Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Section 10
SECTION 10
TALE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 10: SPEED MANAGEMENT................................................................10.1
10.1 Introduction................................................................................................10.1
10.2 Speed Management Principles...................................................................10.1
10.3 Speed Control Measures............................................................................10.2
10.3.1 Gates...........................................................................................10.2
10.3.2 Speed control zone......................................................................10.3
Table 10-1:
Table 10-2:
Table 10-3:
LIST OF TABLES
Detailed design of circular humps..............................................10.4
Detailed design of plateau humps...............................................10.5
Road width for different speeds and meeting situations..........10.8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 10-1: Speed management principles on 50km/h through road..........10.1
Figure 10-2: The design of gates.............................................................................
10.3
Figure 10-3: Alternative design of humps........................................................10.4
Figure 10-4: Detailed design of hump transition.............................................10.5
Figure 10-5: Example of hump drainage design at kerbed footway..............10.5
Figure 10-6: Markings and signing of humps..................................................10.6
Figure 10-7: Design of rumble strips................................................................10.7
Figure 10-8: Design of road narrowings..........................................................10.7
Figure 10-9: Example of road narrowing with central island.........................10.8
SECTION 10:
Section 10
SPEED MANAGEMENT
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Major traffic safety problems arise when main roads pass through trading centres and
towns. This is because of the mix of long-distance high-speed motor vehicles with local
access traffic, parking and vulnerable road users. The safest solution and by far the
most expensive is to build a by-pass. If this is not possible, a number of traffic safety
measures must be implemented, such as:
Through roads with heavy traffic can also be provided with a median to improve
traffic safety. U-turns should then preferably be achieved by use of roundabouts,
which maybe false, i.e. no connecting roads.
This section focuses on speed limits and speed control measures in built-up areas.
However some of the measures described may have uses in other situations, such as
in advance of hazardous bends or bridges. Advice on footways, cycleways and service
roads is given in other sections.
R u m b le s t r ip s
g a te
R u m b le s t r ip s
S p e e d lim it 5 0
C e n tra l s p e e d
c o n tr o lle d a r e a
f o o t - a n d c y c le
w a y s e c tio n
g a te
10.1
Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications
Section 10
The narrowing of the carriageway through the gate can put pedestrians and cyclists at
risk of being squeezed by motor vehicles. It is recommended that short footway / cycle
by-passes be built around the gates.
10.2
Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications
Section 10
smooth design
smooth design
taper design
2 m passenger
c a r tr a c k
E x it r a d iu s
R3
E x it r a d iu s
R 3
2 m passenger
c a r tra c k
2 m passenger
c a r tr a c k
E x it r a d iu s
R3
2 m passenger
c a r tra c k
S e p a ra te d fo o t
a n d c y c le w a y
S e p a ra te d fo o t
a n d c y c le w a y
S e p a ra te d fo o t
a n d c y c le w a y
S e p a ra te d fo o t
a n d c y c le w a y
E x it r a d iu s
R 3
taper design
R 2
R 2
R2
R2
E n tr y r a d iu s
R1
E n tr y r a d iu s
R1
E n t r y r a d iu s
R1
E n t r y r a d iu s
R 1
Speed control is most effectively achieved by humps. Speed control should preferably
be located where judged reasonable for drivers. Sometimes formal pedestrian
crossings could be implemented combined with humps, see Section 11.1.2. Welldesigned roundabouts are also very effective speed control measures and are highly
recommended. False roundabouts (i.e. where there is no intersection) are worth
considering.
Humps
The most effective device to use for speed control is the speed hump. Two alternative
designs have proved to be most effective. These are the circular hump and the plateau
hump. The geometric designs are shown Figure 10-3 for length profile.
10.3
Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications
Section 10
Length profile
circular
plateau
R
le n g th
car (truck)
speed level
20 (5)
25 (10)
30 (15)
35 (20)
40 (25)
45 (30)
50 (35)
(40)
Radius
(m)
11
15
20
31
53
80
113
180
Length
(m)
3.0
3.5
4.0
5.0
6.5
8.0
9.5
12.0
The traffic level-of-service, especially for buses and trucks, can be improved if the hump
entry and exit is smoothed with a fillet as shown below.
10.4
Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications
Section 10
H u m p s u rfa c e
S m o o th e d tr a n s itio n
L e n g th (m )
-0 .7 5
H e ig h t ( m m ) f r o m
0
h u m p a n d r o a d s u r fa c e
-0 .5 0
2
-0 .2 5
5
R o a d s u r fa c e
0 .2 5
0 .5 0
10
0 .7 5
0
r 4 - 6 m
i
car (truck)
speed level
25 (5)
30 (10)
35 (15)
40 (20)
45 (25)
50 (30)
(35)
(40)
0 .1 0 m
ramp length r
(m)
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.3
1.7
2.0
2.5
3.3
4.0
Grade i (%)
14
12.5
10
7.5
6
5
4
3
2.5
Note:
On a road with hard shoulders the hump must extend over the shoulder for a
1 m or so.
Consider whether the hump will interfere with drainage. On roads with kerbed
footways you may have to stop the hump 100 150 mm before the kerb to
create a drain. This solution cannot be used at a flush pedestrian crossing.
100 - 150 m m
F o o tw a y
H um p
Section 10
Humps are only allowed on roads with speed limit 50 km/h or lower. They should
always be clearly marked, as illustrated in Figure 10-6, with chequerboard markers
(sign no. M35) and hump information signs (sign no. I02) in each direction of the road.
Hump warning signs (sign no. W24) might also be needed.
C h e q u e rb o a rd m a rk e rs
1 .5 m
H u m p le n g th
rumble strips should preferably have yellow thermoplastic lines across the top for
better visibility
10.6
Section 10
strips should continue across the full width of the carriageway, including the
shoulders but be terminated so that they do not interfere with drainage.
T o a llo w
d r a in a g e
and
c y c le
passage
Speed
50
70
D
20
80
In te rv a l 0 .5 - 1 m
H a z a r d i. e .
G a te
n a r ro w in g
s p e e d li m it
3 0 to 5 0
s h o u ld e r
0 .5 m
s tr ip d e t a il
0 .0 1 0 to 0 .0 1 5 m
One sided
S h o u ld e r o r fo o tw a y
narrowing
Double sided
S h o u ld e r o r fo o t w a y
narrowing
Section 10
impact - 3.5 m is the recommended width between kerbs for one-way traffic. The
narrowing should be designed with tapers at least 1:5.
Table 10-3: Road width for different speeds and meeting situations
Speed
Meeting situation
km/h
Two cars
Two trucks
30
4.0 m
4.15 m
4.95 m
5.9 m
50
4.5 m
4.5 m
5.5 m
Another alternative is to build a kerbed island (min. width 1.2 m and length 5 m) in the
centre of the road, with 3.0 m 3.5 m wide traffic lanes either side. This could also
function as a pedestrian refuge, perhaps combined with a raised pedestrian crossing.
The island must be well-signed to avoid it becoming a hazard. As with all narrowings,
consider whether cyclists may be put at risk.
5 m
3 -3 .5
3 -3 .5
10.8
Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications