Appendix B

Alberta Transportation
ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
DISCLAIMER.......................................................................................................................................... Ii
1.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ..................................................................................... 1
2.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 1) .............................................................. 1
3.
GENERAL LAYOUT AND GEOMETRY (FIGURE B.2, STEP 2) ............................................. 1
4.
LOADS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 3) ................................................................................................. 2
5.
MATERIALS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 4) ......................................................................................... 2
6.
EQUILIBRIUM OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT (FIGURE B.2, STEP 5)....................................... 3
7.
DEAD LOAD DESIGN ACTIONS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 6) ........................................................ 3
8.
LIVE LOAD DESIGN MOMENTS FOR ROOF SLAB (FIGURE B.2, STEP 7)......................... 4
9.
LIVE LOAD DESIGN SHEARS FOR ROOF SLAB, MOMENTS AND SHEARS FOR
HORIZONTAL ARM, AND AXIAL FORCE IN CULVERT WALL (FIGURE B.2, STEP 8)....... 5
10.
DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR SHEAR AT ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
(FIGURE B.2, STEP 9)............................................................................................................... 6
11.
CULVERT TOP PLATE STRENGTH IN TENSION (FIGURE B.2, STEP 10).......................... 6
12.
DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR FLEXURE AND AXIAL LOADS AT
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE (FIGURE B.2, STEP 11)................................................................... 6
13.
SHEAR CONNECTORS FOR ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE (FIGURE B.2, STEP 12) ................ 7
14.
TRANSFER OF AXIAL FORCE FROM CULVERT TO SLAB (FIGURE B.2, STEP 13)......... 7
15.
SERVICE LOAD RESISTANCE OF BOLTED JOINTS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 14).................... 7
16.
FATIGUE LIMIT STATE STRESSES AND FORCES (FIGURE B.2, STEP 15) ..................... 7
17.
FATIGUE RESISTANCE (FIGURE B.2, STEPS 16, 17 AND 18) ............................................. 8
18.
DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT (FIGURE B.2, STEP 19) ................................................. 8
19.
CULVERT PLATE AND SEAM STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION

(FIGURE B.2, STEPS 20 AND 21)............................................................................................. 8
20.
SOIL CAPACITY UNDER ARMS AND ADJACENT TO CULVERT SIDE WALLS

(FIGURE B.2, STEP 22)............................................................................................................. 9
21.
HEADWALL BEAMS AND FOOTINGS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 23) ............................................. 9
The Cohos Evamy Partners
DISCLAIMER
The material presented in these structural design guidelines has been prepared in
accordance with generally recognized engineering principles and practices for Alberta
Transportation. These guidelines should only be used by qualified consultants designing
structures for Alberta Transportation. In using the guidelines, the principles of CAN/CSAS6-00, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code must be applied, and appropriate
engineering judgment used.
CONTACT
Questions or further information on this guideline may be directed to Raymond Yu, P.Eng.,
Structural Standards Engineer, Alberta Transportation (780) 415-1016
1. STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Figure B.1 shows the Arch-Beam-Culvert system. The system consists of a structural plate
corrugated steel pipe, surrounded by compacted granular backfill, with a reinforced concrete
slab on top. Horizontal arms project transversely from the slab, beyond the steel pipe on
either side of the structure. The slab acts compositely with the corrugated steel pipe to resist
load from fill placed above and vehicular traffic passing over top of the structure.
Arch-Beam-Culverts are normally used in installations where the depth of cover (Figure B.1)
is small.
Figure B.2 provides a flow chart that can be used to organize the structural design
calculations for these structures.
2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Figure B.2, Step 1)

Arch-Beam-Culverts shall be designed to conform to the requirements of CAN/CSA-S6-00.
Normally, the design life of these structures will be 75 years.
For sites with highly corrosive environmental conditions, it may not be possible to achieve
the design life of 75 years required by Clause 1.5.2.3. As part of the normal evaluation
process, the potential for early replacement should be considered and Arch-Beam-Culverts
should be compared to other structural alternatives using life-cycle cost analysis.
Prior to initiating structural design, geotechnical, hydraulic, and corrosion investigations for
the site must be undertaken by qualified specialists.
3. GENERAL LAYOUT AND GEOMETRY

(Figure B.2, Step 2)
The general layout and cross-sectional geometry for the Arch-Beam-Culvert shall be
selected to satisfy the requirements of the project.
Roof slab span lengths, L, shall be limited to the range of 5 to 10 m. Rise-to-span ratios for
the roof slab shall be no larger than 0.2. The lengths of the horizontal arms shall be not less
than 0.15 L.
The minimum roof slab span to culvert span ratio shall be 0.875.
The minimum thicknesses of the culvert plates shall be not less than those required for a
culvert of the same dimensions meeting the minimum cover requirements of CAN/CSA-S600, Clause 7.6.3.1. In addition, the minimum thickness of the top and side plates shall be
5 mm to allow for the welding of studs and for durability considerations. The minimum
thickness of the bottom plates shall be 4 mm.
The minimum bottom width of the excavation and compacted granular backfill shall be
(L + 2a). A 200 mm thick layer of uncompacted granular backfill shall be placed below the
bottom plates.
4. LOADS (Figure B.2, Step 3)

The load factors and load combinations used for the design of conventional bridge structures
shall be used for the proportioning of Arch-Beam-Culverts.
The design live load in Alberta is the CL800 Truck. For live load effects, the dynamic load
allowance for arch type buried structures in accordance with Clause 3.8.4.5.2 shall be used.
It should be noted that where asphaltic wearing surface is placed directly in contact with the
crown of the roof slab, it is not considered as earth cover and there will be no reduction in
dynamic load allowance.
Where appropriate, an allowance should be made for the dead load from an additional
100 mm thickness of wearing surface placed at some time in the future.
Temporary supports are generally placed 30 mm below the top plates prior to pouring the
roof slab concrete when the roof slab is cast. All loads including the weight of the slab, the
soil and asphalt wearing surface within the slab span above the roof, and live loads shall be
carried by the composite roof slab.
5. MATERIALS (Figure B.2, Step 4)

Structural Plate Corrugated Steel Pipe shall be in accordance with the current edition of CSA
G401. The designer may consider the increase in yield strength that occurs as a result of
cold working of the corrugated plates during manufacturing when substantiated by the
appropriate test results.
High quality backfill is required around Arch-Beam-Culverts to ensure that the structural
performance is satisfactory.
Reinforcing bars shall be epoxy coated.
Class SF concrete shall be used for Class A Highways. Class C concrete is acceptable for
Class B and lesser highways.
6. EQUILIBRIUM OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT (Figure B.2, Step 5)

The analytical model shown in Figure B.3 may be used to determine the dead load design
actions and live load bending moments in a one metre wide strip of the structure.
Figure B.3(a) shows the free body diagram of the roof slab and the soil above. In this figure,
Wr is the weight of the roof slab, W s is the weight of the soil and W is the portion of truck
wheel load distributed to the one metre wide strip. At node B, MD is the dead load moment,
ML is the moment from wheel load, HD is the dead load axial force, and HL is the axial force
from wheel load. At node A, Mr, Vr and Hr are the roof slab moment, vertical force and
horizontal force, respectively. Horizontal forces HS1 and HS2 are the resultant forces from
horizontal soil pressures. In this figure Ko is the at-rest horizontal earth pressure coefficient
and is the unit weight of the backfill.
Figure B.3(b) shows the free body diagram for node A. The moments, M, vertical forces, V,
and horizontal forces, H, have subscripts r, a and c to represent the roof slab, horizontal arm
and culvert wall below, respectively.
Figure B.3(c) shows the free body diagram for the horizontal arm. The distance along the
arm to the resultant vertical reaction from soil pressures below is assumed to be 0.5a.
As a conservative simplification when using Figure B.3 for the design of the roof slab, it may
be assumed that 75 percent of the vertical load on the roof slab is carried by the culvert
sidewall and the remainder by the horizontal arm. For the design of the culvert side wall, it
may be assumed that 100 percent of the vertical load on the roof slab is carried by the
culvert wall below.
If the depth of soil cover above the slab is small, the resultant forces from horizontal soil
pressures may be ignored. In the design of the roof slab for shear and bending moment, it is
generally conservative to neglect the horizontal forces Hr, HD, and HL.
7. DEAD LOAD DESIGN ACTIONS (Figure B.2, Step 6)

Once the dead loads are determined from the geometry, the analytical model in Figure B.3
may be used to calculate the dead load actions for the design of the Arch-Beam-Culvert.
8. LIVE LOAD DESIGN MOMENTS FOR ROOF SLAB

Once the portion of the wheel load distributed to the one metre wide strip in Figure B.3 is
determined, the analytical model may be used to calculate the live load longitudinal bending
moments for the design of the roof slab at the ultimate, serviceability and fatigue limit states.
It may be assumed that the second two axles of the design truck are positioned
symmetrically over the centre of the structure.
The provisions of CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 5.7.1.2 may be used to determine the truck
wheel load distribution. The distribution for longitudinal bending at the ultimate and
serviceability limit states may be determined from [Clause 5.7.1.2.1(b)]
Wheel load distribution =
m
M wheel
2Fm nR L
Be
(1)
The distribution for bending at the fatigue limit state may be determined from
[Clause 5.7.1.2.2(d)]
Wheel load distribution =
m
M wheel
2Fm
Be
(2)
In these equations, m is the maximum longitudinal moment per metre width, Mwheel is the
maximum moment for a line of wheel loads, Fm is an amplification factor to account for
transverse variation in maximum longitudinal moment intensity compared to average
longitudinal moment intensity, n is the number of design lanes and Be is the effective barrel
length of the Arch-Beam-Culvert. These parameters are defined further in CAN/CSA-S6-00.
The effective barrel length shall be taken as not more than the clear roadway width between
guardrails plus 0.5 m on either side.
In determining the wheel load distribution and design moments, the span should be taken as
the roof slab span, L.
9. LIVE LOAD DESIGN SHEARS FOR ROOF SLAB,

MOMENTS AND SHEARS FOR HORIZONTAL ARM,
AND AXIAL FORCE IN CULVERT WALL (Figure B.2, Step 8)
The provisions of CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clauses 5.7.1.4.1(b) and 5.7.1.4.2 may be used to
determine the live load longitudinal vertical shears near the mid-span of roof slabs. The
span of the roof slab shall be taken as L.
Near the ends of the slab, the live load longitudinal vertical reaction for all of the design lanes
on the structure shall be distributed uniformly over an effective width equal to the sum of the
lane widths plus the sum of the depth of fill and one-half of the slab thickness on either side
of the lanes. The effective width calculated in this way must be less than the barrel length of
the structure.
In determining the live load longitudinal vertical reaction per metre width near the ends of the
slab, the wheel loads may be distributed parallel to the span in accordance with Clause
7.6.2.1.3. The live load reaction shall be multiplied by the appropriate modification factor for
multilane loading.
For design, the live load longitudinal vertical reaction per metre width near the ends of the
roof slab may be resolved into a radial shear component and a tangential axial force
component.
In determining the resultant vertical reaction from soil pressures, Va, in Figure B.3(c), for the
design of the horizontal arm at the ultimate and fatigue limit states, the live load reaction from
wheel load may be taken as 50 percent of the uniformly distributed live load longitudinal
vertical reaction per metre width at the ends of the roof slab.
The culvert side wall immediately below the roof slab should be proportioned to resist 100
percent of the uniformly distributed live load longitudinal vertical reaction per metre width
from the roof slab at the ultimate limit state. The live load axial force per metre width in the
culvert wall is equal to the design live load reaction per metre width divided by the sine of the
angle the wall makes with the horizontal.
The potential for the settlement of the soil under the horizontal arms shall be taken into
consideration in the design of the arms and the culvert wall below the arms.
10. DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR SHEAR AT

ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE (Figure B.2, Step 9)
The requirements of CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 8.9.4 for beam action should be used to
proportion the roof slab and horizontal arms to resist the design shears.
The requirements of Clause 8.9.4 should be used to check the roof slab for two-way shear
under the action of truck wheel loads. The critical location will be near the slab mid-span
where the wheel loads are applied directly on the roof slab.
Shear strength requirements will normally control the thickness of the roof slab. The slab
thickness should be selected so that no shear reinforcement is required.
11. CULVERT TOP PLATE STRENGTH IN TENSION

The culvert top plate acts compositely with the roof slab to resist bending moments. The
culvert wall strength in tension is needed to determine the flexural strength of the composite
roof slab.
The axial tensile resistance of the culvert top plate may be determined from Clause 10.8.2
using a resistance factor for the culvert steel of 0.85.
The tension capacity of the culvert at longitudinal seams between adjacent structural plate
corrugated steel pipe sections may be determined by calculating the shear resistance of the
bolted connections. Clause 10.18.2.2.2 may be used to check the bearing resistance of the
culvert wall adjacent to bolts and the shear resistance of bolts using a resistance factor of
0.67. Calculations should assume that bolt threads are intercepted by a shear plane.
12. DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR FLEXURE AND

AXIAL LOADS AT ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE (Figure B.2, Step 11)
The requirements of CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 8.8 should be used to proportion the roof slab
and horizontal arms to resist the design moments.
In designing the roof slab for longitudinal bending moment, the culvert top plate and the
circumferential reinforcing steel may be considered as the flexural reinforcement. The
contribution of the culvert top plate is limited to the tensile capacity determined in Figure B.2,
Step 10.
13. SHEAR CONNECTORS FOR ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

The tensile force in the culvert wall at the ultimate limit state must be developed between the
point of maximum moment in the composite roof slab and the location of minimum moment
at the intersection of the horizontal arm and the culvert.
CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 10.11.8.3 may be used to determine the number of connectors
required to transfer this force.
14.
TRANSFER OF AXIAL FORCE FROM CULVERT TO SLAB

The shear connectors between the culvert wall and the roof slab must transfer the axial force
in culvert below into the roof slab.
CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 10.11.8.3 may be used to determine the number of connectors
required. These shear connectors are in addition to those determined in Figure B.2, Step 12.
15. SERVICE LOAD RESISTANCE OF BOLTED JOINTS

The service load tension in the longitudinal bolted joints between adjacent structural plate
corrugated steel pipe sections may be determined by the cracked transformed section
approach.
When the factored tensile resistance calculated from Step 10 is limited to less than 55
percent of the unfactored seam strength in compression, service load deformations of the
bolted splices should be acceptable and no further investigation will be required.
16. FATIGUE LIMIT STATE STRESSES AND FORCES

The stresses in the culvert top plate and circumferential reinforcing steel in the composite
roof slab at the fatigue limit state may be determined by the cracked transformed section
approach.
17.
FATIGUE RESISTANCE (Figure B.2, Steps 16, 17 and 18)
For the top plate portion of the culvert acting compositely with the roof slab, the longitudinal
seams between adjacent plate sections shall be assessed for structural fatigue using Clause
10.17 of CAN/CSA-S6-00. Stresses should be checked at the net section of the culvert wall
for the fatigue stress range resistance determined from the average of the resistances for
detail categories (C) and (D).
CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 8.5.3.1 should be used to determine the fatigue resistance of
reinforcing steel in the composite slab.
CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 10.17.2.6 may be used to determine the fatigue resistance of the
studs connecting the culvert wall to the concrete roof slab.
18.
DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT (Figure B.2, Step 19)
Distribution reinforcement is required to resist the transverse moments in the roof slab.
The transverse reinforcement should be sized to resist a transverse bending moment of 30
percent of the maximum longitudinal moment from truck loading at the ultimate limit state.
The amount of transverse reinforcement shall be not less than that required by Clause
8.18.7.
19. CULVERT PLATE AND SEAM STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION

(Figure B.2, Steps 20 and 21)
For the portion of the culvert below the horizontal arms, the wall strength and seam strength
in compression shall be reviewed for the factored axial forces using the procedures in Clause
7.6 of CAN/CSA-S6-00.
In reviewing the culvert wall strength using Clause 7.6.2.2, the modified modulus of soil
stiffness should be used, the factor VKRXOGEHWDNHQDVDQGWKHUHGXFWLRQIDFWRU
accounting for depth of cover, , may be taken as 1.0.
The continuous longitudinal seam between the side plates and the top plates near the end of
the roof slab shall be detailed as shown in Figure B.4.
20. SOIL CAPACITY UNDER ARMS AND ADJACENT

TO CULVERT SIDE WALLS (Figure B.2, Step 22)
The soil capacity for vertical loads transferred by the horizontal arms to the backfill below
and the horizontal soil pressure adjacent to the side walls of the culvert should be reviewed.
The vertical soil pressures under the arms and the horizontal soil pressures adjacent to the
culvert side walls shall not exceed 500 kPa and 650 kPa for the serviceability and ultimate
limit states, respectively.
21.
HEADWALL BEAMS AND FOOTINGS (Figure B.2, Step 23)
Headwall beams are normally placed at the ends of the Arch-Beam-Culverts to stiffen the
structure and retain soil. These beams shall be supported on spread footings.
Unless a refined analysis is undertaken, the headwall beams shall be proportioned to
support a single line of truck wheel loads applied in the vertical direction and soil pressures
applied in the horizontal direction.
The resultant vertical force acting on the soil below the spread footings supporting the ends
of the headwall beams shall be taken as 100 percent of the vertical reactions from dead and
live loads at the end of the beam.
START
General Requirements
Design Life
Geotechnical Requirements
Hydraulic Requirements
Corrosion Requirements
Select General Layout and

Cross-Sectional Geometry
Establish:
Load Factors and Load Combinations

[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 3.5]
Dead Loads
Live Load
Dynamic Load Allowance

[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 3.8.4.5]
FIGURE B.2: FLOW CHART FOR THE DESIGN OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERTS
Select Materials:
Structural Plate Corrugated Steel Pipe
Compacted Granular Backfill
Concrete
Reinforcing Steel
Shear Studs
Equilibrium of Arch-Beam-Culvert
Figure B.3
Determine Dead Load Design Actions
Figure B.3
Determine Live Load Moments For Roof Slab:
Longitudinal Bending Moment for

Ultimate and Serviceability Limit States
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 5.7.1.2.1(b)]
Longitudinal Bending Moment for

Fatigue Limit States
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 5.7.1.2.2(d)]
Figure B.3
FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)
Determine Live Load Shears For Roof Slab,

Moments and Shears For Horizontal Arm
And Axial Force In Culvert Wall
Longitudinal Vertical Shear for

Ultimate and Serviceability Limit States
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 5.7.1.4.1(b)]
Longitudinal Vertical Shear for

Fatigue Limit States
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 5.7.1.4.2]
Distribute Wheel Loads Through Fill

Near Ends of Slab [CAN/CSA-S6-00,
Clause 7.6.2.1.3]
Figure B.3
Design Roof Slab And Arms For Shear

At Ultimate Limit State
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clauses 8.9.4.2 and 8.9.4.3]
10
Determine Culvert Top Plate Strength

In Tension [CAN/CSA-S6-00,
Clauses 10.8.2 and 10.18.2.2.2]
11
Design Roof Slab And Arms For Flexure

and Axial Loads At Ultimate Limit State
12
Shear Connectors For Ultimate Limit State

[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 10.11.8.3]
FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)

13
Provide Additional Shear Connectors

To Transfer Axial Force From The Culvert Wall
Near The Ends Of The Span To The Roof Slab
14
Check The Service Load Resistance Of The

Bolted Joints In The Connections Between
Adjacent Plate Sections
15
Determine Fatigue Limit State Stresses

and Forces
16
Check Fatigue Resistance of Culvert Wall

[CAN/CSA-S6-00,
Clauses 10.17.2.2 and 10.17.2.3]
17
Check Fatigue Resistance of Reinforcing Steel

FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)
18
Check Shear Connectors for

Fatigue Resistance
[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 10.17.2.6]
19
Provide Distribution Reinforcement

[CAN/CSA-S6-00, Clause 8.18.7]
20
Review Culvert Wall Strength,

Check Side and Bottom Plate Thicknesses
21
Review Culvert Seam Strength

FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)

22
Soil Capacity
Review Bearing Capacity of Soil Under Arms
Check Horizontal Soil Pressure Adjacent To
Side Walls
23
Design Headwall Beams and Footings:

Select Geometry
Determine Wheel Load Distribution
Determine Design Shear Forces
and Bending Moments
Design for Flexure At Ultimate Limit State
Design For Shear At Ultimate Limit State
Design Spread Footings Supporting
Headwall Beams
END
FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)

k:\buildings\e00702\01\admin\reports\abc struct design guidelines.doc

Appendix B

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Appendix B

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Alberta Transportation

ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ..................................................................................... 1

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 1) .............................................................. 1

GENERAL LAYOUT AND GEOMETRY (FIGURE B.2, STEP 2) ............................................. 1

LOADS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 3) ................................................................................................. 2

MATERIALS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 4) ......................................................................................... 2

EQUILIBRIUM OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT (FIGURE B.2, STEP 5)....................................... 3

DEAD LOAD DESIGN ACTIONS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 6) ........................................................ 3

CULVERT TOP PLATE STRENGTH IN TENSION (FIGURE B.2, STEP 10).......................... 6

SERVICE LOAD RESISTANCE OF BOLTED JOINTS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 14).................... 7

FATIGUE RESISTANCE (FIGURE B.2, STEPS 16, 17 AND 18) ............................................. 8

DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT (FIGURE B.2, STEP 19) ................................................. 8

CULVERT PLATE AND SEAM STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION

SOIL CAPACITY UNDER ARMS AND ADJACENT TO CULVERT SIDE WALLS

HEADWALL BEAMS AND FOOTINGS (FIGURE B.2, STEP 23) ............................................. 9

The Cohos Evamy Partners

The Cohos Evamy Partners

1. STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Figure B.2, Step 1)

3. GENERAL LAYOUT AND GEOMETRY

The Cohos Evamy Partners

4. LOADS (Figure B.2, Step 3)

5. MATERIALS (Figure B.2, Step 4)

The Cohos Evamy Partners

6. EQUILIBRIUM OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERT (Figure B.2, Step 5)

7. DEAD LOAD DESIGN ACTIONS (Figure B.2, Step 6)

The Cohos Evamy Partners

8. LIVE LOAD DESIGN MOMENTS FOR ROOF SLAB

Wheel load distribution =

Wheel load distribution =

The Cohos Evamy Partners

9. LIVE LOAD DESIGN SHEARS FOR ROOF SLAB,

The Cohos Evamy Partners

10. DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR SHEAR AT

11. CULVERT TOP PLATE STRENGTH IN TENSION

12. DESIGN ROOF SLAB AND ARMS FOR FLEXURE AND

The Cohos Evamy Partners

13. SHEAR CONNECTORS FOR ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

TRANSFER OF AXIAL FORCE FROM CULVERT TO SLAB

15. SERVICE LOAD RESISTANCE OF BOLTED JOINTS

16. FATIGUE LIMIT STATE STRESSES AND FORCES

The Cohos Evamy Partners

FATIGUE RESISTANCE (Figure B.2, Steps 16, 17 and 18)

DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT (Figure B.2, Step 19)

19. CULVERT PLATE AND SEAM STRENGTH IN COMPRESSION

The Cohos Evamy Partners

20. SOIL CAPACITY UNDER ARMS AND ADJACENT

HEADWALL BEAMS AND FOOTINGS (Figure B.2, Step 23)

The Cohos Evamy Partners

Select General Layout and

Load Factors and Load Combinations

Dynamic Load Allowance

FIGURE B.2: FLOW CHART FOR THE DESIGN OF ARCH-BEAM-CULVERTS

The Cohos Evamy Partners

Structural Plate Corrugated Steel Pipe

Compacted Granular Backfill

Determine Dead Load Design Actions

Determine Live Load Moments For Roof Slab:

Longitudinal Bending Moment for

Longitudinal Bending Moment for

FIGURE B.2 (CONTD)

The Cohos Evamy Partners