Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rohini Devi
Elastomers Division, HTCC, Advanced Systems Laboratory, DRDO, Hyderabad
ABSTRACT
Aerospace systems employ large number of rubber
components in the form of seals, gaskets, liners, vibration
isolators etc. The service life of these systems is governed
by the useful life of elastomeric materials used in different
subsystems. Defence equipments are expected to have
long storage life. Hence the rubber components should
have long life when stored in different environments
prevalent in the actual field of application. Rubber
components can get degraded when exposed to oxygen,
ozone, sunlight, UV radiations and also due to mechanical
stress in the assembled conditions. A study has been
conducted to predict the life of different rubber
components by accelerated ageing of compositions at
different temperatures both by Hot air oven ageing and
also by Compression stress relaxation studies. In this work
three types of Acrylonitrile Butadiene rubber (NBR)
compositions, Na tura l Rubber (NR) composition,
Chloroprene Rubber, Ethylene Propylene Diene Rubber
(EPDM) compositions are studied for a geing
characteristics. Sam ples were exposed to high
temperatures in hot air oven and in compression stress
relaxation tester. The aged and unaged samples were
periodically tested for physico-mechanical properties.
Experiments were continued till 50 % reduction in
properties. Based on the accelerated test data Arrhenius
methodology is adopted to predict the life at ambient
temperature. Time taken for 50% drop in elongation at
different temperatures in case of hot air oven ageing and
in compressive stress in case of compression stress
relaxation were monitored for each composition. Log of
Time Vs. 1/T (Absolute temperature) was plotted. From
these plots life at ambient temperatures is predicted for
different rubber compositions.
Keywords: Accelerated ageing, Stress relaxation, Life
prediction of Rubber, Arrhenius Methodology.
1. INTRODUCTION
Defence equipments are expected to have long service
life in variety of hostile environments such as hot, dry,
dusty deserts, extremely low temperatures, hot and
humid coastal plains and sometimes in sea water
environments also. The materials selected for various
sub systems should have long life when stored under
the above mentioned environmental conditions.
Aerospace systems consist of many subsystems
*
62
I J M E M S: 5(1) 2013
: Thermo-oxidation, additive
migration, cross linking
UV light
: Photo-oxidation
Photo-oxidation
: Radio-oxidation, cross
linking
Fluids (gas, organic or : Chemical degradation,
swelling,
extraction,
cracking inorganic liquids,
vapors)
Mechanical stress,
: Fatigue, creep stress
pressure :
relaxation, set, abrasion
Oxidative degradation is generally considered to
be the most serious problem for rubbers at high
temperature. Degradation is relatively slow at ambient
temperatures. Short wave UV and sunlight cause
damage to the rubber components exposed to outdoor
environment. Temperature accelerates the rate of any
chemical reaction. While most photo chemical reactions
are not temperature sensitive, any subsequent chain
reaction usually is temperature dependent [6].
In this present work three types of Nitrile rubber
compositions, Natural rubber, Chloroprene and
EPDM compositions were considered for ageing
studies and life prediction. These compositions were
selected based on its importance and usage in defence
systems. The details of these compositions are
discussed in Experimental part.
2. THEORY AND METHODOLOGY
The properties of rubbers are subject to change as a
result of degradation, ultimately to the point where
the material is no longer capable of fulfilling its
functions. The degree of ageing is dependent on many
factors including Polymer type, formulation, test
product geometry, environmental conditions etc. [7].
2.1 Causes for Chemical Degradation
The chemical degradation of rubber essentially takes
places via radical reaction, these radicals being
Initiator (I)
I + RH
Chain Reaction R + O2
ROO + RH
Termination
2ROO
Reaction
I
IH +R
R OO
R + ROOH
Deactivated
material
Where: RH = rubber
(B) When there is no oxygen present
Initiation
Initiator (I)
I + RH
Chain Reaction R +RH
(Containing
a double bond)
Chain Transfer R +RH
Reaction
Beta scission
R
reaction
Termination
2 R
Reaction
I
IH + R
RRH
(a form of
cross linking)
RH + R
R1 + R2
R-R
Deactivated
material
63
Relaxation Index
1.0
0.9
0.8
70C
85C
0.7
100C
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
t3
0.1
0.0
10
50
100
t2
500 1000
t1
5000 1000
(1)
Where : K (T) = Reaction rate constant (min), A = Preexponential factor (min), E = Activation energy
(J/mol), R = Gas constant (8.314 J/mol K) and
T = Absolute temperature (K)
The state of a chemical reaction is given by
relation:
Fx (t) = K (t) . t
(2)
(3)
64
I J M E M S: 5(1) 2013
Remarks
1.
Nitrile 1
2.
Nitrile 2
3.
Nitrile 3
4.
Natural Rubber
5.
Chloroprene
6.
EPDM
Table 3
Physico-mechanical Properties
Properties
Tensile Strength
(MPa)
Elongation at
break (%)
Hardness (Shore A)
Specific gravity
Compression set %*
643
754
11.5 17.38
1100
16.54
242
475
28-30 68-70
1.01 1.40
17.0
15
73-75
1.03
15.43
Table 4
t1/2 Period for Hot Air oven Ageing
150
4.65
150
130
150
160
6.0 12.82
34.40 12.30
12.83
1.0
3.1
7.3
12.62
1.14
1.79
110.8
95.5
78.0
28.4
93.1
70.8
8.9
10.7
15.70
Nitrile
1
Nitrile
2
5
11
34
118
286
5
15
25
96
Nitrile Natural
3 Rubber
10
18
34
200
8
15
38
154
Chloro EPDM
prene
5
9
46
71
185
336
4
23
42
56
3 A (Nitrile 1)
3 B (Nitrile 2)
3 C (Nitrile 3)
3 D (Natural Rubber)
3 E (Chloroprene)
3 F (EPDM)
65
66
I J M E M S: 5(1) 2013
Table 5
t1/2 Period for Compression Stress Relaxation
Nitrile 1
16.3
32.6
57.7
94.5
189.3
6.7
10.2
38
121
3.0
9.3
30.6
67.0
2.8
9.7
39.2
5 A (Nitrile 1)
5 B (Nitrile 2)
5 C (Nitrile 3)
5 D (Natural Rubber)
5 E (Chloroprene)
Figure 5: Arrhenius Plots for Stress Relaxation
Chloroprene
21
36
60
105
Nitrile 1
Nitrile 2
Nitrile 3
Natural Rubber
Chloroprene
EPDM
Compression Stress
relaxation
40
23
36
28
33
56
14
5.1
6.2
10
8
--
67
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
68
I J M E M S: 5(1) 2013
[8]
[9]