Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Review
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Keywords:
Numerical cognition
Arithmetical abilities
Visuo-spatial representation of numbers
In the study of numerical and arithmetical abilities, there is compelling evidence demonstrating that
number and space representations are connected to one another. Historically the rst source of support
came more than a century ago, when Galtons investigations on mental imagery suggested that the
internal representation of numbers may evoke a stable, linear space. In the past few decades, empirical
evidence lent further support to the hypothesis that numerical representation is spatially coded into a
non-verbal mental number line, which in turn lead to considering this representation as the core of
number meaning. Visuo-spatial processing is intuitively involved in various aspects of number
processing and calculation: For instance, the meaning of a digit in a multi-digit number is coded following
spatial information, given its association to its relative position within the number; similarly, to solve a
complex written multiplication one has to know the correct location of the intermediate results. In this
review behavioral, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data concerning the close relationship
between numerical abilities and visuo-spatial processes are considered.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
1362
1362
1362
1365
1366
1367
1367
1368
1369
1369
1370
1370
1370
1362
Fig. 1. A number form. Illustration of the mental image evoked by a subject when
thinking about numbers (from Galton, 1880).
Fig. 2. (A) The classical experimental setting in which the SNARC effect is observed.
In a numerical classication task, smaller magnitude numbers elicit left-sided
responses, larger magnitude numbers right-sided responses. (B) Expected
differences in RT (dRT) between right, and left hand responses, as a function of
the digit to be classied.
1363
1364
to-right oriented mental number line is not the only representation which leads to visuo-spatial associations. In fact, when
subjects use all their ngers in a task that requires to identify
Arabic digits (each digit is assigned to a unique nger), they show
an advantage for small numbers responded to with the right hand,
provided that the specic digit-nger mapping imposed in the task
mirrors the personal nger counting strategies (Di Luca et al.,
2006). These studies provide evidence of further spatial frames
onto which numbers might be mapped, such as a nger counting
map, which may even overcome the canonical left-to-right
orientation of the mental number line.
In addition, the spatial representation of the mental number
line is not conned to the horizontal dimension. In fact, the
specic mapping of the responses has proved to be related to the
emergence of spatialnumerical compatibility effects. When
participants are required to perform the numerical classication
task with key responses arranged in a top-down fashion, a vertical
SNARC effect is observed, where smaller (larger) numbers are
preferentially associated to low (high) locations (Ito and Hatta,
2004; Schwarz and Keus, 2004). Moreover, the response advantage
driven by the numerical information is not specic to bimanual
responses, being also present with responses involving eye
movements (Fischer et al., 2003): When subjects are required to
detect a stimulus in the right or left sides of the computer screen,
there is an advantage in detecting left-sided stimuli when a smallmagnitude digit (i.e., 1, 2) is previously presented in the centre of
the screen, while right-sided stimuli are primed by a largermagnitude digit (i.e., 8, 9) (Fischer et al., 2003). These shifts of
attention towards the left or the right sides of space are also found
along the vertical dimension, with saccadic responses towards
bottom locations being faster for smaller numbers, saccadic
responses towards top locations faster for larger numbers
(Schwarz and Keus, 2004).
Similar lateralized effects, which emerge in the processing of
numerical information, have been observed in a variety of different
experimental paradigms, such as naming (Brysbaert, 1995; Zebian,
2005), unimanual pointing (Fischer, 2003; Ishihara et al., 2006),
and numerical classication tasks with pedal responses (Schwarz
and Muller, 2006). In these studies, participants show effects of
congruency between the numerical and the spatial information. In
naming tasks, subjects show faster responses when the numerical
Fig. 3. (A) Illustration of the bisection paradigm with numerical material. Participants are asked to set the subjective midpoint of horizontal lines, anked by digits. (B) Mean
spatial biases exhibited in the bisection task: rightward biases are observed when the larger digit is on the right-hand side, leftward biases when the larger digit is on the lefthand side of the line (reprinted from de Hevia et al., 2006b, with permission).
1365
1366
Fig. 4. Bilateral parietal network involved in numerical processing. A bilateral-intraparietal system may be devoted to the more abstract representation of quantity (grey), the
left angular gyrus to verbal numerical representations (black), and a bilateral posterior-superior parietal system to spatial and non-spatial attention (cross-hatched).
(Adapted from Dehaene et al., 2003).
1367
1368
1369
1370
Ansari, D., Donlan, C., Thomas, M.S., Ewing, S.A., Peen, T., Karmiloff-Smith, A., 2003.
What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical
and atypical number development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
85, 5062.
Ardila, A., Roselli, M., 1994. Spatial acalculia. International Journal of Neuroscience
78, 177184.
Ashcraft, M.H., 1992. Cognitive arithmetic: a review of data and theory. Cognition
44, 75106.
Bachtold, D., Baumuller, M., Brugger, P., 1998. Stimulusresponse compatibility in
representational space. Neuropsychologia 36, 731735.
Baddeley, A.D., 2007. Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
Basso, A., Burgio, F., Caporali, A., 2000. Acalculia, aphasia and spatial disorders in left
and right brain-damaged patients. Cortex 36, 265280.
Becker, J.T., MacAndrew, D.K., Fiez, J.A., 1999. A comment on the functional
localization of the phonological storage subsystem of working memory. Brain
and Cognition 41, 2738.
Benson, D.F., Davis, R.J., Snyder, B.D., 1988. Posterior cortical atrophy. Archives of
Neurology 45, 789793.
Benton, A.L., 1961. The ction of the Gerstmann syndrome. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 24, 176181.
Benton, A.L., 1992. Gerstmanns syndrome. Archives of Neurology 49, 445447.
Berch, D.B., Foley, E.J., Hill, R.J., Ryan, P.M., 1999. Extracting parity and magnitude
from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and
mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 74, 286308.
Berti, A., 2002. Unconscious processing in neglect. In: Karnath, H.-O., Milner,
A.D., Vallar, G. (Eds.), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 313326.
Bisiach, E., Luzzatti, C., 1978. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14,
129133.
Bisiach, E., Vallar, G., 2000. Unilateral neglect in humans. In: Boller, F., Grafman,
J., Rizzolatti, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. second ed. Elsevier
Science, Amsterdam, pp. 459502.
Bryant, P., Squire, S., 2001. Childrens mathematics: lost and found in space. In:
Gattis, M. (Ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge,
MA, pp. 175200.
Brysbaert, M., 1995. Arabic number reading: on the nature of the numerical scale
and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General 124, 434452.
Buckley, P., Gillman, C., 1974. Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. Journal of
Experimental Psychology 103, 11311136.
Calabria, M., Rossetti, Y., 2005. Interference between number processing and line
bisection: a methodology. Neuropsychologia 43, 779783.
Campbell, J.I.D., 1994. Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition 53, 144.
Cantlon, J., Brannon, E.M., Carter, E.J., Pelphrey, K., 2006. Notation-independent
number processing in the intraparietal sulcus in adults and young children.
PLoS Biology 4, 111.
Carota, A., Di Pietro, M., Ptak, R., Poglia, D., Schnider, A., 2004. Defective spatial
imagery with pure Gerstmanns syndrome. European Neurology 52, 16.
Castelli, F., Glaser, D.E., Butterworth, B., 2006. Discrete and analogue quantity
processing in the parietal lobe: a functional MRI study. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 103, 46934698.
Castronovo, J., Seron, X., 2007. Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects:
the role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology 60, 101119.
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P.F., Dehaene, S., 1999. Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, 617630.
Chokron, S., Imbert, M., 1993. Inuence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive
Brain Research 1, 219222.
Cooper, R.G., 1984. Early number development: discovering number space with
addition and subtraction. In: Sophian, C. (Ed.), Origins of Cognitive Skills.
Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 157192.
Critchley, M., 1953. The Parietal Lobes. Hafner, New York.
Critchley, M., 1966. The enigma of Gerstmanns syndrome. Brain 89, 183198.
Dahmen, W., Hartje, W., Bussing, A., Sturm, W., 1982. Disorders of calculation in
aphasic patientsspatial and verbal components. Neuropsychologia 20, 145
153.
de Hevia, M.D., Girelli, L., Bricolo, E., Vallar, G., 2008. The representational space of
numerical magnitude: illusions of length. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology 61, 14961514.
de Hevia, M.D., Girelli, L., Vallar, G., 2006a. Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?
Experimental Brain Research 168, 254264.
de Hevia, M.D., Vallar, G., Girelli, L., 2006b. Visuo-spatial components of numerical
representation. In: Vecchi, T., Bottini, G. (Eds.), Imagery and Spatial Cognition.
John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 155171.
Dehaene, S., 1992. Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44, 142.
Dehaene, S., 2003. The neural basis of the WeberFechner law: a logarithmic mental
number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 145147.
Dehaene, S., Akhavein, R., 1995. Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition 21, 314326.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., Giraux, P., 1993. The mental representation of parity and
number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 371
396.
1371
Gobel, S., Walsh, V., Rushworth, M.F., 2001. The mental number line and the human
angular gyrus. Neuroimage 14, 12781289.
Gold, M., Adair, J.C., Jacobs, D.H., Heilman, K.M., 1995. Right-left confusion in
Gerstmanns syndrome: a model of body centered spatial orientation. Cortex
31, 267283.
Grana`, A., Hofer, R., Semenza, C., 2006. Acalculia from a right hemisphere lesion
dealing with where in multiplication procedures. Neuropsychologia 44,
29722986.
Grifn, S.A., Case, R., Siegler, R.S., 1994. Rightstart: providing the central conceptual
prerequisites for rst formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school
failure. In: McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory
and Classroom Practice. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, pp. 2550.
Gruber, O., Indefrey, P., Steinmetz, H., Kleinschmidt, A., 2001. Dissociating neural
correlates of cognitive components in mental calculation. Cerebral Cortex 11,
350359.
Guariglia, C., Padovani, A., Pantano, P., Pizzamiglio, L., 1993. Unilateral neglect
restricted to visual imagery. Nature 364, 235237.
Hartje, W., 1987. The effect of spatial disorders on arithmetical skills. In: Deloche,
G., Seron, X. (Eds.), Mathematical Disabilities. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.
121125.
Hatta, T., Hirose, T., Ikeda, K., Fukuhara, H., 1989. Digit memory of soroban experts:
evidence of utilization of mental imagery. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7, 265
281.
Hayes, J.R., 1973. On the function of visual imagery in elementary mathematics. In:
Chase, W.G. (Ed.), Visual Information Processing. Academic Press, New York,
pp. 177214.
Heathcote, D., 1994. The role of visual-spatial working memory in the mental
addition of multi-digit addends. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 13, 207245.
Hecaen, H., Angelergues, R., Houillier, S., 1961. Les varietes cliniques des acalculies
au cours des lesions retro-rolandiques: approche statistique du proble`me.
Revue Neurologique 105, 85103.
Heilman, K.M., Valenstein, E., 1979. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect.
Annals of Neurology 5, 166170.
Henschen, S.E., 1919. Ueber sprach- musik- und rechen-. Mechanismen und ihre
lokalisationen im grosshirn. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 52, 273298.
Hitch, G.J., 1978. The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic.
Cognitive Psychology 10, 302323.
Hubbard, E.M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., 2005. Interactions between number and space in
parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 435448.
Hung, Y.-h., Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.-L., Wu, D.H., 2008. Flexible spatial mapping of
different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition 106, 14411450.
Ishihara, M., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Flory, V., Salemme, R., Imanaka, K., Rossetti, Y.,
2006. Interaction between space and number representations during motor
preparation in manual aiming. Neuropsychologia 44, 10091016.
Ito, Y., Hatta, T., 2004. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers:
evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition 32, 662673.
Jewesbury, E.C.O., 1969. Parietal lobe syndromes. In: Vinken, P.J., Bruyn, G.W.
(Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 680
699.
Keus, I.M., Schwarz, W., 2005. Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect:
evidence for a response related origin. Memory & Cognition 33, 681695.
Kleist, K., 1934. Gehirnpathologie. Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig.
ez, R.E., 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied
Lakoff, G., Nun
Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books, New York.
Lee, K.M., Kang, S.Y., 2002. Arithmetic operation and working memory: differential
suppression in dual tasks. Cognition 83, B63B68.
LeFevre, J.A., Kulak, A.G., 1994. Individual differences in the obligatory activation of
addition facts. Memory & Cognition 22, 188200.
Lemer, C., Dehaenene, S., Spelke, E., Cohen, L., 2003. Approximate quantities and
exact number words: dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia 41, 19421958.
Logie, R., Baddeley, A., Mane, A.M., Donchin, E., Sheptak, R., 1989. Working memory
in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Acta Psychologica 71, 5387.
Logie, R.H., Gilhooly, K.J., Wynn, V., 1994. Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition 22, 395410.
Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., Umilta`, C., 2003. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon
effect? Cognition 88, B1B10.
Mayer, E., Martory, M.D., Pegna, A.J., Landis, T., Delavelle, J., Annoni, J.M., 1999. A
pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. Brain 122, 1107
1120.
McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., Basili, A., 1985. Cognitive mechanisms in number
processing and calculation: evidence from dyscalculia. Brain and Cognition 4,
171196.
Menon, V., Rivera, S.M., White, C.D., Glover, G., Reiss, A.L., 2000. Dissociating
prefrontal and parietal cortex activation during arithmetic processing. Neuroimage 12, 357365.
Morris, H.H., Luders, H., Lesser, R.P., Dinner, D.S., Hahn, J., 1984. Transient neuropsychological abnormalities (including Gerstmanns syndrome) during cortical
stimulation. Neurology 34, 877883.
Moyer, R.S., Landauer, T.K., 1967. The time required for judgments of numerical
inequality. Nature 215, 15191520.
Naccache, L., Dehaene, S., 2001. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel
unseen stimuli. Cognition 80, 215229.
Nieder, A., 2005. Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 177190.
1372
Nieder, A., Diester, I., Tudusciuc, O., 2006. Temporal and spatial enumeration
processes in the primate parietal cortex. Science 313, 14311435.
Nieder, A., Miller, E., 2004. A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United
States of America 101, 74577462.
Nieder, A., Miller, E.K., 2003. Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of
numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37, 149157.
Noel, M.P., 2005. Finger gnosia: a predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child
Neuropsychology 11, 413430.
Noel, M.P., Desert, M., Aubrun, A., Seron, X., 2001. Involvement of short-term
memory in complex mental calculation. Memory & Cognition 29, 3442.
Noel, M.P., Seron, X., 1993. Arabic number reading decit: a single-case study or
when 236 is read (2306) and judged superior to 1258. Cognitive Neuropsychology 10, 317339.
Noel, M.P., Seron, X., 1997. On the existence of an intermediate semantic representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23, 697720.
Nuerk, H.C., Geppert, B.E., van Herten, M., Willmes, K., 2002. On the impact of
different number representations in the number bisection task. Cortex 38, 691
715.
Nuerk, H.C., Wood, G., Willmes, K., 2005. The universal SNARC effect: the association
between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology 52,
187194.
Oliveri, M., Rausei, V., Koch, G., Torriero, S., Turriziani, P., Caltagirone, C., 2004.
Overestimation of numerical distances in the left side of space. Neurology 63,
21392141.
Paterson, S.J., Girelli, L., Butterworth, B., Karmiloff-Smith, A., 2006. Are numerical
impairments syndrome specic? Evidence from Williams syndrome and
Downs syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47, 190204.
Peritz, G., 1918. Zur pathopychologie des rechnens. Deutsche Zeitshrift fur Nervenheilkunde 61, 234340.
Pesenti, M., Thioux, M., Seron, X., De Volder, A., 2000. Neuroanatomical substrates of
Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: a PET
study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 461479.
Pesenti, M., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Mellet, E., Samson, D., Duroux, B., et al., 2001.
Mental calculation in a prodigy is sustained by right prefrontal and medial
temporal areas. Nature Neuroscience 4, 103107.
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., 2004. Tuning curves for
approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron 44, 547
555.
Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., 2007. A magnitude code common to
numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron 53,
293305.
Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivie`re, D., LeBihan, D., 2001. Modulation of parietal activation
by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage 14, 1013
1026.
Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., Umilta`, C., 2006. Explicit vs. implicit
processing of representational space in neglect: dissociations in accessing the
mental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 680688.
Restle, F., 1970. Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental
Psychology 83, 274278.
Rickard, T.C., Romero, S.G., Basso, G., Wharton, C., Flitman, S., Grafman, J., 2000. The
calculating brain: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38, 325335.
Rivera, S.M., Reiss, A.L., Eckert, M.A., Menon, V., 2005. Developmental changes in
mental arithmetic: evidence for increased functional specialization in the left
inferior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 15, 17791790.
Roeltgen, D.P., Sevush, S., Heilman, K.M., 1983. Pure Gerstmanns syndrome from a
focal lesion. Archives of Neurology 40, 4647.
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., 1989. Calculation decit in patients with right and left
hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 27, 607617.
Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Ota, H., Michel, C., Boisson, D., 2004. Does
action make the link between number and space representation? Psychological
Science 15, 426430.
Rossetti, Y., Rode, G., 2002. Reducing spatial neglect by visual and other sensory
manipulations: non-cognitive (physiological) routes to the rehabilitation of a
cognitive disorder. In: Karnath, H.-O., Milner, A.D., Vallar, G. (Eds.), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.
375396.
Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B.L., Umilta`, C., Butterworth, B., 2006. Spatial
representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition 99, 113129.
Sagiv, N., Simner, J., Collins, J., Butterworth, B., Ward, J., 2006. What is the relationship between synaesthesia and visuo-spatial number forms? Cognition 114
128.
Sandrini, M., Rossini, P.M., Miniussi, C., 2004. The differential involvement of
inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: a rTMS study. Neuropsychologia
42, 19021909.
Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D.C., Ajax, E.T., 1980. Line bisection and unilateral visual
neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 30, 509517.
Schwarz, W., Keus, I.M., 2004. Moving the eyes along the mental number line:
comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception &
Psychophysics 66, 651664.
Schwarz, W., Muller, D., 2006. Spatial associations in number-related tasks: a
comparison of manual and pedal responses. Experimental Psychology 53, 415.
Seron, X., Pesenti, M., Noel, M.P., Deloche, G., Cornet, J.A., 1992. Images of numbers,
or when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue. Cognition 44, 159196.
Shuman, M., Kanwisher, N., 2004. Numerical magnitude in the human parietal lobe:
tests of representational generality and domain specicity. Neuron 44, 557
569.
Siegler, R.S., Lemaire, P., 1997. Older and younger adults strategy choices in
multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126, 7192.
Simon, T.J., 1997. Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: a nonnumerical account. Cognitive Development 12, 349372.
Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Bihan, D.L., Dehaene, S., 2002. Topographical
layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human
parietal lobe. Neuron 33, 475487.
Singer, H.D., Low, A.A., 1933. Acalculia (henschen): a clinical study. Archives of
Neurology and Psychiatry 29, 476498.
Smith, S.B., 1983. The Great Mental Calculators. The Psychology, Methods, and Lives
of Calculating Prodigies, Past and Present. Columbia University Press, New York.
Spelke, E., Dehaene, S., 1999. Biological foundations of numerical thinking.
Response to T.J. Simon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 365366.
Strub, R.L., Geschwind, N., 1983. Localization in Gerstmann syndrome. In: Kertesz,
A. (Ed.), Localization in Neuropsychology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 295
321.
Temple, E., Posner, M.I., 1998. Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-yearold children and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
United States of America 95, 78367841.
Trbovich, P.L., LeFevre, J.A., 2003. Phonological and visual working memory in
mental addition. Memory & Cognition 31, 738745.
Vallar, G., 1998. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 87
97.
Vallar, G., 2000. The methodological foundations of human neuropsychology:
studies in brain-damaged patients. In: Boller, F., Grafman, J., Rizzolatti, G.
(Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. second ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.
305344.
Vallar, G., 2007. Spatial neglect, Balint-Homes and Gerstmanns syndrome, and
other spatial disorders. CNS Spectrum 12, 527536.
Vuilleumier, P., Ortigue, S., Brugger, P., 2004. The number space and neglect. Cortex
40, 399410.
Walsh, V., 2003. A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and
quantity. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences 7, 483488.
Zago, L., Pesenti, M., Mellet, M., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio, N., 2001. Neural
correlates of simple and complex mental calculation. Neuroimage 13, 314
327.
Zago, L., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., 2002. Distinguishing visuospatial working memory
and complex mental calculation areas within the parietal lobes. Neuroscience
Letters 331, 4549.
Zebian, S., 2005. Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English
and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of
Cognition and Culture 5, 165190.
Zhou, X., Chen, C., Chen, L., Dong, Q., 2008. Holistic or compositional representation
of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC
effects in a number-matching task. Cognition 106, 15251536.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., Umilta`, C., 2006. The spatial
representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: evidence from
neglect. Neuropsychologia 44, 10611067.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Umilta`, C., 2002. Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental
number line. Nature 417, 138139.