Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
M
Effective elastic
Yield
stiffness:
secant-to-yielding moment
My
member deformation:
chord-rotation
chord
rotation
y
section deformation:
Yield deformation
curvature
u
Ultimate deformation
Practical
act ca e
expressions
p ess o s
for the yield & failure properties
developed for EN 19981998-3:2005
- their advancement
ad ancement since 2005
D. BISKINIS, G. ROUPAKIAS & M.N. FARDIS, Cyclic Deformation Capacity of Shear-Critical RC Elements, Proceeding of fib Symposium, Athens, May 2003.
M.N.FARDIS & D.BISKINIS, Deformation Capacity of RC Members, as Controlled by Flexure or Shear. Proceedings of International Symposium on
Performance-based Engineering for Earthquake Resistant Structures honoring Prof. Shunsuke Otani University of Tokyo, Sept. 2003, pp. 511-530.
D.BISKINIS, G.K. ROUPAKIAS & M.N.FARDIS, Resistance and Design of RC Members for Cyclic Shear, 14th Greek National Concrete Conference, Kos,
Oct 2003,
Oct.
2003 Vol.
Vol B,
B pp.
pp 363
363-374
374.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Cyclic Strength and Deformation Capacity of RC Members, including Members Retrofitted for Earthquake Resistance, Proc. 5th
International Ph.D Symposium in Civil Engineering, Delft, June 2004, Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 1125-1133.
D.BISKINIS, G.K. ROUPAKIAS & M.N.FARDIS, Degradation of Shear Strength of RC Members with Inelastic Cyclic Displacements, ACI Structural Journal,
Vol. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp.773-783.
M.N.FARDIS,
S D.BISKINIS,
S
S A. KOSMOPOULOS,
OS O O OS S.N.
S
BOUSIAS
O S S & A.-S.
S SPATHIS,
S
S Seismic
S
Retrofitting
f
Techniques for
f Concrete
C
Buildings, Proc. SPEAR
S
Workshop An event to honour the memory of Jean Donea, Ispra, April 2005 (M.N.Fardis & P. Negro, eds.)
S.N. BOUSIAS, M.N.FARDIS & D.BISKINIS, Retrofitting of RC Columns with Deficient Lap-Splices, fib Symposium, Budapest, May 2005.
S.N. BOUSIAS, M.N.FARDIS, A.-S. SPATHIS & D.BISKINIS, Shotcrete or FRP Jacketing of Concrete Columns for Seismic Retrofitting, Proc. International
Workshop:
p Advances in Earthquake
q
Engineering
g
g for Urban Risk Reduction,, Istanbul,, MayJune
y
2005.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Assessment and Upgrading of Resistance and Deformation Capacity of RC Piers, Paper no.315, 1st European Conference on
Earthquake Engineering & Seismology (a joint event of the 13th ECEE & the 30th General Assembly of the ESC), Geneva, September 2006.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Cyclic Resistance and Deformation Capacity of RC Members, with or without Retrofitting, 15th Greek National Concrete
Conference, Alexandroupolis, Oct. 2006, Vol. B, pp. 495-506.
D BISKINIS M.N.FARDIS,
D.BISKINIS,
M N FARDIS Effect of Lap Splices on Flexural Resistance and Cyclic Deformation Capacity of RC Members
Members, Beton & Stahlbetonbau,
Stahlbetonbau 102,
102 2007
th
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Cyclic Deformation Capacity of FRP-Wrapped RC Columns or Piers, with Continuous or Lap-Spliced Bars, 8 International
Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-8), Patras, July 2007.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Upgrading of Resistance and Cyclic Deformation Capacity of Deficient Concrete Columns, in Seismic Risk Assessment and
Retrofitting with special emphasis on existing low rise structures (A.Ilki, ed.), Proceedings, Workshop, Istanbul, Nov. 2007, Springer, Dordrecht.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Cyclic Deformation Capacity, Resistance and Effective Stiffness of RC Members with or without Retrofitting, 14th World
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, paper 05-03-0153, Oct. 2008.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Chapter 15: Upgrading of Resistance and Cyclic Deformation Capacity of Deficient Concrete Columns , in Seismic Risk
Assessment and Retrofitting with special emphasis on existing low rise structures (Ilki A et al, eds.), Springer, Dordrecht, 2009
D BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS,
D.BISKINIS
M N FARDIS Ultimate Deformation of FRP
FRP-Wrapped
Wrapped RC Members
Members, 16th Greek Nat.
Nat Concrete Conference
Conference, Paphos,
Paphos Oct.
Oct 2009,
2009 paper 171106
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Flexure-Controlled Ultimate Deformations of Members with Continuous or Lap-Spliced Bars, Structural Concrete, Vol. 11, No. 2,
June 2010, 93-108.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Deformations at Flexural Yielding of Members with Continuous or Lap-Spliced Bars, Structural Concrete, Vol. 11, No. 3,
September 2010, 127-138.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Effective stiffness and cyclic ultimate deformation of circular RC columns including effects of lap-splicing and FRP wrapping.
Paper 1128, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Sept. 2012.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Stiffness and Cyclic Deformation Capacity of Circular RC Columns with or without Lap-Splices and FRP Wrapping, Bulletin of
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 11, 2013, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9442-7.
D.BISKINIS & M.N.FARDIS, Models for FRP-wrapped rectangular RC columns with continuous or lap-spliced bars, Engineering Structures, 2013 (submitted).
Experimental Database
1 Range/mean of parameters in tests for calibration of expressions
1.
for the member chord rotation and secant stiffness at yielding
1653 rectangular
Parameter
beams/columns
rectangular section
307 circular
columns
min/max
mean
min/max mean
0.1 / 2.4
0.31
0.2 / 3.96
1.4
1 / 13.3
2.03
1.1 / 10
3.77
0.2 / 4
1.3
16.7
1.0
1.0
40.4
16.7 / 90
36.7
0.06
0.7
0 / 8.83
fc (MPa)
9.6 / 175
axial-load-ratio, N/Acfc
0 / 3.54
0.4 / 3.0
4 / 30
1.19
10.9
0.10
0 / 0.50
0 2 / 8.55
0.2
8 55 1.97
1 97 0.07
0 07 / 4.27
4 27 1.5
15
0 / 1.68
2.5 / 57
0.027
0 / 0.25
0.005
0 205 / 6.2
0.205
62
1 23
1.23
0.86
0 53 / 55.88 2.34
0.53
2 34
-
transverse steel yyield stress fyyw, MPa 118 / 2050 468 220 / 1375 443 160 / 1375
504
longitudinal steel yield stress fy, MPa 247 / 1200 440.2 276 / 1273 470
453
209 / 900
Experimental Database
2. Range/mean of parameters in tests for calibration of
2
expressions for ultimate curvature in monotonic or cyclic loading
Parameter
160 cyclic
0.12 / 0.8
59 rectangular walls
13 monotonic
min/max
mean
0.41
2.39 / 2.41
2.4
46 cyclic
min/max mean
1.7 / 2.0
1.99
0 225 / 3.73
0.225
3 73 1.54
1 54
1 21
1.21
21 2 / 23.4
21.2
23 4
22 4
22.4
13 3 / 28.3
13.3
28 3 13.7
13 7
fc (MPa)
34.5 / 40.8
35.3
axial-load-ratio, N/Acfc
0 / 0.78
0.08
0 / 2.38
0 / 3.68
t
transverse
steel
t l yield
i ld stress
t
fyw, MPa
MP
0 / 596
0 / 0.77
0.66
0.88 / 1.76
1.35
440 / 483
443 3
443.3
465 / 562
502
490
444 / 510
466.6
523 / 580
552
Experimental Database
1159 rectangular
95 rectangular
53 members of nonnon
143 circular
beams/columns
walls
rectangular section
columns
min/max
mean
min/max mean
0.1 / 2.4
0.2 / 3.4
1.21
1 / 13.3
3.7
2.85
1.77 / 10 4.22
0.2 / 6
9.95
1.0
1.0
fc (MPa)
38.5
23.1 / 90 38.0
axial-load-ratio, N/Acfc
0.07
0.59
0.2 / 6.19
1.32
0 / 0.86
0.116
0 / 0.30
0 / 6.29
0 / 1.68
0.028
0 / 0.25
0.004
t
transverse
steel
t l yield
i ld stress
t
fyw, MPa
MP 118 / 1497 497 220 / 1375 435.3
435 3 178 / 1375
513
longitudinal steel yield stress fy, MPa 281 / 1275 467.5 276 / 1273 471.2 331 / 596
438.7
Yield
e d & failure
a u ep
properties
ope t es o
of RC
C
sections
y Es
y
0.51 1
1 1 1 1
1 y 1 y 1 2
y Ec
3
2
3 2
6
bd
My
Curvature
C
t
att yielding
i ldi off ttension
i steel:
t l
2B
B 1 2 1 0.5 v 1 1
E s 1 y d
1/ 2
A
N
,
A 1 2 v
bdff y
2
fy
N
bdff y
c
1.8 f c
y
y d E c y d
N
N
1 2 v
, B 1 21 0.5 v 1 1
c Es bd
1.8 bdfc
Moment at corner of bilinear envelope to experimental momentdeformation curve vs yield moment from section analysis
Left: 2085 beams/columns, CoV:16.3%; Right: 224 rect. walls, CoV:16.9%
10500
median: M y,exp= 0.99M y,pred
4000
9000
median:
di
M y,exp=1.025M
1 025M y,pred
7500
My,exp (kN
Nm)
My,exp (k
kNm)
3000
2000
1000
6000
4500
3000
1500
0
0
1000
2000
My,pred (kNm)
3000
4000
0
0
1500
3000
4500
6000
7500
9000 10500
My,pred (kNm)
Bias by +2.5%
+2 5% or -1%,
1% because corner of bilinear envelope of the
experimental moment-deformation curve 1st yielding in section. Same bias
considered to apply to predicted yield curvature.
1.54 f y
Es d
1.37 f y
Es d
1.75 f y
Es h
1.47 f y
Es h
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
250-125 -100
-75
-50
-100
-150ultimate
conventional
a -200
deformation-250coincides
-125 -100 -75 -50 -25
0
25
-50 -25 w/
0
25
50 failure
75 100 250
125
real
Deflection (mm)
Deflection (mm)
150
150
100
50
0
-50
a
50
75
50
0
-50
-100
100
125
-150
-120
-150
-200
-75
-50
-25
25
Deflection (mm)
50
75
50
0
-50
-150
-200
-250
-125 -100
100 125
-90
-60
-30
30
Displacement (mm)
100
-100
-100
Q RC
Q-RC
100
200
Ap
pplied force (kN)
150
50
200
-250
-125 -100
200
Force (kN
N)
-75
-50
-25
25
Deflection (mm)
50
75
100
125
60
90
C
Concrete
t - law:
l
Parabolic up to fc, co,
constant stress (rectangular) for co< < cu
Steel -
law:
Elastic-perfectly plastic, if steel strain rather low and
concrete
t fails
f il first;
fi t
Elastic-linearly strain-hardening, if steel strains are
relatively high and steel breaks at stress and strain ft,
su.
Section fails by rupture of tension steel, s1= su, before extreme compression
fibers reach their ultimate strain (spalling), c < cu
su
Ultimate curvature occurs in unspalled section,
section due to steel rupture: su
1 su d
2. Compression fibres reach their ultimate strain (spalling): c = cu
the confined concrete core becomes now the member section.
Two possibilities:
i. The moment capacity of the spalled section, Ro, never increases above
80% of the moment at spalling,
spalling Rc: Ro< 0.8
0 8Rc
cu
(1 )( )
2
1
1
2
bd f c
2
1 1
1 f y
( 1 )(1 )
3 s cu
co
3 cu
1
co
4 cu
2
1 su d
1 su y 1 1
su y
co
co
cu
3 f t 1 f t su y
3 f t 1 f t su 1 1 cu 1 1
2
1
v
2
1
v
fy
f
2
f
y
y
su
y
cu
su
f y 1 1 su cu
su
1 1 1
1 1 1 f t v
2
f y
f
1 t v
f y
ft
2 co
3 su
fy
1 1 1 co
3 su
1 su y 1 1
co
3 f t 1 f t su y
v
2
1
su y
fy
f y 2 su y
v f t
su 2
ft
co
su from:
2
(
1
)
f
E
su
1
y
s su
y
ft
su
f t
ft
su co
ft
su
f t
ft
2 co
2 su
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2 1
1
f
E
f
E
3
(
1
)
3
2
(
1
)
1
1
su
y
y
y
s su
y
su
y
y
y
s su
y
Concrete crushes after tension steel yields, w/o compression steel yielding, if :
2 1
cu
v cu y
3
1
1 1
1 1 cu y
cu y
cu y 2 2
co
v
1 2 cu
1
y 1 1
3 cu 2(1 1 ) cu y
co
1 cu 1
v 1 cu 1
2
0
21 1 y
cu
co
cu
co
v cu y
v cu y
3
3
1 1
2 1
1
2 1
1
cu y
1 1 cu y
1 1 cu y
cu y
cu
1 1 1 2 1 1 v
cu from:
cu
1 1 1 co
3
cu from:
2 1
cu
2v
co
v cu y
3
1
1 1 cu y
cu y
cu y 2 2
co
v
1
2 1 cu
3 cu 2(1 1 ) cu y
1 1
y
cu
v cu
1 1
0
2
1
1
y
yes
no
1 satisfies
Eq.(3.38)?
yes
<s,y2 - LHS
Eq.(3.39)?
su from
yes
<s,c - RHS
Eq.(3.39)?
Eq.(3.41)
no
su from
Eq.(3.36)
q(
)
no
yes
<s,c - RHS
Eq.(3.39)?
su from
Eq.(3.40)
*<*s,y2 - LHS
Eq.(3.39)?
no
Unconfined full section Spalling of concrete cover
*su from
Eq.(3.41)
no
1 satisfies
Eq.(3.42a)?
yes
cu from
yes
*<*s,c - RHS
Eq.(3.39)?
< c,y1
c y1 - LHS
Eq.(3.48)?
Eq.(3.47)
no
no
cu from
*su from
Eq.(3.40)
no
Eq (3 46)
Eq.(3.46)
yes
yes
cu from
*<*c,y2 - LHS
Eq.(3.44)?
cu from
Eq.(3.45)
Eq.(3.49)
yes
su from
Eq.(3.36)
no
no
<c,y1 - RHS
Eq (3 44)?
Eq.(3.44)?
yes
no
yes
<c,y2
c y2 - LHS
Eq.(3.44)?
yes
no
Ultimate curvature of confined core after spalling of concrete cover
yes
*cu from
Eq.(3.47)
no
cu from
Eq.(3.37)
*<*c,y1 - RHS
Eq (3 44)?
Eq.(3.44)?
yes
*cu from
Eq.(3.45)
no
*cu from
Eq (3 46)
Eq.(3.46)
cu from
Eq.(3.37)
08
0,8
0,7
0,6
u,eexp (1/m)
0,5
,
Cyclic
all
Concrete
crushing
Steel
rupture
Median
0 96
0.96
0 90
0.90
0 98
0.98
C.o.V.
46.7%
55.1%
38.0%
205
97
108
0,4
0,3
0,2
No
No.
cyclic, slip
0,1
cyclic, no-slip
0
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
u,pred (1/m)
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
10
w
*
0.285
cu 0.0035
1 K
hc (mm) 2
10
w
*
0.2
cu 0.0035
1 K
hc (mm)
u,exp (1
1/m)
0.8
06
0.6
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
u,pred (1/m)
0.8
1.2
Cyclic
all
Concrete
crushing
Steel
rapture
Median
0.99
0.99
1.01
C.o.V.
44.2%
52.6%
34.2%
205
97
108
No.
Yield
e d & failure
a u ep
properties
ope t es o
of RC
C
members
Sli
Slippage off ttension
i b
bars ffrom region
i b
beyond
d end
d section
ti ((e.g. ffrom jjoin
i
or footing)
rigid body rotation of entire shear span = fixed-end
rigid-body
fixed end rotation
rotation, slip
(included in measured chord-rotations of test specimen w.r. to base or joint; doesnt
affect measured relative rotations between any two member sections).
y ,slip
y d bL f y
8 fc
(fyL, fc in MPa )
Ratio:
experimental-topredicted yield
curvature
t
(w/
( /
correction for
fixed-endfixed
end
rotation) in terms
of gauge length
1.75
1.5
1.25
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
lgauge / h
1.25
1.5
Ls aV z
h
y y
0.0014 1 1.5
3
Ls
Rect.
R t or non-rect.
t walls:
ll
Ls aV z
y y
0.0013 asl y , slip
3
Shift
Shift rule:
rule :
asl y , slip
0.2 1 / 6
0.2 1 / 3
N
1/ 3
f c 0.15
VR ,c max 180 100 1 , 35 1
f c 1
bwd
d
d
Ac
Test-model comparison y
Beams/rect. columns, no. tests: 1653
3.5
3
median=1.01,
CoV=32.1%
y,exp (%
%)
2.5
median:
y,exp=1.01y,pred
2
1.5
1
0.5
rect.beams /columns
0
0
0.5
1.5
y,pred (%)
2.5
3.5
1,2
1,2
0,8
0,8
y,exp (%)
y,exp (%)
Test-model comparison y
Walls,
a s, no.
o tests:
tests 386
median:
y,exp=0.97y,pred
0,6
04
0,4
0,2
median:
y,exp =1.01y,pred
0,6
04
0,4
0,2
Rectangular walls
Rectangular walls
Non-rectangular Walls
0
Non-rectangular Walls
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
y,pred (%)
0,8
1,2
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,2
y,pred (%)
Ls aV z
5h
y y
0.00045
0 00045 1
asl y , slip
3
3Ls
median=1.01, CoV=30.9%
Test-model comparisons - y
Circular columns - not in EN 1998-3:2005: no. tests: 291
Ls aV z
2 Ls
y y
0.0027 1 min 1;
asl y , slipp
3
15D
2,5
median=1.00,, CoV=31.7%
median:
y,exp=y,pred
y,exp (%)
1,5
0,5
circular
0
0
0,5
1,5
y,pred (%)
2,5
More realistic:
EI eff
M y Ls
3 y
secant stiffness at yielding of
end of shear span Ls=M/V
500
EI eff
M y Ls
3 y
(MyLs/3
3y)exp (M
MNm2)
median=1.00,
CoV=32.1%
median:
(MyLs/3y)exp =MyLs/3y)pred
400
300
200
100
rect.beams /columns
0
0
100
200
300
400
(MyLs/3y)pred (MNm2)
500
600
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =1.035(My Ls/3y )pred
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =1.035(My Ls/3y )pred
1250
3000
2000
1000
non-rectangular walls
(MyLs/3y)exp (M
MNm2)
With expression
i ffor y
in EN 1998-3:2005
median=1 035
median=1.035
CoV=42.8%
(MyLs/3y)exp (M
MNm2)
4000
1000
750
500
250
non-rectangular walls
rectangular walls
rectangular walls
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2)
( yLs/3
(M
/ y)pred (MNm
(
250
1500
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =0
0.98(M
98(My Ls/3y )predd
750
1000
1250
1500
detail
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =0
0.98(M
98(My Ls/3y )predd
1250
3000
2000
1000
non-rectangular walls
(M
MyLs/3y)expp (MNm2)
(M
MyLs/3y)expp (MNm2)
4000
500
2)
( yLs/3
(M
/ y)pred (MNm
(
1000
750
500
250
non-rectangular walls
rectangular walls
0
rectangular walls
0
1000
2000
(MyLs/3y)pred
3000
(MNm2)
4000
250
500
750
(MyLs/3y)pred
1000
1250
(MNm2)
1500
M y Ls
3 y
median=0.99,
ed a 0 99, Co
CoV=31.2%
3 %
4000
175
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =0.99(M
0.99(My Ls/3y )pred
3500
150
(M
MyLs/3y)eexp (MNm
m2 )
(M
MyLs/3y)eexp (MNm
m2 )
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =0.99(M
0.99(My Ls/3y )pred
125
100
75
50
25
detail
circular
0
circular
0
0
500
(MyLs/3y)pred (MNm2)
25
50
75
100
125
150
(MyLs/3y)pred (MNm2)
175
Ls
N
Beams/columns
no. tests: 1616
median=1.00
CoV=36 1%
CoV=36.1%
500
(M
MyLs/3
y)exp (M
MNm2)
median:
((M yLs/3y)exp =EIpred
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
EIpred (MNm2)
500
600
4000
median:
(My Ls/3y )exp =EIpred
3000
2000
1000
non-rectangular
non
rectangular walls
1000
500
non-rectangular
non
rectangular walls
rectangular walls
rectangular walls
1000
EIpred
2000
3000
4000
EIpred
175
median:
(My Ls/3y ) exp =EIpred
3500
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
detail
150
((MyLs/3y)exxp (MNm2)
3000
((MyLs/3y)exxp (MNm2)
500
(MNm2)
4000
Circular columns
no tests: 273
no.
median=0.995
CoV=31.4%
detail
detail
median:
(MyLs/3y ) exp =EIpred
(M
MyLs/3y)exxp (MNm2)
Walls
no tests: 386
no.
median=1.00
CoV=44.6%
1500
(M
MyLs/3y)exxp (MNm2)
Test-model
comparison
Empirical EIeffff
independent of
reinforcement , not
in EN1998-3: 2005
1000
1500
(MNm2)
median:
(My Ls/3y ) exp =EIpred
125
100
75
50
25
circular
circular
0
0
0
500
EIpred (MNm2)
25
50
75
100
EIpred (MNm2)
125
150
175
0.5L pl
pl
u y u y (u y ) L pl 1
L
s cu,c
su
cu,c d c (1 su )d
O ti
Option
2:
2 New,
N
per EN 1998
1998-3:2005
3 2005
sx f yw 0.05 f c : f cc f c 5sx f yw
0.86
sx f yyw 0.05 f c : f cc 1.125 f c 2.5sx f yyw f cc f c 1 3.7 sx f yyw / f c
cu ,c co 0.2sx f yw / f c
Lpl 0.1Ls 0.17 h 0.24 d b f y
cu ,c 0.004 0.5sx f yw
fc
/f
cc
2
: confinement effectiveness:
sh
sh bi
index c: confined;
1
1
1
rectangular section:
s: stirrup ratio;
2bc s 2 2hc 6bc hc
h
15
12 5
12,5
12,5
10
u,eexp (%)
u,eexp (%)
Cyclic
y
loading
g
10
7,5
7,5
5
5
2,5
0
0
2,5
7,5
10
u,pred (%)
12,5
15
17,5
2,5
0
0
2,5
7,5
u,pred (%)
10
12,5
u y a sl u ,slip
L pl
( u y ) L pl 1
2 Ls
w f yw
f cc f c 1 3.5
fc
Monotonic loading
g - Rect.
beams,, columns,, walls,, non-rectangular
g
walls:
2
w f yw
10
7
cu,c 0.0035
0.57
, su , mon
su ,no min al
f cc
12
ho ( mm )
Ls
L pl,m on h1.1 0.04 min
i 9;
2
f
3
0.4 w yw , su ,cy su ,no min al
Cyclic loading:
10
cu,c 0.0035
f cc
8
ho ( mm )
Rect. beams/columns/walls, non-rect. walls: L
Circular columns:
L pl ,cy,cir
1
Ls
pl,cy 0.2h
1 3 min 9; h
1
Ls
0.6 D1 min 9;
6
D
or
u , slip
li 5.5d bL u
or
Cyclic loading:
Complete
C
l t pull-out
ll t off
beam bars, due to
short anchorage in
corner joint
10d bL y u / 2
16d bL y u / 2
C li loading
Cyclic
l di
12,5
14
12
u,exp (%)
10
u,expp (%)
median:
u,exp=u,pred
7,5
5
10
8
6
4
2,5
circular
2,5
7,5
u,pred (%)
10
12,5
10
u,pred (%)
12
14
16
or:
0.225
Ls
h
0.35
0, 3
f yw
sx
fc
25
(1.25100 d )
0.35
f
yw
sx
f c
max(0.01; ' )
0.2 Ls
pl
um
f
um y 0.0145 (0.25 )
c 25
h
max(0.01; )
(1.275100 d )
, ':
:
Ls/h :
:
sx:
d:
sh
s
1 h
confinement effectiveness factor :
1
2bc 2hc
Ash/bwsh: transverse steel ratio // direction of loading;
ratio of diagonal reinforcement.
Walls:
W ll
Cold-worked brittle steel:
bi2
1
6b h
c c
1st expression
i di
divided
id d b
by 1
1.6;
6 2nd multiplied
lti li d b
by 0
0.6
6
1st expression divided by 1.6; 2nd by 2.0
median=1.00, CoV=37.6%
Cyclic loading
Cyclicloading
median: u,exp
, p =u,pred
,p
12,5
,
12,5
10
u,,exp (%)
10
u,exp (%)
median:
median:u,exp
=u,pred
, p =
,p
u,exp
u,pred
7,5
5
5% f ractile:
u,exp=0.5 u,pred
2,5
7,5
5
5% f ractile:
u,exp=0.52 u,pred
2,5
rect. walls
rect. walls
non-rect. sections
non-rect. sections
0
0
2,5
7,5
u,pred (%)
10
12,5
2,5
7,5
u,pred (%)
10
12,5
median=1.00, CoV=30.6%
median=0.99, CoV=31.8%
9
median: u,exp =u,predd
u,exxp (%)
u,exxp (%)
5
4
5
4
0
0
u,pred (%)
u,pred (%)
w f yw
f c
1.225100 d
h
max(0.01;2 )
L
0
.
2
pl
hbw
s
min 9; fc 25
u st (1 0.525acy )1 0.6asl 1 0.052max1.5; min10; 0.2
h
max(0.01;1)
bw
12,5
10
u,exp (%)
sthbw:
0.022 for hot-rolled
hot rolled or Tempcore bars;
0.0095 for brittle cold-worked bars;
cy:
= 1 ffor cyclic
li lloading,
di
= 0 for monotonic;
sl:
= 1 if slippage of long. bars from
anchorage zone is possible,
= 0 otherwise;
bw: width of (one) web
7,5
5
5% f ractile:
u,exp=0.51 u,pred
25
2,5
b
beams
& columns
l
rect. walls
non-rect. sections
0
0
25
2,5
75
7,5
10
12 5
12,5
Effect
ect o
of laplap
ap-sp
splicing
c g the
t e column
co u
bars in the plastic hinge region
Or,
O Eligehausen
Eli h
& Lettow
L tt
2007 ffor fib MC2010:
0.55
0.25
lb f c
20
f s 51.2
d b 20 max(d b ; 20 mm )
cd = min[a/2;
[ ; c1; c]] db , cd 3db
cmax = max[/2; c1; c] 5db
fy, fc in MPa
0.2
c 1/ 3 c 0.1
1 k s nl Ash
max
d
kKtrt f y , kKtr
d b cd
nb d b sh
2000
1750
median=1.00
CoV=11.8%
1,5
1250
no.tests: 92
1000
My
750
500
median=1 05
median=1.05
y,exp (%)
no.tests: 114
My,eexp (KNm)
1500
0,5
CoV=20%
250
0
0
250
500
750
0,5
My,pred (KNm)
1,5
y,pred (%)
250
12
no tests: 92
no.tests:
median=0.955
CoV=24.8%
10
150
u,exp (%)
(M
MyLs/3y)exp (MNm2)
200
100
EIeff
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
(MyLs/3y)pred (MNm )
2
250
no tests: 81
no.tests:
median=1.035
CoV=39.3%
u
0
u,pred (%)
10
12
2000
median:
di
My,exp =0.98M
0 98My,pred
1750
no.tests: 114
Median=0.98
CoV=12%
no tests: 92
no.tests:
My,exp (KNm
m)
1500
1250
1000
750
500
median=1.03
250
CoV=20.5%
CoV
20.5%
250
500
750
My,pred (KNm)
250
median:
(M yLs/3y)exp=0.97(M
=0 97(M yLs/3y)pred
200
0,5
no tests: 92
no.tests:
median=0.97
0
0
0,5
y,pred (%)
1,5
CoV=24.6%
(M
MyLs/3y)exp (MNm2)
1,5
y,exp (%)
My
150
100
EIeff
50
0
0
50
100
(M L /3 )
150
d
200
(MNm2)
250
or
um=y+plum
Ls for
o plum not
ot reduced
educed by lo
T t
Test-model-ratio
d l ti for
f um
no laps
laps
M di
Median
1 015
1.015
1 03
1.03
C.o.V.
33.3%
33.4%
34
11
no tests
no.
(ultimate condition not necessarily controlled by region right above the lap)
Cyclic
Cyc
cs
shear
ea resistance
es sta ce o
of RC
C
members
Shear resistance in p
pl. hinge
g after flex. yyielding,
g, as controlled byy stirrups
p
(linear decay of Vc & Vw with cyclic plastic rotation ductility ratio pl=(-y)/y>0
hx
L
pl
VR
min N ; 0.55 Ac f c 1 0.05 min 5; 0.16 max( 0.5;100 tot )1 0.16 min 5; s
2 Ls
h
f c Ac Vw
Vw=wbwzfyw, due to stirrups (bw: web width, z: internal lever arm; w: shear reinf. ratio)
tot: total
t t l longitudinal
l
it di l reinforcement
i f
t ratio
ti
h: section depth
x : depth
p of compression
p
zone at yyielding
g
Ac= bwd
pl
A
f
h
c
c
4
1 0.02 min 5, pll
7
1 1.35 ANf
800
Vexp (kN
N)
600
400
Rectangular
Circular
walls & piers
200
0
0
200
400
600
Vpred (kN)
800
1000
800
2000
600
Vexp (kN)
Vexp (kN)
1500
400
1000
200
500
500
1000
1500
2000
Vpred (kN)
2500
200
400
600
Vpred (kN)
800
Experimental Database
4 Range and mean values of parameters in the tests of
4.
FRP-jacketed rectangular columns in the database
Parameter
MR, My: Enhanced by FRP jacket (by 9% w.r.to calculated w/o confinement)
EN 1998-3:2005: increase neglected.
Effective (elastic) stiffness EIeff: unaffected by FRP; pre
pre-damage:
damage: 35% drop
EN1998-3:2005: Flexure-controlled ultimate chord rotation, u:
h 2 R b 2 R
f 1
3bh
b, h: sides of section;
R: radius at section corner
2500
2000
non-predamaged
predamaged
median (non-predamaged)
median (predamaged)
2,5
1500
yy,exp (%)
My,exp (KNm)
1000
1,5
1
500
My
0
0
500
1000
1500
My,pred (KNm)
2000
05
0,5
2500
0
0
05
0,5
15
1,5
y,pred (%)
25
2,5
f cc
bx a f f f u , f
1 3 .3
fcc from (widely used) Lam & Teng 2003:
b
f
f
c
Yield curvature y calculated with fcc (as above) & multiplied times
correction factor 1.06
EIeff = MyLs/3y
2500
non-predamaged
predamaged
median (non-predamaged)
median (predamaged)
2.5
2000
1500
y,exp (%
%)
My,exxp (KNm
m)
1000
1.5
500
My
0.5
0
0
500
1000
1500
My,pred (KNm)
(
)
2000
2500
0
0
0.5
1.5
y,pred (%)
2.5
Pre-damaged or not:
L
a
max0.01, '
f c0.2 s
upl 0.0185 1 0.52acy 1 sl 0.25
h
1.6
max0.01,
0.3
0.35
w yw fu
f
fc
c
25
with:
f fu , f
afu
a f c f min
i 0.4;
f
fc
c f , eff
f fu , f
i 0.4;
1 0.5 min
fc
cf=1
1.8
8 for CFRP or polyacetal fiber (PAF) sheets
sheets,
cf=0.8 for GFRP or AFRP.
fu,f=Ef(keffu,f): effective FRP strength
f ,eff
1.275100 d
25
u,eexp (%)
u,eexp (%)
20
15
10
15
10
CFRP jacket
CFRP jacket
AFRP jacket
0
0
10
15
u,pred (%)
AFRP jacket
GFRP jacket
GFRP jacket
PAF jacket
PAF jacket
20
0
25
10
15
u,pred (%)
20
25
25
20
cu 0 .007 f cc f c 2
f f ,e f u , f
u
2 3
y
u,eexp (%)
GFRP:
median (all):
u,exp
1.75
75u,pred
e p =1
pred
15
10
CFRP jjacket
AFRP jacket
GFRP jacket
PAF jacket
0
0
10
15
u pred (%)
20
25
u=y+plu(lo/lou,min),
) if lo < lou,min = dbfy/[(1.05+14.5
/[(1 05+14 5 lf ff,e)fc],
fc: MPa, f=2tf/bw: FRP ratio // loading,
l = f(4/ntot)
0.25
lb f c
20
f s 51.2
d b 20 max(d b ; 20 mm )
cd = min[a/2;
[ ; c1; c]] db , cd 3db
cmax = max[/2; c1; c] 5db
fy, fc in MPa
0.2
c 1/ 3 c 0.1
d
max
kKtr f y , kK 1
tr
d b cd
nb d b
k s nl Ashh k f n f t f E f
s
Es
h
y: median=1.075, CoV=17.7%
2
2000
1.75
1500
1.5
1250
1 25
1.25
y,exp (%)
My,exp (KNm)
1750
1000
750
1
0.75
0.5
500
My
250
0.25
0
0
0
250
500
750
My,pred (KNm)
0 25
0.25
05
0.5
0 75
0.75
1 25
1.25
y,pred (%)
15
1.5
1 75
1.75
no.tests: 42
median=1.00
no tests: 42
no.tests:
5000
My,exp ((KNm)
3000
2000
My
1000
C V 15 2%
CoV=15.2%
median=0.98
0
0
CoV=22%
CoV
22%
1000
2000
4000
5000
My,pred
(KNm))
y pred (
1000
3000
y,exxp (%)
no.tests: 42
0,5
median=0.96
(MyLs/3y)exxp (MNm2)
800
15
1,5
EIeff
600
400
median:
(M yLs/3y)exp=0
0.96(M
96(M yLs/3y)pred
200
CoV=22.2%
0
0
0
0,5
y,pred (%)
1,5
200
400
600
800
(MyLs/3y)pred (MNm2)
1000
db f y
1.05 14.5 2
n
tension
a f u
fc
f , eff
f
c
f fu , f
i 0.4;
a f c f min
f
fc
c f , eff
with: afu
f fu , f
i 0.4;
1 0.5 min
fc
fu,f=Ef(keffu,f)
ntension: number of lapped bars on tension side of section
If
lo<lou,min, upl
is reduced as:
lo
min 1,
lou ,min
i
0.5
upl,lap
pl
u
EN 1998-3:2005
median=0 89 CoV=36.3%
median=0.89,
CoV=36 3%
12
12
10
10
u,exxp (%)
u,exxp (%)
median: u,exp
, p =0.885u,pred
,p
u,pred (%)
10
12
u,pred (%)
10
12
u , slip 5 .5 d bL u
f
l
l
with: lou,min
lou, min
0.2 su o
loy, min Es
d bL f y
5 6 6a sh f yh / f c
fc
u,exp (%
%)
su,l 1.2
0
0
u pred (%)
hx
L
min N , 0.55 Ac f c 1 0.05 min 5, pl 0.16 max( 0.5, 100 tot )1 0.16 min 5, s f c Ac Vw V f
2 Ls
h
Vf=min(
( u,f
y
shear resistance:
u fEu,f
u f, fu,f
u f)f bwz/2 : FRP-contribution to cyclic
f :FRP ratio, f = 2tf/bw;
fu,f:FRP tensile strength.
Vw=wbwzffyw: contribution
t ib ti off web
b steel
t l (bw: web
b width,
idth z: iint.
t llever arm; w: steel
t l ratio)
ti )
tot: total longitudinal steel ratio
1,4
p
h: section depth
12
1,2
x : depth of compression zone
1
Ac= bwd
Vu,exp /V
Vu,pred
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5
4,5
d tilit
ductility
Calculation assumptions:
Fullll composite
F
it action
ti off jacket
j k t & old
ld concrete
t assumed
d (jacketed
(j k t d member:
b
monolithic), even for minimal shear connection at interface (roughened interface,
steel dowels epoxied into old concrete: useful but not essential);
fc of monolithic
monolithic member=
member = that of the jacket (avoid large differences in old & new fc)
Axial load considered to act on full, composite section;
Longitudinal reinforcement of jacketed column: mainly that of the jacket. Vertical
bars of old column considered at actual location between tension & compression
bars of composite member (~ web longitudinal reinforcement), with its own fy;
Only the transverse reinforcement of the jacket is considered for confinement;
For shear resistance,
resistance the old transverse reinforcement taken into account only in
walls, if anchored in the (new) boundary elements
The detailing & any lap-splicing of jacket reinforcement are taken into account.
Then:
~100%
~105%
~100%
100%
~100%
of
of
off
of
1.6
1.4
M y,exp/ My,calc
y,exp/ yy,Eq.(1)&(2)
0.8
0.6
0.4
My
0.2
continuous bars
group average
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
04
0.4
0.2
0
2.5
0
1.6
2.25
1.4
2
pl
Eq.((3))
1.2
1.5
y + u
u,exp / ( *
EIexp / EI*eff
1.75
1.25
1
0.75
EIeff
1
0.8
06
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.25
0