Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
A. Exclusive
1) Petitions under Rule 65
against:
CA
COMELEC
COA
Sandiganbayan
CTA en banc
Ombudsman in criminal
and non-administrative
disciplinary cases
COURT OF APPEALS
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
A. Exclusive
A. Exclusive
A. Exclusive
1) Annulment of judgments of
1) Civil
1) Civil
Other cases where
Actions involving personal
RTC
2) Petitions under Rule 65
demand or value of
property valued at not
involving an act or omission of
property in controversy
more than 300K/400K
No controversy or
appointment of
opposition, and
directors, trustees,
of such corporation,
at more than 100K
Special
partnership or
Petition for Habeas Corpus
association
In the absence of all
Petition to be declared
RTC judges
in a state of suspension
2)
Criminal
of payments
Summary Procedure
Application for issuance of
Violations of traffic
writ of search and seizure
laws, rules and
in civil actions for
regulations
infringement of
Violations of
Violations of Anti-Money
city/municipal
Laundering Act
ordinances committed
2) Criminal
w/in territorial
Not within the EJ of any
jurisdiction
court, tribunal, or body
Offenses punishable
Offenses punishable with
with imprisonment of
imprisonment of more
not more than 6
than 6 years
months, or a fine not
Irrespective of fine
exceeding 1K, or both
Offenses not falling within
Regardless of other
EOJ of Sandiganbayan
impossible
None of the accused is
accessory or other
occupying a position
penalties and civil
corresponding to salary
liability arising
grade 27 and higher
therefrom
Only penalty provided by
Offenses involving
law is a fine exceeding 4K
damage to property
Jurisdiction to impose the
through criminal
maximum and most
negligence where
serious penalty imposable
imposable fine does
for an offense forming
not exceed 10K
part of the complex crime
Offenses punishable with
imprisonment of not more
than 6 years
Irrespective of fine
Regardless of other
impossible accessory or
other penalties and civil
liability arising
therefrom
Have EOJ over Offenses
SUPREME COURT
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
B. Concurrent
1) With CA
Petitions under Rule 65
against CSC
Petitions under Rule 65
against NLRC
2) With CA and RTC
Petitions for habeas
corpus and quo warranto
Actions brought to
prevent and restrain
violation of laws
concerning monopolies
and combinations in
restraint of trade
3) With CA, RTC and
Sandiganbayan
Petitions under Rule 65
relating to an act or
omission of a MTC, or of a
corporation, board, officer
or person
Petitions for writ of
amparo and habeas data
4) With RTC
Actions affecting
COURT OF APPEALS
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
B. Concurrent
1) With SC
Petitions under Rule 65
against CSC
Petitions under Rule 65
against NLRC
2) With SC and RTC
Petitions for habeas
corpus and quo warranto
Actions brought to
prevent and restrain
violation of laws
concerning monopolies
and combinations in
restraint of trade
3) With SC, RTC and
Sandiganbayan
Petitions under Rule 65
relating to an act or
omission of a MTC, or of a
corporation, board, officer
or person
Petitions for writ of
amparo and habeas data
involving damage to
property through
criminal negligence
Offenses not falling within
EOJ of Sandiganbayan
None of the accused is
occupying a position
corresponding to salary
grade 27 and higher
Only penalty provided by
law is a fine not exceeding
4K
Special
Applications for bail
In the absence of all
RTC judges
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
B. Concurrent
1) With SC
Petition for quo warranto
insofar as barangay
officials are concerned
2) With RTC
Application for Protection
Order
SUPREME COURT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
A. Ordinary Appeal
1) From CA, in all cases involving
offenses for which:
Penalty imposed is
reclusion perpetua or life
imprisonment, or
Lesser penalty is imposed
for offenses committed on
the same occasion or
which arose out of the
same occurrence that
gave rise to the more
severe offense for which
the penalty of death is
imposed
B. Petition for Review on
Certiorari
1) From CA
2) From Sandiganbayan on pure
questions of law
3) From judgments or final
orders of RTC (OJ)
Constitutionality or
validity of any treaty,
international or executive
agreement, law,
presidential decree,
proclamation, order,
instruction, ordinance or
regulation is in question
Legality of any tax,
impost, assessment or
toll, or any penalty
imposed in relation
thereto
Jurisdiction of lower court
is in issue
Only error or question of
law is involved o From
CTA
C. Petition for Certiorari
COURT OF APPEALS
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
A. Ordinary Appeal
1) From RTC
In its exercise of OJ
On constitutional, tax,
jurisdictional questions
involving questions of
facts which should be
appealed first to CA
Penalty imposed is
reclusion perpetua or life
imprisonment
Lesser penalty is imposed
for offenses committed on
the same occasion or
which arose out of the
same occurrence that
gave rise to the more
severe offense for which
imposed penalty is
reclusion perpetua or life
imprisonment
2) From Family Courts
3) From MeTC, MTC, MCTC
Land registration and
cadastral cases
B. Petition for Review
1) From CSC
2) From RTC
In cases appealed from
MeTC and MCTC, which
are not a matter of right
3) From quasi-judicial agencies
4) From NCIP
5) From Ombudsman
In administrative
disciplinary cases
C. Petition for Certiorari
1) Against NLRC
D. Automatic Review
1) RTC imposed the death
penalty