyses or
evaluations of these innovation investments to support this notion. To address this critical gap in
knowledge, we are hosting a two-day workshop focusing on crime, risk and technology entitled,
“Constructing, Predicting and Experiencing Risks”, June 15-16, 2016. The workshop aims to
bring together criminal justice practitioners with academics who are doing empirical research on
risk technologies in the pursuit of security. The goal of the workshop is to share new theoretical
insights and frameworks that suggest innovative ways to interrogate the use of technologies in
the construction and application of risk, as well as to identify the benefits and experiential
implications associated with such classifications.
Government investments in predictive technologies, risk assessments and preventative policies
gives off a perception that the integration of scientific practices in criminal justice settings
enhance objectivity, accountability and security. However, there are very few analyses or
evaluations of these innovation investments to support this notion. To address this critical gap in
knowledge, we are hosting a two-day workshop focusing on crime, risk and technology entitled,
“Constructing, Predicting and Experiencing Risks”, June 15-16, 2016. The workshop aims to
bring together criminal justice practitioners with academics who are doing empirical research on
risk technologies in the pursuit of security. The goal of the workshop is to share new theoretical
insights and frameworks that suggest innovative ways to interrogate the use of technologies in
the construction and application of risk, as well as to identify the benefits and experiential
implications associated with such classifications.
The Crime, Risk, Technology Symposium: Constructing, Predicting, Experiencing Risks
Hosted June 15-16, 2016 by Wilfrid Laurier University (Brantford) at the Best Western Brant Park Inn and Conference Centre Open to criminal justice practitioners, police, policy makers, academics, students and interested members of the public. Workshop Objectives: Government investments in predictive technologies, risk assessments and preventative policies gives off a perception that the integration of scientific practices in criminal justice settings enhance objectivity, accountability and security. However, there are very few analyses or evaluations of these innovation investments to support this notion. To address this critical gap in knowledge, we are hosting a two-day workshop focusing on crime, risk and technology entitled, Constructing, Predicting and Experiencing Risks, June 15-16, 2016. The workshop aims to bring together criminal justice practitioners with academics who are doing empirical research on risk technologies in the pursuit of security. The goal of the workshop is to share new theoretical insights and frameworks that suggest innovative ways to interrogate the use of technologies in the construction and application of risk, as well as to identify the benefits and experiential implications associated with such classifications. This workshop is open to criminal justice practitioners, police, policy makers, academics, students, and interested members of the public. Registration is FREE, but pre-registration is required and seats are limited. To register, please go to https://www.eventbrite.com/e/constructing-predicting-and-experiencing-risks-symposiumtickets-22914747627
The Conference at a Glance:
June 15, 2016 Keynote Address: Opening a critical space: Data analytics, social structures and criminogenic risk needs Kelly Hannah-Moffat, University of Toronto Thematic Session 1: Managing Risk in Correctional Settings Enrolling neuroscience. Mapping scientific controversies pertaining to psychopathy Silvan Roy, Dominique Robert, and Martin Dufresne, University of Ottawa Risk Management and the Remand Population Explosion in Ontario Aaron Doyle and Laura McKendy, Carleton University Anti-Fungal or Opiate? Visitor or Vector? The Ion Mobility Spectrometry Device and Risk Management in Correctional Institutions Stacey Hannem, Wilfrid Laurier University
Thematic Session 2: Policing and Risk Management
Policing and Media: Social Media as Risk Media Christopher Schneider, Brandon University Police Partnerships and Practices in Ontario Community Safety Initiatives: Studying the Applications and Implications of Acute Risk Carrie Sanders and Debra Langan, Wilfrid Laurier University Thematic Session 3: Predicting Policing: Police and Data Analytics Operationalizing the Spatial Influence of the Risk Factors behind the Open-air Drug Markets in Durham Region Davut Akca, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Can Big Data Analytics Predict Policing Practice? Janet Chan and Lyria Bennet Moses, University of New South Wales (Australia) Thematic Session 4: Thinking Critically About Public Security: Theorizing Security Critical Reflections on the Human Security Intelligence Paradigm James Sheptycki, York University State-Corporate Symbiosis in Critical Infrastructure Security in Canada Philip Boyle and Shannon Speed, University of Waterloo June 16, 2016 Plenary Address: The Politics of Mass Preventive Justice Pat OMalley, University of Sydney (Australia) Thematic Session 5: Thinking Critically About Public Security: Unintended Consequences of Security Technology Automatizing Canadian Customs: A Case of Technologies-in-Practice Karine Ct-Boucher, University of Montreal Immigration Security: security certificates and the management of risk Shannon Speed, University of Waterloo The Production and Classification of Terrorist People and Transactions in the Banking Industry: The use of private technology for public purposes Vanessa Iafolla, University of Alberta For more information, please contact Amanda Lancia (lanc1340@mylaurier.ca) The Organizers: Drs. Stacey Hannem, Carrie Sanders, Tony Christensen (Wilfrid Laurier), Aaron Doyle (Carleton University), Christopher Schneider (Brandon University)