Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 4
CASE STUDY 1: HORIZONTAL LIGHT PIPES
4.1 Introduction
Chapter IV
Figure 4.1: Left- Waterfront House building. Right- Section of Waterfront House (source Ken
Yeang).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.2: Left- Site plan of Waterfront building in Kuala Lumpur. Right- View of the
Waterfront building in the site.
Figure 4.3: Optimum orientation for a building in the tropics (Marsh, 2000).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.5: View of the west faade of the Waterfront building which shows the faade treatment
of the service core (Richards, 2001).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.6: Light pipes in plan (red), aligned to come through the westerly core.
Figure 4.8: A- Light pipe with clear glazing. Light at any high angle coming into the pipe will be
lost due to multiple reflections. B- Light pipe with LCP. LCP redirects the light along the pipe
reducing the number of reflections and therefore loss of intensity.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.9: Detail of the laser cut panel as light collector, and deflection of incident sunlight into
the light pipe for high elevation angle (A) and low elevation angle (B).
Figure 4.10: Transmission of light through horizontal pipes for the deflected and undeflected
beam of light at different times of the day.
Chapter IV
Scale model 1
Figure 4.13: Area of the building represented by the scale model construction.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.15: The effect of multiple light pipes was simulated by placing mirrors on the side walls.
View from the front opening (east window).
1) Light Collection
2) Light Transmission
3) Light extraction
Figure 4.16: View of extraction apertures of light pipes and its light extractor panels. Decrease in
the light intensity at each extracting panel showing that the amount of light is not achieved.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.17: View of same scale model as Figure 4.16 with the inclusion of light distribution
system (LCP).
4) Light distribution
Figure 4.19: Diffuser arrangement (left) and LCP arrangement (right). View of light spread in
the ceiling. View through the floor of the scale model showed in Figure 4.14 up to the ceiling.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.20: Scale model testing under sunny sky conditions (left) measurement grid (right).
Figure 4.21: Measured values for 81, 57, 45 and 27 of sun elevation.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.23: Interior of horizontal light pipe scale model for testing under real overcast sky
conditions.
Validation
Chapter IV
Scale model 2
1) Light collection
2) Light Transport
3) Light extraction
Figure 4.25: Comparison of influence of the averaging factor on the light distribution along the
pipe.
4) Light distribution
Chapter IV
Figure 4.27: Interior of horizontal light pipe model tested under sunny sky conditions.
Figure 4.29: Light distribution for horizontal light pipe for sun altitude 20 (top), 29.3 (below).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.30: Light distribution for horizontal light pipe for sun altitude 46.7 (top), 57.9 (below).
Figure 4.31: Light distribution for horizontal light pipe for sun altitude 70.9 (top), 74 (below).
Chapter IV
Validation
Figure 4.32: Comparison of interior average illuminance levels (under each extraction aperture)
obtained from testing HLP under sunny sky conditions, and from the mathematical models.
Figure 4.33: Comparison of average illuminance levels of HLP with LCP collectors obtained
from mathematical modelling and testing under real sky conditions against different sun altitude
angles.
Chapter IV
Chapter IV
Table 4.1: List of parameters modeled for horizontal light pipes
x 10
Area 1.6m2
3.5
Lumens
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Elevation angle
Figure 4.34: Luminous flux collected by the pipe opening for pipes of various w/h ratios under
different sun elevations angles.
Figure 4.35: Illustrating the variation of projected collection area with sun elevation.
Figure 4.36: Average illuminance levels for pipes of various cross sections, but same area of
collection, under different sun elevation angles.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.37: Efficiency of light pipes of various heights under different sun elevations
Chapter IV
Figure 4.38: Average illuminance levels for Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections
and light pipe reflectance of 90%.
Figure 4.39: Average illuminance levels for Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections
and reflectance of 95%.
Figure 4.40: Average illuminance levels for Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections
and light pipe reflectance of 98%.
Figure 4.41: Efficiency of Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections and light pipe
reflectance of 90%.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.42: Efficiency of Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections and light pipe
reflectance of 95%.
Figure 4.43: Efficiency of Horizontal light pipes with different cross sections and light pipe
reflectance of 98%.
Figure 4.44: Comparison of average illuminance levels for pipes width heights of 0.4m, 0.6m and
0.8m and reflectance of 98%, 95% and 85% respectively.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.45: Comparison of average illuminance of a horizontal light pipe for sun elevation
angles from 10 to 90, for pipes of different heights (0.4m to 2m) and different reflectance of the
light pipe material.
4.4.3 Performance
orientations
of
horizontal
light
pipes
for
different
Figure 4.46: Sun path of Kuala Lumpur and sun position on December 1st at 1:30pm and
4:00pm.
Chapter IV
Chapter IV
Figure 4.48: Performance of rectangular horizontal light pipe with LCP, cross section 0.8m x 2m.
Figure 4.49: New azimuth angles of the light deflected by LCP for different elevation angles
Chapter IV
Figure 4.52: Performance of horizontal light pipe under different altitude and azimuth sun
angles. Cross section 0.8m x 2m and pipe reflectance 95%. D/W=0.66
Figure 4.53: Performance of horizontal light pipe under different altitude and azimuth sun
angles. Cross section 2.0m x 0.8m and pipe reflectance 95%.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.54: Performance of horizontal light pipe under different altitude and azimuth sun
angles. Cross section 0.8m x 2m and pipe reflectance 95%.
Figure 4.55: Solar Charts for locations at different latitudes (Kuala Lumpur, Brisbane,
Tasmania, and Rio Gallegos).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.56: Horizontal light pipe orientations. 1) Building in the south hemisphere, 2) building
in the tropics.
Figure 4.57: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe; cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 85% and LCP tilt 45 for a range of elevation angles (15 to 90).
Chapter IV
Figure 4.58: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 85% and LCP tilt 50.
Figure 4.59: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 85% and LCP tilt 60.
Figure 4.60: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 95% and LCP tilt 45.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.61: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 95% and LCP tilt 50.
Figure 4.62: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 95% and LCP tilt 60.
Chapter IV
Figure 4.63: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 95%, LCP tilt 55 and D/W=0.33.
Figure 4.64: Average illuminance levels for a horizontal light pipe, cross section 0.8m x 2m,
reflectance 95%, LCP tilt 55 and D/W=0.50.
Table 4.3: Minimum aspect ratios of horizontal light pipes coupled with laser cut panels of
different reflectance of the light pipe material.
Chapter IV
29,
29,
25,