Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
0 iYIN 'VIVO
(V.!EDlCAL
Az)SPAl
LABORATORY
S.
RESEAR.Ch
IiGUST 1.,f 6
[)
[)
1976
OCT-OGT
D
JDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
AEROSPAC,
AEROSPACE 'NEDICAL DIVISION
AlIIR FORCE SYSTEM COMMAND
,,IHT-tPTTERON AIR FORCE BASE. OHIO 45433
Best
Avai~lable
Copy
"1
NOTICES
When US Governme~nt drawings, specifications, or other data are used for any purpose other thai a definitely related
Government procurement operation, the Government thereby inLurs no responsiblity nor
any obligation whatsoever, and the fact that the-overnment may have formulated, furnshed, or in any way supplied
specifications, or other data, is not t. be regarded by implication or otherwise, as inany manner the said drawings,
or any other penon or corporation, or conveying any rights or permission to manufacture. L.se, licensing the holder
or sell any patented
invention thltt.niay in any way be related theretn
Please do not request copies of this report from Acrospace Medical Research Laboratory. Additional copies m,,y be
,,;Purchasd from:
Ctameron Station
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
S1he voluntary informed consent of the subjects used in this research was obtaiihed as required
by Air Force
Regulation 9.0-33.
SThis ;eport has been reviewed by the information Office (01) and is releasable to the National Techrnical
Service (NTIS). At NTIS, ft will be available to the general public, including.foreign nations.
This technical report has been reviewed and is approved for publication.
FOR THE COMMANDER
PTOMuE
76--O
7It-
Information
REPO
_________
.REPORT
oeto!Entered)
OCUMNTAION
AGEREAD
INSTRUCTIONS
rDOCUMENTATION______PAGE_
'2
GOVT ACCESSION NO.
/S.
AUTHOR#
vivo6.
./oh
Ifo
Mort
9.
8.
Ohlnm
10.
Aerospace
6;F, 7222
REOT
l~S*
controlling Office)
UNCLASSIFIED OOWNGRADING
DECL ASS1FICATIONH
1Sa.SCHEDULE
S
16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
it
15.
AE
CNEDUl
117.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the &bstract entered In Block 20, it different from Report)
Vibration
Vision
DD
1iJAN 73
1473
EDIT'
--I
lI
2OV
6S IS OBSOLETE
ECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE {iU'hen bate Entered)
'
SUMMARY
ConLemporary aerospace missions inclhding those
involving space flight, rotor wing vehicles, VTOL and
,ith vibration
n
Aiv
A mechaniLsm involving at
accelerometer,
accomplished simultaneously,
vibration condition,
These
Consistent results indicate that the vibration transmission ratio from seat to head monotonically decreases
from 1.6- at 5 Hz to 0.21 at 50 Hz.
A peak in
the trans-
= .92)
= .42)
it.
it
indicating thaz
At
it
is
more
frequencies.
VA
PREFACE
This effort was performed under the sponsorship of the Air Force Institute
of Technology.
ate School,
ACCESS IT4
for
P:TIS
W-.te Sctlio
9"'! section
.......................
".............
."' ....
...........
~,/-D
U
! -c D
' C~g
S-
196
III
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
I.
introduction
HII.
III.
13
IV.
16
V.
Experimental Objectives
23
VI.
Subjects
25
VII.
Method
-o
VIII.
Data Reduction
36
IX.
Results
43
X.
Discussion
47
XI.
61
Bibliography
64
Appendix
A.
Accelerometer Record
for One Subject
68
B.
70
C.
The Parameters of
77
Vibration
D.
80
E.
96
iv
Lv
FIGURE
TITLE
1.
12
2.
Resonance
17
3.
17
4.
Subjective Tolerance to
Vibration
19
5.
20
6.
Determination of Resonance
by Ratio
20
7.
30
8.
Schematic of Experimental
Arrangement
35
9.
Skull/Seat Transmission
38
10.
Eye/Skull Transmission
39
11.
57
12.
58
PAGE
1i
Ofiu
LV
I..
LIST OF TABLES
:-':',"
TABLE
TITLE
1.
Skull/Seat Tiansmission
7atiob
40
"e/Skull
41
2.
PAGE
Transmission
I,.-tios
*,
3.
42
4.
54
-'i
vi
A.A
I.
INTRODUCTION
The fact that various physiological stresses
is
is inappropriate to demand
11
Moreover,
conditions,
be completely unnecessary.
That is
to say,
effects or decrements in
II.
Wulfeck et al 1958)
but serious
If
noted
K;;
5 Hz a reasonable average (Magid et al 1960).
al (1964)
Harris et
it
is
nevertheless
vibration,
The description
specified,
nevertheless it
was demonstrated
in tracking performance.
Taub (1964)
-i;-,
acceleration,
.~
phase with
performance
the Y axis.
At frequencies
Sattenuation
Dennis (1965)
AR
-TP
!A
His
"baseline static
performance.
However,
19 and 27 Hz,
at 14,
subject
(1) Subject
(2)
The
quicker
In this study,
quite-significant.
the experiment
i4-
--
alone.
Although it
apparently
it
at least as
They rejected
S~The
(5,
8,
11 Hz)
of
As an additional factor,
When the
- - - - -
- , s,
. .
and
It
subject-only and in
subjeLL-
Although the
this is
only a
frequencies,
However,
Although engineers
acuity tinder this stress was far greater than that which
had been expected on the basis of experimental reports
and prevented the crew from making appropriate instrument
observations.
9
9
Apparently,
in
it
orientation, frequency
That is
S~et
Ohlbaum
al 1971).
(a) At higher
10
the
This turns
j"
discussed in Chapter X.
41
llK
20/55
~20/50
D.SAC
2045VIEWING
I.O
>- 20/40~20/35
O-
O 4.0OM
wa
420/25
4
20/2 0
20/15
DISPLACEMENT
7.6
14.7 3.7
57 10
Vigure 1:
1.7
.9
.6
(M M.)
.4
j15
15 20 25 30
FREQUENCY (Hz
50
III.
Nevertheless,
not only is
important since it
can
Nickerson et al (1963)
investigated
13
This cannot be
It must be considered
they presented
14
resonant frequency.
The head to eye data, however,
unreasonable.
appear to be grossly
Intuitively,
IV.
is a fairly simple
experirental determination is
relatively
straightforward.
One simply applies to the ubject various forcing
functions from a pre-selected vibration spectrum of
pure frequencies.
let us consider
The
.16
Human tolerance to
41
00L
FREQUENCY
FIGURE 2.
With equal
RESONANCE.
input loads, the frequency
of maxJmum output represents
resonance.
Idi
0.
:3
0000
2F
FREQUENCY
Fli;JI(IE 3.
17
3F
vibration stress, in
terms of comfort,
performance, and
In
would be
The output
is
By using
a resonance at "A"
18
Instrumentation of
6--~
z
0
'4:
-J
U
FIGURE 4.
10
8
FREQUENCY
12
(HZ)
14
Magid et al 196j).
19
16
'o
INPUT
OUPU
FREQUENC
I
z
(L~
FREQUENCY
FIGURE 6.
SETEPPDINPUTOAMELITUDC.
BYRThe .
Byu
The major
not insignificant
is
the facd
Second,
to their eye.
of
but movement
Irving (1962)
21
I
Y
711
however,
or +0.12 Gz is
questionable.
2'
2
I
I
222
V.
EXPERIMENTAL OBJECTIVES
Visual performance as a function of seat vibration
although the
Any encumbrances
(2)
23
The
frequencies,
but the
.nLire range in
which significant
(3)
(4)
In
stresses used.
I!
24I
W
24
VI.
SUBJECTS
Fifteen male U.S. Air Force officers and enlisted
Although the
25
VII.
METHOD
40, 50 Hz
@+2.0 Gz.
The purposes of this experiment included the
investigation of resonance.
26
This spectacle-frame-accelerometer
to suitable
to read in
"G" units.
A Polaroid
A relatively simple
IE a beam of light is
If
directed at
also known as
This,
of
course,
target while he is
axis),
27
'
i~
By photographing the
it
would
150
A Sylvania Sun--Gun
camera,
By
The
28
The spectacle-frame-
usual use, it
is
In
this simple
In its
a vibrating target
If
the
29
Ix
A.
STATIONARY
S4
30
. [B.
APPARENT SEPARATION
7.
t7V]!30
S.....UR
T iL V-SCOPE
WEDGtE.'
IN Gz VIBRAT'ION
77
S~These
on
possibility is
If,
then the
Separation
the experiment,
its
purpose,
the
n.. "
31
q,,
!r
3.
Eu'g
'r;,!-
The spectacle-frame-accelerometer
ias direcLLd
was adjusLed
to fixate on a V-scope
the first
"up" to one
Presentation
On these records,
one-half second.
acceleration,
Th2 vcrtical
7,
He
33
8.
The data
was incomplete,
on the oscilloscope.
2.
3.
4.
movement).
5.
linear movement).
33
shown on Figure 8.
Ii
i
3
~1
S.
- 4,
,,
34
L.
s,.ssz5~.,.XtIS
V-SCOPE WEDGE
AT 4.0M
POLAROID
CAMERA
35 MM CAMERA
z
SUN-GUN
SCP
wi
l;.-55
a.r
S AE
EAMPL.
CONTR~OL
M-B C-
FIGURE 8.
SHAKER
~35
0r
VIII.
DATA REDUCTION
Examination of the accelerometer records showed
Since each
was a simple
A comparison of this
it
j Iamplitude
is done,
When this
36
d and is
shown
in Appendix C.
Individual data tables for each subject relating
seat input (frequency and G load),
skull movement (G
Mean
ii
37
1.7-
L1.61.7:
1.6
Z1.7
1.0
1.2
ZI.J
!I
I
.7t-
I-3.6-
~
I'0
is'
12.
15
.3 .2
'..
..
7.5
l0
VIBRATION
FIGURE 9.
12.5 1$
162
FREQUENCY
SKULL/SEAT TRANSMISSION.
2,
I1
30f
Hz
40o
Measured G
(a~rrows 'nict
standard deviation)
-|
3N,
"-
r-51771
-,~--
1.7-
1.6
1.53
1-4-
II
b11:
i /z
01.2-I
I
AW
okl.O
"
I.8
J.7
7.5
10
1Z.5
15
18 21
25
30
FIGURE 10.
Measured
EYE/SKULL TRANSMISSION.
amplitude of eye movement divided
by calculated amplitude of head
movement.
(arrows indicate standard deviation)
39
40
50
TABLE 1I1
SKULL/SEAT TRANSMISSION RATIOS FOR EACH FREQUENCY.
FREQUENCY
(Hz)
Subj ecti
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
50
.7
.75
.65
.60
.40
.30
.25
.18
.1
.97
.90
.87
1.3
1.05
.98
.90
1.0
1.0
.85
1.4
1.1
.72
.82
.90
.87
.87
1.2
.93
.82
.85
.75
.70
.85
.90
.82
.72
.85
.70
.62
.77
.80
.62
.48
.70
.70
.58
.60
.58
.50
.42
.68
.58
.45
.55
.57
.49
.35
.60
.35
.34
.50
.57
.20
.20
.30
.26
.26
.33
.32
.13
.15
.29
Sbc
1.4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.76
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.25
1.76
1.54 1.25
1.1
.95
.85
.70
.60
.43
.35
.19
.13
10
1.76 1.40
.90
.77
.85
.85
.75
.60
.45
.38
.36'
.23
1.25
1.3
.90
1.1
1.7
.96
1.3
.76
.85
.87
.75
.70
.65
.55
.35
1.16
.90
.64
.60
.48
.42
.37
.25
.19
.15
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.1
.92
.88
.87
.78
.77
.65
.65
.70
.58
.45
.45
.29
.23
.25
.16
1.75 1.0
.70
.62
.65
.55
.48
.35
.20
.08
.08
MEAN
1.65 1.20
.96
.90
.84
.74
.62
.54
.44
.29
.21
STD DEV
.27
.18
.20
.14
.12
.13
.13
.13
.12
.09
11
2.0
1.16
12
1.4
13
14
2.2
2.0
15
.20
40
.-
',
TABLE 2
EYE/SKULL TRANSMISSION RATIOS FOR EACH FREQUENCY.
FREQUENCY
(Hz)
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
(1
Subject:
1
2
3
.96
.95
.95
1.25
1.0
1.05
1.17
1.04
1.26
1.12
1.03
1.22
1.15
.95
1.31
1.25
.90
1.61
1.36
.91
1.18
2.5
1.09
1.09
2.75
.94
.80
1,8
.95
'95
.85
1.30
.75
1.0
.65
,67
5
6
7
8
.83
1.07
.88
.85
1.02
.90
1.04
.89
.82
.93
.80
1.07
.82
1.09
1.26
1.12
1.04
1.0
.89
.95
1.25
1.47
1.25
.89
9
10
11
.96
.94
.89
1.57
.97
.98
.84
.89
1.30
.97
1.15
1.40
.90
1.0
1.50
.3
.83
-1.11
.91
.87
.95
13
14
15
.75
.84
.90
.83
.89
1.0
1.14
.77
.95
1.40
1.24
1.16
12
.95
1.0
.93
1.24
1.61
1.40
1.60
1.12
1.03
.75
1.17
1.21
.98
1.30
1.21
.76
1.18
.85
.98
.93
-1.05
.91
1.05
.80
.97
1.47
1.30
.86
1.15
1.60
.96
1.13
1.40
1.6
1.09
.87
1.1
.80
.80
.91
1.11
.71
--
1.31
1.57 1,09
.87
.77
1.03
--. ..
MEAN
.905 1.05
.98
1.15
1.13
1.33
1.16
1.10
1.03
.93
STD DEV
.076 .19
.18
.15
.22
.26
.21
.41
.53
.35
41
TABLE 3
MEAN OBSERVED AND ADJUSTED WEDGE SEPARATIONS.
(Hz)
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
50
MEAN
SEPARATION
4.0M
.1
.4
1.6
5.3
4.1
6.3
6.3
5.1
3.5
3.3
2.3
RV(E)
0.5M
3.4
2.73
2.6
1.9
1.5
1.0
.87
.53
.33
.33
.07
4.0o
.2
.8
1.6
5.3
4.1
6.3
6.3
5.1
3.5
1.7
1.2
0.5M
6.8
4.46
2.6
1.9
1.5
1.0
.87
.53
.33
.17
.04
.2
.67
.51
.79
.79
.64
.44
.21
.15
SEPARATION
ADJUSTED
FOR 1 G
CONSTANT
INPUT
ADJUSTED
.016 .1
4.0M
SEPARATION
"
42_-
..........
IX.
IM
RESULTS
A.
However,
it
Is
is
B.
Nevertheless,
is
one may
is apparent that
43
rt
since individual
identical response,
it
them individually.
iz.
44
Firstly, the
a harmonic.
It would be difficlt
What seems
not only
Therefore,
45
'I.
--
-PIM
e-nt,3'fl77-*..~
the constant
frequency.
litt]e
separation
4b
P4
DISCUSSION
X.
the
occur at all
the curve is
in close agreement
is
"distant dependent
S
Although there is
47
then
inversely
for a given G
some evidence
rx
'*-
for this, it
the movement is
-an example,
if
As
As these
increase,
Although previous
it
is
to be "'tracked".
48
it
would still
As the distance is
extended,
At
too great
so that
However,
below 20 Hz,
at greater distances,
if
the frequency
so
becoming
relatively low
the performance
no tLacking,
angular amplitude.
49
If
I
and Figure 9, it
high frequencies,
At low frequencies,
t'ae
amplified more
the eye
My investigation
50
~4~4
However,
it
18 Hz.
at higher frequencies,
this case is
.203
(Appendix
51
should
conservative.
1 made my measurements in a relatively
Possibly of greater
Since,
in every
It must therefore
52
-.
4.
-. t.
it
For th.
the measured
Indeed,
Although minimal
53
TABLE 4
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN EYE MOVEMENT AND VISUAl ACUITY AT SELECTED
VIEWING DISTANCES.
EYE MOVEMENT
28.93
4.OM
19
1.OM
27
o.4M
52
10.73
20
26
44
10
4.95
2.09
21
23
22
23
36
30
20, 21
.793
24
21
28
25
.440
25
21
26
30
.231
22
19
23
50
.156
17
17
21
.42
.81
.92
"T"
1.15
3.33
5.69
FREQUENCY
(Hz)
5
7,
'
7.5
S15
of "T'
3.71 is required.
54
-N
a value of "T"
Similarly,
makes
Eye movement
(left
similarity in
acuity curves.
ordinate)
Visual acuity
and
plotted
There is
little
55
differences.
Although there is
is
In the event
56
,..
.,
* ...
..-
.4
K!
4.0 M
D-cJ0.5 M
,I
0~
01
7.5
S2
FIGURE 11.
10
12.0 15
18 21
VIBRATION FREQUENCY
40)
10
(HZ)
*-N
57
50
.
'-
A;A
IJ
12-
"T45
RDNAT
EYE MOVEMEN
e,------** O---OV.A.AT 1.0M
IGHT
V. TRDINAT.
(RDINATE)
/RIGHT
RDINATE
V.A.AT 0.4M
-101-
40
in
35
~1:0)7
-307
0
z
pW
25F
3
01,,
7.5
10
40
50
2FIGURE 12.
58
THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN,W EYE MOVEM4ENT ANI) VISUAL
--------------------------------ACUITY.
Note essential similarity between eye
movement and 0.4M vision.
58
One-eighth of
The
their phase
59
the lag is
However at
60
5'
X1.
1.
The
a monotonic function of
at 5 Hz or less.
Lee and King is
2.
In the 5 to 50 Hz spectrum,
the eye
At this
There is
little
Conceivably this
It
61
suggedted
co the
the amplifica-
tion also.
3.
at long range,
ii
there is
If
a different relationship
The
seat inputs
insignificant
S4.
Spresented
Smovement
iwe
i
is
If
Irelationships,
Slow
nonlinearities
These nonlinearities
"isrange.
62
-Ito
5.
small.
In the interests
k.
II
~i'~~4
j.
2!
II
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AGARD,
Collected
Studies on
B.,
Ontario, Canada,
LR-463,9400
(1966).
Chancy,
R.
E. and D. L.
Parks, Visual-motor
Temple, H.
N. P.,
E. Vykukol,
H. Taub, H. F. Scherer,
and M. Matter,
W.
Preliminary
R. R.,
(1965).
E. B. Magid and K.
0.
P.,
(1965).
64
Psychol.
49:245-252
P711M.
TV
..
Guignard,
J. C. and A.
Irving, Measurements
33:1230-1238 (1966).
Harris,
C. S.,
C. S.
and R. W. Schoenberger,
C. S.
and R. W. Schoenberger,
Eng.
Psychol.
5:1-15 (1966).
Hornick,
t
research,
R. J.,
Problems of vibration
J.
H. F.,
Tracking performance
54:401-408 (3970).
Visual
R. A. and A. I.
response, J. Appl.
Magid,
Ziegenruecker,
Physiol.
E. B.,
King,
Visual vibration
30:281-286 (1971).
R. R.
Coermann and G. H.
31:915-924 (1960).
65
>.
.
Mercier, A.,
d'aujourd'hui,
In AGARD,
Medicine (1962).
,/-
Nickerson,
Feinhandler,
J.
L.,
A.
C. R.
41:79-82 (1970).
Ohlbaum, M. K. and C. R.
O'Briant,
In Preparation (1970).
Ohlbaum, M. K.,
C. R. O'Briant and R.
E.
Optom.
48:298-306 (1971).
Rorn, E. M. and A.
N. Chambers,
Compendium
8:
V's
L. and R. Kaplan,
Some effects
of
--Y axis vibration on visual acuit.y, AMRL-TR-68-19 (1968).
Rubenstein, L.
66
AMRL-TR-66-181 (1967).
~'w
.
Schoenberger,
R. W.,
Human performance
R. W.,
Effects of vibration
Aeropace_Med.
3_:
1264-1268 (1967).
Schoenberger,
R.
W.,
Investigation of the
AMRL-TDR-64-70 (L964).
and D. L.
Parks, Visual
A. Z.,
Boeing
TR4 (1963).
C. Goddard and R. W. Allen,
(1965).
Wulfeck, J.
W.,
AAl
67
APPENDIX A
ACCELEROMETER RECORD FOR ONE SAMPLE SUBJECT.
This shows the vibration pattern at the
skull as measured by the accelerometer.
The frequency
and higher.
The ordinate is
each small
7.5, 10 Hz.
18 Hz.
68
ROW
IBMA
".iLI
N1
69mnmmmmr
im
mm69
' ,o
APPENDIX B
EYE MOVEMENT PHOTOGRAPHS FOR ONE SUBJECT.
The following pages show the face of one
subject at each of the eleven seat inputs of the
experiment.
Nominal shutter speed was 1/2 second and
the extent of the corneal excursion is
the reflection.
represented by
it
possible
At the higher
is
noted.
monitored by an
not vibrating.
Test
to the ruler.
70
711
.4
1'
II
I:
41
4'
)
*
4
1,
72
........................................
24
4;
* V.
.
11<
*64
I
:1
73
*4
-6
-~~~
~~
- ----
74
44
Y- -
AWTh
304
i75
__
t'~-
"
r SO
\
,_
It'
';Y'
APPENDIX C
THE PARAMETERS OF VIBRATION.
Analysts of the magnitude of the various components of vibration
is dependent upon the time history of the motion which produces the
vibration.
dX/dt
?
2
-d2X/dt - X
x
2
instantaneous acceleration (cm/sec2)
zero position,
is
This is
expressed in mm,
time (sec)
then:
sin 2wft
=x
X= x
0
77
Therefore:
I'
Xmax =x
kmax = x
Xi"ax
(2nf)
0
(27if)
in
neglected
V4
here since it
For example,
known and it
is
frequency to be 10 Hz,
Assume the
then:
X= x
(2wf)
and
2
= 980 am/sec /(2 x 3.14 x 10)2 sec-2
x0
X/(2vf)
0.24 cm = 24 cm
is
proportional to amplitude
to be kept constant.
An
it
is frequently desirable
If one solves the.
it
is possible to
S~the
double amplitude
acceleration (in
(in
appropriate frequency.
The following table indicates the double amplitude factors tv be
used when acceleration is
in
desired
millimeters.
5
7.5
SFREQUENCY
10
12.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
50
19.5
8.62
SFACTOR
5.08
3.15
2.18
1.33
1.1
.785
.557
.304
.203
Ig
the
(n
te
oube uits
amlitde esied)
ne
ultilie
th
I
--
APPENDIX D
iI
!4
S.8
80
'
4...'4.1-
M1.4
01.5
Sr.
.5
OJI.i-
z\
l1.l
A-
\5
AZ5
10
1.
62
220
SKULLV/S`EAT
"
S.4
FREQ (liz)
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
SK/ST TRANS
SKULL (H44)
EYE (MK)
EYE/SK TRANS
5
.5
.7
1.4
15.0
14.4,
.96
7.5
1.0
12.5
.5
1
1
.6
.7
.75
1.2
.70
.75
5.3
5.6
3.0
2.9
8.3
4.7
1.57
.84
.97
TRANSMISSION DAtA
15
18
1
1
.65
.60
.65
.60
1.9
.93
1.6
1.7
.9
1.61
FOR SUBJECT
21
1
.40
.40
.66
.8
1.21
11
25
1
.30
.30
.34
.4
1.18
30
1
.25
.25
.19
.2
1.,05
40
2
.35
.18
.11
.1
.91
50
2
.20
.10
.053
--
>1.
P.
1.4--
SKULLAtEAT
EYE/SKULL
!0
z
.9
A-
1.4
\75
S\
101
Is
1M21
25...
82
iI
40U50
25
1.0
.70
.70
*.55
.60
1.09
39
1.0
.58
.58
.32
.3
.94
40
2.0
.70
.33
.21
.2
95\
50
2.0
.45
.26
.092
..
;2,.I
--
L,%'>,2
....
~i
1.7-
(.6
-K
1.5
1.3
Zg
SULLSEA
EYEA/uL
SKULL
(G
.7
.5
.A.
SKUL
(G
.5
70
.2
.8
70
.2
.8
.'
32
T .
.68 .6
'k.93
.5
5.8'F3.9
2.
~~~...SKULL/(S)1.756E.6
EYE
MM)13.'5..83
EYEISK TRAN)
95
SEAT
.7
SKULL (G)
7.05
i01.26
.5
TRANSMISSION5 DAT
.65
.9
1.0
1.3
FO
83
i5
.0
.80
.90
1.0
.5
.8
1.6
1.18
1.0
SUBJECT2#3
L44
r.7
1.3\
01.00\
A-
.5
\5
1.
182
*3
I.o8
VIRAIO
FRQ(i)
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
SIC/ST TRANS
SKULL ,MH)
EYE (MM)
EYE/SKUTRANS
5
.5
.8
1.6
15.6
13.2
.85
7.5
10
12.5
FEUECY.12
15
is821
1
1
1.
1
1
.87
.85
\7
.87
.85
.87
.85
.77
.85
.87
.85
1.13
2.7
1.9
4.8
.9
1.6
2.5
2.8
3.6
5.2
1.4
1.1
1.0
1.3
.75
1.3
TRANSMISSION DATA FOR SUBJECT #4
.5
.45
.90
3.9
25
1
.60
.6o
.47
.5
1.06
30 40
50
1
.55
.55
.31
.2
.65
2
.65
.33
.13
2
1.0
.50
.30
.2
.67
--
IA
1.7.-'
!j
1.7
I!
01.6
V)1.0
Ol.\
UNCERTAINTYI &
cfl 1.0
SEE TEXT
-T"4
.7.6-
SKULL/SEAT
.5-EYE/SKULL
.4
5
FREQ (Hz)
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
SK/ST TRANS
SKULL (.M)
EYE (MM)
EYZ/hUC TRANS
5
.5
.8
1.6
15.6
13.0
.83
I
7.5
,
I
i
, i
,
10
12.515 1821 25 3Q
VIBRATION FREQt'ENCY (HZ)
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
.5
1
1
1
1
1
.55
1.3
1.4
1.2
.9
.8
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.2
.9
.8
4.8
6.6
4.4
2.6
1.2
.88
4.9
5.4
3.6
2.7
1.5
.9
1.02
.82
.82
1.04 1.25 1.12
THSMLSSION DATA FOR SUBJECT #5
85
25
1
.58
.58
.46
.4
.87
40
30
1
.57
.57
.32
.3
.94.
50
40
50
2
2
1.08 .63
.50
.32.33
.128
.1
.1
.3
'.78
'.5
/\
1.3-
1.4
0/
W\
IxI
0IA:.1.0
(I)
.8
.7.6-
SKULL/SEAT
.5 ;
EYE/SKULL
pL"'I.
... I
7.5
10
12.5 15
F
I
1821
IS .
25- 30
a .. j
4C
5,
7.5
10
12.5
.5
.7
1.4
13.7
.5
.85
1.7
7.3
1
1.05
1.05
5.4
1
1.1
1.1
3.5
15
1
.93
.93
2.0
18
1
.82
.82
1.09
EYE (MM)
1.4.6 6.6
5.0
EYE/SK TRANS
3.8
2.0
1.07 .9
.93
1.09
1.0
21
1
.68
.68
.75
25
1
.50
.50
.39
30
1
.49
.49
.27
1.6
.8
.3
--
1.47
1.03
.77
40
2
.40
.20
.12
,
2
.25
.13
.051
.t
---
.83
1.7
IAe
1. -
I-A
z 1.4
0*
-.\
A-
/ A\
.,v.
SKULL/SEAT
EYE/SULL\
.6
.47
.4LAVIBRATION
FREQ (Hz)
.5
.62
,.25
12.110.6
.88
EYE (MM),
EYE/SK TRANS
7.5
.5
7
7Z
1'
10
12.5
1
.98
.98
5.0
4.0
.8
1
.72
.72
2.3
2.9
1.26
120 15
18 41
25
FREQUENCY (HZ)
15 18
1
.82
.82
1.8
1.6
.89
1
.72
.72
.96
1.2
1.25
21
1.
.48
.48
.96
.484.1
.53
4..3
.4
.. 04
.75
TRANSMISSION' LDATA FOR SUBJECT #7
,87,
30
40
50
25
30
40
1
.42
.42
.33
.4
1.21
1
.35
.35
.19
.2
1.05
2 - 2
.40
.30
.20
.15,
:.2.06".
50
.
--
'-
1.7
iA
Z1.
1.1
-II
6123L*A
EY/SUL
SEAT
INU
(G
546
EY/S
TAN
FRB
.5
3
476 50111
891.07 1.12.95
.89 1.1
VRNSIBRAIONDAAFRSBET-
5(H) 7.5
10
2.5
885
15
25
30
1.6
".
iii-
1.71 "
S~1.5a
~IA -\
Z1.4
0
(01.0IV)
.7-
-..
.. SKULL/SEAT
EYE/SKULL
.6
.4
5.
FREQ (Hz)
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
SK/ST TRANS
SKULL (MM)
EYE (MM)
EYE/SK TRANS
5
.5
77
1.54
15.0
14.4
.96
10 1215 15
18.; 21 p530
VIBRATION FREQUENCY (HZ)
7-5
7.5
10
12.5
1
1
.5
.95
.62
1.1
1.1
.95
1.25
5.6
3.0
5.3
2.9
4.7
8.3
.97
1.57
.84
TRANSMISSION DATA
15
18
1
1
.85
.70
.70
.85
.93
1.9
1.60
-. 7
1.61
.9
FOR SUBJECT
89
8.
21
1
.60
.bO
.66
.80
1.21
#9
25
1
.43
.43
.34
.4
1.18
40 50
30
1
.35
.35
.19
.2
1.05
40
2
.37
.19
.11
.i
.91
50
2
.26
.13
.053
---
1.7
1.4-,3-
.f
':
1.2 ~z
0 I.I\
S~o\
V)
Z .97
.6 .
..-----..
KULLAEAT
EYE/SKULL
,"".4 I
5'25
FREQ (Hz)
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
Skijtr TRANS
SKULL (MM)
EYE C4)
EYE/SK TRANS
5
.5
.88 .
1.76
17.2
16.2
.94
I-~
-. 10o
,
15
1 21
2,2 30
VIBRATION FREQUENCY (Hz)
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
.5
1
1
1
1I
1
70
.90
.77
485 .,5
.,,
1.40
.90
.77
.85
.85
.75
6.0
4.6
2.43
1.9 -1.13
.82
5.8
4.1
2.8
1.9
1.6
.80"
.97
.89
1.15
1.0
1.4
.98
TRANSMISSION DATA FOR SUBJECT #10
25
1
.60
.60
.47
.4
.85
40
50
30
1
.45
.45
.25
.2
.8
40
2
.75
.38
.23
.2
.87
50
2
.72
.36
.147
---
1.7-
i.e -
IFI
-.
0I
AE
ZI.'
(/1.0
zl.9
'.5
71.0
5
S
.6-
101"
53
.\EYS.7 KULL
INU"G
SSRLEAT
5
,5
12.15
7.5 .7
08
VIBRATION
21
25
(HZ)30
FREQUENCY
40
50
SSEAT
FREQ (Hz)
X.NPUT (G)
5
.5
7.5
.5
10
1
1z, 5
1
15
1
18
1
21
1
25
1
30
1
40
2
50
2
SSK/ST
SKULL (G)
TRA:
1.0
2.0
.58
1.16
.76
.76
.85
.85
.87
.87
.75
.75
.70
.70
.65
.65
.55
.55
.70
.35
.45
.23
SKULL (MM)
EYE (MM)
EYE/SK TRANS
19.5 5.0
17.2 4.9
.89
.98
.77
1.0
1.3
#11
.51
.5
.98
.31
.3
.97
.21
.2.
.95
.092
--
3.9
2.7
3.8
5.0
1.3
1.4
TRANSMISSION DATA
91
1.9
1.0
1.6
2.9
1.5
1.6
FOR SUBJECT
--
"1.6
--.. ... -
--
1.4-
1.3-I.2
. -
2.9
:a
\
.6-
.4L--\
(
L ()
SULSEAT \2
.5
.7..58.90
..
I I
7.5
-: A
---
EYf3KULL
I0
12.5 1518
I
21 2530
I iL%~
VIBRATION FREQUENCY
FREQ (Hz)
SEAT-INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
5
.5
.70
SK/ST TRANS
SKULL (MH)
EYE (MH)
EYE/SK TRANS
7.5
.5
.58
I.
I
50)
40
(HZ)
10
1
.90
1.2-.5
1
.64
15
1.
.60
1.8
1.
.48
21
1
.42
25
1
.37
30
1
.25
40
2
.37
50
2
.30
1.40 1.16
13.6 5.0
.90
4.6
.64
2.1
.60
1.3
.48
.64
.42
.46
.37
.29
.25
.14
.19
.11
.15
.061
12.9 5.0
.95
1.0
4.2
.93
2.6
1.24
1.7
1.0
.5
.3
1.03
--.
..
..
.
..
92
..
'.7.
1.6-
I
.1.5-
IZ zI
z I.O
.9 -
;
SZ,9-
'.5
I1-.8
k/
VIBRATION..
SIUUL
EAT
FE(11)
SEAT INi~t'LJ
SKUl. ()
SK/5T TRANS
Smill., (mN)
t-m-/s
rIM
RNS
7.5
.5
I.1
.5
.5
,6
1
-
12.5
10
1.0
2.2 1.0
1.0
21.5i 4.3
5.j
.13~E(M)1
5
5.8
.75
.83
1.14
.1
15
1
1.1
.88
L. 1
3. 5
4.9
.88
1.9
2. 8
18 21
1
.7
1.04
1.2
6
.71
.8
.78
250
.65
1.40
1.47
1.15
1.13
TRANSM ISS ION DATA FOR SUBJEC~(T #1l3
93
\.
40 5
7
.55
.6
.45
.2.5
.2
.29
.18
.2
.2
.10
1.09
.80
L.11
.70
.45
.58
.50
. -
\~.'
1.7 -
\V
\I
1.5-
\\
1.4-
1.0
z .9-
.7-K\
S....SKULL/AEAT
"
EYE/SKULL1
.5
\7
.4
s7.5
FREQ (Hz,
SEAT INPUT (G)
SKULL (G)
SK/ST TRANS
SKULL (YM)
EYE (Mm)
EYE/SK TRANS
5
.5
1.0
2.0
1.9.5
16.4
.84
J-
!
a
\-
10 12.5 15 18 21 ?,
0
VIBRATION FREQUENCY(HZ)
7.5
10
12.5
15
i8
21
.5
1
1
1
1
1
.65
1.3
.q2
.87
.77
.65
1.3
1.3
.92
.87
.77
.65
5.6
6.6
2.9
1.9
1.02
.71
5.0
5.1
3.6
2.5
1.6
3.0
.89
.77
1.24
1.3
1.6
1.4
TRANSMISSION DATA FOR SUBJECT #14
94
25
1
.58
.58
.46
.4
.87
40
30
1
.45
.45
.25
.2
.8
S0
40
2
.45
.23
.14
.1
.71
50.
2
.32
.16
.065
1.7
SI
;-!'
4-
"
---
1.37
Z1.4
21.26
o.3
0I
V7-F~
z.6-
.6
l--
ANI.O
\KL SA
.....
SKULL/SEAT
K
.4:
.I .. Il I
S~VIBRATION
SSKULL
FREQUENCY (HZ3
EYV153S.K.4
FRQ(i)
5
75
..
.5
,
5
1
1
1
1
1
25
1
30
1
40
2
50
2
.65
1.4
.55
.55
.73
.48
.48
.53
.35
.35
.27
.20
.20.
.11
.15
,08
.045
.i.=
.08
.031
.86
.96
1.6
1.1
.91
.87
.50
1.75 1.0
17.0 4.3
.10
.70
3.6
.6.2
.62
3.9
HEYT/SK TRANS
.90
.95
1.16
1.0
1.U7L.L.
1.
1
SqKULL ((;)
SK/ST TRANS
(MM)
,.YE, (lf1)1.3 .3
22
10
1
3.4 2.2
.65
1.2
.7 1.0
95
.3 .1 ..
..-
APPENDIX E
WEDGE SEPARATION DATA FOR EACH SUBJECT
Apparent Separation in MM of V,-Scope Wedge at Each Test Frequency.
I.
FREQUENCY
7.5
1.0
1Y.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
50
Subject:
1
2
3
.5
0
.5
2
0
3
3
0
6
10
3
16
6
2
16
1
1
14
0
1
12
0
1
10
0
1
9
0
1
6
LO
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
0
2
7
12
1
0
3
C.
6
1
"
1
2
14
10
3
6
4
1
0
4
6
0
1
0
1
4
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
4
3
0
4
0
5
1
0
8
0
10
22
7
4
3
34
2
6
2
3
32
2
10
5
3
24
2
4
5
3
14
1
1
5
2
12
1
1
3
.
2
1
2
3
2
4.1
6.3
6.3
5.1
3.5
3.3
2.3
"0
0
02
4
1
0
.5
0
0
11
12
13
14
15
U
0
).l 0.4
MEAN
0
2
3
1
3 1"
8
0
7
9
3
1.6
5.3
II.
0.5 M.
"FREQUEf-!Y 5
7.5
10
12.5
15
18
21
25
30
40
50
Subject:
1
2
3
4
3
8
2
6
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
5
3
4
6
0
3
6
0
1
0
0
2
4
3
6
2
3
5
0
2
4
0
1
0
1
2
1
3
4
2
2
4
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
2
1
4
3
1
1
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
2.6
1.9
1.5
1.0
.87
.53
.33
.33
.07
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
8
6
10
00
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
15
"4
MEAN
3.4 2.73
96
U
0. S. GOVMERNITPRINTING OFFICE- 1916 -
6(57-6.".'990