Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DRIVE
SPRING 2016
PROGRAM
M.COM
SEMESTER
III
SUBJECT CODE & NAME MCC301 & Research Methodology
BK ID
B1602
CREDIT
4
MARKS
60
_____________________________________________________________________________
Q1. What are the criteria of a good research?
Ans: Research process includes steps or a series of actions and logical sequence of those steps to
carry out research effectively. The various steps in a research process are not mutually separate,
exclusive or discrete, but they at the same time need not always follow each other. The researcher,
at each step, anticipates subsequent steps and the requirements.
Whatever be the type of research one undertakes, certain common criteria of good scientific
methods have to be followed. A good research follows logical methods, is systematic, and
structured in accordance with well defined sets of rules and practices to enable the researcher in
arriving at dependable conclusions. Both, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning should be
followed for meaningful research. Good research also implies obtaining reliable data which
provides sound validity to the research findings. The following principles underlie good research
criteria:
The aim and objective of the research being conducted should be clearly specified.
The research procedure should be replicable so that if the research needs to be continued or
repeated, it can be done easily.
The research design should be so chosen that the results are as objective as possible.
Interpretation of any research should be done keeping in mind the flaws in the procedural
design and the extent to which it has an effect on the results.
Research should be carried out systematically. It should progress in pre-defined stages, and
researchers should avoid using their intuition or guesswork to arrive at conclusions.
Research should be logical so that it is meaningful, and help in decision making.
Research should be empirical as far as possible.
The results of the research should only be used and generalized for the population for
which the data provides an adequate basis.
The validity and reliability of the data used in research should be double checked.
Further, good research produces results that are examinable by peers, methodologies that
can be replicated, and knowledge that can be applied to real-world situations.
1 | Page
Type of universe: Define the universe or set of objects to be studied. The universe can be
finite or infinite. In the finite universe, the number of items is certain, while in the infinite
universe, it is uncertain. An example of the former is the number of industrialists in a
country, and the latter, the number of stars in the sky.
Sampling unit: This is the group from which the sample is to be drawn. For example, a
population unit can be in terms of peoples age, gender, etc and a housing unit like
bungalow, flat, etc, or an educational unit like university, college, school, etc.
Service list: The sampling from a list index or other population records from which the
sample is to be drawn, e.g., prepare all the items in the universe from which the selection
of the sample can be made. It should be comprehensive, correct and reliable, so that the
sample becomes representative.
Size of the sample: This refers to the number if items to be selected from the population,
to constitute the sample. An optimum sample size should be reliable, flexible and
representative. The size could be determined by the precision with which estimations are
needed. Cost considerations also come into play, here.
Parameters of interest: This involves the type of measures needed from the sample. What
factors you want to study.
Budgetary constraints: This refers to the practical problems about the size of the sample
and costs associated with the collection of data from the sample.
2 | Page
Test units: Test units are those entities on which treatments are applied. The researcher is
often interested in measuring the effect of treatment on test units. The examples of test
units include individuals, organizations and geographic areas. In the case of our example,
test units were the sales personnel who were sent for the training programme.
Extraneous variables: These are the variables other than the independent variables which
influence the response of test units to treatments. Examples of extraneous variables could
be store size, advertising efforts of competitors, government policies, temperature, food
intake, and geographical location. In our example, some of the extraneous variables could
be weather condition, a strike at competitors plant, a problem at the distribution channel at
the competitors end. These variables can weaken the results of the experiment performed
to establish a cause-and-effect relationship.
Q4. Discuss the various types of formal experimental designs by giving suitable examples.
Ans: There are following types of formal experimental designs discussed below:
(i)
Completely randomized design (CR design): This design rests on the principle of
randomization. The subjects are assigned randomly to the experimental conditions.
Two-group simple randomized design: In this design, the population is identified and
then a sample is chosen randomly. Then the subjects are again randomly assigned to the
experimental and control group conditions. This ensures the principle of
randomization, so both the groups are representative of the population chosen for the
study.
(ii) Randomized block design (RB design): This is an improvement over the completely
randomized design. Here, the subjects are first divided into two groups known as blocks (married
men, single men, high or low income, etc.). So, the blocks are homogeneous with respect to the
chosen variable. The number of subjects in a given block would be equal to the number of
treatments. One subject in each block would be randomly assigned to each treatment. The blocks
are the levels at which the extraneous factor is fixed. This enables one to know its contribution to
the total variation. The main feature of this design is that each treatment appears the same number
of times in each block. The RB design is analysed by a two-way ANOVA (The ANalysis Of
Variance)
(iii) Latin-Square design (L-S design): A Latin square is a multi-faceted experimental design.
The Latin square can be used in many different situations. It is an experimental design that
consists of allocation of treatments to experimental units. The set of experimental units and the set
of treatments may be structured in some way.
Below is a Latin square of order 5. In a number of different experiments this could be the basic
structure for the design. The following example will help the student understand the concept of
Latin squares better.
Example:
Suppose we want to test five drugs A, B, C, D and E for their efficacy in alleviating the symptoms
of a chronic disease. Five patients are available for a trial and each will be available for five
weeks. Testing a single drug requires a week. Thus an experimental unit is a patient week.
The structure of the experimental units is a rectangular grid (which happens to be square as in
Figure 1). There is no structure for the set of treatments. We can use the Latin square to allocate
treatments. If the rows of the square represent patients and the columns are weeks, then for
example, the second patient in the third week of the trial, will be given drug D. Now each patient
receives all five drugs and thus in each week, all the five drugs are tested.
4 | Page
First step is to select the relevant parts of a text; Second is to analyse the data with who, what,
when, whom, how etc., questions. The coding unit presents the smallest element. The categories
provide the larger unit. The contextual unit determines the largest elements for analysis.
All relationships that have been found in the course of the study must be explained
adequately. Any common link that ties the findings together must be clearly identified. This
is the beginning of the process of generalization following a study;
Data that has been thrown up by the study incidentally or accidentally also needs to be
given sufficient importance while interpreting the findings that one was studying. These
bits of information may have far reaching consequences for the current study, as well as
those in the future.
One can always open the study to an expert or a practitioner in the given field to act as the
devils advocate, so that any omissions or fallacies in the logic of interpretation can be
detected. This would also give opportunities for correction.
All facts must be obtained and collated in the most suitable manner before interpretations
are carried out.
6 | Page
Restrict the generalizations and interpretations to the study undertaken and never overextend. Limiting the scope of the interpretations of ones findings is a safe option to
prevent inaccurate conclusions.
All interpretations must ultimately go back to the starting point of the study in terms of the
research problem that is being investigated. Findings must always be made keeping this
connection in mind. The theoretical concepts, the empirical observations and the analysis
carried out on the data obtained should ideally be in synchrony with the findings and
interpretations offered.
7 | Page