Ali Mirza hath proved his ignorance from a Principle of H:adi:th: called T:aqt:i:

First we prove this principle from authentic sources:

IBN AS:S:-LA:H:
According to Ibn As:s:-lah: the Permission of Division of a Text Of H:adi:th: in
distinct parts and then to include them in different ABVA:B [CHAPTERS/TOPICT] is
more acceptable then its non acceptance .
Leaders of H:adi:th: like Ma:lik ,Bukha:ri etcetera Have done it.
[IBN AS:S:-LA:H: 217]
KH:AT:I:BI:
AAccording to Kh:at:i:bi: If the Text of a H:adi:th: consisteth of such parts and
orders which are not connected to one another [i.e Independent of one another ]
then it is permitted to separate them . Several Scholars of H:adi:th: have done it.
[-LK-FA-YAH 193].
How ever Ibn AS:S:-LA:H: hath written in epilogue :
It is not empty from dislikeness.
Now it is clear that the scholars who have argued from the part of H:adi:th Ka:na:
Yakt-bu Al Vahy have used this principle.
Since the proper and logical negation of this part is Ma kana .. This negation is
neither implied by the words of Prophet May God not fill His Stomach not by the
act of not coming upon being called.
Ali Mirza Has said many disgracing words and abusing sentences in his speech , as
if the scholars has done a crime or a transgression of Principles of H:adi:th: by not
quoting then the H:adith: in its entirety.
He has even criticized his former teacher Zubair Ali Zai.
But what so ever they have done is in perfect accordance of the Rules,Principles and
Axioms Of H:adi:th: .
Logical FormationThe statement used to prove that Saiyiduna: Mua:viah RD is Katib Al Vah:y is:=
He did use to write Revelation /Aspiration [Vah:y].(1)
The logical negation of this statement [proposition] is:

He did not use to write Revelation /Aspiration [Vah:y]..(2)

There are just to points of knowledge in the Text of H:adith: :=
1]SAIYIDUNA MUAVIAH RD did not come upon being called two times, and
continued eating [ the food]. ..(3)

2] Statement of Holy Prophet {S:allallahu alaihiV a Sallama}:

May ALL-H not fill His Stomach. -----------------(4)
(3) IS AN ACT NOT A STATEMENT AND IT NEITHER IMPLIETH (2) NOR
CONTRADICTETH (1).
(4) IS A STATEMENT AND IT NEITHER IMPLIETH (2) NOR IMPLIETH (4).
This proveth that (1) is an Independent Statement.
So it is a H:jjah irrespective of (3) and (4).
Abusing Language:=
Ali Mirza used satyr by saying the word TOTA for the Holy Text of Tradition. The word
Tota even in Panjabi language is not a word worth of being used for any portion of
Texts of Qura:n or H:adi:th: .
A REQUEST TO THE FOLLOWERS OF ENGINEER ALI MIRZA.
FOR THE SAKE OF ALL-H PLEASE DO LISTEN THE LECTURE OF ALI MIRZA LIKE 131C ,116:A,B,C ; AND DECIDE WHETHER HE IS MAKING SATYR AND MOCKING ON THE
PRINCIPLE OF H:ADITH: OR NOT
.
HE IS MOCKING A S:AH:ABI: , HE IS MOCKING THE TEXT OF H:DI:TH:, HE IS MOCKING
THE PRINCIPLE OF H:ADI:TH, AND HE IS ALSO MOCKING AN OTHER S:AH:ABI [IBN
ABBAS RD] .
FOR SAKE OF ALL-H PLEASE COMPARE THIS ANSWER TO THE COOMENTS OF
ENGINEER ALI MIRZA AND DECIDED YOURSELVES THAT WHETHER THE ENGINEER IS
A RAFID:I: OR NOT.