Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Design
Spring 2005
Ra
ul Radovitzky
February 6, 2005
Stress at a point
We are going to consider the forces exerted on a material. These can be
external or internal. External forces come in two avors: body forces (given
per unit mass or volume) and surface forces (given per unit area). If we cut a
body of material in equilibrium under a set of external forces along a plane,
as shown in Fig.1, and consider one side of it, we draw two conclusions: 1)
the equilibrium provided by the loads from the side taken out is provided by
a set of forces that are distributed among the material particles adjacent to
the cut plane and that should provide an equivalent set of forces to the ones
loading the part taken out, 2) these forces can now be considered as external
surface forces acting on the part of material under consideration.
The stress vector at a point on S is dened as:
t = lim
S 0
f
S
(1)
If the cut had gone through the same point under consideration but along a
plane with a dierent normal, the stress vector t would have been dierent.
Lets consider the three stress vectors t(i) acting on the planes normal to the
coordinate axes. Lets also decompose each t(i) in its three components in
the coordinate system ei (this can be done for any vector) as (see Fig.2):
t(i) = ij ej
1
(2)
surface forces
body forces
body forces
Stress tensor
We could keep analyzing dierent planes passing through the point with
dierent normals and, therefore, dierent stress vectors t(n) and one might
wonder if there is any relation among them or if they are all independent. The
answer to this question is given by invoking equilibrium on the (shrinking)
tetrahedron of material of Fig.3. The area of the faces of the tetrahedron are
S1 , S2 , S3 and S. The stress vectors on planes with reversed normals
t(ei ) have been replaced with t(i) using Newtons third law of action
and reaction (which is in fact derivable from equilibrium): t(n) = t(n) .
Enforcing equilibrium we have:
t(n) S t(1) S1 t(2) S2 t(3) S3 = 0
(3)
where V is the volume of the tetrahedron and f is the body force per
unit volume. The following relation: Sni = Si derived in the following
mathematical aside:
By virtue of Greens Theorem:
dV =
ndS
V
x3
(3)
33
32
23
31
x2
e3
e1
13
e2
21
22
(2)
11
12
x1
(1)
t
t
(2)
(1)
e1
n
t(n)
e2
(3)
0=
ndS
S
(4)
(5)
(7)
t(n) = n ij ei ej = ij n ei ej = ij ni ej
tj = ij ni
(8)
(9)
or:
= kl ek el = mn
em en
(10)
We would like to relate the stress components in the two systems. To this
end, we take the scalar product of (10) with ei and ej :
ei ej = kl ei ek el ej = mn
ei em en ej = mn
im nj = ij
or
ij = kl ei ek el ej
(11)
The factors in parenthesis are the cosine directors of the angles between the
original and primed coordinate axes.
tS = t(n) 2 t2N
It is obvious from these equations that the normal component achieves its
maximum tN = t(n) when the shear components are zero. In this case:
t(n) = n = n = In
or in components:
ki nk = ni
ki nk = ki nk
ki ki nk = 0
5
(12)
which means that the principal stresses are obtained by solving the previous
eigenvalue problem, the principal directions are the eigenvectors of the prob
lem. The eigenvalues are obtained by noticing that the last identity can be
satised for nontrivial n only if the factor is singular, i.e., if its determinant
vanishes:
11
12
13
21
22
23 = 0
31
32
33
1
2
2
2
I2 = ii jj ij ji = 11 22 + 22 33 + 33 11 12
+ 23
+ 31
(14)
2
I3 = det[] = ij
(15)
are called the stress invariants because they do not depend on the coordinate
system of choice.
vdV and
x vdV
V
D
vdV =
f dV + tdS
(16)
Dt V
V
S
6
where
but
D
Dt
D
D
v
(dV )v +
vdV =
dV
Dt V
t
V Dt
V
D
(dV
Dt
v
f dV + tdS
dV =
t
S
V
V
(17)
Now, using what weve learned about the tractions and their relation to the
stress tensor:
v
dV =
f dV + n dS
(18)
t
V
V
S
This is the linear momentum balance equation in integral form. We can
replace the surface integral with a volume integral with the aid of the diver
gence theorem:
n dS =
S
dV
V
v
f dV = 0
t
V
Since this principle applies to an arbitrary volume of material, the integrand
must vanish:
v
f =0
(19)
t
This is the linear momentum balance equation in dierential form. In com
ponents:
vi
ji,j + fi =
t
D
x vdV =
x f dV + x tdS
(20)
Dt V
V
S
7
vj
vi
xj
xi tj xj ti dS +
xi fj xj fi dV =
xi
dV
t
t
S
V
V
Using ti = ki nk , the divergence theorem and (19), this expression leads to
(see homework problem):
(ij ji )dV = 0
V
(21)