Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Title:
Paper Number
and Title:
Assessed
Learning
Outcome:
3
Conditions:
Assignment 3
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
For this assignment you will analyse the Lovely Linens Case Study and
answer the related questions. You will need to substantiate your findings
by referring to source materials including your textbook and Study Guide.
You are required to engage in some research into the theories
underpinning situational analysis and how it is used to determine
promotional objectives and target markets in order to successfully
complete this assignment.
Make sure you reference all of your sources using the correct APA
referencing conventions.
Make sure you read the Marking Schedule below carefully before
embarking on the assignment. It will give you clear idea of what
we are looking for in the submission.
Marking schedule
Criteria
E (0-39)
D (40-49)
C (50-64)
B (65-79)
A (80-100)
Market
Analysis
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
, fails to
identify
components
of market
analysis
theory or
research
procedures.
Poor
understanding
of market
analysis
theory.
Evaluation is
shallow and
fails to
identify
complete
procedures
for market
research.
Reasonable
evaluation of
market
analysis
theory,
including
various
methods to
analyse a
market, and
listing market
research
procedures.
Exceptional,
insightful and
comprehensive
evaluation of
market analysis
theory, including
details of various
methods to analyse
a market, and
detailing market
research
procedures.
Weak analysis
of markets
and lack of
understanding
of link to Case
study.
Reasonable
analysis of at
least 2
markets
relating to the
Case study,
showing
evidence of
basic
understanding
.
Thorough and
comprehensive
evaluation of
market analysis
theory,
including
details of
various
methods to
analyse a
market, and
detailing
market
research
procedures.
Weighting
12%
Lack of
knowledge of
markets and
poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Unconvincing
evaluation.
Environm
ental
Analysis
Weighting
12%
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
, fails to
identify
components
of
environmental
analysis.
Lack of
knowledge of
theory and
poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Unconvincing
evaluation
and poor
Lack of
research.
Poor
understanding
of
environmental
analysis. Lack
of detail of
current or
future
environments.
Weak
evaluation
and
incomplete
examples.
Lack of
research.
Sound analysis
of at least 2
markets
relating to the
Case study,
showing
evidence of
good
understanding.
Some
research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Competent
environmental
analysis,
including
details of
current and
future
environments.
Thorough and
comprehensive
environmental
analysis,
including
details of
current and
future
environments.
Reasonable
evaluation of
at least 1
point for each
PESTLE
element
including
examples
from Case
Study.
Some
research
Sound
evaluation of at
least 2 detailed
points for each
PESTLE
element
including
original and
detailed
examples from
Case Study.
Exceptional,
insightful and
comprehensive
environmental
analysis, including
details of current
and future
environments.
Extremely high
level of
understanding is
shown by
evaluation of at
least 2 detailed
points for each
PESTLE element
including original
and insightful
examples from
Case Study.
examples.
Competito
r Analysis
Weighting
12%
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
, fails to
identify
theoretical
models.
Poor
understanding
of models of
competitor
analysis. Lack
of detail or
link to Case
Study.
Lack of
knowledge of
theory and
poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Weak
evaluation
and lack of
understanding
of purpose of
analysis and
link to target
market.
Unconvincing
evaluation
and poor
examples.
Market
Measure
ments
Weighting
12%
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
, fails to
identify
market
measurement
s.
Lack of
knowledge of
theory and
poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Unconvincing
evaluation
and poor
examples.
Lack of
research.
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
In-depth research
carried out beyond
course materials.
Competent
description of
models, and
reasonable
application of
model to Case
Study.
Thorough and
comprehensive
description of
models, and
detailed
application of
model to Case
Study.
Exceptional,
insightful and
comprehensive
description of
models, and
detailed
application of
model to Case
Study.
Reasonable
evaluation of
purpose of
analysis and
link to
determination
of target
market.
Some
research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Sound
evaluation of
purpose of
analysis and
link to
determination
of target
market.
Extremely high
level of
understanding is
shown of purpose
of analysis and link
to determination of
target market.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
In-depth research
carried out beyond
course materials.
Lack of
understanding
of market
measurement
s.
Competent
description of
market
measurement
s.
Thorough and
comprehensive
description of
market
measurements.
Exceptional and
comprehensive
description of
market
measurements.
Poor
comprehensio
n is
demonstrated
in Case Study
application.
Reasonable
level of
understanding
is
demonstrated
by application
to Case Study
giving 3
methods with
relevant
examples.
Extremely high
level of
understanding is
demonstrated by
detailed
application to Case
Study giving 3
methods with
creative and
insightful
examples.
Some
research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
In-depth research
carried out beyond
course materials.
Less than 3
methods with
incomplete
and weak
examples.
Productivi
ty/Profita
bility
Analysis
Weighting
12%
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
of productivity
and
profitability
analysis.
Lack of
knowledge
and poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Unconvincing
evaluation
and poor
examples.
Lack of
understanding
of productivity
and
profitability
analysis.
Poor
comprehensio
n is
demonstrated
in Case Study
application.
Less than 2
methods with
incomplete
and weak
examples
Competent
description of
productivity
and
profitability
analysis,
showing
reasonable
understanding
.
Reasonable
understanding
is
demonstrated
by application
to Case Study
giving 2
relevant
examples.
Some
research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
Target
Market
Weighting
15%
Clear
evidence of
lack of
understanding
of target
market.
Lack of
knowledge of
promotional
objectives and
elements.
Poor
understanding
of Case Study
application.
Unconvincing
evaluation
and poor
examples.
Lack of
understanding
of target
market.
Less than 2
promotional
objectives
outlined
showing poor
level of
understanding
.
Flawed
promotional
mix campaign,
weak link to
Case study.
Flawed link of
target market,
promotional
objectives and
promotional
mix to Case
study
organisation.
Competent
description of
target market
showing
reasonable
understanding
.
2 promotional
objectives
outlined
showing
reasonable
level of
understanding
.
Thorough and
comprehensive
description of
productivity
and profitability
analysis,
showing good
understanding.
Exceptional and
comprehensive
description of
productivity and
profitability
analysis, showing
clear insight and
understanding.
Good level of
understanding
is demonstrated
by detailed
application to
Case Study
giving 2
excellent
examples.
Extremely high
level of
understanding is
demonstrated by
detailed
application to Case
Study giving 2
insightful
examples.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
In-depth research
carried out beyond
course materials.
Thorough and
comprehensive
description of
target market
showing good
understanding.
Exceptional,
detailed and
insightful
description of
target market
showing excellent
understanding.
3 promotional
objectives
clearly outlined
with good level
of
understanding
and insight.
3 promotional
objectives clearly
outlined with
exceptional
understanding and
insight.
1 promotional
mix campaign
outlined
including
promotional
elements and
description of
benefits to
Case Study
organisation.
2 different
promotional
mix campaigns
outlined
including detail
of promotional
elements and
clear
description of
benefits to Case
Study
organisation.
2 different creative
and inspired
promotional mix
campaigns
outlined including
detail of
promotional
elements and clear
description of
benefits to Case
Study
organisation.
Reasonable
understanding
is shown by
basic analysis
Good level of
understanding
is shown by
clear analysis
Extremely high
level of
understanding is
shown by
Organisat
ion/ logic
No flow.
No argument.
Weighting
5%
Writing
Weighting
5%
No
consideration
for
presentation.
Muddled
writing that is
very difficult
to follow.
Numerous
grammatical
errors.
Multiple
spelling
errors.
Research
Weighting
10%
No
authoritative
sources, no
evidence of
research or
not relevant
for the task.
Very limited
understanding
.
The research
has not been
linked to the
and
evaluation
linking target
market,
promotional
objectives and
promotional
mix to Case
study
organisation.
and evaluation
linking target
market,
promotional
objectives and
promotional
mix to Case
study
organisation.
exceptional
analysis and
evaluation linking
target market,
promotional
objectives and
promotional mix to
Case study
organisation.
Research
carried out
beyond course
materials.
In-depth research
carried out beyond
course materials.
Poorly
organised and
difficult to
read. Does not
flow logically
from one part
to another.
The argument
is not clear.
Generally well
organised
although the
flow of the
argument is
not always
logical.
Argument is
clear and
mostly sound.
Coherently
organised and
logical
formation of
sound
argument.
Exceptionally well
structured. Logic
is easy to follow.
Arguments are
sound and
convincing.
Acceptable
presentation.
Tidy
presentation.
Professional
presentation.
Polished
presentation.
Long winded
and some
clear writing
presentation.
Mostly clear
writing but at
times long
winded.
Clear writing
mainly to the
point.
Some
grammatical
errors.
Writing style
lacks
consideration.
Multiple
spelling
errors.
Few issues
around
grammar.
Less than 5
spelling
errors.
Less than 2
authoritative
sources or
sources are
not relevant
for the task.
Limited
understanding
.
Little
evidence of
meaningful
integration of
Considered
writing style.
Excellent
grammar with
only minor
oversights.
Mature and
appropriate
writing style.
Excellent
grammar, correct
in all aspects.
No spelling errors.
Less than 3
spelling errors.
2-3 scholarly
sources.
3-4 scholarly
sources.
4-5 scholarly
sources.
Some sources
lack relevance
or authority
but are still
appropriate
for the task.
Sources are
mostly wellchosen,
authoritative
and appropriate
for the task.
Adequate
understanding
.
Good
understanding.
The research
The research is
integrated with
Excellent
understanding.
The research is
very well
integrated with the
In-text
citations
and
Reference
list APA
formatted
main text.
the research
with the main
text.
could be
incorporated
with the main
text more
consistently.
main text.
More than 5
errors.
4-5 errors.
2-3 errors.
1 error.
No errors.
Weighting
5%