Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared for:
Mid-State Properties LLC
2040 Sutton Lane
Sutton, WV 26601
Prepared by:
PHASE I
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
OF
Mid-State Collision Center Located at:
4001 Webster Rd., Summersville, WV 26651
Nicholas County, WV
As the individual responsible for performing the Phase I ESA and report, all information
contained herein is true and accurate to my knowledge and information.
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of
Environmental Professional as defined in 312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific
qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature,
history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate
inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Approved by:
______________________________________
Gary A. Covey, PE
G.A. Covey Engineering PLLC.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify and document the current and historical
environmental conditions of the subject site, and the presence of substances which indicate an
existing, past or potential adverse impact to the air, soil, groundwater or surface waters as a
result of operations on the subject site and adjacent and surrounding properties, and which
indicate further investigation may be necessary to evaluate the potential environmental
liabilities associated with the subject site.
The following buildings and structures are located on the subject property:
Age
Circa 1968
# of Stories
1
Usage
Storage
Construction
Masonry (block & brick)
Steel (roof truss & siding)
Concrete(floors)
Due to the age of the building the paint on the roof trusses should be tested for lead
contamination.
Due to the age of the building the painted window frames should be tested for lead
contamination.
There are multiple 55 gallon storage drums located at the northeast corner of the building that
contains Rhino liner spray in truck bed coating.(MSDS papers available on request)
Automotive paint and supplies are stored on site in the body shop portion of the building.
(MSDS papers available on request)
It is our professional opinion that the impact on the property of the current recognized
environmental conditions identified in the Findings section of this report are:
A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended for this site based on the
observations and research performed by G.A. Covey Engineering, PLLC.
Except for the limitations and exceptions discussed in Section 1.4, this Phase I ESA complies
with the ASTM Standard 1527-05.
No additional services beyond the scope of the ASTM Standard 1527-05 were conducted as part of
this assessment.
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
INTRODUCTION ..1
1.1
P URPOSE ...........1
1.2
SCOPE OF SERVICES .....1
1.3
SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS .....1
1.4
LIMITATIONS & EXCEPTIONS .......2
1.5
SPECIAL TERMS & CONDITIONS .......2
1.6
USER RELIANCE ...2
SITE DESCRIPTION .....3
2.1
LOCATION & LEGAL DESCRIPTION ..........3
2.2
SITE & VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS ...3
2.3
CURRENT USE(S) OF PROPERTY .......3
2.4
PAST USE(S) OF PROPERTY ......4
2.5
CURRENT USE(S) OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES ..4
USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................4
3.1
TITLE RECORDS .......4
3.2
ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY & USE LIMITATIONS4
3.3
SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE...5
3.4
COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION .5
3.5
VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ......5
3.6
OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, & OCCUPANT INFORMATION ..5
3.7
REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I ESA .5
3.8
OTHER .............5
RECORDS REVIEW......5
4.1
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ........5
4.2
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES .............6
4.3
PHYSICAL RECORDS ............6
SITE RECONNAISSANCE ..6
5.1
METHODOLOGY & LIMITING CONDITIONS ...7
5.2
GENERAL SITE SETTING ...7
5.3
EXTERIOR & INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS ...........7
5.3.1 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & PETROLEUM PRODUCTS .7
5.3.2 STORAGE TANKS .7
5.3.3 ODORS .............7
5.3.4 POOLS OF LIQUID .....7
5.3.5 DRUMS ........7
5.3.6 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & PETROLEUM CONTAINERS .........8
5.3.7 UNIDENTIFIED SUBSTANCE CONTAINERS ............ 8
5.3.8 PCBS ..8
5.3.9 LIQUID & SOLID WASTE ..8
5.3.10 AIR EMISSIONS ....8
5.3.11 ASBESTOS, LEAD BASED PAINT, CHEMICALS ......8
5.3.12 PIPELINES ............9
TABLE OF C O N T ENTS
5.4
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
APPENDIX G
Special Contractual Conditions between User and Environmental Professional
APPENDIX H
Qualifications of the Environmental Professional
1.0 INTRODUCTION
G.A. Covey Engineering PLLC. has been contacted to conduct a Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) of the property for the Mid-State Collision Center located at
4001 Webster Rd. Summersville, WV 26651, subsequently referred to in this report as
"the property", or site. This assessment was prepared in general accordance with the
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process
(ASTM Designation: E1527-05).
Included in this report are an analysis of the site, inspection results and findings,
governmental regulatory records review as related to potential environmental liability.
G.A. Covey Engineering, PLLC is not able to represent that the site or adjoining land
contains no hazardous waste, oil, or other latent condition beyond that detected or
observed by this company during the assessment. The possibility always exists for
contaminants to migrate through surface water, air, or ground water. The ability to
accurately address the environmental risk associated with transport in these media is
beyond the scope of this investigation.
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify and document the current and
historical environmental conditions of the subject site, and the presence of
substances which indicate an existing, past or potential adverse impact to the air,
soil, groundwater or surface waters as a result of operations on the subject site and
adjacent and surrounding properties, and which indicate further investigation may
be necessary to evaluate the potential environmental liabilities associated with the
subject site.
1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work for this assessment was in general accordance with the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM Designation:
E1527-05). These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and
customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying
recognized environmental conditions.
1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
While this report provides an overview of potential environmental concerns, both
past and present, the environmental assessment is limited by the availability of
information at the time of the assessment. It is possible that unreported disposal of
waste or illegal activities impairing the environmental status of the property may
have occurred which could not be identified. The conclusions and recommendations
regarding environmental conditions that are presented in this report are based on a
scope of work authorized by the Client. Note, however, that virtually no scope of
work, no matter how exhaustive, can identify all contaminants or all conditions
above and below ground.
1
# of Stories
1
Usage
Storage
Construction
Masonry (block & brick)
Steel (roof truss)
Concrete(floors)
Wood (office partitions)
Due to the age of the building the paint on the roof trusses should be tested for
lead contamination.
Due to the age of the building the painted window frames should be tested for
lead contamination.
There are multiple 55 gallon storage drums located at the northeast corner of
the building that contains Rhino liner spray in truck bed coating. (MSDS
papers available on request)
Automotive paint and supplies are stored on site in the body shop portion of
the building. (MSDS papers available on request)
Open Space
Open Space
Monongahela Power field offices and sub-station
Open Space
None
None
None
None
Adjoining Properties
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Within Property
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Adjoining Properties
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
5.3.12 PIPELINES
There are public water, sewer, and gas pipelines on the site. These pipes
are not known to have leaked in the past.
5.4 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
The exterior grounds of the subject property were accessible at the time of the
inspection. There were no visual or physical obstructions of the subject property.
5.4.1 PITS, PONDS, OR LAGOONS
There are no known or observed pits, ponds, or lagoons on the property
5.4.2 STAINED SOIL OR PAVEMENT
Areas of stained soil or pavement were not observed on the exterior of the
property.
5.4.3 STRESSED VEGETATION
Areas of stressed vegetation were not observed on the property.
5.4.4 SOLID WASTE
Areas, mounds, or depressions that may be filled or graded by non-natural
causes or filled with fill of unknown origin suggesting trash or other solid
waste disposal were not observed on the property.
5.4.5 WASTE WATER
Historically waste water was discharged to a septic system on site but the
septic system has been removed and is now tied into the municipal sewer
system
5.4.6 WELLS
Wells were not observed on the property.
5.4.7 SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Septic systems or cesspools were not observed on the property.
5.5 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
The interior of the building on the subject property was accessible at the time
of the inspection. There were no visual or physical obstructions of the subject
property.
5.5.1 HEATING/COOLING
Ceiling mounted natural gas heating units are located within the building.
Cooling units were not observed during the site inspection. Its believed
cooling units have never been used on the property.
Organization
Mid-State
Automotive
Organization
N/A
7.0 FINDINGS
The results of this assessment have revealed the following current recognized
environmental conditions associated with the property:
Environmental conditions do exist on the property due to the age of the structure that
should be sampled and tested as listed in Section 5.3.11. There are other hazardous
materials stored on site as listed in Section 5.3.5.
The results of this assessment have not revealed any reported historical recognized
environmental conditions associated with the property.
8.0 OPINION
In our professional opinion it is recommended that the property is safe for future
development. It is also recommended that other testing or remediation is necessary or
desirable based on the observations and research performed by G.A. Covey Engineering
PLLC.
There were not data gaps that significantly affected our ability to identify recognized
environmental conditions associated with the property.
10
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the
scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of the Mid-State Properties, LLC
property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4
of this report.
This assessment has revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the property as described above and it is recommended that a
Phase II study be performed.
10.0 DEVIATIONS
Except for the limitations and exceptions discussed in Section 1.4, this Phase I ESA
complies with the ASTM Standard 1527-05.
11.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
No additional services beyond the scope of the ASTM Standard 1527-05 were
conducted as part of this assessment
12.0 REFERENCES
The following documents, maps, or other publications may have been used in the
preparation of this report:
American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Practice for Environmental
Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM
E1527-05).
American Society for Testing and Materials Guide for Environmental Site
Assessments: Transaction Screen Process (ASTM E1528).
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA or Superfund), as amended by Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) and Small Business Liability Relief and
Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002 (Brownfield Amendments), 42 U.S.C.
9601, et. seq.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), 42 U.S.C.
6901, et. seq.
Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Insurance Program,
Flood Insurance Maps.
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil
Surveys.
United States Geological Survey, Topographic Maps.
11
APPENDIX A
VICINITY MAP
APPENDIX B
SITE PLAN
APPENDIX C
SITE PHOTOS
APPENDIX D
HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTS
Index
Kind
Type
226/718 DEEDS DEED
Book/Pg
Description
(Not Warrented)
[ 1968] [DEED ]
LOT4 FIRST ADD
BRECKINRIDGE
HGTS
[ 1968] [DEED ] .40
A
SUMMERSVILLE
DISTRICT
[DEED] 13.93 A
LESS R/W & .40 A
SUMMERSVILLE
DISTRICT
CERTAIN
PARCEL WTS
MUDDLETY CK
SUMMERSVILLE
DIST
Date
Filed
1/1/1968
GRANTORS
GRANTEES
1/1/1968
CARROLL SHOE CO
SUMMERSVILLE
TOWN OF
2/11/1997
CARROLL SHOE CO
WHITLOCK
REALTY INC
7/6/2011
WHITLOCKS REALTY
INC
MID STATE
PROPERTIES
Page 1 of 1
http://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/srchrslt.cfm?
start=1&CFID=13712808&CFTOKEN=53901486&jsessionid=e030a42216f0baee4a511018702059295f3c
Last updated on Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Superfund
Sites
Search Results
Search Criteria:
Active vs. Archived:
Site Name:
City:
County:
State(s):
Native Interest:
Responsible Federal Agency:
http://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/srchrslt.cfm?start=1&CFID=13712808&CFTOK... 9/28/2011
APPENDIX E
REGULATORY RECORDS DOCUMENTATION
80 50' 35''
80 50' 44''
513510
513540
513570
513600
513630
513660
513690
4239300
4239270
4239240
4239240
4239270
4239300
4239330
38 18' 7''
4239330
38 18' 7''
4239210
4239210
Ud
4239180
4239150
4239120
4239090
4239060
513540
513570
513600
513630
0
0
10
20
50
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
40
100
Meters
60
200
Feet
300
513660
513690
80 50' 35''
513510
80 50' 44''
38 17' 58''
4239060
4239090
4239120
4239150
4239180
KaB
9/28/2011
Page 1 of 3
38 17' 58''
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Stony Spot
Spoil Area
Sodic Spot
Slide or Slip
Sinkhole
Sandy Spot
Saline Spot
Rock Outcrop
Perennial Water
Miscellaneous Water
Mine or Quarry
Marsh or swamp
Lava Flow
Landfill
Gravelly Spot
Gravel Pit
Closed Depression
Clay Spot
Borrow Pit
Blowout
Soils
Other
Wet Spot
9/28/2011
Page 2 of 3
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Local Roads
8/25/2007
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
measurements.
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000.
MAP INFORMATION
Major Roads
US Routes
Interstate Highways
Rails
Transportation
Water Features
Cities
Political Features
Other
Gully
MAP LEGEND
Whitlock Property
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
KaB
8.4
78.6%
Ud
Udorthents, smoothed
2.3
21.4%
10.6
100.0%
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
9/28/2011
Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX F
INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION
13. Are there any special terms and conditions that must be agreed upon by the
environmental professional?
No
14. Do you have any other knowledge or experience with the property that may be
pertinent to the environmental professional (for example, copies of any
available prior ESA reports, documents, correspondence, etc.)?
The client does not have any other knowledge or experience with the property that may
be pertinent to the environmental professional other than that has been disclosed in this
report.
LANDOWNER LIABILITY PROTECTION RELATED QUESTIONS
1. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that
are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law(4- CFR 312.25)?
The client is not aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are
filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law.
2. Are you aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions
or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or
recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law(40 CFR 312.26)?
The client is not aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions
or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in
a registry.
3. As the user of this ESA do you have any specialized knowledge or experience
related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in
the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or
an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the
chemicals and processes used by this type of business (40 CFR312.28)?
The client does have specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or
nearby properties.
4. Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair
market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have
you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is
known or believed to be present at the property (40 CFR 312.29)?
The client does believe the purchase price being asked for this property reasonably
reflects the fair market value of the property.
5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40
CFR 312.30).
a) Do you know the past uses of the property?
Past uses of the property was a shoe factory owned by Carroll Shoe Co. and a
miniature horse registry.
b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at
the property?
There are automotive paint and supplies as well as rhino lining that is present. The
client doesnt know of any specific chemicals that were present at the property and
how they were handled and disposed of prior to purchasing the property.
c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the
property?
The client does not know of any spills or other chemical releases that have taken
place at the property.
d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the
property?
The client does not know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the
property.
6. As the user of the ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the
property are there any indicators that point to the presence or likely presence
of contamination at the property (40 CFR 312.31)?
The client does not know of any indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of
contamination at the property.
APPENDIX G
SPECIAL CONTRACTUAL CONDITIONS BETWEEN USER AND
ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL
APPENDIX H
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL
Curriculum Vitae
Phone 304-750-2203
Fax 304-750-2204