Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
A self-diverting-acid based on viscoelastic surfactant (SDVA)
has been used recently on stimulation treatments of carbonate
formations. The new system has been proven successfull in
more than 250 field applications.
The decrease of acid concentration during the spending
process viscosifies the fluid by the transformation from
spherical micelles to an entangled wormlike micellar structure
while penetrating the carbonate rock. The highly viscous fluid
acts as a temporary barrier and diverts the fluid into the
remaining lower-permeability treating zones. After treatment,
the SDVA barrier breaks when contacted either by formation
hydrocarbons or pre-and post-flush fluids. Quantifying
diversion, fluid efficiency, and cleanup are important factors
for successful candidate selection and job design. Laboratory
tests defining these key factors are presented in this paper.
This paper demonstrates the diverting ability of the acid as
a function of permeability, characterized by introducing the
concept of maximum pressure ratio (dPmax/dPo) supported by
core-flow and acid conductivity tests using limestone and
dolomite cores. Results demonstrate high dPmax/dPo in highpermeability cores and low dPmax/dPo in low-permeability
cores. Retained permeability measurements are presented that
assesses the level of cleanup. Flow initiation experiments of
spent acid systems with gas and brine were performed to
illustrate the cleanup behavior of SDVA in comparison to
gelled acid systems under conditions encountered in gas and
oil wells. The results indicate that SDVA systems clean up
easily and that SDVA provides higher regained permeability
than conventional gelled acid systems.
Background
The purpose of matrix stimulation in limestone and dolomite
reservoirs is the formation of wormholes, which can bypass
the damaged areas and increase the effective wellbore area.
Experimental
Core-Flow Experiments. The core flow apparatus is shown
schematically in Fig. 1. The flow procedure unless otherwise
noted was as follows:
1. Carbonate cores (0.1 to 50 mD) were saturated with 2
wt% potassium chloride brine. The cores were 1 or
1.5 in. wide and 5 to 6 in. long.
2. The initial permeability of the core was measured by
injecting 2 wt% KCl at 1mL/min.
3. Acid was injected into the core at a constant injection
rate of 1 mL/min.
4. The injection was stopped as soon as the core was
fully penetrated, as indicated by the differential
pressure dropping to zero.
5. The regained permeability to 2 wt% KCl brine was
measured in the reverse direction. The measurement
of regained permeability of the fully penetrated cores
was in most cases not applicable, because no pressure
drop
was
detected
resulting
in
an
infinite permeability.
Acid Fluid-Loss Experiments The fluid-loss tests were
performed in the above-described core apparatus on Indiana
limestone cores (1 to 3 mD) at 150oF (except where noted)
according to a procedure published by Crowe et al.11 At the
beginning of the test, 2 wt% KCl brine was flowed through the
core to establish the differential pressure required for
1mL/min initial leakoff velocity. This differential pressure
was applied during the leakoff test, and the change in flow rate
was monitored versus time.
Conductivity Experiments. The conductivity apparatus
consists of a 125,000-lbf-load press with automated hydraulic
intensifiers and a modified API conductivity cell with a 12-in.2
flow path. Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of the apparatus.
The apparatus can attain a maximum closure stress of 10,000
psi and a maximum temperature of 350F. The temperature of
the conductivity cell is controlled by heated platens contacting
the sides of the cell and hot oil circulated through the pistons.
Pressure transducers are used to measure the system pressure
and the pressure drop across the length of the fracture. The
transducers are plumbed with 1/8 in. lines and checked with
manometers to an accuracy of 1 in. of water. A digital caliper
is used to measure the fracture gap width. The apparatus is
capable of running both proppant and acid conductivity.
The fluid is loaded in the acid reservoir and pumped with a
diaphragm-metering pump. The pump is capable of pumping
a maximum rate of 1500 mL/min against 3,000 psi of
backpressure. Before the fluid enters the conductivity cell, it
passes through the reservoir simulator, where the fluid is
heated to the test temperature.
ISCO Chromatography pumps are used to pump brine
through the cell during conductivity measurements. The
pumps draw nitrogensparged 2 wt% KCl brine from a 100gal flowback reservoir.
Before the brine enters the
conductivity cell, it passes through the reservoir simulator and
a silica saturation system (for proppant conductivity). The
apparatus is discussed in more detail elsewhere in
the literature.12
SPE 86504
SPE 86504
SPE 86504
SPE 86504
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank ChevronTexaco and
Schlumberger for the permission to publish this paper.
Special thanks to Toan Bui, Jack Lie, and Aaron Galt for their
hard work on laboratory testing. Thanks to Dr. Ernie Brown,
Curtis Boney, Dr. Dan Fu, and Dr. Steve Davies for
discussions and for the critical reading of the manuscript.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Nomenclature
Da
De
dPo
dPmax/dPo
FIP
L
PV
PVbt
PVinj
Q
= Damkhler number
= effective Diffuision coefficient, cm2/s
= baseline pressure drop to brine
= maximum pressure ratio
= flow initiation pressure, psi
= length scale, cm
= pore volumes
= pore volumes to breakthrough
= pore volumes injected
= injection rate. cc/min
12.
13.
14.
References
1.
2.
3.
15.
16.
17.
SPE 86504
SPE 86504
Table 1. Comparison of surface tension, contact angle and capillary pressure for SDVA (EGMBE) and a GA
system formulated with a surfactant blend.
Surface Tension
Contact Angle, q
Capillary Pressure, Pc
g or ST, mN/m
degrees
psi
SDVA (EGMBE)
31.5
9.7
90
GA
31.2
8.9
89
23
33.0
81.6
141
Fluorcarbon23
21.0
54.8
351
Water23
72
0.0
2089
Surfactant A
Baseline 3%
NH4Cl at 1 ml/min
(4.5 mD)
Inlet Pressure
Gauge
100.000
1000.0
Hassler Cell
Water Inlet
10.000
dPmax/dPo
= 20
100.0
K/Ko
Back Pressure
Regulator
Fluid
Regain 3% NH4Cl at 9
ml/min (3625 mD)
10000.0
Differential
Pressure
Gauge
Pump
SDVA at 1
ml/min
1.000
10.0
0.100
1.0
0.010
0.1
0.001
dP/dPo
Sample
0.0
0.000
11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0
Pore Volume
o
Computer Automation
Overburden Pressure
SPE 86504
dPmax/dPo
100
10
SDVA
GA
XLGA
HCl
1
1
10
100
1000
Residual
polymer
damage
45
1.8
Dolomite
Limestone
40
1.6
dPmax/dPo
1.4
PV(bt)
1.2
25
20
0.8
15
0.6
10
0.4
0.2
dPmax/dPo
30
PV(bt)
35
4.5 mD
0.5 mD
38 mD
1.7 mD
1000.00
10.0000
100.00
1.0000
dPmax/dPo
= 11.4
10.00
0.1000
1.00
0.0100
0.10
0.0010
0.01
GA
0.0001
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
SDVA
25
22.0
100.0000
dP/dPo
K/Ko
30
10000.00
XLGA
HCl
20
SDVA/EGM BE
15
10
5
Pore Volume
0
0
Time^0.5
o
SPE86504
120
250 F
200 F
20
120
Rel. FIP
Reg. Permeability
100
100
150 F
15
80
60
60
40
40
Time^0.5
20
20
80
10
5
0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.01
0
SDVA
XLGA
SDVA/EGMBE
120
120
Rel. FIP
100
100
Reg. Permeability
0.1
1
Flowrate [ml/min]
10
100
Figure 11. Pore volumes to break through versus injection rate for
SDVA and HCl.
Pore Volumes to
Breakthrough
25
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
Leak-off (ml)
30
0
SDVA
XLGA
SDVA/EGM BE
2.00
k/ko
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
SDVA/16 mD
GA/3.6 mD
GA/0.7 mD
10
SPE 86504
10000
1200
1000
SDVA
SDVA
HCl
800
HCl
1000
Conductivity
(mD-ft)
GA
600
400
100
10
200
1
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
2000
4000
6000
8000
Time^0.5
o