Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

IN THE COURT OF HONBLE SESSIONS JUDGE,

CHANDIGARH

Bail Application No._______________ of


2016
1. Subhash Mahajan S/o Sh. Yograj Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon Bazar,
Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District Chamba.
2. Sushma Mahajan W/o Subhash Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon Bazar,
Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District Chamba.

Petitioners
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh.

Respondent

First

Anticipatory

Bail

Petition

Under

Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of Anticipatory


bail on behalf of the Applicant.
RESPECTFULLY SHOWTH:1. That the petitioners are peace loving and law abiding citizen of India
and is Father-in-law and Motherinlaw of the complainant.
2. That the petitioners got their Son married to Mehak Sehgal D/o Mr. Anil
Kumar Sehgal at Sohi resort Zirakhpur on 05-12-2015 .
3. That the fact and circumstances for the present application is that due
to some temperamental differences and misunderstanding matrimonial

dispute cropped up between the son of the

applicant and the

complainant Mehak Sehgal D/o Mr. Anil Kumar Sehgal R/o H.No. 3320,
Sector 23 D, Chandigarh.
4. That the petitioners have never demanded any dowry nor have subject
the complainant to any sort of cruelty.
5. That the marriage was a simple marriage and it has been solemnized
without any pomp and show.
6. That it is pertinent to mention here that the mother in law of the
complainant i.e the petitioner No . 2

is a heart patient and has

recently got operated for fixing of stunt in heart from PGI. That she was
discharged from PGI on 15/01/2016 and is under observation and is
advised complete bed rest. The Discharge & Follow Up card is
exhibited as Ex P-1
7. That it is pertinent to mention here that the complainant stated
insulting and picking up quarrels on every small things with the
petitioners/ applicant and their son after a week of marriage. That
petitioners/ applicant and their son tried to fulfill all the demands of the
complainant but complaint was getting rigid day by day and uses to
taunt and harass applicants/ petitioners by her acts. That to the
surprise of the petitioners/ applicants daughter in law left the house of
the petitioners and went back to her own house on

20/

10/2015 taking all her jewellery and isthri dhan along and threatened
the applicant/ petitioner and his patents that she will implead them
all in false criminal case. The reason being unknown to the petitioners.
8. That it is pertinent to mention that after about one month from the
above date petitioners / applicants and their son were called by
Women Cell Sector 17, Chandigarh as a complaint was filed in the SSP
Office, Sector 9, Chandigarh wherein false allegations have been
leveled against the petitioners/applicants regarding cruelty and dowry
by the complainant.

9. That all the allegations made in the complaint are totally false and
baseless and infact it was Mehak Sehgal the complainant who use to
harass and insult the petitioners/ applicants and their son and use to
threat them to implead them all in a false criminal case.
10.

That the petitioners/ applicants along with

their son as and when was called to the women cell went there to give
their statements and have joined the investigation, but has came to
know that an FIR has been registered against the present petitioners/
applicants and his parents u/s 406, 498-A although the FIR number is
not known to the petitioners.
11.

That

the

petitioners

have

every

apprehension of being arrested by the police officials and therefore,


seek indulgence of this Honble court to grant the petitioners the
concessions of anticipatory bail in case of his arrest.
12.

That the petitioners undertakes to abide by all the terms and

conditions as will be imposed by this Honble Court at the time of


granting him concession of bail. The petitioner further undertakes to
furnish the sureties to the satisfaction of this Honble Court.

It is therefore , most respectfully prayed that this Honble


court may kindly be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to
the petitioner/ applicant in the interest of justice.
Place: Chandigarh
Date: __/1/2016

Applicants / Petitioners
Through Counsel

IN THE COURT OF HONBLE SESSIONS JUDGE,


CHANDIGARH

Bail Application No._______________


of 2016
1. Subhash Mahajan S/o Sh. Yograj Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon Bazar,
Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District Chamba.
2. Sushma Mahajan W/o Subhash Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon Bazar,
Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District Chamba.

Petitioners
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh.


Respondent

Joint Short affidavit of

Mr. Subhash Mahajan

S/o Sh. Yograj Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon


Bazar, Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District
Chamba

and

Mrs.

Sushma

Mahajan

W/o

Subhash Mahajan R/o H.No. 111, Ballon Bazar,


Dalhousie Cantt. Dalhousie. District Chamba.

We, the above named deponent, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as
under:1. That we have gone through the contents of the Anticipatory Bail
Application. The contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application are
dreated under our kind concern and supervision. No part of it is false
and nothing material has been concealed therein. We affirm that the
contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application are true and correct to our
knowledge.
2. That the contents of the Anticipatory Bail Application may read as part
of this affidavit.

Place: Chandigarh
Date:30/01/2016
Verification:-

Deponents

Verified that the contents of my above affidavit are true and


correct to our knowledge. No part of it is false and nothing material has been
kept concealed therein.

Place: Chandigarh

Deponents

Date:30/01/2016

IN THE COURT OF HONBLE SESSIONS JUDGE,


CHANDIGARH

Bail Application No._______________


of 2016

Subhash Mahajan & Another

Versus

State of
U.T., Chandigarh.

INDEX
SR.

PARTICULARS

DATED

PG. NO.

NO.
1.

Petition

29.01.2016

1-3

2.

Affidavit

30.01.2016

4-5

3.

The Discharge & Follow Up card is

09.01.2016

4.

exhibited as Ex P-1
Power of attorney

29.01.2016

CHANDIGARH
DATED: 29.01.2016