Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
BRnuH
OBESITY
APRIL 8, 1961
s.
28
16
5
5
3
d.
7
5
10
1
6
1011
helpful advice and to Dr. D. Mansel-Jones, of MerrellNational (Laboratories) Ltd., who supplied the preparations
used. Our thanks are also due to Miss E. Wilson and Miss
M. Kellock for their invaluable help in the dietetic aspects
of the trial.
REFERENCES
Medical Memoranda
A Case of Genital Prolapse in a
Newborn Baby
Genital prolapse in the newborn is a rare condition
usually associated with spina bifida. The following
record is of a baby who showed no evidence of an
associated lesion and who has made an apparently
complete recovery after replacement of the prolapsed
uterus. Some features of the mother's pregnancy and
labour suggested that her abnormal uterine action was
the important aetiological factor.
CASE REPORT
A married woman aged 23 was referred to the antenatal
clinic at 35 weeks with a breech presentation. One year
previously she had an abortion at 11 weeks, but her medical
history contained no significant feature.
During her present pregnancy there had been very slight
vaginal bleeding at 5 and 13 weeks. A breech presentation,
corrected at 34 weeks by external cephalic version, had
recurred.
On her first visit to the clinic a midline fundal " dimpling"
was noted and a provisional diagnosis of a degree of uterine
duplication was made. Attempted version was again
unsuccessful. At 37 weeks the impression of a fundal
depression was confirmed, but exact palpation was difficult
and the breadth of the uterus aroused a suspicion of twins.
A flat abdominal film showed a single foetus presenting by
the breech with both legs extended. Erect lateral pelvimetry
demonstrated a true conjugate of 4.35 in. (11 cm.) and a
pubo-sacral diameter of 4.25 in. (10.8 cm.). The pelvic
shape appeared normal.
On later examinations the uterus felt normal and the
foetal parts were much more readily palpable. The baby
seemed small, and it was decided to await the spontaneous
onset of labour in anticipation of a normal vaginal delivery,
with the proviso that caesarean section be performed should
progress not be satisfactory.
The patient was admitted to hospital three days before
term. The membranes had ruptured spontaneously and
clear liquor was draining. No contractions had been felt,
the breech was free, and the foetal heart was satisfactory.
Vaginal examination excluded cord prolapse.
MEDICAL MEMORANDA
The Infant
After delivery the ring was still palpable to a lesser degree
about the middle of the uterus. The placenta was removed
manually after the injection of ergometrine, 0.5 mg., into
the uterine muscle, and careful exploration of the cavity did
not show any evidence of a septum. The uterine exterior
and adnexa were normal. Despite the deepening of the
anaesthesia the avascularity of the uterine incision was
maintained and the operation was completed without any
further complication. The puerperium was normal.
A congested oedematous mass protruded from the baby's
vulva. The apex of the mass was the cervix, and the
whole uterus appeared to lie outside the introitus. A
transverse ridge corresponding to the bladder was visible.
The mass appeared to become more congested and
oedematous before the examiner's eyes, and, as the baby
was still pale and shocked, digital reposition was performed.
This was done easily, with an immediate improvement in
the baby's condition.
The baby was observed closely on crying and there was
no recurrence of the uterine prolapse nor occurrence of
rectal prolapse. Digital examination at the end of a week
showed the cervix to be well supported at a high level. The
introitus admitted an average-sized index finger more readily
than expected.
Follow-up examinations of the infant were performed 3
and 17 months after delivery and no abnormality was found.
There had been n sign of recurrence and bowel and bladder
function was normal. She had walked at 11 months, and
the lumbar spine, sacrum, and external genitalia were
normal to inspection and palpation. Radiological
examination showed no evidence of spina bifida.
DISCUSSION
Findley (1917) stated that genital prolapse in the
newborn was usually not detected at birth but after the
first week; and in his series it was associated with
spina bifida in 86% of cases.
Noyes (1927) reviewed 24 bona-fide cases from the
literature (not all of these were in the newborn) and
concluded that spina bifida was the primary aetiological
factor. The lower sacral nerve roots, particularly the
fourth sacral, are drawn through the lumbar vertebral
defect to produce a partial or complete paralysis of the
pelvic floor musculature.
Radwansky (1898) recorded a case in which the
prolapse was detected on the day after delivery and
replaced successfully, with a satisfactory result on
examination six months later. Spina bifida occulta was
not excluded in this instance.
Malpas (1955) has classified the causes of prolapse
into: (a) primary-for cxample, congenital tissueweakness, obstetric trauma; and (b) secondary-for
example, raised intra-abdominal pressure. Had
congenital tissue-weakness been an important factor in
the above case one would have expected a recurrence,
It is
with the stresses of crying and defaecation.
possible that raised intra-abdominal pressure due to
abnormal uterine action was the primary cause.
Palmer (1951) described a series of apparent
abnormalities of the uterus which were observed at
caesarean section and were due to abnormal uterine
action. A similar mechanism may have produced the
impression of a bicornuate uterus noted at the antenatal
clinic. During labour there was no clinical evidence of
hypertonic uterine action-rather the reverse. The
avascularity of the lower segment was remarkable, and,
with the contraction ring, did seem to indicate
hypertonus. The alterations in the foetal heart rate and
rhythm could be explained by embarrassment of the
utero-placental circulation, by pressure on the cord, or
by alteration of the circulation within the foetus.
My thanks are due to Mr. P. R. Mitchell, under whose
care the patient was admitted, for permission to publish
this report.
R. D. FRASER, M.B., M.R.C.O.G.,
Dominions Assistant,