Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NUMERICAL SOLUTION
OF
DYNAT PROGRAM
REPORT
JODY SETIAWAN
1. INTRODUCTION
The goals of report are how to analyze dynamic analysis, static analysis and modal analysis by DYNAT
program, and compare the result of dynamic analysis toward result of static analysis and modal analysis.
2. ANALYSIS CONDITION
.1. MODEL OF ANALYSIS
The model of analysis is represented by figure 2.1.1. Based on the figure 2.1.1, total of elements
are 12 elements, and the span of model is 21.6 m. The profile of column and beam is H-350 x 175
x 7 x11. The numerical model is on the X and Z direction.
1320
1200
1080
960
840
(6)
4
(5)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(4)
720
(10)
6003
10
480(3)
(11)
3602
11
240
(2)
(12)
12
120
0
(1)
0
360
720
1080
1440
1800
(13)
2160
Distance between
two nodes ( m )
3.6
Distance in
Y direction (m)
5
Loading
Condition
600 x 3.6 x5
Result of loading
condition ( N )
10.8
3. STEP OF ANALYSIS
3.1. FLOW CHART OF DYNAMIC ANALYSIS STEP
The steps of dynamic analysis of DYNAT program is represented by flow chart 3.1.1
start
input
COOD.dat
input
DYNA.dat
input outf
file
Running
DYNAT
output
DYNAT
finish
Flow Chart 3.1.1 steps dynamic analysis of DYNAT program
input Cood.dat
Running
DYNAT
output
start
DYNAT
Calculate
Flow Chart 3.2.1 steps static
analysis of DYNAT program
Dynamic Analysis
3.3. FLOW CHART OF MODALfinish
ANALYSIS STEP
The steps of modal analysis of DYNAT program
is represented by flow chart 3.3.1
Calculate
Response Spectrum
Calculate
Modal analysis
output
Modal Analysis
finish
4. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
4.1. INPUT DATA COOD.DAT, DYNA.DAT AND OUTF FILE
The input of COOD.dat is showed by table 4.1.1. The input of DYNA.dat is showed by table 4.1.2.
The input of OUTF file is showed by table 4.1.3.
Table 4.1.1 COOD.dat
COOD.dat
12
0 0
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
360.00
720.00
1080.00
1440.00
1800.00
2160.00
2160.00
2160.00
2160.00
13
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
4 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
5 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
280.00
560.00
840.00
960.00
1080.00
1200.00
1080.00
960.00
840.00
560.00
280.00
0.00
6 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
8 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
9 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
10 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
11 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
12 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1
1 1 0.0 20500.0 7884.6 62.91 0.00 13500.0 984.0
12
0
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6 6
7
7
7
8
8 8
9
9
9 10
10 10 11
11 11 12
12 12 13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 11
12 12
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
25000
1
0.0
980.0
11
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
11
11
0.0
3
7.8178 0.02
30.680 0.02
4
0
10
2500
0.02
0
0
0.002
0
0
1
110.35
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
10
11
12
13
10
11
12
13
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
10
11
12
13
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Umax = 0 cm
time [sec]
1.5displacement [cm]
Umax = -1.068cm
cm
1
0.5
0
-0.5
10
20
30
40
50
-1
-1.5
time[sec]
60
3
2
1
0
-1 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
-2
-3
-4
Umax = -3.367 cm
displacement [cm]
Umax = -5.62 cm
4
2
0
-2
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4
-6
-8
time [sec]
8displacement [cm]
Umax = - 6.095 cm
6
4
2
time [sec]
0
-2 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4
-6
-8
8
6
displacement [cm]
4
2
0
-2 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
-4
-6
-8
Umax = - 6.022 cm
Umax = - 5.628 cm
4
2
0
-2
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4
-6
-8
time [sec]
displacement [cm]
Umax = - 6.022 cm
6
4
2
time [sec]
0
-2 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4
-6
-8
displacement [cm]
Umax = - 6.095 cm
4
2
0
-2 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
-4
-6
-8
displacement [cm]
Umax = - 5.62 cm
4
2
0
-2
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4
-6
-8
time [sec]
displacement [cm]
Umax = - 3.367 cm
3
2
1
0
-1 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-2
-3
-4
time [sec]
10
20
30
40
50
60
-1
-1.5
displacement [cm]
Umax = - 1.068 cm
time [sec]
displacement [cm]
Umax = 0.000 cm
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2 0
-4
-6
-8
-10
10
20
30
40
50
60
velocity [cm/s]
time [sec]
30
20
10
0
-10
10
20
30
40
50
60
-20
-30
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
40
20
0
-20
10
20
30
40
50
60
-40
-60
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
60
40
20
0
-20
10
20
30
40
50
60
-40
-60
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10 0
-20
-30
-40
-50
max =42.52 cm /s
U
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
40
20
0
-20
10
20
30
40
50
60
-40
-60
max =45.63 cm / s
U
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
40
20
0
-20
10
20
30
40
50
60
-40
-60
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
20
10
0
-10
10
20
30
40
50
60
-20
-30
max =25.45 cm /s
U
time [sec]
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2 0
-4
-6
-8
-10
velocity [cm/s]
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
velocity [cm/s]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
acceleration [cm/s2]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
+ U g max=0.000 cm/s2
U
time [sec]
150
+ U g max=136.4 cm/ s2
U
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
acceleration [cm/s2]
200
100
0
-100
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
+ U g max=239.1 cm/s 2
U
time [sec]
400
acceleration [cm/s2]
300
200
100
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=359 cm/ s2
U
time [sec]
500acceleration [cm/s ]
400
+ U g max=368.5 cm / s2
U
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
500
+ U g max=363.7 cm/s2
U
400
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=360 cm/ s2
U
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=363.7 cm/s2
U
400
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=368.5 cm / s2
U
400
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=359 cm/ s2
U
300
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
-400
+ U g max=239.1 cm/s 2
U
200
100
time [sec]
0
-100
10
20
30
40
50
60
-200
-300
150
acceleration [cm/s2]
+ U g max=136.4 cm/ s2
U
100
50
0
-50
10
20
30
40
50
60
-100
-150
time [sec]
acceleration [cm/s2]
+ U g max=0.000 cm/s2
U
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time [sec]
Figure 4.2.3
Figure 4.2.3.13 Time acceleration relationship of node number 13 on x direction
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
node
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
acceleration [cm/s2]
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
node
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
The result of mode shape of dynamic analysis by DYNAT program can be represented by Figure 4.2.7.
1320
1200
1080
960
840
720
600
480
360
240
120
0
0
360
720
1080
7
0.9215
6
0.9880
5
4
3
2
1
1.0000
0.92019
0.54856
1440
1800
2160
0.9880
9
1.0000
11
0.17318
0.000
0.92019
10
12
13
0.54856
0.17318
0.000
F=M a
Eq.(1.0)
Table 5.1.4 Calculation of Additional Load For Static Analysis on DYNAT Program
NOD ** MAXIMUM ABSOLUTE ACCELERATION ISTEP =
Weight
E
2867***
[kn cm/s2]
0.00
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
10.800
0
0.00
2
88.570
0.000
0.147
0.000 0.435
10.800
0
232.20
0.00
3
0.000
0.297
0.000 0.527
10.800
0
0
354.30
0.00
4
0.000
0.452
0.000 0.304
10.800
0
0
368.50
0.00
5
0.000
-41.570
0.000
10.800
0
0.023
0
360.20
0.00
6
0.000
-16.190
0.000
10.800
0
0.073
0
354.80
0.00
7
0.000
0.000
0.000
10.800
0
0.031
0
360.20
0.00
8
0.000
16.190
0.000
10.800
0
0.073
0
368.50
0.00
9
0.000
41.570
0.000
10.800
0
0.023
0
354.30
0.00
10
0.000
-0.452
0.000 0.304
10.800
0
0
232.20
0.00
11
0.000
-0.297
0.000 0.527
10.800
0
0
0.00
12
88.570
0.000
-0.147
0.000 0.435
10.800
0
0.00
13
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
10.800
0
Table 5.1.5 Calculation Result of Additional Load
NOD
E
*** Static Load of Step number of STEP 2867****
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.9760
0.00162
0.0047
2
78
0
1
0
91
0
0
Mass
[kn]
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
0.0110
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2.5589
39
3.9045
31
0.00327
2
0.00497
9
4.0610
2
0.45812
3.9695
51
0.17842
3.9100
41
7.85E13
3.9695
51
0.17842
0
0
0.0058
08
0.0033
5
0.0002
5
0.0008
1
0.0003
4
0.0008
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
displacement [cm]
6
4
2
node
0
0
STATIC
DYNAMIC
10 11 12 13
Figure 5.2.1 Comparison of maximum displacement between static analysis and dynamic analysis
Based on figure 5.2.1, the maximum displacement is dynamic analysis in the node number 9.
5
4
3
2
1
node
0
0
STATIC
10 11 12 13
DYNAMIC
Figure 5.2.2 Comparison of maximum internal force between static analysis and dynamic analysis
Based on figure 5.2.2, the maximum internal force of static and dynamic analysis is nearly same.
500
450
Acceleration [cm/s2]
400
350
300
H = 2.00
H =10.00
H = 7.00
250
H = 4.00
200
H = 3.00
150
H = 9.00
100
H = 5.00
50
H =14.00
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
2
60
displacement [cm]
50
H = 2.00
40
H =10.00
H = 7.00
30
H = 4.00
H = 3.00
20
H = 9.00
H = 5.00
10
H =14.00
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
2
D=SD
A=SA
(1.1)
(1.2)
displacement [cm]
8
6
4
2
node
0
0
MODAL
10 11 12 13 14
DYNA
Figure 6.3.1 Comparison of modal displacement analysis and dynamic displacement analysis
Based on figure 6.3.1, the maximum displacement is dynamic analysis in the node number 9.
400
acceleration [cm/s2]
300
200
100
node
0
0
MODAL
10 11 12 13 14
DYNA
Figure 6.3.2 Comparison of modal acceleration analysis and dynamic acceleration analysis.
Based on figure 6.3.2, the maximum acceleration is dynamic analysis in the node number 9.
7. CONCLUSION
Comparison of dynamic analysis, static analysis, and modal analysis is shown in table 7.1
Table 7.1 Comparison of dynamic analysis, static analysis, and modal analysis
Type of analysis
Dynamic analysis
Static analysis
Modal analysis
Max Displacement
[cm]
6.1
5.7
6.0
Max Acceleration
[cm/s2]
368.5
344.4
1. The result of dynamic, static and modal analysis nearly same result.
2. The biggest displacement value is dynamic analysis and the biggest acceleration is dynamic
analysis. Therefore, it can be concluded the most safety design is dynamic analysis.
3. The biggest displacement value is dynamic analysis because the biggest of absolute acceleration is
dynamic analysis.